Lawsuit alleges anti-Israel group leaders are 'Hamas' foot soldiers in New York City'
A lawsuit filed in the Southern District of New York last month claims the leaders of several radical anti-Israel groups involved in 18 months of disruptive, violent and antisemitic protests on campuses and in the streets of New York City are "accountable for aiding and abetting Hamas' continuing acts of international terrorism."
In purported violation of the Antiterrorism Act and the Alien Tort Statue, the defendants are said to have "acted as Hamas' foot soldiers in New York City," and may have had foreknowledge of the designated foreign terror organization's devastating Oct. 7 attacks.
Defendants in the case are Within Our Lifetime and its founder Nerdeen Kiswani, Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and its representative Maryam Alwan, Columbia-Barnard Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and its representative Cameron Jones, and Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD) and its representative Mahmoud Khalil, who is currently in custody of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).
The lawsuit asserts that the associational defendants have "distribute[d] Hamas-created and affiliated propaganda, incite[d] fear and violence, and attack[ed] critical academic, economic, and infrastructure centers in New York City," as well as having "repeatedly terrorized and assaulted Jews across New York City and on Columbia University's campus, physically assaulted Columbia University employees, and illegally seized and damaged public and private property."
Duffy Slams Mta Over 'Fact Check' On Anti-israel Mob's Grand Central Takeover
The details of the allegations are thorough. To demonstrate how the defendants "resoundingly and knowingly answered Hamas' call to action" on and after Oct. 7, the lawsuit cites how the defendants knowingly "obtain[ed] and disseminat[ed]" a Hamas propaganda document, which contained directions created by the Hamas Media Office for spinning the narrative of their deadly attacks. By "painstakingly follow[ing]" the document, the lawsuit alleges defendants "directly responded to, and followed orders from, Hamas."
Read On The Fox News App
The lawsuit also supplies several indicators that defendants may have had foreknowledge of the heinous Oct. 7 attack, to include "a highly suggestive social media post published moments before the October 7 attack began" in which Columbia SJP posted on Instagram "We are back!!" after a months-long hiatus.
On Oct. 7, Kiswani utilized marketing materials that "would not be released until the next day" in a National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) "Toolkit" demonstrating how SJP organizations across the country could support the Gazan "resistance."
Following Oct. 7, Within Our Lifetime promoted a "Day of Rage" in New York City while Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP promoted their own "Day of Resistance." The mere announcements of these events forced closures of Jewish schools and institutions, and "even forced Columbia University – a non-Jewish institution – to close its campus as a safety precaution," while Jewish students "were advised to lock their doors and remain inside for their own safety," according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit names Khalil as the purported leader of Columbia SJP's Day of Resistance.
Columbia's Anti-israel Protesters Say Trump Pulling $400 Million In Grants From University Is A 'Scare Tactic'
In November 2023, the suit describes how a "'Shut it Down for Palestine' event descended into – as planned – anti-Jewish and vitriolic hatred and threats," with speakers shouting "Death to Jews!" and "encourage[ing] Hamas and… comrades across Columbia's campus to hunt down and assault pro-Israel students."
The next day, Columbia University suspended Columbia SJP and Columbia JVP, at which time "Khalil and former members and/or organizers of Columbia SJP became leaders of CUAD." As a result, CUAD "became the primary organizer of the violent and antisemitic protests that would foment terror, sow discord, and disrupt campus life at Columbia for over a year."
Khalil would later become the lead negotiator of the Columbia encampment, which the lawsuit notes was "well-supplied with identical tents, toiletries, food, and professional signage." Based on a statement from Shlomi Ziv, a plaintiff in the lawsuit who was held captive by Hamas for 246 days following his kidnapping at the Nova Music Festival, "Hamas and [American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)]/NSJP provided financial, organizational, and other support… for the Encampment."
Ziv alleges that his "Hamas captors bragged about having Hamas operatives on American university campuses," and even "showed him Al-Jazeera stories and photographs of protests at Columbia University that were organized by Associational Defendants."
Apparent Anti-israel Activists Splash Red Paint On Homes Of Jewish Officials At Brooklyn Museum
Given the "legal chasm between independent political advocacy and coordinating with a foreign terrorist organization to seed pro-terror propaganda throughout America's largest city," the lawsuit alleges the defendants' "actions violate the Antiterrorism Act and the law of nations."
According to the Jerusalem Post, the National Jewish Advocacy Center, Greenberg Traurig LLP, the Schoen Law Firm, and the Holtzman Vogel Law Firm filed the suit on behalf of plaintiffs who include Ziv, several Columbia University students who have served with the Israel Defense Forces, and a number of American and Israeli citizens whose family members, most of whom are believed dead, remain in Hamas captivity.
