One in four regular e-scooter users has been involved in a collision, says RSA
Nearly a quarter of regular e-scooter users have been involved in a collision, while one in three have experienced a near miss, research published by the
Road Safety Authority
(RSA) has found.
All reported collisions involved male riders.
The report published on Friday found that e-scooters were now perceived as the most dangerous form of transport in Ireland, surpassing motorcycles in terms of perceived risk.
Of those surveyed, 80 per cent said they believed e-scooters were 'not very safe' or 'not at all safe', compared with 70 per cent of participants who thought motorcycles were unsafe.
READ MORE
The research also found that 5 per cent of adults (classed as those aged 16 years and older) had used an e-scooter in the past 12 months, with 4 per cent being regular users – that is, using an e-scooter at least monthly.
Most people who used e-scooters were male (76 per cent), under 35 (75 per cent) and living in Dublin (65 per cent) or urban areas (97 per cent).
Dr John Cronin, emergency medicine consultant at
St Vincent's University Hospital,
Dublin, and an RSA board member, said e-scooters 'offer real mobility benefits', but also 'bring a high risk of injury'.
'E-scooters have quickly become a popular mode of transport, particularly in our cities, but with that popularity comes vulnerability,' he said.
'As an emergency medicine consultant, I've seen just how frequent and serious the injuries can be when things go wrong – from broken bones to serious head trauma.'
Dr Cronin said that e-scooter users 'have very little protection and very little room for error, especially when mixing with larger, faster vehicles'.
'We're seeing a high and growing number of incidents, particularly among younger people, often involving no helmet or use in inappropriate or unsafe settings.'
The research also found that one in three e-scooter users rode on footpaths.
Using e-scooters on footpaths is not permitted under new regulations as these can pose a safety risk to pedestrians.
Speaking further on Drivetime on RTÉ Radio 1, Dr Cronin said e-scooter users had 'limited ability to hit the brakes' when travelling at speed.
'When those small wheels hit something or collide with something – a rock or a stone or an object, a person – you're going to go over very quickly.
'We've seen very severe head injuries. We see a lot of head injuries – a lot of them are minor, but there's a potential for very severe brain injury.'
Approximately one in 10 e-scooter users said they carried a child passenger (13 per cent) or an adult passenger (8 per cent). Three in five users said they wore a helmet and two in three wore reflective gear when using an e-scooter.
Three in four users surveyed were aware that e-scooters were now legal to use on Irish roads.
Though there has been some public uncertainty regarding how e-scooter laws will be enforced, regular users said they considered it likely that they would be caught by the gardaí if they broke the rules.
Half of respondents said they believed the new 20km/h speed limit was appropriate, compared to 35 per cent of regular e-scooter users.
More than a third (36 per cent) of all respondents said they believed the speed limit was 'too high', compared to 30 per cent of regular e-scooter users.
Sarah O'Connor, director of partnerships and external affairs with the RSA, said the findings 'show that while there is support for the new laws among all adults, risk-taking behaviour by e-scooter users is of concern, as is the safety of these users on our roads'.
'As e-scooter use continues to grow, it's essential that riders, pedestrians, and all road users remain aware of and respectful toward one another to ensure everyone's safety,' she said.
