logo
Five in play as dream builders sniff the potential of 1950s home

Five in play as dream builders sniff the potential of 1950s home

News.com.au2 days ago

Five bidders raised their hands for a 1950s brick house in Newtown amid a further indicator of improving buyer sentiment in the property market.
The three-bedroom house at 8 Garlick Ave was snapped up for $820,000, selling for $70,000 above the 525sq m property's reserve price.
McGrath Geelong agent David Cortous said the broad field of interest in the property underlined the improving conditions for sellers following a second interest-rate cut in May.
'There was interest of quite a few different buyers,' Mr Cortous said.
'There was first-home buyers, there was families that were going to come there and love, renovate and maybe do some type of extension.
'And there was actually two that were looking for a project – to do it up and then re-sell it.
'That was the buyer in the end.'
Mr Cortous said part of the attraction was the property's location, on a street opposite the Geelong College Junior School and near Elderslie Reserve.
But the property had a lot to offer for a renovator, or redeveloper.
'It was a 1950s brick, so it had a bit of charm to it and it was very much a blank canvas,' he said.
'It really, really neat but very much a blank canvas.'
Mr Cortous said the property offered possibilities for different buyer groups.
'It would be a good property to hold for an investor, a good property for a family to get in and live there for the next few years as set up home.'
There was plenty of original charm apparent in the house, including the kitchen and central bathroom.
The property last sold for $65,000 in 1987 and had been rented since 2008.
It was one of three properties taken to auction to sell in Newtown at the weekend, including a three-bedroom weatherboard house that also offered buyers to chance to renovate or redevelop.
A property at 4 Coronal Ave, Newtown, sold for $790,000, which was at the top of its quoted range.
HF Richardson, Newtown agent Tony Hyde said a local builder, acting on behalf of a Sydney investors, secured the home as a potential renovation or rebuild.
Mr Hyde said the property passed in at $760,000 after the one bidder emerged for the property. Several first-home buyers were keen, but were unable to bid at auction, he said.
'They'll be looking at either renovating the existing house or rebuilding,' Mr Hyde said.
'It's such a well-held area, a lot of people don't know that it's a Newtown area.
'It's close to schools, you've got the Geelong College Junior and Middle Schools around the corner and it's just off Aberdeen St, so it's close to the ring road and the shopping centres and it's all flat, easy walking.'
The much-loved family home offers has great scope to value-add through a renovation, rebuild or a development on the 613sq m block.
A favourable north-facing rear orientation with established gardens and a lush lawn adding to the overall appeal of the property.
A rare 1146sq m vacant block at 3-5 Stinton Ave, Newtown was snapped up for $1.882m in the biggest sale reported in the past week.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Aldi sued for stocking ‘confusingly similar packaging' to famous snacks
Aldi sued for stocking ‘confusingly similar packaging' to famous snacks

News.com.au

timean hour ago

  • News.com.au

Aldi sued for stocking ‘confusingly similar packaging' to famous snacks

The supermarket of choice for those on tight budgets is being slugged by a potentially devastating legal case. We've all walked past a couple of dubiously named brands that look very much like the original in Aldi's snack isle. But now those cheaper options are being put under the microscope as multinational corporations put the foot down. Snack maker Mondelez, the company behind Oreos and Ritz crackers, has launched legal action against Aldi's US arm, accusing the discount retailer of stocking 'blatant copies' of its iconic biscuit brands. The case claims Aldi's private-label products bear 'confusingly similar packaging' that could mislead shoppers and damage Mondelez's reputation. The company has requested a court order to block Aldi from selling the products in question, alongside a claim for monetary damages. Side-by-side comparisons submitted in the lawsuit show visual similarities between Aldi's chocolate sandwich cookies and Oreos, both featuring blue packaging with near-identical cookie arrangements. Similar comparisons were made between Aldi's Golden Round crackers and Ritz, both wrapped in red boxes with blue and yellow accents. Mondelez alleges it repeatedly warned Aldi about the likenesses. While the retailer reportedly adjusted or withdrew some packaging, others remain on shelves. Aldi, which operates more than 2500 stores in 39 US states and 600 in Australia, has not commented publicly on the case. Known for keeping prices low by selling mostly in-house brands, the German-founded chain has faced similar legal challenges over its private-label packaging in several countries in the past. In Australia, Aldi was found to have infringed copyright in a 2023 case involving children's snack brand Baby Bellies. The court found some of Aldi's Mamia puff products too closely resembled the benchmark design provided by the brand's licensor, Hampden Holdings. Evidence included internal correspondence acknowledging the resemblance. However, Aldi prevailed in other claims involving rice cakes and has appealed the ruling. Elsewhere, Aldi won a 2018 appeal in Australia against Moroccanoil Israel over similar packaging claims related to haircare products, while in the UK, a court sided with cider brand Thatchers in a dispute over bottle design.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store