Much is going wrong with our children's schooling
Complaining about your child's schooling can have consequences you might not have envisaged. When Maxie Allen and Rosalind Levine raised questions about their nine-year-old daughter's primary school in a WhatsApp group they received a visit from the Hertfordshire Constabulary.
Echoing what happened to Telegraph columnist Allison Pearson, they were detained in front of their daughter and questioned on suspicion of harassment, malicious communications and causing a nuisance on school property. After five weeks, the police concluded there was no case to answer. This is no way to handle legitimate concerns and it is outrageous that it ever came to this. The police must learn lessons and so must schools.
There is every reason for parents to be concerned about educational standards. Take the collapse in discipline at schools: it has now engulfed even the youngest children. Alarming figures reveal that even nursery and reception classes are becoming battlegrounds. In 2022/23, well over 5,000 of these infants were suspended or expelled for assaulting staff or other pupils.
It may stretch credulity that children so immature that many arrive in nappies could nevertheless be violent. Yet schools are struggling to deal with this explosion of bad behaviour: in one year, more than 25,000 primary-age pupils were excluded.
The normalisation of antisocial behaviour is in part a legacy of Covid lockdowns. But that is not the whole story. The real issues are personal responsibility and family breakdown. Dysfunctional parents, who either do not know how to raise children or do not care, are quick to point the finger at others. Yet a child who comes to school unable to give its name has clearly not been brought up, but let down.
The answer is not to impose arbitrary fines on inadequate parents, unless their neglect is so bad as to be criminal.
Instead, schools need to take time and trouble to explain to prospective parents what will be expected of them.
It is these types of issues that the education establishment must focus on. Parents and teachers must work together to ensure that schools are places of safety and achievement. The actions of the Hertfordshire Constabulary will only sow mistrust and serve to undermine this vital alliance which is so critical to the success of the next generation.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Man gets 120 free flights after pretending to be a flight attendant
Tiron Alexander is soon to be sentenced and faces decades in prison after he was caught impersonating flight attendants dozens of times in order to get free flights A canny traveller managed to blag his way onto 120 flights for free by impersonating cabin crew. At the moment, flying is expensive business. A shortage of aircraft due to supply-side issues, and spiking demand post-Covid, has sent ticket prices soaring. In the last year, the consumer price index for airline tickets shot up by 25% in the US, with similar rises in the UK. As heavy on the purse strings as jetting off somewhere nice may now be, not many would-be passengers have gone to the same lengths to save cash as Tiron Alexander. According to a release filed by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida, on June 5 the 35-year-old was convicted of wire fraud and entering into a secure area of an airport by false pretenses. Do you have a travel story to share? Email webtravel@ He did so with the view of securing free flights through the booking system meant for airline employees, and managed to bag 120 using the scheme. "From 2018 to 2024, Alexander booked free flights on an airline carrier's website that were only available to pilots and flight attendants," the Attorney's Office writes. "Over the 34 flights, Alexander claimed through the airline carrier's website application process — a process that required an applicant to select whether they were a pilot or flight attendant and provide their employer, date of hire, and badge number information — that he worked for seven different airlines and had approximately 30 different badge numbers and dates of hire." Tiron managed to secure 120 flights for free by claiming he was a flight attendant working for seven different airlines. It is not completely clear how he managed to repeatedly gain access to the internal systems that flight attendants use with different airlines. Why nonexistent badge numbers were not flagged by at least one of them is not clear either. READ MORE: Flight attendant reveals first thing crew do in an emergency at 30,000ft "The evidence at trial also showed that Alexander posed as a flight attendant on three other airline carriers. Ultimately, Alexander booked more than 120 free flights by falsely claiming to be a flight attendant," the statement from the Attorney's Office adds. U.S. District Judge Jacqueline Becerra is scheduled to sentence Alexander on August 25, 2025. He faces up to 20 years in prison for the wire fraud counts and up to 10 years for entering the airport's secure area, according to the indictment. Although there is no suggestion that he did anything wrong or illegal, Steven Rothstein is another high-profile example of a passenger who loved a free or cheap flight. The New York investment banker bought an American Airlines all-you-can-fly AAirpass in the 1980s and then set about using it to fly around the world, in first class, several times a month for 25 years. American Airlines ended up growing tired of his relentless round-the-world travelling and decided to kick him off it in 2008. Despite his best legal efforts, Steven was unable to get the pass reinstated.
