logo
Why is actor Gerard Depardieu on trial – and what does it mean for #MeToo in France?

Why is actor Gerard Depardieu on trial – and what does it mean for #MeToo in France?

Sky News24-03-2025

One of France's most successful actors is in court accused of sexually assaulting two women on the set of one of his films.
Gerard Depardieu, 76, has starred in more than 200 films over five decades, winning two best lead actor awards at the Cesars, as well as being nominated for an Oscar and 15 other Cesars.
In recent years he has faced a series of sexual assault allegations, all of which he denies.
While the #MeToo movement ultimately led to the downfall of Hollywood film director Harvey Weinstein, France's #balancestonporc equivalent has struggled to gain momentum.
Depardieu's court case, coming soon after that of Gisele Pelicot, who waived her anonymity to reveal her husband had orchestrated her drugging and rape by more than 50 men, is proof for many that France is finally getting its own #MeToo moment.
Here Sky News looks at the case - and what it means for women's rights in France.
What is he accused of?
Depardieu is accused of sexually assaulting two female crew members on the set of the film Les Volets Verts (Green Shutters) in 2021.
The anonymous women both claim the actor forced himself on them on multiple occasions, touching them over their clothes, according to court documents.
The first woman said in one incident, as she passed him in a corridor he grabbed her, pinned her down between his legs and rubbed himself against her waist, hips, and chest, making accompanying gestures and lewd comments.
The other woman claimed he touched her buttocks in public on more than one occasion, as well as touching her chest.
Depardieu denies the allegations and is expected to appear in person at the Tribunal de Paris for the case to be heard on Monday and Tuesday. A panel of judges will decide whether he is found guilty, which would leave him facing up to five years in prison or a fine of€75,000 (£62,000).
The trial was due to start in October but was postponed after Depardieu's legal team asked for a six-month delay due to his poor health. Suffering complications from diabetes and high blood pressure, they said he was unable to sit for long periods.
Separately, he also remains under investigation for the alleged rape and sexual assault of a 22-year-old actress. The woman claims Depardieu sexually assaulted her twice at his home.
She originally reported the alleged incidents in 2018 but the charges were dropped in 2019 following a nine-month investigation.
However, the case was reopened in October 2020 when the woman refiled the complaint.
In March 2022, Depardieu's bid to get the case thrown out was rejected by Paris's court of appeal, with authorities saying he would remain under investigation until the matter is either sent to trial or dismissed. He denies the allegations.
In April 2023, investigative French media outlet Mediapart reported claims of 13 women who said Depardieu sexually assaulted or harassed them between 2004 and 2022.
In an open letter in the newspaper Le Figaro that October, Depardieu said he had "never abused a woman".
A group of 50 French stars, including singer and wife of former French President Nicolas Sarkozy Carla Bruni, wrote their own open letter defending him in Le Monde, condemning what they described as his "lynching" and describing him as "probably the greatest" French actor.
A week later, President Emmanuel Macron condemned the "manhunt" for Depardieu, calling him an "immense actor" who "makes France proud".
Who is Gerard Depardieu?
Depardieu was born in Chateauroux, central France in 1948. He left home at the age of 16 for Paris, where he got his first acting job with a travelling theatre company.
After a few minor film roles, his break came in 1973 with a lead part in Bertrand Blier's film Les Valseuses (Going Places) - alongside his former theatre friends Patrick Dewaere and Miou Miou.
From there his popularity boomed and he became one of the most prolific French actors of the 1980s and 1990s.
He won awards for his roles in The Last Metro and Cyrano de Bergerac, which also received an Oscar nomination. He was made president of the Cannes Film Festival jury in 1992.
His success also saw him become a Chevalier of France's Legion d'Honneur and its Ordre national du Merite - two of the country's most prestigious honours.
Across roughly 250 films, he has worked with more than 150 directors, including Jean-Luc Godard and Ridley Scott.
He became close friends with Robert De Niro after they starred together in Bernardo Bertolucci's film 1900 in 1976.
