logo
Iconic car brand boss gives major update on merger with rival as firms say EV push is slashing sales

Iconic car brand boss gives major update on merger with rival as firms say EV push is slashing sales

Scottish Sun19-05-2025

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
THE BOSS of an iconic car brand has revealed a major update on its merger with a rival, as the company admits the EV push is hurting sales.
Despite rumours of a potential tie-up between Stellantis and Renault, both companies have denied seeking a partnership.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
2
The Renault group reported record sales last year
Credit: Getty
2
Stellantis manages several brands, including the supercar maker Maserati
Credit: Alamy
John Elkann, Stellantis Chairman, told the Financial Times: "We are not discussing any merger."
Management at the automotive giant has been turbulent following the resignation of the former CEO, Carlos Tavares, who they still haven't replaced.
The automotive giant currently oversees many carmakers such as Peugeot, Fiat and Vauxhall.
However, Stellantis has several underperforming brands, such as Chrysler, described as "a shadow of its former self," according to motor1.com
Another failing car manufacturer is Abarth, which has seen revenues drop during its push to go fully electric.
This has caused major concern at Stellantis, adding to the company's decision not to get involved in a massive merger.
Last year, the Auto conglomerate recorded a 12 per cent drop in shipments, which they blamed on "temporary gaps in product offerings".
On the other hand, the Renault group reported their highest sales.
The two major companies share a common ground regarding the future of cars in Europe.
Both share concerns over strict emission regulations negatively impacting their profit and production of gas-powered city cars.
Fiat 500e production paused
The European Union recently granted automakers an extension to meet their emission targets.
However, by 2030, stricter regulations will come into force, banning the sale of new cars with harmful emissions across the EU.
This comes after Europe's second-largest carmaker halted production of an iconic model as its EV lineup faces "deep trouble".
An initial manufacturing break at Stellantis has now been extended as bosses report a collapse in demand for electric cars.
The Fiat 500 was one of the vast company's most successful and beloved models across two production runs lasting a collective 35 years.
Dating back to 1957, it has sold more than six million units between its two iterations.
However, the 500e, unveiled in 2020 as an electric alternative, has proved less popular.
The model is intended as the long-term successor to the 500 beyond the 2035 ban on petrol and diesel car sales.
But stuttering demand has now forced a pause in its production.
The latest data suggest that both the petrol and electric 500 sol 74,885 units from January to July.
That's almost a quarter down on the same period last year.
Bosses told Autocar that poor sales were "linked to the deep difficulties experienced in the European EV market by all producers."
They have also reportedly told union reps that the electric car segment is facing "deep trouble" more generally.
Fiat CEO Olivier François said: "We obviously, like everyone else, thought that the world would go electric faster and the cost of electrification would go down faster.
"But we couldn't imagine that Covid would happen, shortage of raw materials would happen [and] the European Society – not all, not the youngest part – would turn their backs on the sustainable solutions.
"But this is the reality. We have to face those realities."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Napoleonic prisoner of war camp buried under field bought from farmer
Napoleonic prisoner of war camp buried under field bought from farmer

Powys County Times

time2 hours ago

  • Powys County Times

Napoleonic prisoner of war camp buried under field bought from farmer

A Napoleonic prisoner of war camp buried under a field in Cambridgeshire has been bought by a trust with the intention of preserving it as a historic site. Norman Cross, the world's first purpose-built prisoner of war camp, was privately owned by a farmer, and has been bought by Nene Park Trust. Located near Peterborough, it contains the remains of around 1,770 French, Dutch and German soldiers captured in the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars fought between the French and other European nations. The trust says it wants to preserve the site and make it available to the public as a historic and green space. The camp now lies barely visible under a field used for arable crops and grazing. But it previously held a self-contained town, with barracks, offices, a hospital, school, marketplace and banking system, according to historian Paul Chamberlain. It operated from 1797 to 1814 and housed around 7,000 French prisoners. The location was chosen because it was far from the sea, making it difficult for any escapees to return to France. Prisoners made intricate models from bone, wood and straw to sell at the camp market and trade for food, tobacco and wine. Around 800 of these artefacts, which include miniature ships and chateaus, are on display at the nearby Peterborough Museum and Art Gallery. The trust received £200,000 of grant funding from Historic England and £50,000 from the National Lottery Heritage Fund to buy the camp following years of negotiations. Its acquisition was fought for by resident Derek Lopez, who owned the Norman Cross Gallery near Yaxley and was an advocate of Peterborough's history. He died last year before seeing the sale complete. Duncan Wilson, chief executive of Historic England, said: 'The Norman Cross prisoner of war camp represents a pivotal moment in our shared European heritage that deserves to be better known.' Matthew Bradbury, chief executive of Nene Park Trust, said he was 'delighted' to take on the ownership of Norman Cross and wanted 'to share its green space and unique stories for generations to come'. Heritage minister Baroness Twycross said: 'Norman Cross represents a poignant chapter in our shared European story. 'The remarkable stories of those held in what was the first purpose-built prisoner of war camp should be remembered now and in the future. 'This partnership has secured this valuable heritage site for generations to come.'

