Concealed carry permits spike in Denver as new rules loom
Obtaining a concealed carry permit in Denver, already home to some of the state's strictest gun laws, will soon require additional steps.
The big picture: A state law taking effect July 1 will add new requirements for obtaining concealed carry licenses, including mandating eight hours of in-person instruction and passing a live-fire test, where a person must shoot a minimum of 50 rounds.
Why it matters: The new law will add barriers for responsible gun owners, including costlier training for a permit type that's grown in popularity over the past five years, as Colorado's gun laws grow increasingly restrictive.
Yes, but: The city's chief compliance officer, Mary Dulacki, tells us she doesn't presume the new requirements will affect the number of applicants.
Firearms training could be more expensive for applicants, she adds.
By the numbers: Denver issued 2,768 concealed carry permits last year, a 31% jump from 2018, the last year DPD had available due to its retention policy.
Those figures include new and renewed permits, which last five years, Denver police spokesperson Jay Casillas tells us.
The intrigue: It's unclear why more Denverites are choosing to conceal carry.
The figures from Denver police show a post-pandemic spike closely mirroring a rise in violent crime rates, which have since fallen in Denver.
What they're saying: Chris Stone, state and local affairs director for the lobbying firm Gun Owners of America, tells us "normal gun owners" are realizing that "you are your own first line of self-defense," which could be driving an uptick in concealed carry's popularity.
Women, people of color and LGBTQ people are among the fast-growing demographics for new gun owners, Stone says.
Zoom in: Most concealed permit applications are approved in Denver, with about 46 applications rejected annually, based on DPD's data from 2018 to 2024.
Last year, 2,768 applications were approved and 51 were rejected, per DPD data.
Between the lines: State law effectively says most people are entitled to a permit if they seek one, Dulacki tells us.
Rejected applicants are often people with protective orders, past felony convictions or frequent police contact, Dulacki adds.
Meanwhile, people getting these licenses run the gamut.
Zoom out: Permits can be revoked, but that's rare, with only about 14 licenses pulled every year on average since 2018.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Dallas police shock park-goers with early shutdown of park, walking areas near Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge
Dallas Police Officers told people coming to the park on Tuesday evening that it was closed early. The shutdown comes after officers had a showdown with a protest against ICE and immigration tactics. Before parkgoers could take an evening stroll near the Margaret Hunt Hill Bridge, Dallas Police Officers turned them away. An officer who did not allow CBS News Texas to identify himself first stated that the department's command staff was shutting down the park at 7 pm. The officer did not say how long the curfew would be in effect. "The park is closed. The park is closed," could be heard blaring repeatedly from another officer's vehicle. The effort comes after a night of conflict on the same grounds. DPD clashed with protesters during a mostly peaceful protest. Gerardo Velasquez faces charges of assaulting a police officer and attempting to take a weapon from an officer. Before the showdown with the officers, protesters chanted and gave speeches. Then, some took off into the street before 9 pm. Afterward, the chants turned to chaos; police said Velasquez was hitting a marked DPD vehicle. Lost in the showdown with the police, the messages of the protest, like Sara Martinez. "I'm the daughter of immigrants, so this issue is very important to me," Sara Martinez said. "People come here seeking a better life, and immigrants have contributed so much to this country, and for them to be vilified as people that just take from the country is unfair." Marissa Lopez's words were not either. She has a personal stake in the solidarity with Los Angeles. "So seeing that I'm from L.A., and although these raids have been happening before this, it's personal, it's home," Lopez said. "And seeing ICE there in my hometown brought me out here. But not only that, but just to help support those who don't have a voice and are going through this horrific time."