Depardieu married fellow actor Elisabeth Depardieu in 1971. She starred alongside him in Jean de Florette and Manon Of The Spring in 1986. They had two children, who both became actors. Their son Guillaume died from pneumonia aged 37 in 2008. The couple divorced in 1996.
He announced his retirement from acting in 2005, claiming he had made "enough" films and wished to pursue other things.
In 2012 he moved to Belgium to avoid paying taxes in France. He wrote an open letter to the then prime minister, saying he was surrendering his French passport because he wanted "nothing to do" with his home country and the government was trying to "punish success".
Vladimir Putin personally signed an executive order to give him Russian citizenship in 2013. Two years later his films were banned in Ukraine over comments he made questioning the country's sovereignty as an independent state. He has since condemned Russia's war there.
He also claims to have been given citizenship by the United Arab Emirates.
In 2023 he was stripped of his National Order of Quebec after a documentary revealed him making lewd comments and sexual gestures on a trip to North Korea in 2018, which the region's premier described as "shocking".
Why is the Depardieu case so important in France?
The #MeToo and #TimesUp movements in the US saw women in the creative industries calling out sexual harassment and assault by their male counterparts.
But it "didn't really take off in France" in the same way, Sarah McGrath, chief executive of Women For Women France, an organisation fighting against gender-based violence, tells Sky News.
While she saw colleagues around the world "thrilled that victims could finally feel confident to talk about the crimes they'd be subjected to", she says in France "we had a very different experience".
In 2018, dozens of female French stars and intellectuals signed an "anti-MeToo manifesto", condemning the movement as a "witch hunt" and defending men's sexual freedom to proposition women.
Although some, notably Depardieu's co-star and friend Catherine Deneuve, have publicly U-turned on the issue, it demonstrated a resistance to change in French society.
Blanche Sabbah, a French feminist activist and comic book author, says: "We love to talk about being the cultural exception in France.
"We have this idea that if you are some kind of artistic genius then you are less accountable for bad behaviour - and that we're more sexually liberated - and don't concern ourselves with moral panics like in the US. I think that stopped the [MeToo] movement in its tracks."
Ms McGrath describes this "cultural exception" as "an attitude that a man's reputation and livelihood is more important than victims".
Both women also point to a "general distrust" of claimants and "false ideas" they are bypassing the courts and telling their stories in the media to "get money".
"It's simply not true and comes from a lack of understanding that the French justice system does not play a protective role for victims of sexual violence," she says.
"Victims are actually more likely to come out with debts of thousands of euros if they go through the justice system, which far exceeds any compensation they might get."
But while the "balancestonporc" - report your pig - hashtag struggled to gain momentum in 2018, the women say they have seen a shift - particularly following the case of Gisele Pelicot and the conviction of her husband for raping and inviting at least 50 other men to rape her while she was drugged and unconscious.
"It's taken time, but finally we're getting somewhere," Ms Sabbah says. "Gisele's case serves as a reminder that our culture has a huge influence on how we behave."
Those found guilty in the Pelicot case were aged between 20 and 70 and included a journalist, nurse, firefighters, and a DJ.
10:58
"She has proven that this is the problem of every man - that what you think your favourite movie star can do serves as an argument for justifying what crimes you would commit as a 'normal' person'," Ms Sabbah adds.
Regardless of the outcome of the Depardieu case, both women agree that his prosecution represents a "huge step forward" for women's rights and victims of gender-based violence.
"There have been three or four convictions [of men for gender-based violence] recently, so I think the way those cases are perceived now is different to how it was in 2018," Ms Sabbah says.
"We have gone from 'classement sans suite' (no further action) to movie stars on trial."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault after bombshell retrial
Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault after bombshell retrial

