
Health MOTs for pensioners 'could combat £23bn social care crisis'
Routine checks for people aged 65 could have a positive impact on the social care crisis, a report has found, with people potentially maintaining independence for longer
Health MOTs for all 65-year-olds could transform the social care crisis, a report has found. It concluded that routine checks at this age would better identify those who might need help in future years.
The report says Japan, which already has such a system, needs only half the number of care home places as the UK despite an older population. Dr Annie Williamson, a fellow of the Institute for Public Policy Research, which carried out the report, said: 'Universal MOT-style assessments at 65 and early support could help people maintain independence for longer while reducing long-term costs.
'It would mean fewer care home admissions, better quality of life and more sustainable funding. As we grapple with rising demand and strained budgets, this kind of forward-thinking reform offers a way out.'
The think-tank has set out a plan to stop the spiralling cost of adult social care which cost councils £23.3billion last year.
Its findings are supported by Sir Andrew Dilnot, the architect of reform recommendations more than a decade ago, who said the 'yawning and indefensible gap in our collective welfare provision' must be addressed urgently.
The Casey Commission is currently looking at ways to implement a national adult care service, as promised by Labour in its election manifesto.
The first phase of its review is expected to be published next year, although recommendations will be phased in over 10 years. Social care leaders have raised concerns over the timeline.
This comes as levels of mental health are 'deteriorating', leading charities have warned, as a survey suggests one in four young adults in England suffer from conditions such as anxiety and depression.
There has also been a particular rise in mental health problems among women, while the proportion of people reporting ever having self-harmed has quadrupled since the year 2000, figures show.
Health leaders said the findings 'paint a deeply worrying but sadly unsurprising picture' amid warnings that the system is 'overwhelmed, underfunded and unequal'.
It is the first time since 2016 that data from the Adult Psychiatric Morbidity Survey, which is carried out by the National Centre for Social Research (NatCen), the University of Leicester, and City St George's, University of London, on behalf of NHS England, has been released.
It found that more than one in five people aged 16 to 74 had reported so-called 'common mental health conditions', which include generalised anxiety disorder, depressive episodes, phobias, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) and panic disorder.
Problems were more common in young people, with more than a quarter of those aged 16 to 24 reporting having any of these conditions, up from 17.5% in 2007.
There was a particular rise among people in this age group reporting OCD, which rose from 1.8% in 2014 to 5.7% in 2023/24.
There was also a sharp increase in the number of women aged 16 to 24 reporting these mental health problems.
Some 36.1% said they had any one of the conditions listed, up from 28.2% in 2014 and 22.2% in 2007.
The hike among women was evident across all age groups.
Outside those aged 16 to 24, the biggest rise was among women aged 35 to 44, which increased from 22.3% to 29.1%.
Dr Sarah Hughes, chief executive of mental health charity Mind, said: 'The nation's mental health is deteriorating, and our current system is overwhelmed, underfunded, and unequal to the scale of the challenge.
'After the trauma of the pandemic, the relentless cost-of-living crisis, and persistent racial inequalities, it is no surprise that mental health has suffered, especially for the young.
'But it is unacceptable that services still aren't meeting people's needs.'
Marjorie Wallace, chief executive of Sane, said: 'The most shocking and often overlooked fact is that people with serious mental illness continue to lose 15-20 years of their lives due to underfunded and under-resourced mental health services.
'The majority of people diagnosed with mental ill health either receive no treatment at all or the help they are given is mostly in the community and is patchy and inadequate.
'This report exposes the huge scale of need facing a system that is already in breakdown, particularly involving the services available to young people.'
Elsewhere, there was a rise in the number of people who reported ever having self-harmed, as well as an increase in those who experienced suicidal thoughts or attempted suicide in the 12 months leading up to the survey.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


South Wales Guardian
30 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
Welfare reforms: What concessions has the Government made?
