
Trump's executive power flex leaves some legal challengers adrift
President Trump's unprecedented flex of executive power has sent legal challengers scrambling to courts to pump the breaks.
But some of the president's more extraordinary actions have been difficult to confront, as the administration barrels forward with an act-first, defend-later approach to its policy agenda.
'We were looking for any mechanism that would, so to speak, stop the trains here,' Andrew Goldfarb, a lawyer representing challengers to the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)'s takeover of the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), said at a hearing this week.
'Anything to stop the destruction that is going on,' he said.
More than 100 lawsuits have been filed opposing Trump's executive actions and the ways his administration has sought to effectuate them, spanning the president's crackdown on law firms, DEI, gender, controversial immigration and deportation policies and DOGE's efforts to slim down the federal government.
In many challenges, judges have granted speedy injunctive relief. It's far more complicated in others.
At the USIP hearing Wednesday, Goldfarb described how DOGE sought to reduce 'essentially to rubble' the independent institute, established to help resolve and prevent violent conflicts. He said nearly all USIP's board members were unlawfully removed before DOGE showed up with armed law enforcement officers to seize control of the building.
U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell raised alarm about the 'offensive' way DOGE accessed the building. But she declined to grant the plaintiffs the temporary restraining order they sought, citing 'confusion' in their complaint and a motion that made her 'very uncomfortable.'
Timothy Zick, a professor at William & Mary Law School, said that litigating under such uncertainty is 'extremely challenging.'
Courts must undergo fact-finding to make the legal determinations necessary to move a lawsuit forward, but that's hard to do in an emergency, he said. While judges can grant emergency relief, a messy record makes it difficult to fashion relief that is appropriate.
'Without a good record of what has transpired, litigants and courts are at a distinct disadvantage,' Zick said.
Challenges to DOGE's cutdown of the federal bureaucracy, in particular, have presented issues where there is uncertainty about the advisory group's constitutional authority, he added.
A federal judge similarly denied requests for temporary restraining orders in a pair of lawsuits contesting efforts to detain migrants at Guantánamo Bay, backed by the American Civil Liberties Union.
ACLU lawyer Lee Gelernt said the challengers found themselves in a 'Catch-22.' The migrants' legal teams would not know if the government moved them to the Cuban detention camp until after it happened. But if they were sent there, it would cause irreparable harm due to the perilous conditions there like shackles and solitary confinement.
He noted that the administration had transferred migrants to the detention site then abruptly emptied it multiple times, complicating any legal challenge to the efforts.
'We don't know that the moment we walk out of court they (won't) be sent to Guantánamo,' Gelernt said during a hearing on the matter last week.
U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols denied their request, pointing to the fact that, at that time, no detainees with final orders of removal were being held at the facility. Less than a week later, the administration sent a new group of migrants there.
Claire Finkelstein, a University of Pennsylvania law professor, said the administration's strategy has a 'certain sense of gamesmanship.'
Though Trump has said he won't violate court orders, the back-and-forth makes it difficult to figure out the truth of the situation at hand, she said.
'You're playing Whack-a-Mole all the time,' she said. 'I think that's an intentional strategy.'
Barbara McQuade, a former U.S. attorney, said there's still value in challenges where the landscape changes, making moot initial arguments.
'It may cause the administration to stop doing something that it doesn't think will hold up in court, even if the court doesn't, hasn't decided yet,' she said.
In First Amendment challenges to Trump's often-vague executive orders, lawyers have argued that confusion regarding how and when the administration will enforce the directives could have a chilling effect.
Howell, who is also overseeing the case over Trump's order targeting the law firm Perkins Coie, pressed the Justice Department last week over why the president's far-reaching order would not chill lawyers or the courts. She asked if the president should simply be trusted to 'draw the right lines.'
'Yes, he has that power,' said DOJ chief of staff Chad Mizelle, who argued for the Trump administration.
In Trump's anti-DEI orders, which have also been challenged in courts, the president does not clearly define 'DEI' — which stands for diversity, equity and inclusion — leaving questions about which specific enforcement actions will occur if- violated, Zick said.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit last week lifted a nationwide injunction prohibiting enforcement of several provisions of two DEI orders for that very reason. One judge wrote in a concurring opinion that 'what the orders say on their face and how they are enforced are two different things.'
' As far as the Administration is concerned, the lack of specificity is a virtue,' Zick said. 'It makes it harder for courts to assess the effect of the Orders, and in the meantime, affected parties may be chilled from engaging in activity or feel pressured to comply in anticipation of enforcement.'
The Trump administration has argued that the lack of specificity is beyond the government's scope of duty.
DOJ lawyer Pardis Gheibi said during a hearing Wednesday in a lawsuit over the president's DEI and gender executive orders that any confusion about their scope should be cleared up through 'legal advice.' She said Trump's orders don't 'rise or fall' on whether he adequately explained their reach.
The unprecedented nature of the Trump administration's sweeping actions so far makes it hard to glean any lessons from history on how to wage legal battles against it, Zick said.