The lawsuit especially states that Khalil, "on information and belief, directly coordinates with Hamas, AMP/NSJP and/or other agents and affiliates of Hamas and related terrorist organizations." The filers state that his detention by ICE in March may have been "based on many of his actions described in this Complaint."
Khalil's involvement in the Columbia protests was cited as a rationale for his removal during his April 11 hearing, when Judge Jamee Comans ruled that Khalil may be deported. Khalil also withheld past employment with the Syrian office in the Beirut British Embassy and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) as well as his membership in the CUAD when applying for a green card.
This withholding of information, according to federal officials, made Khalil "inadmissible at the time of his adjustment."
Disruptive events in New York City show no signs of abating. In March, students stormed a classroom at Columbia University and took over a building in affiliated Barnard College, where they assaulted an employee. A Within Our Lifetime protest on April 7 "took over" the main concourse of Grand Central Station.
Fox News Digital reached out to CUAD, Columbia SJP, Within Our Lifetime, and Columbia-Barnard JVP for comment about the allegations contained within the lawsuit, but received no response.Original article source: Lawsuit alleges anti-Israel group leaders are 'Hamas' foot soldiers in New York City'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dawn, there is nothing funny about October 7
Dawn French has become the latest 'national treasure' to betray a complete lack of understanding of the conflict in the Middle East. Following hot off the heels of that other self-styled Professor of Palestine, Gary Lineker, the comedian insisted there was nothing 'complicated' or 'nuanced' about the ongoing war in Gaza. In a video posted on X, she put on a whiny childish voice to mock Israelis over invoking the October 7 attacks, in which 1,195 people were murdered. Credit: X/@Dawn_French 'Bottom line is no,' she insisted. Then, in a childish voice: 'Yeah but you know they did a bad thing to us. [Serious voice] Yeah but no. [Childish voice] But we want that land and there's a lot of history and urgh… [Serious voice] No. [Childish voice] Those people are not even people are they really? [Serious voice] No.' Like so much of French's output, she appeared under the illusion that she was being funny. In fact, it amounted to an obnoxious and offensive piece of useful idiocy, dressed up as performance art. Imagine being so warped that you would dismiss the rape and murder of Israeli women – the slaying of children and babies – as 'a bad thing'. The implication is that Israel does not have a right to defend itself. That it has acted disproportionately. But there is nothing remotely proportionate about recording a video about Gaza without even mentioning Hamas. Almost everyone and everything you can think of is funnier than Dawn French. What's truly hilarious is that these luvvies think they have enough expertise to emote on such issues. Like your average 'Free Palestine' ranting student marcher, her infantile outburst appeared to have largely been informed by things she's seen on social media. Anyone with any actual knowledge of the region understands that it is, in fact, an extremely complex issue with a very chequered history. Oh, and that it involves terrorists. Stunts like this do nothing to advance the debate. They simply debase it with ignorance and intolerance. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Trump's threat to pull Columbia's accreditation is so ominous
I suspect that even casual followers of the news have heard about the ongoing battles between the government and higher education. First there's House Republicans' plan to increase taxes on university endowments, and now President Donald Trump's administration is threatening Columbia University's accreditation. As a college president, I know what these threats mean, but I've found myself having to explain them to folks who aren't higher ed nerds like me. Accreditation, I tell them, is what people Gen X or older might think of like a Good Housekeeping Seal of Approval, but for colleges and universities, accreditation is not just something that's nice for a university to have; it's something a university needs to have if it expects to offer any kind of financial aid to its students. The vast majority of college students receive some form of financial aid, so even the wealthiest of institutions understand that accreditation is important. That's why it's so ominous that the Trump administration, which claims that Columbia insufficiently handled expressions of antisemitism on its campus, contacted the university's accreditor alleging that the university is no longer eligible to be accredited. According to a statement from the Department of Education, Columbia 'failed to meaningfully protect Jewish students against severe and pervasive harassment on Columbia's campus and consequently denied these students' equal access to educational opportunities to which they are entitled under the law.' Columbia issued a statement that said it is 'deeply committed to combating antisemitism on our campus,' that it's 'aware of the concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights today,' and that it has 'addressed those concerns directly' with its accreditor. Prior to the first Trump administration, there were seven regional accreditors that were responsible for assuring that most colleges and universities operate at standards that signify what they do is done well and in order. Each accrediting agency developed a set of standards requiring that an institution, generally in five- to 10-year intervals, conduct a self-study to ensure that it continues to meet them. The institution must then submit a report to its accrediting agency. Then, a team of colleagues reviews the materials, and depending on the agency and its timelines, that team or another visits the campus to certify that what was submitted is accurate and that the institution is in good standing and keeps its 'seal of approval.' During the first Trump administration, the