Here, the PA news agency takes a look at what the changes are and how Labour MPs and disability groups have reacted. – What had the Government originally planned? In March, reforms to the welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The Government said the changes, including restricting access to the main disability benefit known as Pip (personal independence payment) and the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC), were expected to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day – 'the equivalent of adding a city the size of Leicester every single year', the Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. An impact assessment published alongside the Bill included estimates that changes to Pip entitlement rules would see about 800,000 people lose out, with an average loss of £4,500 per year. Changes to UC were expected to see an estimated 2.25 million current recipients of the health element impacted, with an average loss of £500 per year. Overall, as a result of the changes, it was estimated some 250,000 more people, including 50,000 children, across Great Britain were likely to fall into relative poverty after housing costs by the end of the decade. – What concessions have been made? In a late-night letter to MPs, Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall conceded two changes she said would 'strengthen the Bill'. In recognition of the 'uncertainty and anxiety' caused by the proposed changes, she said all current Pip recipients would keep their benefits, saying only new claims from November 2026 will come under the tightened eligibility requirements. An impact assessment had stated that 370,000 current recipients were set to lose Pip entitlement across England and Wales. Ms Kendall also vowed all those currently receiving the UC health element, as well as new claimants meeting the severe conditions criteria, will have their incomes 'fully protected in real terms'. The Work and Pensions Secretary has also promised a review of the Pip assessment, led by social security and disability minister Sir Stephen Timms, which will have input from disabled people 'to ensure the benefit is fair and fit for the future'. – What are disability groups saying? Mikey Erhardt, from Disability Rights UK, accused the Government of 'playing politics with our lives', insisting the Bill must still be pulled. He said the changes will mean 'a benefits system where future generations of disabled people receive less support than disabled people today' and added that, in making the original announcement of cuts, the Government had 'prioritised balancing its books over improving the lives of disabled citizens'. Mr Erhardt added: 'Despite seemingly rowing back on some of the worst aspects of its plans, the Government is still attempting to slash billions of pounds from a system that doesn't provide enough support as it stands.' The MS Society said the Government was simply 'kicking the can down the road and delaying an inevitable disaster', and urged MPs 'not to be swayed by these last-ditch attempts to force through a harmful Bill with supposed concessions'. Food bank network Trussell welcomed the 'significant' concessions but said the proposals 'still present a bleak future for future claimants and still risk placing the Government's commitments to end the need for emergency food and tackle poverty in serious jeopardy'. – What are Labour MPs saying? Dame Meg Hillier, one of the leading rebel voices, described the concessions as 'a good deal' involving 'massive changes' to protect vulnerable people and involve disabled people in the design of future reforms. She said: 'It's encouraging that we have reached what I believe is a workable compromise that will protect disabled people and support people back into work while ensuring the welfare system can be meaningfully reformed.' Health minister Stephen Kinnock said he is confident the welfare reforms – being brought under the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment Bill – will pass a vote in the Commons on Tuesday in the wake of the concessions. But some Labour MPs are still not satisfied, with Nadia Whittome saying the concessions are 'nowhere near good enough', vowing to still vote against the Bill unless 'serious' proposals are made to 'protect the dignity of disabled people'. Speaking to the Today programme on BBC Radio 4, she said MPs she had spoken to 'are sticking to their position because we understand that we are answerable to our constituents'. Ms Whittome added: 'If the Government doesn't pull the Bill, doesn't consult properly with disabled people and come back to MPs with a serious proposal that protects the dignity of disabled people, I will vote against and I will be far from the only one.'


The Independent
39 minutes ago
- The Independent
Calls to give 65-year-olds automatic Japanese-style health checks
A radical proposal for Japanese-style health "MOTs" for people turning 65 could revolutionise adult social care in England, a new report suggests. The Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) argues that this preventative approach would not only enhance the quality of life for older adults but also potentially reduce the number of care home admissions. The think tank's plan aims to curb the "spiralling costs" of adult social care, which burdened local authorities with a £23.3 billion bill in 2023/24. Sir Andrew Dilnot, who spearheaded reform recommendations over a decade ago, has backed the findings, stating that the "yawning and indefensible gap in our collective welfare provision" demands urgent attention. The state of adult social care in England is under review by the Casey Commission, which aims to set out a plan for how to implement a national care service, as promised by Labour in its election manifesto. The first phase of the review is expected to report next year, although recommendations from the initial probe will be implemented in phases over the course of 10 years. Social care leaders have raised concerns over the potential timeline of 2036 for some reforms to be introduced. The second phase of the commission, setting out longer-term reforms, is due to report by 2028. The IPPR has set out its own recommendations, insisting that there should be a 'right to live and age well' as part of any reforms. Among the measures suggested in its latest report is automatic assessment of the care needs of all adults turning 65 as well as those receiving other disability-related benefits. The report stated Government 'should look to the Japanese model of proactive assessments' and while funding will be needed for such a move, 'a more effective state social care system would invest in, not drain, the economy'. The report said Japanese people are automatically assessed for a range of support including home-based help with cooking and dressing to residential respite and some nursing or medical care for long-term conditions when they turn 65 years old. It stated: ' Care is managed by community comprehensive support centres, which employ long-term care specialists, care managers, and social workers. 