The research was conducted online by Ipsos B&A last October and comprised a sample of 1,254 participants. A further sample of e-scooter users was included in the survey and was made up of 254 adults under 35 living in urban areas.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
At a time when the boom is even boomer, this statistic should mortify us
I've written before about Ireland's unknown knowns, our singular talent for wilful absent-mindedness. We have been very good at rendering invisible what is in front of our eyes. And we have not lost the knack. We're doing it now with a reality to which our history should make us especially sensitive: hunger. At the start of this century, one child in every six growing up in Ireland sometimes went to bed hungry because there was not enough food in the house. Now, when (to adopt Bertie Ahern's neologism) the boom is even boomer, this mortifying statistic has changed radically. We've managed to get it up almost to one child in every five. And for children in the poorest third of families, we're closing in on one in four. According to the comprehensive Health Behaviour in School-Aged Children (HBSC) study published last week, 15 per cent of Irish kids in the lowest income families sometimes went to bed hungry in 2002. Twenty years later (2022 is the latest year of the analysis), that metric had risen to 24 per cent. If you missed this news, you probably shouldn't blame yourself. The HBSC report got extensive coverage for its findings on whether children were feeling 'low' or drinking alcohol, smoking dope or using condoms if they had sex. The data on hunger was largely ignored, meriting at best a glancing reference. It is not hard to understand why: it induces a kind of cognitive dissonance. It does not fit in the frame of contemporary Irish reality. READ MORE There is something viscerally shaming about the thought of a child going to bed hungry. It reeks of Oliver Twist or, closer to home, of Angela's Ashes, where 'the children slurp the porridge and complain that they didn't get enough, they're starving with the hunger'. We have confined it in public consciousness to misery lit. It is a terrain most of us visit as psychological tourists, slumming it in a dark past to make us feel better about our present state of plenty. By my count, the word 'hungry' has been used 17 times in the Dáil this year. Some of the speakers were using it metaphorically ('Our airports need to be hungry for this business …') Most of the references to human bodily hunger were, entirely justifiably, to the terrible events in Gaza . There was only one real allusion to hunger in Ireland and that was one that placed it firmly in the realm of history. Danny Healy-Rae , summoning the folk memory of his native Kerry, told the Dáil, 'I know what hunger is from my grandfather and grandmother telling me of when people were hungry here, what they went through and what they had to go through when they did not have anything to eat. They were poorer times. Gladly, that is not the case here in Ireland today. There is no one hungry like that, or there need not and should not be.' This last sentence is telling. It is entirely true that no child need or should be hungry in an Ireland awash with money. But it is all too easy to slip from saying that there is no reason for something to be happening to the assumption that it could not be happening. Yet we know it is. In 2022, a study conducted by Amárach Research for Barnardos found that 17 per cent of Irish parents, and 25 per cent of those who were not working outside the home, reported not being able to provide their children 'with a sufficiently nutritious diet, quality and quantity, which you would ideally like' . This is not about parental fecklessness: in the same study, one in five Irish parents reported skipping or skimping on their own meals so they could feed their kids. [ More parents going without to feed their children, say Barnardos Opens in new window ] The last government's Task Force on Food Poverty notes that while 'for some people food skills and a lack of access to shops or equipment play a part', the basic problem is lack of money: 'For most people, the main cause of food poverty is low income in relation to their household costs – not inability to manage money or food.' The Barnardos study also showed that many of us, even if we are not directly suffering food poverty in our own families, know children who are doing so. Asked, 'Do you have any first-hand experience of children where the impact of not having sufficient nutritious food has been evident to you?', almost one in three Irish people said they did. What they noticed in these children were bad impacts on their physical, cognitive, social and educational development. Yet there is no common public language even to name this knowledge. An official study of two areas, one in Dublin, the other in rural Ireland, for the Department of Social Protection in 2023, noted that 'food poverty, as a specific term, is not used in or by the community. Food insecurity is acknowledged but again not a common phrase in conversations'. Ironically, that report has now itself disappeared from the department's website, as has the Action Plan based on it. Under ' The Action Plan on Food Poverty and the associated research report are available ', it now says 'Item was unpublished or removed.' [ 'It's kind of become our daughter's cheat meal': The view on new hot school meals programme Opens in new window ] In spite of this apparently deliberate un-knowing, there has been some real progress in recent years. The Hot School Meals scheme has been gradually rolled out and from this year covers all primary schools. A pilot scheme to continue to provide food to these pupils during the school holidays will start this summer. But there's still a huge gap in provision for older children and young people. The stark fact is that there are students sitting Junior and Leaving Cert exams today who went to bed hungry last night. Much of this injustice could be removed almost instantly if the Government would do what it has been talking about for more than a decade: introduce a second level of child benefit targeted at those most in need. But it won't do that until we decide to know what we know.
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
I wrote the Leas Cross report. Two decades on, has anything changed in Irish nursing homes?