practice of regional accreditors as the primary determinants of accreditation was changed. All accreditors are viewed as national accreditors, including some with more of a niche focus like Christian colleges, that have the same power to certify that an institution is eligible for federal financial aid. This provides several options now for schools to be accredited, and more than 30 accreditors exist today. Accreditation is essentially about continuous improvement through constant assessment. Even the peer review process is designed not to simply determine if the standards are met, but if they are not, to identify weaknesses and provide feedback for improvement to meet those standards. While not meant to be a punitive process, the various agencies do have a series of steps in place to heighten an institution's urgency to address any deficiencies. There are generally levels of sanctions that an institution might receive, from a monitoring report to show progress made on deficiencies, to a public warning, which allows anyone to know what the institution must do to improve, and finally some kind of probationary period in which significant deficiencies must be corrected. While rare, accrediting agencies can cease to recognize an institution for failure to meet the standards set. It would take several years, though, for a school to get to the place where it loses accreditation — and even if accreditation is lost, most agencies have processes in place that allow schools to appeal that decision. There are multiple examples of schools successfully appealing a loss of accreditation and working their way back into good standing. When the Trump administration contacted the Middle States Commission on Higher Education, which accredits Columbia, it simply began a process to review the charges. Different commissions might handle these notices in different ways. Under the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Commission on Colleges, the accrediting agency I'm most familiar with, 'unsolicited information,' such as a letter from the federal government or a local news article covering a negative event, could begin such a review. But accreditation is a process, so even a letter from the administration would not create an immediate negative action as accreditors engage in a thoughtful and deliberate process to verify compliance with the standards. Again, the goal is continuous improvement, not punishment. If a school is out of compliance, the accreditor will take action. But this would occur only after working closely with the institution, giving it a chance to correct course on its own. Columbia, in the short term at least, doesn't appear to be at any risk of not being able to provide its students financial aid. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘We are not just fighting for Harvard': For alums, this year feels different
In the 45 years since graduating from Harvard University, Laura Hastings has never been to a reunion. 'I've always felt that Harvard didn't need me,' Hastings said. However, like many of her classmates, when she saw the escalating battle between her alma mater and the Trump administration, she realized this year was the moment for her to 'show up.' The alumni day had a record of 9,000 attendees this year, a speaker said. A sea of maroon Harvard regalia coated the Cambridge streets as some men walked around with tophats and suits, and others waved reunion flags. Shrieks bounced off the brick buildings as classmates saw each other and young children in oversized Harvard merch clung to their parents. Read more: Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University The event comes only a few hours after the institution amended one of its lawsuits against the federal government on Thursday evening and asked for a temporary restraining order. Those actions were in response to President Donald Trump's issuance of a proclamation this week declaring that the school's foreign students would not be allowed into the country. Harvard has been a leader in resisting — through multiple lawsuits — the Trump administration as it attempts to cut billions of dollars from the university in addition to research funding. In one of the cuts, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services said it was due to 'continued failure to address anti-Semitic harassment and race discrimination.' 'In the Trump Administration, discrimination will not be tolerated on campus. Federal funds must support institutions that protect all students,' the department said. Hastings said she has had some embarrassment about going to Harvard as an elite institution. 'Elite universities, by their very definition, suggest exclusion,' she said, adding that she had a privileged upbringing. While higher education can be the thing that can help people advance to higher-paying and more prestigious careers, the federal government has tapped into a segment of the population who feels excluded by higher education, said Hastings, who is a professor at Georgia State University. One Harvard alum who spoke with MassLive on Friday traveled across the United States border to come to the reunion, despite his fears of being let in — or out — of the country. MassLive isn't using his name because he isn't a citizen of the United States and fears retaliation from the federal government. 'As a non-citizen and non-[permanent resident] you have no procedural rights at the border, meaning that they could ask to see my phone, my messages, my WhatsApp history, anything that they would take that is politically not congruent with what they want they could use that as a basis to deny me entry,' he said. 'I was worried that that would happen. So I scraped my phone of messages that would indicate a political leaning that was contrary to what the administration would be putting out there,' he said. As Harvard fights against the federal government, alumni are doing the same. Members of Crimson Courage, a community of Harvard alumni whose mission is to stand up for academic freedom, urged alumni to wear stickers of support and sign on to a legal document, also known as an amicus brief, in support of Harvard's second lawsuit against the Trump administration focused on international students. 