Metro

time3 hours ago

  • Metro

Harvey Weinstein found guilty of sexual assault after bombshell retrial

Harvey Weinstein has been found guilty of one charge in his sex crimes retrial, after lengthy proceedings in New York. The disgraced film mogul was initially convicted of a criminal sexual act in the first degree and rape in the third degree, in February 2020. However, his 23-year sentence was overturned last year, sparking a three-week retrial in Manhattan. After a second round of hearings, the 73-year-old was convicted of sexually assaulting Miriam Haley. He was also acquitted of a second charge stemming from sexual assault accusations made by Kaja Sokola, with the jury struggling to reach a unanimous verdict on a third count involving Jessica Mann. According to the Guardian, Judge Curtis Farber encouraged them to continue deliberating in the hopes they can find a verdict. Deadline reports that each count of first-degree criminal sexual act carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Weinstein's previous conviction for sex crimes in New York was overturned last April by the Court of Appeal, after it was ruled that he didn't receive a fair trial in 2020. In September, he was then indicted on new sexual assault charges – but has denied all accusations against him. Earlier today, Weinstein addressed Judge Farber to plead for a mistrial, but was quickly denied. 'This is my life that's on the line, this is not fair,' the former movie producer said. 'I'm not getting a fair trial.' Although the sentencing hearing has not yet taken place, the conviction will be in addition to a 16-year sentence he is yet to serve in LA. Weinstein has been at the center of rape or sexual misconduct allegations from more than 100 people, with some claims dating back to the 1970s. More Trending The allegations sparked the Me Too movement, which highlighted sexual violence in the film industry, as well as worldwide. He has been behind bars for the last few years, and filed a lawsuit against Rikers Island at the end of 2024, calling out the conditions and services at the prison facility after suffering a number of health problems. In documents obtained by Deadline, his legal team confirmed they were seeking 'no less than $5,000,000', and demanding 'monetary damages arising from negligence, carelessness, recklessness, gross negligence, medical malpractice, intentional and/or reckless and/or negligent deprivation of medical treatment, deprivation of civil and constitutional rights, and negligent and intentional torts' that he claimed have been 'committed by officers, agents, and employees of the New York City Department of Correction'. They also named New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation, Rikers Island Correctional Facility, and New York City Health & Hospitals Corporation/Bellevue.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Beach Boys co-founder Brian Wilson dies aged 82 MORE: Brooke Shields podcast episode criticising Meghan Markle quietly removed from platforms MORE: Reality TV legend's husband 'deported from US after being detained for 4 months'

Weinstein guilty of one charge in sex assaults trial but acquitted of second
Weinstein guilty of one charge in sex assaults trial but acquitted of second

BreakingNews.ie

time4 hours ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Weinstein guilty of one charge in sex assaults trial but acquitted of second