'This model emphasises preventative care and home-based services, reducing both cost and reliance on institutional care while supporting family caregivers. 'Japan has half the number of people in care homes as the UK, despite a much older population.' The report's other recommendations include investment in exercise groups and community centres to support older people and those with disabilities to stay healthy and active, as well as further training and development for carers, enabling them to give more personalised care. The IPPR also argued there must be a care costs cap, based on Dilnot Commission recommendations, but with additional central Government funding. Proposals for an £86,000 cap on the amount an older or disabled person would have to pay towards their social care support at home or in care homes were scrapped by Labour last year. Sir Andrew, who chaired the 2010 commission into adult social care, said the IPPR paper 'argues powerfully and persuasively that good social care provision can be a wonderful way of enhancing human flourishing'. He added: 'For far, far too long we have had a social care system that fails us all – those who need care, those who provide care, and those who might need care in the future. 'Acting now can transform lives for those with care needs, create a vibrant and exciting care sector, and finally fill this yawning and indefensible gap in our collective welfare provision. Let's do it.' Sir Andrew previously deemed it 'completely unnecessary' to wait three years for the commission's longer-term recommendations and argued it is 'perfectly feasible' for the Government to set out by the end of this year what it is going to do. IPPR research fellow Dr Annie Williamson said: 'A proactive approach to adult social care, including universal MOT-style assessments at 65 and early support, could help people maintain independence for longer while reducing long-term costs. 'A shift to prevention will mean fewer care home admissions, better quality of life for older adults, and more sustainable funding. As the UK grapples with rising demand and strained budgets, this kind of forward-thinking reform offers a way out.' A Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: 'Through our 10-Year Health Plan, we will shift healthcare from treatment to prevention to help people live longer, healthier lives. 'This includes diagnosing and treating conditions earlier, predicting and preventing problems before they become serious, and helping people to live healthier lifestyles. 'At the same time, Baroness Casey has begun her work on the Independent Commission into adult social care, which will start a national conversation and provide recommendations for a National Care Service that is fair and affordable for all – and works alongside the NHS.'


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
NHS under Labour carries out 100,000 more appointments a week than under Tories
Health Secretary Wes Streeting says 'every extra appointment we've delivered represents someone getting their life back on track' The NHS in England is carrying out 100,000 more appointments a week now than it was under the previous Tory government. Health Secretary Wes Streeting announced an extra 4.2 million appointments took place in the first nine months since the General Election when compared to the same period the previous year. This more than double the target Labour had set to deliver two million extra NHS appointments in the first year. Mr Streeting said: 'Every extra appointment we've delivered represents someone getting their life back on track. A parent no longer in pain, a worker returning to their job, an elderly person regaining their independence. 'What's remarkable is that we're seeing progress faster than expected. We've delivered 4.2 million extra elective appointments in the nine months since July – more than double our target of two million in the first year. "This didn't happen by accident. With proper investment and proper reform, we're changing how care is delivered.' The NHS waiting list in England has come down to its lowest for two years but still stood at 7.39 million treatments waiting to be carried out at the end of April New NHS data also shows 6,700 more mental health workers have now been recruited since July 2024. This is 79% of the way to the Government's 8,500 target. Mr Streeting said: 'Not getting the right support for your mental health isn't just debilitating, it can hit a painful pause button on your life – stopping you working, enjoying time with family and friends, or living day-to-day life. Patients have faced the crisis of access to mental health services for far too long. 'We are already over halfway towards our target of recruiting 8,500 extra mental health workers, and through our upcoming 10 Year Health Plan we will get more people back to health and back to work.' Since last year's General Election the incoming Labour government has increased NHS spending by £26 billion and ended NHS strikes which had been hampering the service after a decade-long funding squeeze under the Tories. Mr Streeting added: 'When there's so much cynicism in politics going round, I'm proud that this is a government that delivers on its promises. We promised to cut NHS waiting lists, and we're delivering. We said we'd hire 1,000 new GPs, and we've recruited over 1,500. We pledged to make our NHS fit for the future and we've invested £26 billion just this year to start making that a reality. 'We're bringing services closer to communities, giving patients more control over their treatment and boosting digital innovations so the NHS works better for everyone. 'The journey to getting our NHS back on its feet will take time, but these early results show we're on the right path. It's only this government that can be trusted to rebuild our NHS and make it fit for the future.'