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Denver settles civil rights lawsuits for $150K with journalist at George Floyd protests
DENVER (KDVR) — Denver City Council approved two settlements to the same man on Monday, related to his coverage of the George Floyd protests in the downtown area and of a homeless encampment sweep. Brian Loma, a journalist, claimed in his federal civil rights lawsuit that Denver Police Department officers 'retaliated' against him for covering what his attorneys called 'rampant police brutality' that occurred during the protests. Loma said he suffered pepper balls, flash-bang grenades and tear gas during the protests as he exercised his First Amendment rights of free speech. 2020 coverage: Police chiefs: Denver saw more protest violence than any major US or Canadian city 'After being shot and tear gassed during the first day of the protests, I showed up in a helmet that had 'PRESS' all over it,' said Brian Loma in a press release from his attorneys. 'And on the second day while wearing it, having shown up at the Capitol I was burning sage and praying in the Capitol lawn when I was directly shot and targeted with tear gas. I was a peaceful protester in meditation when Denver police targeted me and violated my rights.' Denver paid $135,000 to settle Loma's claims. 'The payment to Brian Loma for the brutality he endured during the George Floyd protests is just the latest in a long line of payments by Denver for police misconduct during the protests,' said Andy McNulty, Loma's attorney. 'Unfortunately, the taxpayers of Denver are forced to compensate victims for the harms they suffered at the hands of Denver Police Department officers while officers have suffered no consequences for their actions.' The second case involved Loma filming officers conducting a homeless sweep of an encampment allegedly primarily occupied by LGBTQ+ individuals. 'The reality of the sweeps was that they inflicted immense trauma on houseless residents of Denver and looked ugly on film for the city,' Loma's attorneys wrote in a press release. Loma argued in his lawsuit that he was filming the installation of a border fence around the encampment that allegedly was constructed to limit access of mutual aid providers and supporters assisting the homeless community. While doing so, he demanded the officers identify themselves, as is the Denver Police Department's policy. 'DPD Officer Berger refused to identify himself and, when Mr. Loma moved his camera to capture the name badge on his uniform, Officer Berger slapped Mr. Loma's camera out of his hand, smashing it on the ground and breaking it,' Loma's attorneys stated. Denver sees historic drop in street homelessness: Mayor Johnston For this case, Denver paid Loma $15,000 to settle his claims. 'This is not the first time that Denver Police Department officers have retaliated against individuals for filming and criticizing the police,' said McNulty in the press release. 'The Denver Police Department's persistent violation of the First Amendment should come as no surprise given Denver's consistent failure to discipline or fire officers who violate civilians' constitutional rights. We are gratified that these settlements impose some semblance of accountability on a police department run amok.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Court sides with Denver over Trump administration's threats to withhold grant funding
DENVER (KDVR) — A Washington federal court granted Denver and other plaintiffs a preliminary injunction on Tuesday in their lawsuit against the Trump administration over threats to withhold grant funding for transportation programs and priorities. The court ruled the Trump administration is likely acting in violation of the Separation of Powers principle by 'attempting to condition disbursement of funds in part on grounds not authorized by Congress, but rather on Executive Branch policy.' Data: Income levels in Colorado among highest in the US, according to report 'The Court concludes that Plaintiffs are likely to prevail in their claim that in attemptingto impose the new funding conditions on recipients of the (Continuum of Care Program) funds, Defendants have run afoul of the Separation of Powers doctrine, and were acting in excess of statutory authority, and that under the (Administrative Procedure Act), those conditions must be set aside,' the order states. The judge overseeing the complaint also determined that the threat of losing out on funds itself constituted harm, writing, 'It is this looming risk itself that is the injury, and one that Plaintiffs are already suffering.' Denver Mayor Mike Johnston applauded the decision on Wednesday. 'Denver follows all laws — federal, state, and local — and it should not be so much to ask the White House to do the same,' Johnston said in a statement. 'We appreciate the court's swift and precise ruling protecting the federal funding that Denverites deserve,' said Johnston. FOX31 Newsletters: Sign up to get breaking news sent to your inbox U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy issued a memo in April to federal funding recipients, warning they could lose taxpayer dollars if they did not align with the Trump Administration's stance on diversity, equity and inclusion programs. The memo also warned federal funding recipients could be cut off if they did not assist in the enforcement of federal immigration policy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