Former movie mogul Harvey Weinstein has been convicted of one of the charges in his sex crimes retrial – but acquitted of another, and jurors were unable to reach a verdict on a third charge. The split verdict on Wednesday meted out a measure of vindication to his accusers and prosecutors – but also to Weinstein – after the landmark case was thrown into limbo. Advertisement Weinstein's initial conviction five years ago seemed to cement the downfall of one of Hollywood's most powerful men in a pivotal moment for the #MeToo movement. But that conviction was overturned last year, and the case was sent back for retrial in the same Manhattan courthouse. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala arrives at court (Yuki Iwamura/AP) This time, a majority-female jury convicted the former studio boss of forcibly subjecting one woman to a criminal sex act in 2006. But jurors acquitted Weinstein of another criminal sex act charge from 2006. Advertisement And jurors were to continue deliberating on a charge that he raped another woman in 2013. Under New York law, the third-degree rape charge carries a lesser penalty than the first-degree criminal sex act offence. The jury in the Harvey Weinstein sexual misconduct case listens to a read back of testimony by a key witness (Elizabeth Williams via AP) Weinstein, 73, denies sexually assaulting or raping anyone. Jury deliberations had teetered on Wednesday as the foreperson again requested to speak to the judge about 'a situation' he found troubling. Advertisement The man, who complained on Monday that other jurors were pushing people to change their minds and talking about information beyond the charges, was being questioned in private, at his request. While the jury was in court to hear the answer to an earlier request to re-hear the text of a rape law, the foreperson signalled to Judge Curtis Farber that he wanted to talk. 'He said words to the effect of, 'I can't go back in there with the other jurors',' Judge Farber explained later. The foreperson was sent to wait in a separate room, where he penned a note saying: 'I need to talk to you about a situation.' Advertisement When briefly brought into court, the foreperson said he wanted to speak in private. He, the judge, prosecutors and Weinstein's lawyers then went behind closed doors. The discussion was closed to the press and public, but Farber later said the foreperson had expressed that he did not want to change his position – whatever it may be – and was being bullied. 'He did indicate that at least one other juror made comments to the effect of, 'I'll meet you outside one day', and there's yelling and screaming,' the judge said. Weinstein's lawyer Arthur Aidala characterised the foreperson's concerns more severely, saying that the man had said he was concerned for his safety after his fellow panellist talked about meeting him outside and added, 'you don't know me'. Advertisement 'I don't think the court is protecting this juror. Period,' Mr Aidala said, going on to ask for a mistrial. Prosecutor Matthew Colangelo, however, said the foreperson had not seemed afraid or apprehensive, just 'stubborn'. 'He said he'd made up his mind, he didn't want to change it, and people were pressuring him to change it. That's what jury deliberations involve,' the prosecutor said. The episode was the latest sign of strain among the jurors. On Friday, one of them asked to be excused because he felt another member of the group was being treated unfairly. Weinstein's lawyers asked unsuccessfully for a mistrial then, and again after the foreperson expressed his concerns on Monday. The jury kept deliberating and went through Tuesday without sending any more messages about interpersonal tensions. The seven female and five male jurors started their fifth day of deliberations on Wednesday by re-hearing accuser Jessica Mann's testimony that he raped her in a Manhattan hotel room in 2013. The group wrapped up Tuesday's deliberations by asking to revisit that testimony. Some jurors appeared to take fresh notes on Wednesday, while others sat impassively as court stenographers read aloud the requested parts of Ms Mann's days-long testimony. The jury had already reheard some of the passages last week. Weinstein, 73, pleaded not guilty to raping Mann and to forcing oral sex on two other women, Mimi Haley and Kaja Sokola. The Oscar-winning producer and former Hollywood powerbroker maintains that he never sexually assaulted or raped anyone, and his lawyers portrayed his accusers as opportunists who accepted his advances because they wanted a leg up in the entertainment world.

Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial have reached a partial verdict
Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial have reached a partial verdict

