Slovakia to challenge adoption of 'critical' global pandemic agreement
GENEVA, May 19 (Reuters) - Slovakia's COVID-19 vaccine sceptic prime minister said on Monday that his country would challenge the adoption of a potentially groundbreaking global treaty on improving pandemic preparedness by calling for a vote at the World Health Assembly.
After considerable disagreements were bridged, World Health Organization member states had agreed in principle on the text of the legally binding agreement in April.
If there is a vote, two-thirds of the 194 WHO member countries must vote in favour for the agreement to pass at the World Health Assembly committee on Monday, before formal adoption by a plenary session on Tuesday.
While the Slovak move is unlikely to gain much backing, supporters of the agreement see it as symbolically problematic following protracted negotiations.
A statement by Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico said that the WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus had called him and asked him not to demand a vote. World Health Organization officials were not immediately available for comment.
"I reiterated that the Slovak delegation is bound by the Slovak government's instructions to demand a vote on the pandemic treaty," the statement said, adding that if the vote takes place, the delegation was instructed to oppose the treaty.
"It violates the principle of the sovereignty of the member states and disproportionately interferes with the area of human rights," the statement said.
The draft accord addresses structural inequities about how drugs or vaccines and health tools are developed. For the first time in an international health agreement, it would require national policies to set access conditions for research and development agreements, and ensure that pandemic-related drugs, therapeutics and vaccines are globally accessible.
It calls for the "widest possible international and regional collaboration" in a pandemic response, "while reaffirming the principle of the sovereignty of States in addressing public health matters".
The agreement had been seen by many diplomats and analysts as a victory for global cooperation at a time when multilateral organisations like the WHO have been battered by sharp cuts in U.S. funding.
"It contains critical provisions, especially in research and development, that — if implemented — could shift the global pandemic response toward greater equity," said Michelle Childs of the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative, a non-profit research group.
Fico, a pro-Russian populist, has long been a critic of the way the previous Slovak cabinet handled the pandemic. He has said he did not get vaccinated for COVID-19, and was charged in relation to a protest against pandemic restrictions. The charges were later dropped.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Popular jewellery set urgently recalled over ‘serious chemical risk' that can ‘damage organs and may cause cancer'
AN urgent recall has been issued for a jewellery set which contains harmful chemicals. A clover jewellery set has been recalled by the Office for Product and Safety Standards (OPSS) after finding chemicals which could cause cancer and damage organs in the jewellery. Imported from China, the set comes in an unmarked orange box and contains a watch, necklace, bracelet and ring. The product was rejected at the border after a report marked the risk level as "serious." A statement from OPSS reads: 'The product presents a serious risk as the cadmium content is much higher than the maximum permissible limit. 'Cadmium is harmful to human health as it accumulates in the body, can damage organs and may cause cancer.' The report also confirmed that the product did not meet the requirements of the REACH Enforcement Regulations 2008. Cadmium has previously been used in various consumer and industrial products as it is known to enhance the shine and colour of pieces. However, it is now heavily restricted in the EU due to its alarming health risks. According to the UK Government: 'Exposure to cadmium for a long period of time may result in damage to the kidneys and bones and may cause cancer.' The clover jewellery is heavily inspired by, and likely presents a cheaper alternative to the popular luxury goods brand Van Cleef and Arpels. The product report describes the jewellery as gold in colour with a black material inset. This bears a striking resemblance to the Van Cleef products which retail for as much as £6,000. This isn't the first time products have been recalled for containing this harmful chemical. The popular Amazon brand Dervivea was also forced to recall their products earlier this month, after a report revealed that it also contained cadmium. The product listings were recalled by Amazon, with customers advised to contact the distributor they purchased the product from to request redress. Government guidance states those inhaling or ingesting cadmium are most at risk. Breathing in air with high levels of cadmium can cause 'a metallic taste in the mouth, shortness of breath, chest pain, cough and flu-like symptoms.' If