'It's just absolutely incredible. I've never seen this type of mobilization,' said Evelyn Kim, a Harvard alum and Crimson Courage organizer. Kim said the backing of Crimson Courage is helpful for Harvard to know that their community supports them. 'We are not just fighting for Harvard,' Kim said. 'We are fighting for every higher education institution's right to be able to pursue the research they want to do, teach what they want to teach, admit the students that they want to admit. This isn't just about Harvard, it's about all higher education,' she said. Crimson Courage is aiming to have other campuses create their own chapters to back their institutions in the face of cuts or other actions from the federal government. Lisa Paige, an alum and organizer with Crimson Courage, said the organization has around 300 volunteers and has continued to grow. Hastings, who handed out Crimson Courage stickers on Friday to alums, said that while there is overwhelming support, resistance from alums is also apparent. She said many people said they didn't want to talk about the Trump administration's actions against Harvard — instead wanting to enjoy their reunion. One alum who told her he stopped giving money to Harvard because it has become 'too liberal.' Much of what the Trump administration has critiqued about Harvard has focused on campus antisemitism, race discrimination and a lack of political diversity. All of the alums MassLive spoke with on Friday said they don't believe these explanations are why the federal government is going after Harvard. Hastings, for instance, said she thought Harvard leaned too conservative in its beliefs when she was a student on campus. And, as a Jew, she thinks the claim of antisemitism is ultimately being used as a 'scapegoat' for the administration to go after Harvard. The government going after universities is a 'red flag for a democracy' which could harm freedom of thought and speech, according to Olumide Adebo, a Harvard graduate school alum. At the same time, Adebo, along with many other alumni, has criticisms of how Harvard has reacted since the Trump administration shined a light on Harvard. One is the cancellation of affinity graduations — which was something he enjoyed when he graduated from Harvard. 'Whatever criticisms I can offer to Harvard are fairly similar to what I offer to our society in terms of how we embrace diversity and equity in general,' he said. Adebo pointed to the university not backing former president Claudine Gay, who stepped down in early 2024 after about six months on the job, and defending her against the attacks claiming that she had plagiarized scholarly work. 'That seems to me to be a very short leash for anybody in leadership. Frankly, regardless of the missteps. Especially since she was fully vetted before being hired for the role,' he said. Read more: What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump To the alum who is not a U.S. citizen, the debate about the future of higher education, funding between public and private higher education and research funding are all 'welcomed.' There are valid critiques about the 'historical injustices' of who is allowed into an institution like Harvard and who isn't — even if the university has been working to address those issues, the alum said. However, the efforts to dismantle Harvard and higher education by the federal government go beyond what is necessary into something that is dangerous, the alum said. As the senior grant manager at Mass General Brigham, a Harvard affiliate, Mary Anne Fox, said she has seen firsthand the attempts at dismantling her alma mater — and the consequences of that. It has been a 'shock' as the attacks against Harvard have emanated into research which won't just hurt the institution but the international research infrastructure, she said. She said she came today to show her support for the institution. 'Now I'm really proud to be from Harvard,' she said. 'I didn't know people hated Harvard so much in the country,' she said. Fox prominently wore a keffiyeh, a traditional headdress worn by people in the Middle East that has taken on a greater symbol of resistance in the United States in support of Palestinians. She said she wore it on that day because many students at Harvard can't — and there is little the university can do against her in response. 'What are they going to do? Suck the degree back out of my head?' she said. Peter Coccoluto, joined by his wife, said he came on Friday to Harvard for his 70th reunion in part due to the actions taken toward the university. 'I feel we are being besieged by an ignorant man who also has the bad quality of seeking revenge on anyone who crosses his path,' Coccoluto said. 'I am here to support Harvard and to urge them to fight, fight, fight, because we fight not only for Harvard, but for all of the other free institutions of learning, higher learning,' he said. Casey Wenz stood outside the Harvard Yard on Friday morning with a finger brace holding up a wooden sign that read 'Harvard Thank You For Your Courage.' While she doesn't have an affiliation with the university, as a Cambridge resident, she said she wanted to show her gratitude to the university for 'standing up for themselves' and ultimately 'standing up for all of us.' She said she has friends who are international students and work at Harvard and that the federal government's actions against Harvard are hurting the country's economy. 'He's knee-capping innovation. And I think undoing that will take years — possibly decades,' she said. 'We might be losing a week or a month for every day that we lose in the research lab,' she said. What a monk, a librarian and a dentist have to do with Harvard's fight with Trump Judge blocks Trump admin from banning Harvard international students from entering US 'Singling out': Harvard president says Trump admin is retaliating against institution 'Government vendetta': Harvard fights back after Trump blocks its foreign students from US Funding cuts, lawsuits, foreign students: The latest on Trump's war with Harvard University Read the original article on MassLive.