NBC News

time4 hours ago

  • NBC News

Jury in Harvey Weinstein sex assault retrial have reached a partial verdict

Jurors in the trial against disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein said Wednesday they unanimously found him guilty of sexually assaulting one woman and not guilty of assaulting another more than a decade ago. But jurors at Weinstein's retrial told the judge they were unable to reach a verdict on allegations he assaulted a third woman and Judge Curtis Farber asked the jurors to continue deliberating Thursday before sending them home for the day. Weinstein, 73, had denied all the charges and his lawyers insisted the sexual encounters with his three accusers were 'transactional' and 'consensual.' The jury weighing the evidence against disgraced movie mogul Harvey Weinstein in his New York retrial reached a partial verdict after five days of deliberation. Weinstein, 73, who has denied all the allegations, was charged with sexually assaulting three women more than a decade ago. Weinstein found himself on trial again after the New York state Court of Appeals last year overturned his landmark 2020 conviction for sexually abusing young women, a trial that defined the #MeToo movement and helped turn the Oscar-winning producer into a pariah. The appeals court found that the judge in that trial had improperly allowed testimony against the former Miramax chief based on allegations that were not part of the case. During the six-week retrial, jurors heard testimony from a former 'Project Runway' production assistant, Miriam Haley, and actress Jessica Mann, both of whom testified in the 2020 trial. New to the retrial was testimony from a third accuser, Kaja Sokola, a former runway model from Poland. Weinstein's lawyers have argued that the sexual encounters with his three accusers were all 'transactional' and 'consensual.' 'If this person wasn't Harvey Weinstein, would we even be here?' Weinstein defense attorney Arthur Aidala asked during his closing argument in accusing the women of being grifters. Prosecutors, however, said Weinstein preyed on young women trying to make it in Hollywood, sometimes repeatedly, and threatened to wreck their careers if they talked. 'He never had any interest in their careers,' Assistant District Attorney Nicole Blumberg told the jury. 'He had an interest in their bodies. And he was going to have their bodies and touch their bodies whether they had wanted him to or not." Just as in 2020, Weinstein did not testify at his retrial. But before the jurors announced they had reached a verdict, he told a FOX5 New York reporter that he acted "immorally" and regretted hurting his wife and family, but never did anything "illegal." "I put so many friends through this and hurt people … that were close to me, by the way, by actions that were stupid," he said. "But never illegal, never criminal, never anything." Much of the evidence that resulted in Weinstein being convicted five years ago of the third-degree rape of one woman and a first-degree criminal sex act against another woman was reintroduced at his retrial. Just as before, Weinstein pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree criminal sexual act and third-degree rape based on complaints by Haley and Mann. But this time, Weinstein also pleaded not guilty to an additional charge of first-degree criminal sexual act in the alleged sexual assault of Sokola. Sokola told the court that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on her in 2006 at a Manhattan hotel when she was 19 years old. But the alleged abuse began in 2002, when she was 16 and Weinstein forced her to masturbate him, she said. 'Her first sexual experience was the defendant forcing himself on her,' Blumberg said. During his three-hour closing, Aidala tried to poke holes in the testimony of the three accusers. He suggested they were coached by prosecutors to describe the sexual encounters, which he likened at one point to 'naked twister,' in a sinister light. 'They did it all to get the original sinner, the poster boy of the MeToo movement,' Aidala said. The #MeToo hashtag took off in 2017 following reports in The New York Times and The New Yorker that detailed allegations of sexual misconduct against Weinstein that went back decades. It helped inspire a reckoning in Hollywood and beyond around sexual harassment. Weinstein, Aidala added, made for an easy target. 'He's a fat dude — sorry, Harvey,' he said while the former producer looked on. Aidala insisted the encounters were all 'transactional' and that all three women believed Weinstein could help their careers. 'It's not really a casting couch I thought it was,' Aidala said. 'It's different now. I know it sounds crazy, but he's the one being used.' Blumberg painted a far different picture during the prosecution's closing remarks. 'I want to remind you why we are here,' she said. 'Because he raped three people.' Sokola and Haley both claimed that Weinstein forcibly performed oral sex on them in separate incidents in 2006. Mann told the court the producer raped her in 2013. Weinstein, Blumberg said, 'had tremendous control over Hollywood. He spoke, people listened. He decided who was in and who was out.' While Blumberg spoke, Weinstein, seated in a wheelchair, appeared to be listening intently. 'Remember, it's not the person sitting here today in a wheelchair but this man, in Hollywood, who had the power and was in control,' Blumberg said. Regardless of the verdict, Weinstein will most likely be returned to California where he has to serve a 16-year sentence for a 2022 rape conviction. His lawyers filed an appeal for that conviction in 2024 that is still in process. During his latest trial, Weinstein was allowed to stay at Bellevue Hospital where he was being treated for a host of serious health issues. Back in October, two sources told NBC News that Weinstein had been diagnosed with chronic myeloid leukemia, an uncommon form of bone marrow cancer. Weinstein was a Hollywood titan in the 1990s and 2000s when he and his brother Bob ran Miramax, the distributor of critically acclaimed independent movies like 'Sex, Lies, and Videotape,' 'The Crying Game,' 'Pulp Fiction' and 'Clerks,' and box office successes like 'Chicago' and 'Bridget Jones's Diary.' In 1999, Weinstein won a best picture Oscar as one of the producers of 'Shakespeare in Love.' And in the early 2010s, his second distribution label, The Weinstein Company, won back-to-back best picture Oscars for 'The King's Speech' and 'The Artist.' But as Weinstein collected accolades, he was dogged by rumors that he preyed on his leading ladies and other women in the industry. By the time he was arrested, more than 80 women had accused him of sexual assault or harassment going back decades. Just as he did at his trials, Weinstein doggedly denied the claims and insisted the encounters were consensual.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store