Shoppers warned about quick online payment option that could end up costing you £1,000s
Shoppers warned about quick online payment option that could end up costing you £1,000s

Scottish Sun

time3 hours ago

  • Scottish Sun

Shoppers warned about quick online payment option that could end up costing you £1,000s

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A WARNING has been issued to shoppers over a quick payment option that can cost £1,000s. Which? is urging caution over use of the "pay by bank" feature which lacks key consumer protection. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 1 Which? has issued a warning over the "pay by bank" payment feature Credit: Getty The payment feature lets shoppers pay for products without the need to enter bank details or use a card. It is used by popular online retailers such as WHSmith, Just Eat, Funky Pigeon and Ryanair. You can also use it to settle credit card balances or pay bills. However, Which? has raised concerns people may be unaware it can leave them unprotected if something goes wrong with a purchase. The option lacks Section 75 and chargeback protections that shoppers get when paying through other methods. Under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act, a credit card company can be held jointly liable for a purchase that turns out to be shoddy or does not materialise. This means a shopper can potentially get a refund from the credit card company if they cannot recover their costs from a retailer. Those using a debit card or credit card for purchases can also potentially get their money back via the chargeback scheme. Which? said pay by bank is a "potential game changer" for businesses as they can sidestep card transaction fees and also benefit from receiving customer funds immediately. There is also appeal for shoppers as refunds can be processed instantly. Shopping discounts - How to make savings and find the best bargains While card details are not shared when making a transaction – eliminating the risk of them being stolen or compromised. People do have general purchase rights under the Consumer Rights Act, meaning that goods must be fit for purpose, as described and of satisfactory quality. But Which? said these protections are not always easy to enforce and in some cases may end up with people needing to go to a small claims court. People may also face difficulties in the event of a business going bust. This could particularly be the case if there is an issue with a future-dated purchase such as a flight, a festival, or a household big ticket purchase such as a kitchen or a sofa. Jenny Ross, Which? money editor, said: 'Innovations like pay by bank present opportunities for businesses and consumers alike, but they're not without risk, particularly as they lack the rigorous purchase protections you get when paying by card. 'We're calling on the regulator to act to ensure consumers can use pay by bank with confidence, but in the meantime, we'd urge consumers to think carefully before using it to book events or make substantial purchases – for now, your good old-fashioned credit or debit card may be the best option.' A spokesperson for banking and finance industry body UK Finance said: 'There are a range of options for making payments online which provides customers with choice as to how they wish to pay. "Different payment methods do come with different levels of protection and it's worth being aware of these when shopping online, particularly when making higher value purchases." What is Section 75 protection? Section 75 protection offers you consumer protection on credit card purchases worth between £100 and £30,000. It applies to any products or services you've bought that end up being faulty, broken, or were not delivered at all. It also covers you in the case a retailer you've bought from goes bust. Section 75 applies to goods bought online, over the phone or via mail order. You aren't covered by Section 75 if you bought anything with a debit card, but may be under chargeback. To make a claim under Section 75, you need to contact your credit card provider. It should then send you a claim form which you can fill in and your provider will use to process your application. Your card firm might ask you to provide evidence such as a receipt or a report verifying that the item is faulty. In the scenario where a retailer has not gone bust, you should complain to them first. If you find that your card company has been unhelpful and refused your claim, you can take your case to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS). Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@ Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

Palace co-owner John Textor would sell shares for Europa League chance
Palace co-owner John Textor would sell shares for Europa League chance

Leader Live

time3 hours ago

  • Leader Live

Palace co-owner John Textor would sell shares for Europa League chance

The American, whose Eagle Football Group owns 43 per cent of Palace, has imperilled the club's chance of a first-ever European campaign owing to his involvement with Ligue 1 side Lyon, but is ready to offload his stake to his fellow co-owners in order to bring the saga to an end. UEFA does not allow clubs with the same ownership to compete in the same European competitions in a season. As well as his stake in Palace, the 59-year-old has a controlling stake in the French club, also via Eagle Football. However it is also reported that the European governing body does not consider Textor's influence at Selhurst Park to be decisive and is leaning towards allowing the club into the Europa League regardless. The PA news agency understands no formal decision is likely on Palace's fate until the end of June. Textor has previously spoken of his frustration at how little influence his stake entitles him to, over football matters. Victory for Oliver Glasner's side over Manchester City in last month's FA Cup final gave them their first major trophy and with it a first crack at Europe. However, Nottingham Forest have since written to UEFA to challenge Palace's Europa League spot and in the hope of taking their place. Forest's owner Evangelos Marinakis, who also owns Greek side Olympiacos, placed his shares in the club in a blind trust before the governing body's March 1 deadline, anticipating Nuno Espirito Santo's side's European qualification. At present Forest, who finished seventh in last season's Premier League, are set to enter the Conference League but would take Palace's Europa League place, should they be deemed ineligible.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store