Evening Standard
4 hours ago
- Evening Standard
It's time for a brutal truth: JD Vance was right about free speech in Britain
In fact anyone who thinks we don't have a free speech problem hasn't been paying attention. Police arrest about 30 people a day for potentially offensive online posts — the result of thousands of hours spent trawling social media rather than, you know, getting out to catch actual criminals. If the respectable Telegraph columnist, Allison Pearson, could be visited at home by two coppers for a tweet about Palestinian protests, none of us is safe. In his post, Rubio's aide Samson mentioned the cases of two anti-abortion activists, Livia Tossici-Bolt and Adam Smith-Connor, who were arrested in Britain for 'silently praying outside abortion clinics' as evidence of 'concerning trends'. That, I'd say, is an understatement. The arrests — and £20,000 fine in the case of Tossici-Bolt — were the consequence of a law banning anything that might resemble dissent, even silently, even in thought, within 150 metres of an abortion clinic. It's self-evidently at the expense of free speech on a profoundly serious matter of conscience.
Daily Mail
12 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Firm linked to Baroness Bra 'must pay back £122m for faulty PPE': Government suing over Covid contract 'initiated' by Tory peer
A firm linked to Michelle Mone must repay £122million for allegedly breaching a Covid PPE contract, a court heard yesterday. The bra tycoon had recommended PPE Medpro, which went on to provide 25 million 'faulty' surgical gowns. The consortium, led by the Tory peer's husband Doug Barrowman, was awarded contracts by the former Conservative administration during the pandemic. PPE Medpro is now being sued by the Department of Health and Social Care (DHSC), with Government lawyers claiming the gowns couldn't be used because they were not sterile. Baroness Mone and the firm both deny any wrongdoing. The Government is seeking to recover the costs of the contract, plus an additional £8,648,691 for transporting and storing the items. PPE Medpro said it 'categorically denies' breaching the contract, with its lawyers claiming the company has been 'singled out for unfair treatment'. Opening the trial, Paul Stanley KC, for the DHSC, said: 'This case is simply about whether 25 million surgical gowns provided by PPE Medpro were faulty. It is, in short, a technical case about detailed legal and industry standards that apply to sterile gowns.' Mr Stanley said in written submissions the 'initial contact with Medpro came through Baroness Mone', with contract discussions then going through one of the firm's directors, Anthony Page. Baroness Mone remained 'active throughout' negotiations, he said, with the peer stating Mr Barrowman had 'years of experience in manufacturing, procurement and management of supply chains'. But he said Baroness Mone's communications were not part of this case, which was 'simply about compliance'. He added: 'The department does not allege anything improper happened, and we are not concerned with any profits made by anybody.' In court documents from May this year, the DHSC said the gowns were delivered to the UK in 72 lots between August and October 2020, with almost £122million paid to PPE Medpro between July and August that year. The department rejected the gowns in December 2020 and told the firm it would have to repay the money, but this has not happened and the gowns remain in storage. Mr Stanley said 99.9999 per cent of the gowns should have been sterile under the terms of the contract. The DHSC claims the deal also specified PPE Medpro had to sterilise them using a 'validated process', attested by CE marking, which indicates a product has met certain medical standards. He said 'none of those things happened', and that of 140 gowns tested for sterility, 103 failed. He added that the DHSC 'was entitled to reject the gowns, or is entitled to damages, which amount to the full price and storage costs'. Charles Samek KC, for PPE Medpro, said the 'only plausible reason' for the gowns becoming contaminated was due to 'the transport and storage conditions or events to which the gowns were subject' after delivery. He said testing was done several months after the gowns were rejected, and that the samples were not 'representative of the whole population'. Mr Samek described the DHSC's claim as 'contrived and opportunistic', with PPE Medpro 'made the fall guy for a catalogue of failures... and uncontrolled buying spree with taxpayers' money'. Neither Baroness Mone nor Mr Barrowman is due to give evidence during the five-week trial. A PPE Medpro spokesman said it 'categorically denies breaching its obligations' and will 'robustly defend' the claim.