'Except that presidents have prevailed in some and lost in other tough cases,' he noted. 'I suspect that will be Trump's experience too.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
11 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Donald Trump confirms US-China deal done, says rare earth deal and 55% tariffs finalised
Donald Trump touts 55% tariffs and rare earth supply in pending China deal By News Desk Published on June 11, 2025, 17:56 IST Last updated June 11, 2025, 17:57 IST Former U.S. President Donald J. Trump on Tuesday announced via social media that a new deal with China has been reached, pending final approval from both himself and Chinese President Xi Jinping. According to Trump, the agreement includes upfront Chinese supply of 'full magnets' and 'any necessary rare earths' to the U.S. In return, the U.S. will uphold previously agreed terms, which Trump said include allowing Chinese students to continue studying at American colleges and universities — a relationship he described as 'always been good with me!' Trump emphasized that under the new deal, the U.S. will receive a combined total of 55% in tariffs, while China will get 10%. 'Relationship is excellent!' Trump declared in the post, adding thanks for attention to the matter. The post, shared on June 11, 2025, at 8:04 AM, comes amid ongoing geopolitical and trade tensions between the world's two largest economies. No official confirmation has yet been released by Chinese authorities or the U.S. State Department. News desk at


Business Upturn
11 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
U.S. President Trump says he has no hard feelings for Musk, leaves door open for reconciliation
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 11, 2025, 17:40 IST U.S. President Donald Trump has downplayed recent tensions with Elon Musk, saying he holds 'no hard feelings' despite their very public feud over the past week. His comments come shortly after Musk posted on X, formerly Twitter, that he 'regrets some of [his] posts' about Trump, admitting, 'They went too far.' In an interview addressing the ongoing spat, Trump said he was surprised by Musk's criticism of the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' which the President described as 'phenomenal' and 'the best thing we signed in the country.' 'When he did that, I was not a happy camper,' Trump said, adding, 'I don't know what his problem is… I haven't thought too much about him in the last little while.' Despite the fallout, Trump appeared to extend an olive branch, stating, 'I think he feels very badly he said [those things]… I was disappointed in him, but it is what happens. I don't blame him for anything.' When asked about the possibility of reconciling with Musk, Trump replied, 'I guess I could, but we have to straighten out the country.' This marks a potential cooling in tensions that had escalated sharply in recent days. Musk had accused Trump of suppressing the Epstein files and labeled the tax proposal a 'pork-filled abomination,' prompting Trump to suggest pulling federal contracts from Musk-led ventures. Musk responded by threatening to halt NASA-related SpaceX missions and hinted that Trump owed his 2024 victory to Musk's influence. As of now, no direct meeting has taken place, but Musk's heart emoji response to Trump's earlier 'wish him well' remark has kept speculation alive about an eventual reconciliation between the two powerhouses. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.


CBS News
14 minutes ago
- CBS News
Kosovo agrees to accept U.S. deportations of migrants from other countries
The European country of Kosovo has agreed to a Trump administration request to allow the U.S. to deport a small group of migrants to the landlocked Balkan nation who are not from there, U.S. and Kosovar officials told CBS News. Officials in Kosovo, Europe's youngest country, agreed to host 50 deportees from other countries, the latest agreement in a broader and aggressive effort by the Trump administration to convince countries around the world to accept migrants who are not their citizens. In a statement to CBS News, Kosovo's embassy in the U.S. confirmed the deportation agreement. "In response to the request from the United States regarding the reception and relocation of third-country nationals, we have expressed our willingness to cooperate with the United States in addressing this matter under established conditions," the embassy said. Kosovo's embassy said the deal would allow 50 deportees from other nations to be "temporarily relocated" to Kosovo, while officials there work to facilitate "their safe return to their home country." It's unclear who exactly could be sent by the U.S. to Kosovo or which countries they would be from. Typically, the U.S. uses third country deportation agreements to deport migrants whose home countries won't take them back, in some cases because of strained diplomatic relations. Kosovo's embassy said the government in Pristina would seek "the opportunity to select individuals from a proposed pool, provided they meet specific criteria related to the rule of law and public order." In a statement to CBS News, the U.S. State Department said, "We welcome cooperation on this key Trump Administration priority." "We are grateful to our partner Kosovo for receiving third country nationals removed from the United States and facilitating those aliens' safe return to their home countries," the State Department added. Formerly part of Yugoslavia, Kosovo declared its independence from Serbia in 2008. The country is recognized by more than 100 nations, including the U.S. But other nations do not recognize its independence, including Serbia, which considers Kosovo one of its regions. Kosovo considers the U.S. one of its strongest allies on the international stage. After the chaotic American military withdrawal from Afghanistan in the summer of 2021, Kosovo agreed to host Afghan evacuees who required extra vetting due to security flags. Since President Trump began his second term and launched a sweeping crackdown on illegal immigration, the U.S. government has approached nations in Asia, Africa, Latin America and other parts of the world, seeking deportation deals. The second Trump administration has already deported several hundred Asian and African migrants to Costa Rica and Panama. It sent more than 200 Venezuelans accused of gang ties to El Salvador, where they were imprisoned at an infamous mega-prison. And it has tried to deport migrants to violence-torn Libya and South Sudan, though those efforts have been stymied by U.S. courts.