logo
Birthing centers bill clears first legislative hurdle in 2025 session

Birthing centers bill clears first legislative hurdle in 2025 session

Yahoo05-02-2025

Sen. Shelley Funke Frommeyer, R-Alexandria, far right, and Rep. Jason Nemes, far left, discussed freestanding birth centers. Their guests, center, did not present. (Kentucky Lantern photo by Sarah Ladd)
FRANKFORT — A bill that could pave the way for Kentucky to get freestanding birth centers sailed out of a Senate committee Wednesday.
Senate Bill 17 would, among other things, remove the certificate of need requirement for freestanding birth centers, which advocates have said is the main hurdle blocking them in the state.
Members of the Senate Standing Committee Health Services passed the bill 10-0-1, with the one member who passed being Sen. Donald Douglas, R-Nicholasville, a physician.
For years, advocates — and at least one lawmaker at a time — have pushed the legislature to make it easier to open a freestanding birth center in Kentucky. Advocates have blamed the state's lack of freestanding birth centers on the certificate of need laws, which mandate a process that attempts to hold down health care costs by certifying that there is a need for a service, be that extra beds in a hospital, an extra MRI machine or a new facility altogether, like a freestanding birthing center.
If a facility like a hospital is already providing birth services, advocates have said, it's impossible to prove a need exists, thus why some call CON rules the 'competitor's veto.'
The version that Sen. Shelley Funke Frommeyer, R-Alexandria, put forward requires centers to have a physician medical director and a hospital transfer agreement, which helped garner support. SB17 also says freestanding birth centers would have to be within 30 miles of a hospital. If a hospital closed after a center opened within 30 miles, that birth center would be exempt from the distance requirement, essentially grandfathered into the place.
Mary Kathryn DeLodder, the director of the Kentucky Birth Coalition, previously expressed concern that the physician requirement would pose a barrier to opening birth centers in light of Kentucky's physician shortage.
Sen. Julie Raque Adams, R-Louisville, when explaining her yes vote, said, 'this is a great day for options for pregnant women in the commonwealth.'
Sen. Karen Berg, D-Louisville, who is a physician and voted in favor of the bill, said, 'If you'd come to me a couple years ago and asked me what I thought about freestyle birthing clinic, I would say, no. I chose to have my children in a facility where there was an ICU attached to the building, in case, God forbid, that was necessary.'
'But the paternalism in medicine is ending, and it is a patient's right to decide where and how they want to deliver their children,' Berg added. 'So even though, honestly, this is a decision I would never make for myself, nor is it a decision I would ever encourage a family member to make … for those people that are so desperately wanting an alternative, they deserve it.'
After the passage, Funke Frommeyer said 'It's a great day for our moms, for our families.'
St. Elizabeth Healthcare in Northern Kentucky, which had expressed some opposition in the past, took a neutral position on the legislation after negotiations over the bill's details.
In a Wednesday statement, the hospital said, 'St. Elizabeth has been supportive of freestanding birthing centers if they are required to operate in a manner that assures the safety of the mother and baby. Having a physician on staff as medical director is a key component of this.'
'A medical director can ensure that only appropriate level births are considered with the center, can provide quality assurance and help guide procedures around transfer,' Emily Wherle, the director of communications and public relations for St. Elizabeth, said in a statement. 'Further, the current language in the bill requires that the birthing center be located close to a birthing hospital and have transfer agreements with hospitals and ambulance providers — both are additional safeguards. The latest version of the bill as filed has all of these provisions, and thus St. Elizabeth has taken a neutral position on the bill.'
Terry Brooks, the executive director for Kentucky Youth Advocates, praised the committee passage.
Should the bill become law, he said, it 'will remove barriers to critical perinatal care options so that more Kentucky moms and their babies have the chance to thrive.'
Supporters of birthing centers gain some political ground in Kentucky
SB17 can head to the Senate floor for a full chamber vote now, which could happen this week.
Before the committee began, Gov. Andy Beshear's office sent over a fiscal note on the bill, which Funke Frommeyer and others found odd. Funke Frommeyer said the administration estimated the bill's cost to state government at about $400,000.
'I'm a little surprised, quite surprised, because this has been on the agenda for two weeks, and why they didn't send something anytime over the last two weeks,' Funke Frommeyer told the Lantern.
Majority Whip Rep. Jason Nemes, R-Middletown, who's sponsored freestanding birth centers legislation for years and has a sister bill in the House, also slammed the timing of the fiscal note.
'I will note that we have filed this bill for five years in a row and the morning that it's coming to committee, we get an email from the governor's office. I do not accept that as professional nor acceptable,' he told committee members. 'We will work with them, but I call to question the good faith of that after this has been filed for five years and it's gone through the House.'
Beshear's office did not respond to a Lantern request for comment on the timing of the note.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament

time17 minutes ago

World Cup host city organizers acknowledge immigration crackdown may impact next year's tournament

