Benefits System Reforms Will Lead to Rise in Homelessness, Charities Say
The government's proposed welfare reforms will increase homelessness, push people further away from the labour market, and add extra pressure on already-stretched statutory services, major charities have said.
Homeless charities St. Mungo's and Shelter are among those who have
The charities said in the open letter to the minister published on Friday said that while they support the government's ambition to ensure people on sickness benefits have the opportunity to get back to work, as a sector, they cannot support the measures outlined in the government's 'Pathways to Work' green paper.
They said, 'We can only conclude that the proposed changes will increase the number of people at risk of becoming homeless for the first time, increase the number of people we have helped resolve their homelessness fall back into it and increase the length of time it takes to resolve people's homelessness in the future.'
The signatories said that these increases in homelessness will have a 'catastrophic impact' on mental and physical health, as well as employment and education opportunities.
They added that statutory services for helping the homeless will be put under even greater strain, with a further rise in homelessness having a 'domino effect of imposing a significant financial cost to the state, as it will need to pay for more temporary accommodation and emergency homelessness services.'
Benefits Bill to Hit £70 Billion
The proposals come amid the rising cost of benefits, which is predicted to hit £70 billion a year by the end of this decade.
Related Stories
3/19/2025
2/7/2025
There are around 2.8 million people who are economically inactive owing to long-term sickness. This is one of the highest rates in the G7, with the UK the only major economy whose employment rate has not recovered since the COVID-19 pandemic era.
The PIP figures are also growing, with 3.66 million people entitled to the benefit as of January 2025, up 12 percent on the year before and 71 percent higher than January 2020, before the start of lockdowns.
Kendall
Eligibility for entitlement for PIPs, which is the main disability benefit used to help cover the extra costs of living with a condition or disability, will be tightened so that they will only be targeted to those with higher needs.
The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) will also reintroduce reassessments for those on incapacity benefits, with the exception of those whose conditions mean they will never improve.
Jobseekers will have a 'right to try' guarantee, meaning that someone on the path to returning to work or trying to work will not immediately have their benefits reassessed.
However, the DWP's
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Liz Kendall arrives to attend the weekly Cabinet meeting at Downing Street in London, on Nov. 26, 2024.Vote Next Week
Responding to the charities' report, a government spokesperson said, 'We will never compromise on protecting people who need our support, and our reforms will mean the social security system will always be there for those who will never be able to work.'
The spokesperson also highlighted the government's £1 billion scheme to help the long-term sick or disabled 'out of poverty and into good, secure jobs.'
'We have also raised the national living wage, increased benefits, and given additional help to the poorest households, as part of our Plan for Change,' the spokesperson added.
The government's 'Pathways to Work' green paper will be voted on in parliament next week and though likely to pass, has already seen opposition from within the Labour Party.
This includes from Mother of the House Diane Abbott, who
The Labour government has also faced
PA Media contributed to this report.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Army hits recruiting goal four months ahead of schedule
The Army has hit its annual recruiting goal of 61,000 new active duty soldiers, four months ahead of the end of fiscal 2025 in September, the service announced Tuesday. The Army said the goal – 10 percent higher than the 55,000 recruits it sought last year – 'represents a significant turning point for the Army and indicates a renewed sense of patriotism and purpose among America's youth,' according to a statement. The surge in new potential troops comes as the Army has significantly ramped up its recruiting efforts over the past several years in response to its struggle with number shortfalls over the past decade. That outreach included loosening certain rules and restrictions to target young Americans who historically have been unqualified to serve due to tattoos, prior medical conditions or drug use. In 2023, the Army fell about 11,000 people short of its 65,000-person goal but rebounded in 2024 to meet its goal of 55,000, though just barely. The U.S. military as a whole struggled to entice young people to serve in the midst of and in the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as during periods of low unemployment across the country and the emergence of more attractive job opportunities within the private sector. It is unclear exactly why the uptick in enlistments occurred after the service struggled to meet its goals across the finish line last year, but the Trump administration has insisted that the recruiting momentum is a sign of renewed excitement to serve following the presidential election. 'I want to thank the commander in chief, President Trump, and Secretary of Defense Hegseth for their decisive leadership and support in equipping, training and supporting these future Soldiers as they face a world of global uncertainty and complex threats,' Army Secretary Dan Driscoll said in the statement. 'Putting Soldiers first is having a tangible impact and shows that young people across our country want to be part of the most lethal land fighting force the world has ever seen.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cash-strapped consumers push at-home cooking to highest level since 2020: Campbell's
This story was originally published on Food Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Food Dive newsletter. The Campbell's Company said consumers are preparing meals at home at the highest level since early 2020 when COVID-19 forced many consumers to forgo visiting restaurants and other establishments. The food manufacturer said consumers are favoring ingredients that stretch their tighter food budgets. This is providing a tailwind for Campbell's condensed cooking soups, broths and Italian sauces. While its meals and beverages operations remain strong, Campbell's continues to face pressure in snacks, most notably chips and crackers. The same inflationary pressures that have pushed consumers to cook more have also led to a decline in snacking, according to the Goldfish maker.. As consumers look to save a few bucks amid inflation and uncertainty over the broader economy, foods that can be prepared at home have proven to be a major beneficiary. Sales in Campbell's meals and beverages segment surged 15% to $1.5 billion during the third quarter, benefitting from the acquisition of Rao's owner Sovos Brands in 2024. Campbell's soup businesses 'continued its strong performance' during the quarter, with its wet offerings benefitting from younger individuals who are increasingly cooking at home, Campbell's CEO Mick Beekhuizen, said in prepared remarks. The company estimated six of its eight top meals and beverages brands, including Pace, Pacific and Swanson, grew or held share in the third quarter, with consumption increasing by 2%. 