Three Israeli soldiers killed in northern Gaza in army's biggest loss of life since ceasefire collapse
Three Israeli soldiers have been killed in northern Gaza, the military said on Tuesday, in the army's biggest loss of life since Israel collapsed a ceasefire deal with Hamas in March.
Another two soldiers were injured when the group's vehicle hit a roadside explosive device in the Jabalia area on Monday, according to an initial probe. The military found around 20 similar devices along the route, Israeli media reported.
The dead were named as Lior Steinberg, 20, Ofek Barhana, 20, and Omer Van Gelder, 22. The death toll of Israeli personnel in the Gaza war now stands at 423. At least 54,249 Palestinians have been killed and 123,492 wounded since the war began in October 2023.
The deaths of the soldiers highlight challenges the Israeli army faces in its campaign in the strip. Despite significantly weakening Hamas and other armed Palestinian factions in Gaza, Israeli troops continue to encounter deadly resistance.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a statement, sending 'condolences from the depths of our hearts to the families of our fighters'.
There were widespread reports in Hebrew media in May that the Israeli army estimated Hamas to have around 40,000 fighters, roughly the same number as before the war broke out.
Israeli outlet Haaretz reported that the group still possesses thousands of short-range rockets, which continuously rained down on southern Israeli communities for months at the beginning of the war.
Haaretz also said a significant tunnel network remained in Gaza, which has been used to great effect by militants to hide hostages and move around the battlefield.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Business
19 minutes ago
- Gulf Business
Dominic Raab: Unlocking the GCC's critical minerals opportunity
Dominic Raab, the former UK Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary. Amidst the slew of deals announced during President Trump's Middle East visit in May, none was more important for US economic policy than the agreement to collaborate with Saudi Arabia on establishing new supply chains for critical minerals. Read more: Critical minerals are the bedrock of the modern global economy. From smartphones in our pockets to electric vehicles on our roads, and the renewable energy systems powering a cleaner future, critical minerals underpin the technologies that will define the 21st century. As the world accelerates its shift toward digital innovation and green energy, securing reliable, long-term access to these essential materials becomes a strategic priority. But there is an urgent need for more markets to participate in this sector, in order to expand and diversify global supply. For instance, China currently accounts for more than 90 per cent of rare earth refining, 77 per cent of cobalt processing and more than 60 per cent of battery-grade global lithium refining. Importance of boosting critical mineral supply chains For the Gulf itself, it is important that it boosts its critical mineral supply chains. In renewable energy, copper, lithium, manganese and nickel are fundamental to solar panel technology. In AI, copper, cobalt, aluminium, lithium and nickel are needed for wiring, data centres and energy storage infrastructure. Conversely, this also represents an opportunity. The Gulf is uniquely positioned not merely as a global trading hub, but as a potential nexus connecting mining projects and their wider supply chains, from Africa to Asia and South America. This geographical advantage, combined with the Gulf's diplomatic agility, positions it as an invaluable partner in an increasingly protectionist global economy. Add to this the Gulf's strategic investments in mining projects across Africa, alongside the recent partnerships signed by the UK and US with Saudi Arabia, and the region's influence is set to expand. Crucially, the Gulf's access to pools of long-term capital, including the GCC's Sovereign Wealth Funds valued at over $3tn, alongside family offices with over $100bn in assets, can help close the funding gap in mining — a notoriously capital-intensive industry where projects can take over 15 years from exploration to production. The mining sector requires a staggering $2.1tn in new supply investments by 2050 to meet global net-zero ambitions. In return, metals and mining offer investors healthy returns coupled with positive exposure to key thematic trends, including the energy transition, geopolitics and inflation protection. In practice, the pressures on publicly listed mining companies to deliver short-term returns for certain investors have shifted their focus towards consolidation rather than the creation of new supply. In contrast, private and sovereign capital can bring a longer-term perspective. That is ideally suited for the mining industry's realities, which need investment across development life cycles and through commodity pricing volatility. The success of private capital-backed firms in bringing new projects into production — outpacing larger industry players — illustrates this comparative advantage. The metals and mining sector is key to enabling next-generation technologies, writes Raab. (Image credit: Getty Images) So, how can the Gulf seize the moment? Firstly, it must invest decisively in its own processing and refining capabilities to develop end-to-end secure supply chains. The $1.36bn lithium processing plant in Abu Dhabi, a collaboration between EZAD Group and Titan Lithium, sourcing raw materials from Zimbabwe, offers a template for success. The region's high-tech ecosystem and culture of innovation will reinforce its capacity to build up the necessary infrastructure. Read more: Secondly, the Gulf must foster genuine Public-Private Partnerships to identify and deliver viable projects. This involves creating a collaborative framework that helps to reduce the financial, technical and operational risks. That is the most effective way to incentivise those best-in-class mining operators capable of unlocking both local and international mineral resources, in a responsible and sustainable way. The Gulf stands at a crossroads. With the right vision and strategic partnerships, it can transition from a transit hub into a global powerhouse in critical minerals supply chains. The region can help diversify existing supply routes and build resilient, secure and sustainable chains to underpin global clean energy and advanced technologies ambitions. Dominic Raab is Head of Global Affairs at Appian Capital, and former UK Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary.
Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
US vetoes Gaza ceasefire resolution at UN Security Council
The United States vetoed on Wednesday a UN Security Council resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza, which Washington claimed undermined ongoing diplomacy to resolve the conflict. It was the 15-member body's first vote on the situation since November, when the United States -- a key Israeli ally -- also blocked a text calling for an end to fighting. "This resolution would undermine diplomatic efforts to reach a ceasefire that reflects the realities on the ground and emboldens Hamas," Washington's United Nations envoy Dorothy Shea said ahead of the vote. "This resolution also draws false equivalence between Israel and Hamas," she said. The draft resolution had demanded "an immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire in Gaza respected by all parties." It also called for the "immediate, dignified and unconditional release of all hostages held by Hamas and other groups." Underlining a "catastrophic humanitarian situation" in the Palestinian territory, the resolution, had it passed, would have demanded the lifting of all restrictions on the entry of humanitarian aid into Gaza. The veto was the first wielded by Washington since US President Donald Trump took office in January. Israel has faced growing international pressure to end its war in Gaza, which was triggered by the unprecedented October 7, 2023 attack by Hamas on Israeli soil. That scrutiny has increased over flailing aid distribution in Gaza, which Israel blocked for more than two months before allowing a small number of UN vehicles to enter in mid-May. The United Nations said that was not enough to meet the humanitarian needs. A US-backed relief effort called the Gaza Humanitarian Fund (GHF) has also faced criticism for going against long-standing humanitarian principles by coordinating relief efforts with a military belligerent. Israeli bombardment on Wednesday killed at least 16 people in the Gaza Strip, including 12 in a single strike on a tent housing displaced people, the Palestinian territory's civil defense agency told AFP. On Tuesday, 27 people were killed in southern Gaza when Israeli troops opened fire near a GHF aid site, with the military saying the incident was under investigation. Riyad Mansour, the Palestinian ambassador to the UN, on Tuesday urged the Council to act. "All of us will be judged by history as to how much have we done in order to stop this crime against the Palestinian people," he said. Israel's ambassador to the UN Danny Danon attacked the text ahead of the vote. "This resolution doesn't advance humanitarian relief. It undermines it. It ignores a working system in favor of political agendas," he was to tell the council, according to remarks released by his office. "It ignores the one party still endangering civilians in Gaza: Hamas." Agence France-Presse
The National
an hour ago
- The National
US and Israel-backed group extends closure of Gaza aid sites
The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) pushed back the reopening of its aid sites set for Thursday, without clarifying when they would resume service, as starvation looms in the war-ravaged enclave. The GHF closed its distribution centres on Wednesday after a string of deadly shooting incidents near its sites killed scores of Palestinians and drew sharp United Nations condemnation. The US and Israeli-backed aid group originally said it was closing aid distribution sites in Gaza on Wednesday for "renovation" and that they would reopen Thursday. But the group said late Wednesday that its facilities would not open at the regular time. "Our distribution sites will not open early tomorrow morning as in previous days due to ongoing maintenance and repair work," it wrote on social media. "We will share information about opening times as soon as work is complete." The Israeli army warned against travelling "on roads leading to the distribution centres, which are considered combat zones". The GHF said it was working to made aid distribution "as safe as possible" and urged those travelling to its sites to "follow the routes designated" by the Israeli army. The foundation began its operations last week after Israel eased a blockade on Gaza that had prevented aid from entering for more than two months, sparking warnings of mass famine. But the group's first week of work has been marred by violence and criticism. At least 27 Palestinians were killed waiting for aid at a distribution centre in the southern city of Rafah on Tuesday, according to Gaza authorities. On Sunday, 31 people were killed in a similar incident near a site run by the foundation. Three were killed on Monday. The GHF is a private group but is backed by the US and Israel. Its aid operations, which bypass traditional humanitarian groups, have been condemned by the UN and established charities, who say they place civilians at risk by forcing them to navigate militarised areas to reach the aid sites. The organisation has said it distributed more than seven million meals in its first week. Gazans are desperate for food after an 11-week Israeli aid blockade and are sleeping near aid collection points despite fears of deadly violence, The National has been told. Food shortages and ongoing violence have propelled fresh international calls for an end to the war but a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas remains elusive. The US, Israel's main ally, used its veto power at the UN Security Council on Wednesday to block a resolution calling for a ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access in Gaza. Hamas condemned the veto as "disgraceful" and accused Washington of "legitimising genocide" in Gaza.