NEW YORK -- Philadelphia's host city executive for the 2026 World Cup says organizers accept that an immigration crackdown by President Donald Trump's administration may be among the outside events that impact next year's tournament. "There are certainly things that are happening at the national level, the international level, there are going to be geopolitical issues that we don't even know right now that are going affect the tournament next year, so we recognize that we're planning within uncertainty,' Meg Kane said Monday at a gathering of the 11 U.S. host city leaders, one year and two days ahead of the tournament opener. The World Cup will be played at 16 stadiums in the U.S., Mexico and Canada from June 11 to July 19 next year, a tournament expanded to 48 nations and 104 games. All matches from the quarterfinals on will be in the U.S., with the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. 'Whether it's the Olympics, whether it's a World Cup, whether it's a Super Bowl, you name it, anytime you've got a major international sporting event, geopolitics is going to have a role,' said Alex Vasry, CEO of the New York/New Jersey host committee. Kane said the host committees must adapt to decisions made by others. 'One of the things that I think we all recognize is that we have to be really good at operating within that uncertainty,' Kane said. 'I think for each of our cities, we want to be prepared to make any person that is coming and makes the decision to come to the United States or come to this World Cup feel that they are welcome. We do not play a role necessarily in what is happening in terms of the decisions that are made.' Trump's travel ban on citizens from 12 countries exempted athletes, coaches, staff and relatives while not mentioning fans. 'We allow for FIFA to continue having constructive conversations with the administrations around visas, around workforce, around tourism,' Kane said. FIFA is running the World Cup for the first time without a local organizing committee in the host nation. Asked in late April whether FIFA president Gianni Infantino was available to discuss the tournament, FIFA director of media relations Bryan Swanson forwarded the request to a member of the media relations staff, who did not make Infantino available. Legislation approved by the House of Representatives and awaiting action in the Senate would appropriate $625 million to the Federal Emergency Management Agency 'for security, planning, and other costs related to the 2026 FIFA World Cup.' The 11 U.S. host committees have been consulting with each other on issues such as transportation for teams and VIPs, and for arranging fan fests. At the last major soccer tournament in the U.S., the 2024 Copa America final at Hard Rock Stadium in Miami Gardens, Florida, started 82 minutes late after fans breached security gates. 'Certainly we were not involved in the planning or the logistics for that particular match,' said Alina Hudak, CEO of the Miami World Cup host committee. She said local police 'have done an extensive review of the after-action reports related to that in collaboration with the stadium and so all of the things that happened are in fact being reviewed and addressed and I can assure you that everything is being done within our power to make sure that the appropriate measures are being placed, the appropriate perimeters.'

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

time34 minutes ago

Minnesota budget deal cuts health care for adults who entered the US illegally

ST. PAUL, Minn. -- Adults living in the U.S. illegally will be excluded from a state-run health care program under an overall budget deal that the closely divided Minnesota Legislature convened to pass in a special session Monday. Repealing a 2023 state law that made those immigrants eligible for the MinnesotaCare program for the working poor was a priority for Republicans in the negotiations that produced the budget agreement. The Legislature is split 101-100, with the House tied and Democrats holding just a one-seat majority in the Senate, and the health care compromise was a bitter pill for Democrats to accept. The change is expected to affect about 17,000 residents. After an emotional near four-hour debate, the House aroved the bill 68-65. Under the agreement, the top House Democratic leader, Melissa Hortman, of Brooklyn Park, was the only member of her caucus to vote yes. The bill then went to the Senate, where it passed 37-30. Democratic Majority Leader Erin Murphy, of St. Paul, called it 'a wound on the soul of Minnesota,' but kept her promise to vote yes as part of the deal, calling it "among the most painful votes I've ever taken." Democratic Gov. Tim Walz, who insisted on maintaining eligibility for children who aren't in the country legally, has promised to sign the legislation, and all 13 other bills scheduled for action in the special session, to complete a $66 billion, two-year budget that will take effect July 1. 'This is 100% about the GOP campaign against immigrants,' said House Democratic Floor Leader Jamie Long, of Minneapolis, who voted no. 'From Trump's renewed travel ban announced this week, to his effort to expel those with protected status, to harassing students here to study, to disproportionate military and law enforcement responses that we've seen from Minneapolis to L.A., this all comes back to attacking immigrants and the name of dividing us.' But GOP Rep. Jeff Backer, of Browns Valley, the lead author of the bill, said taxpayers shouldn't have to subsidize health care for people who aren't in the country legally. Backer said California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, has proposed freezing enrollment for immigrants without legal status in a similar state-funded program and that Illinois' Democratic governor, JB Pritzker, has proposed cutting a similar program. He said residents can still buy health insurance on the private market regardless of their immigration status. 'This is about being fiscally responsible,' Backer said. Enrollment by people who entered the country illegally in MinnesotaCare has run triple the initial projections, which Republicans said could have pushed the costs over $600 million over the next four years. Critics said the change won't save any money because those affected will forego preventive care and need much more expensive care later. 'People don't suddenly stop getting sick when they don't have insurance, but they do put off seeking care until a condition gets bad enough to require a visit to the emergency room, increasing overall health care costs for everyone,' Bernie Burnham, president of the Minnesota AFL-CIO, told reporters at a news conference organized by the critics. Walz and legislative leaders agreed on the broad framework for the budget over four weeks ago, contrasting the bipartisan cooperation that produced it with the deep divisions at the federal level in Washington. But with the tie in the House and the razor-thin Senate Democratic majority, few major policy initiatives got off the ground before the regular session ended May 19. Leaders announced Friday that the details were settled and that they had enough votes to pass everything in the budget package.