'We are seeing improved consumption across all consumer income groups' for meals and beverages, Beekhuizen said in a statement. Consumers are 'turning to our brands for value, quality, and convenience.' As inflationary pressures have led to a renaissance in home cooking, it's become a dual-edged sword for food companies that also are seeing a decline in snacking consumption. Beekhuizen said the snack space remains soft as consumers become more selective and the category continues to be 'increasingly competitive.' Campbell's said snack sales slipped 8% to $1 billion in the third quarter. The company singled out its Goldfish cracker brand, noting 'we have more work to do to reinvigorate this brand and get it back on its historical growth trajectory.' 'While we are not satisfied with the results of our Snacks division, we remain confident in the strength of our Snacks portfolio and continue to take steps to regain our momentum,' Campbell's CFO Carrie Anderson said in prepared remarks. Campbell's also said it is closely watching to see how tariffs will impact its business. The company, which imports tinplate steel for cans and canola oil for chips, noted trade headwinds could cut into its fiscal-year earnings by 3 cents to 5 cents a share. Beekhuizen said the company is 'actively work[ing] to mitigate as much of the potential direct impact of tariffs as possible.' Anderson added that these steps include inventory management, pursuing alternative sourcing and 'where absolutely necessary, consideration of surgical pricing actions.' Recommended Reading Snacking takes a hit as consumer spending shifts to food staples Sign in to access your portfolio
Epoch Times
39 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Woman Cleared in Abortion Trial as MPs Push for Law Reform
The recent acquittal of Nicola Packer, a 45-year-old woman prosecuted for inducing an abortion beyond the legal limit, comes as MPs push to reform UK abortion laws. Packer, who took abortion pills during the COVID-19 lockdown believing she was within the permitted gestational period, was found not guilty by a jury at Isleworth Crown Court on May 8. The legal limit for taking medication at home to terminate a pregnancy is 10 weeks, while the outer limit for abortions in England, Scotland, and Wales is 24 weeks, apart from in certain circumstances. Packer maintained she was unaware of her true gestation, which was approximately 26 weeks. The trial heard she took prescribed abortion medicine at home in November 2020 and later brought the foetus to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital in a backpack. The telemedicine abortion, also known as the It allows women in the first 10 weeks of pregnancy to receive abortion medication at home after a remote consultation. Related Stories 9/18/2024 11/27/2023 Supporters Critics, including the Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (SPUC), The pro-life organisation has argued the policy enables abusers to coerce women into abortions and allows women to misrepresent their gestation timelines over the phone. Proposed Changes Abortion complications become more likely as pregnancy progresses, no matter the method used. A Right to Life UK campaigners have warned that changes to the abortion law could put more women at risk. Commenting on the The amendment seeks to remove women from criminal law related to abortion. It means that women acting in relation to their own pregnancies would no longer face arrest, prosecution, or imprisonment, regardless of gestation. 'The proposed change to the law would also lead to an increased number of viable babies' lives being ended well beyond the 24-week abortion time limit and beyond the point at which they would be able to survive outside the womb,' said Right to Life UK. It noted that the amendment does not outline circumstances in which it would continue to be an offence for a woman to perform her own abortion, highlighting the case of In 2020, Foster aborted her child at 34 weeks with illegally-obtained abortion pills. She was jailed in 2023 after the court found she lied to the British Pregnancy Advisory Service—a leading abortion provider—about how far along in her pregnancy she was. Foster was sentenced to jail, though she was later suspended on appeal. Despite the criticism, Antoniazzi Representatives from the whole pro-life movement and their supporters gather to demonstrate in Parliament Square in London on May 15, 2024.'Full Decriminalisation' A separate It would extend legal safeguards to medical professionals who assist women with consent, provided the pregnancy is under 24 weeks. It also introduces an additional layer of protection by requiring that any prosecution—whether of a woman or a doctor—must first be personally approved by the Director of Public Prosecutions. Criticising the proposals, SPUC 'This would in effect mean full decriminalisation of abortion, up to birth, for any reason … including the sex of the baby,' it said. The government has said any changes to abortion laws are 'a matter of conscience for parliamentarians.' 'All women have access to safe and legal abortions on the NHS,' a government spokesperson said, adding that decisions to prosecute are for the Crown Prosecution Service and are 'incredibly rare.' Abortion Law Abortion is still technically a criminal offence under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 and the Infant Life (Preservation) Act 1929. But under the Abortion Act 1967, there are exceptions that legalise it under specific circumstances, including sign-off by two doctors. This framework applies in England, Scotland, and Wales, but not in Northern Ireland, where abortion is legal in the early stages of pregnancy (up to 12 weeks) without needing to give a reason. A change to the law is being supported by professional bodies including the British Medical Association, the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG), the Royal College of Midwives, the Royal College of Nursing, and the Royal College of General Practitioners. In a The groups called for women to no longer be prosecuted under the 1861 and 1929 acts for ending their own pregnancies, bringing the law in England and Wales in line with Northern Ireland. Public Opinion Public opinion polling by Overall, 74 percent support enshrining abortion rights in law, though opinion is evenly split on keeping the pills-by-post policy. Support is much lower for further loosening abortion rules, such as allowing abortion pills to be sold over the counter without a prescription. Just 33 percent of people back the idea, while 53 percent are opposed. Opposition is consistent among both men and women across all age groups. PA Media contributed to this report.