Almost the worst aspect of the heartbreaking and horrifying scenes from the nursing home RTÉ Investigates programme was the predictability that these should still occur 20 years after the Leas Cross scandal. The Leas Cross report , which I authored, followed a similar exposé on shocking conditions and work practices in the private Leas Cross Nursing Home in Swords. It led to a range of recommendations and the institution of the Health Information and Quality Authority (Hiqa) . Last week's documentary featured scenes of older people allegedly being manhandled, 'forced' down into chairs or left in incontinence pads for so long their clothes were soaked. The persistence of gross institutional abuse of vulnerable older people signals the lack of serious intent and will in the Department of Health and successive governments to address well-signposted problems and proposed solutions to a deeply flawed nursing home system. READ MORE Not only are some of the recommendations from the Leas Cross report as yet unfulfilled, but none of those of significance from the ministerial panel on Irish nursing homes during the Covid-19 pandemic have been met, and others have been watered down. This is despite Irish nursing home residents experiencing very high death rates in comparison with the rest of the developed world and a torrid experience paralleling that of Amnesty UK's report on nursing homes during the pandemic, As If Expendable . At the heart of the problem is the shift from a largely public nursing home system to a private one without debate, foresight or learning from international experience and research. This occurred in a context of multiple failures by the professions, advocacy and the health system to develop a clear blueprint for the development of a high-quality framework for our future care in nursing homes. Put simply, the health service has no control of care standards in the private sector, and in particular what is known as clinical governance, a clear framework for leadership, responsibility and accountability, both internally and externally, in a complex care environment with vulnerable older people. Added to this is a profit-driven business with large chains, at least one of which, Emeis Ireland, has a deeply tarnished reputation outside this country – as detailed in Victor Castanet's book Les Fossoyeurs: Révélations sur le système qui maltraite nos aînés (The Gravediggers: Revelations about the system that mistreats our elders). In some, profit trumps care and, as we saw with the documentary, cost-cutting erodes care. In addition, this is associated with the building of huge impersonal nursing homes distant from the communities where residents formerly lived. Despite Sláintecare pledging to reverse the ratio of private to public nursing home beds, the reverse has happened with an increase in the proportion of private nursing home beds. [ What is Emeis and where are its Irish care homes located? Opens in new window ] The framework is so rickety and uninformed that there is a misplaced belief in regulation and safeguarding. Standards in hotels, restaurants and hospitals are not high because of regulation or safeguarding, but rather because we, the public and professions, have set high expectations of what we should receive. This has long been accepted in healthcare. The author of the first major medical ethics scandal in the US, where African-Americans were left untreated with syphilis, wrote that regulation, while necessary, would never succeed on its own: what was required was a system that upheld virtuous thought and virtuous action. As was obvious from the RTÉ documentary, and long clear to informed healthcare professionals, Hiqa cannot assure the public of appropriate and dignified care standards in Irish nursing homes, nor respond effectively and in a timely manner to grave concerns reported to it. Instead, we need a radical reset of prioritising informed support to residents in nursing homes and those working in them. We can do this while recognising the many who strive to provide good care – they are not tarnished by critique of lack of policy or the inherent problems of an untrammelled private sector. If anything, all suffer if we do not address the glaring problems of the system. There needs also to be soul-searching among the professions about supporting care in this sector. It would be helpful for the Nursing and Midwifery Board of Ireland to engage proactively on advising how nurses should engage with the challenges of providing high-quality care in a profit-driven nursing home system. The public also need to start pushing their politicians to do better. As things stand – and hard as it is to accept – we have no assurance that the scenes played out in the RTÉ documentary are not occurring elsewhere in the Irish nursing home system. The Ombudsman has already pointed to the lack of dignity and choice in Irish nursing home systems. [ Review of all nursing homes operated by Emeis Ireland requested by Department of Health Opens in new window ] It is not just a question of 'it might be my mother' but actually 'it might be me': men have a one in four, and women a one in three, chance of spending time in a nursing home before we die. We need to clearly signal that we expect a setting where choice will be respected and that we can continue to flourish. We must demand a lower tolerance for uninformed passivity from the Department of Health, HSE and other State bodies, and inclusion of stronger advocacy and gerontological voices (notably absent from the ministerial panel oversight implementation team) in responding to this lingering crisis. Politicians are adept at detecting the priorities of their constituents. If we do not push for a better present and future for those we care for and our future selves, nor will they. Prof Des O'Neill is a consultant geriatrician and author of the Leas Cross report 2005-6
Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
From 20 cigarettes a day for 55 years to finally quitting: ‘I took it up, thinking I was the big man'
For 55 years, Mick Staunton smoked more than 20 cigarettes a day. His wife, Olivia, wasn't far behind him, having taken up smoking 46 years ago and smoking at least 10 a day ever since. However, proving that you are never too old to quit, the Roscommon couple have finally ditched the habit and are feeling much healthier as a result. 'I took it up, like every young fella, thinking I was the big man,' said the 74-year-old. 'Olivia (71) was similar, and with the two of us smoking, it became harder and harder to quit, even though we tried a few times.' The retired garda says that he and his wife, who used to work in the Civil Service, attempted to stop smoking on numerous occasions throughout their lives, but knew they needed support to stop for good. READ MORE 'Whenever I tried, I would only last a few months before going back on them [cigarettes] and Olivia was the same,' said the father of five. 'We tried to go cold turkey and were using sweets and chewing gum whenever we wanted a cigarette, but they were a poor substitute. So last year we contacted the [ HSE ] QUIT team and the support we got was the biggest thing to help us through.' More than 17 per cent of the Irish population are smokers, with 14 per cent smoking daily, and 4 per cent occasionally. With 20 per cent of the 25- to 34-year-old age bracket smoking, this demographic has the highest number of smokers. However, these figures have declined since the first Healthy Ireland Survey in 2015, when the figure was 32 per cent. This decrease could be down to more available supports, as, according to the HSE, smokers are four times more likely to quit successfully if they use a combination of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) in the form of sprays, mists, lozenges and patches, along with support from a 'stop smoking adviser'. Smoking is a leading cause of preventable death and significantly impacts physical and mental health, so giving up can lead to improved health, reduced disease risk, and better overall wellbeing, including increased life expectancy and reduced stress. 'Smoking is dangerous, and the odds facing people who smoke are stark - 1 in 2 will die of a smoking-related disease; on average, people who smoke will die 10 years earlier and are at increased risk of cancer, heart attack, stroke, lung disease and many other debilitating diseases,' said Dr Paul Kavanagh, HSE public health consultant and clinical adviser to the Tobacco Free Ireland Programme. [ Smoking ban has important lessons for Ireland's approach to climate issues Opens in new window ] However, Dr Kavanagh says it's not all bad news, as these odds can be changed when people stop smoking. 'We see changes in physiological measures like heart rate, blood pressure and exhaled carbon monoxide within days; breathing and exercise tolerance will improve within weeks; and over the coming months and years, the risk of smoking-related disease reduces dramatically.' Mick Staunton with his wife Olivia in their garden in Castlerea. Photograph: Arthur Ellis According to the HSE, other health benefits include increased life expectancy as smoking takes an average of 10 to 15 years off a person's life, reduced risk of life-threatening diseases, improved respiratory function, circulation and oxygen levels, and better skin, teeth and hair. Quitting smoking also helps with improved mood and reduces feelings of stress, anxiety and depression. Giving up also helps to improve fertility, reduces risk of pregnancy complications, offers protection for loved ones from second-hand smoke and creates financial savings as it can 'free up a significant amount of money'. Research from Healthy Ireland Statistics shows that 17 per cent of the population smokes cigarettes, while another 8 per cent uses e-cigarettes, either daily or occasionally. These figures have not changed since 2023, and Martina Blake, national lead for the HSE Tobacco Free Ireland Programme, says NRTs can help more people to quit. 'These licensed medicines safely give you just enough nicotine to relieve cravings and withdrawal symptoms, while reducing your dependence on nicotine gradually,' she said. 'They help you to cope with cravings and withdrawal symptoms, but do not contain the poisonous and cancer-causing chemicals in tobacco smoke, such as tar and carbon monoxide.' [ Quitting smoking isn't easy, but these tricks could help Opens in new window ] Men remain more likely to smoke than women (20 per cent of men smoke as opposed to 15 per cent of women), and Mick Staunton says it's never too late to think about giving up. 'We both wish we did it years ago, as we're flying it now.'