you are experiencing these symptoms and are concerned about your health following prolonged exposure to cadmium, you should seek guidance from your GP or contact NHS 111. Your product recall rights Chief consumer reporter James Flanders reveals all you need to know. Product recalls are an important means of protecting consumers from dangerous goods. As a general rule, if a recall involves a branded product, the manufacturer would usually have lead responsibility for the recall action. But it's often left up to supermarkets to notify customers when products could put them at risk. If you are concerned about the safety of a product you own, always check the manufacturer's website to see if a safety notice has been issued. When it comes to appliances, rather than just food items, the onus is usually on you - the customer - to register the appliance with the manufacturer as if you don't there is no way of contacting you to tell you about a fault. If you become aware that an item you own has been recalled or has any safety noticed issued against it, make sure you follow the instructions given to you by the manufacturer. They should usually provide you with more information and a contact number on its safety notice. In some cases, the manufacturer might ask you to return the item for a full refund or arrange for the faulty product to be collected. You should not be charged for any recall work - such as a repair, replacement or collection of the recalled item
-in-Nice-oc42fqvv.jpeg%3Fwidth%3D1200%26height%3D800%26crop%3D1200%3A800&w=3840&q=100)
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Macron pushes social media ban for under-15s after school stabbing in France
French President Emmanuel Macron has announced plans to advocate for EU-wide regulation to ban social media access for children under 15. The move follows a recent fatal stabbing at a school in eastern France, which has intensified concerns about youth safety and violence. In an interview on Tuesday, Macron expressed his urgency to address the issue, stating his aim to implement the ban within the next few months. "If that does not work, we will start to do it in France. We cannot wait," he told France 2, hours after a 14-year-old student was questioned by police over the fatal knifing of a 31-year-old school aide. The incident occurred during a bag search for weapons at a middle school in Nogent, Haute-Marne. Prime Minister Francois Bayrou told parliament the incident was not an isolated case. Macron said social media was one of the factors to blame for violence among young people. Writing on social media platform X after the interview, Macron said such regulation was backed by experts. "Platforms have the ability to verify age. Do it," he wrote. Macron's comments come amid a wave of measures in countries around the world aimed at curbing social media use among children. Australia last year approved a social media ban for under-16s after an emotive public debate, setting a benchmark for jurisdictions around the world with one of the toughest regulations targeting.
Reuters
28 minutes ago
- Reuters
Russian court postpones hearing in $2.9 billion Rosatom-Fortum dispute until March
MOSCOW, June 11 (Reuters) - A Russian court on Wednesday postponed legal proceedings by more than nine months in a $2.9 billion lawsuit filed by Russia's Rosatom against Finland's Fortum ( opens new tab and Outokumpu ( opens new tab, court filings showed. State-controlled nuclear energy firm Rosatom is seeking 227.8 billion roubles ($2.9 billion) in compensation for losses over the termination of a contract for the Hanhikivi-1 nuclear power plant in Finland, court documents and a Rosatom statement showed in May. A hearing scheduled at the Moscow City Arbitration Court for Wednesday morning was postponed until March 16, 2026, court filings showed, without giving further details. Rosatom, Fortum and Outokumpu had no immediate comment. Rosatom and its former Finnish partners have been locked in dispute over the cancelled contract since May 2022. The Finnish side terminated the project soon after Moscow launched the conflict in Ukraine, citing significant delays and political risks. Rosatom in May said it was seeking compensation for losses caused by what it called the unlawful termination of the EPC contract to build the plant, violations of the shareholder agreement and other contractual disputes. Outokumpu has said it was never a direct party to the EPC agreement or any other agreement with any Rosatom company related to the Hanhikivi-1 project. Fortum said in May that the International Chamber of Commerce's decision that Rosatom's subsidiary could not make Fortum a party to proceedings was final. The contract to build the 1.2 gigawatt plant with investments estimated at 6.5-7 billion euros was signed in 2013 with Fennovoima, a joint consortium in which Finnish stakeholders including Fortum, Outokumpu and SSAB originally controlled two thirds through a joint venture, and the Russian side held one third. After the project's termination, Fennovoima ceased all its operations and is only engaged in legal disputes. ($1 = 78.6000 roubles)