Primary day in New Jersey governor's race could offer hints on how voters feel about Trump

time2 hours ago

Primary day in New Jersey governor's race could offer hints on how voters feel about Trump

TRENTON, N..J. -- New Jersey voters on Tuesday will settle the Democratic and Republican primaries for governor in a contest that could send signals about how the public is responding to President Donald Trump's agenda and how Democratic voters think their leaders should push back. New Jersey is one of just two states with a race for governor this year — the other is Virginia — and the fact two-term Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy is term-limited has created fresh drama for the open seat. There's a six-way race on the Democratic side that features several seasoned political figures. Trump's endorsement of former state lawmaker Jack Ciattarelli may have given him a boost on the Republican side, where he faces four primary challengers. Polls are open from 6 a.m. until 8 p.m. Tuesday, but it's not the only day of voting. Early in-person voting was held from June 3-8. Mail-in ballots were sent to voters beginning in April. The contest hinges in part on New Jersey issues, including high property taxes and the soaring cost of living, but national politics are sure to figure in. Trump, who has long had a strong presence in New Jersey, waded into the race with his endorsement, attacking Democratic control of state government. Democrats are looking for a winning message and leadership after the sting of bitter losses in 2024. "Because these are the first major elections since Donald Trump's return to the White House, there's a tremendous amount at stake simply through public perception," said Ben Dworkin, director of the Rowan Institute for Public Policy & Citizenship. For Democrats? 'They'll just get further in a hole if they don't hold this seat,' he said. For Republicans? They could win because New Jersey tends to be purple during gubernatorial years, Dworkin said, but that would be viewed as a tremendous victory for Trump. The Democrats running are Mayors Ras Baraka of Newark and Steven Fulop of Jersey City; U.S. Reps. Josh Gottheimer and Mikie Sherrill; teachers union President Sean Spiller and former state Senate President Steve Sweeney. The Democratic campaign has been hard fought and pricey, with tens of millions spent in one of the country's most expensive media markets. On the Republican side, most of the candidates declared their support for the president's agenda, pressing for a state-level version of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency. They've also said they would end so-called sanctuary policies and, in a New Jersey-specific pitch, called for the end of the state's 2020 law banning single-use plastic bags. Ciattarelli has said he would sign an order on his first day in office ending New Jersey's Immigrant Trust Directive, which bars local police from cooperating with federal officials on civil immigration matters. He has also said he would direct whomever he names attorney general to end lawsuits against the Trump administration, including a case aimed at stopping the president's order ending birthright citizenship for people whose parents were in the country illegally. Murphy, who became the first Democrat to be reelected in more than four decades in 2021, is barred from running again by term limits and hasn't endorsed a successor in the primary. Both parties will look to build their general election campaigns on widespread voter frustration. For Democrats, that means focusing on the parts of Trump's aggressive second-term agenda that are unpopular. Republicans, meanwhile, are casting blame for economic hardships on Democrats who've run state government for the last eight years. New Jersey has been reliably Democratic in Senate and presidential contests for decades. But the odd-year races for governor have tended to swing back and forth, and each of the last three GOP governors has won a second term. Democrats have the largest share of registered voters in the state, followed closely by independent voters and then Republicans, who have roughly 800,000 fewer registrations than the Democratic Party. But the GOP has made gains in recent years, shaving the Democrats' lead of more than 1 million more registrations to the current level.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store