Irish university to cut links with Israel over Gaza war
Ireland's prestigious Trinity College Dublin said on Wednesday that it would cut all links with Israel in protest at "ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law".
The university's board informed students by email that it had accepted the recommendations of a taskforce to sever "institutional links with the State of Israel, Israeli universities and companies headquartered in Israel".
The recommendations would be "enacted for the duration of the ongoing violations of international and humanitarian law", said the email sent by the board's chairman Paul Farrell, and seen by AFP.
The taskforce was set up after part of the university's campus in central Dublin was blockaded by students for five days last year in protest at Israel's actions in Gaza.
Among the taskforce's recommendations approved by the board were pledges to divest "from all companies headquartered in Israel" and to "enter into no future supply contracts with Israeli firms" and "no new commercial relationships with Israeli entities".
The university also said that it would "enter into no further mobility agreements with Israeli universities".
Trinity has two current Erasmus+ exchange agreements with Israeli universities: Bar Ilan University, an agreement that ends in July 2026, and the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, which ends in July 2025, the university told AFP in an email.
The board also said that the university "should not submit for approval or agree to participate in any new institutional research agreements involving Israeli participation".
It "should seek to align itself with like-minded universities and bodies in an effort to influence EU policy concerning Israel's participation in such collaborations," it added.
Ireland has been among the most outspoken critics of Israel's response to the October 7, 2023 attacks on southern Israel by Hamas militants that sparked the war in Gaza.
Polls since the start of the war have shown overwhelming pro-Palestinian sympathy in Ireland.
In May 2024, Dublin joined several other European countries in recognising Palestine as a "sovereign and independent state".
It then joined South Africa in bringing a case before the International Court of Justice in The Hague accusing Israel of committing genocide in Gaza -- charges angrily denied by Israeli leaders.
In December, Israel's Foreign Minister Gideon Saar ordered the closure of the country's embassy in Dublin, blaming Ireland's "extreme anti-Israel policies".
The University of Geneva also announced Wednesday that it has ended its partnership with the Hebrew University of Jerusalem following student protests, saying it no longer reflected the institution's "strategic priorities".
pmu/jwp/jkb/giv
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Amid Devastation in Gaza, a Deepening Environmental Wound
The ongoing war in the Gaza Strip has obliterated trees, crops, and grasslands, according to a new assessment of the impact. Amid fighting that has killed more than 50,000 people, including more than 16,000 children, the Israeli campaign has also devastated farmland in Gaza, says He Yin, a geographer at Kent State University. For a recent study, Yin tracked the loss of vegetation in Gaza by evaluating satellite images through September 2024. The research showed massive destruction of orchards and croplands. In an update to that study, Yin tabulated the losses through the end of May 2025, sharing his findings with Yale Environment 360. The latest accounting shows damage to 78 to 98 percent of fallow fields and grasslands; 71 to 98 percent of annual crops; and 90 to 94 percent of tree crops. As most farms in Gaza span less than two acres, Yin told Yale E360 earlier this year, 'the loss of a single tree can be devastating.' In Gaza War, the Environmental Devastation Runs Deep
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
In Nashville, everybody wants to be a millionaire — until they are
Editor's note: Letters to the editor reflect the views of individual readers. Scroll to see how you can add your voice, whether you agree or disagree, or click on this link to fill out the form. We welcome diverse viewpoints. I know some Nashvillians who wanted the rich to pay their fair share (whatever that is). They never considered themselves rich until, lo and behold, they woke up one day and found out that the $400,000 home they over-paid for ten years ago is now worth a whopping one million dollars. They have, by luck or design, joined that same exclusive 'Millionaire's Club' they've resented for years. Now, they don't want the rich to pay their fair share… because they hate paying the increased real estate taxes that go along with the sky-rocketing value of their home. However, no matter what, they never stop funding their pet projects, even if the money comes from continuing the deficit spending they have embraced for years. They can't have it both ways. More: With Nashville budget debate looming, some on council may lobby for lower property taxes Do we want a city or state income tax? (Tennessee has neither.) Do we want a state inheritance tax? (Tennessee doesn't have one.) Do we want tolls on all our highways? Do we want the European valued added tax of 20% on everything we buy, or our 9.75% sales tax? More: Trio of Republican groups form coalition to oppose potential tax hike in Nashville Every Tennessean is expected to live within their means. Yet some won't apply that same principle to our own town. And they don't want to pay the higher taxes on their highly appraised properties. Hypocrisy is alive and well and living in Nashville, Tennessee. Dr. Steve Morris DDS (ret), Nashville 37205 Agree or disagree? Or have a view on another topic entirely? Send a letter of 250 words or fewer to letters@ Include your full name, city/town, ZIP and contact information for verification. Thanks for adding to the public conversation. This article originally appeared on Nashville Tennessean: Meet Nashville's new millionaire's club: Your neighbors | Letters
Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Israel at a crossroads: Is Netanyahu's government on the brink of collapse?
NATIONAL AFFAIRS: Netanyahu's current coalition, despite the colossal failure of October 7, has already outlasted about 75% of its predecessors. Only three Israeli governments in the country's 77-year history have completed a full four-year term: Golda Meir's (1969–1974), Menachem Begin's (1977–1981), and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's fourth government (2015–2020). That's it. That historical reality hangs heavy over Netanyahu's current coalition – the 37th government – which, despite the colossal failure of October 7, has already outlasted about 75% of its predecessors. Astonishingly, it has endured longer than most. Now, though, it's facing its most serious crisis yet. And the issue threatening to bring it down is one that has dogged Israeli politics for decades: the conscription of haredi (ultra-Orthodox) men into the army. For years, there were two constants in Israeli politics: coalition crises are often overblown, and efforts to conscript the haredim never bear fruit. This week, both assumptions were being tested. At the core of the drama is a yawning gap between what haredi rabbinical and political leaders want, and what the rest of the country is increasingly demanding. The former want things to remain as they are, and are pushing for legislation that would once again exempt tens of thousands of yeshiva students from IDF service. The latter – worn down by 600 days of war, repeated reserve duty, and a deepening manpower crisis – is saying: enough. For the haredi leadership – both political and rabbinic – it's as if October 7 never happened. As if hundreds of thousands of reservists haven't put their lives on hold. As if the frustration and anger of the non-haredi public over unequal burden-sharing simply do not exist. But they do. Very much so. October 7 changed the country in fundamental ways. One is in how it views its security doctrine – and what it takes to keep Israel safe. If, before October 7, the assumption was that passive deterrence alone could keep genocidal enemies at bay, there is now a realization that isn't enough. That explains Israel's more muscular responses to threats on all fronts: in Gaza, where the IDF continues to dismantle Hamas's military infrastructure; in Lebanon, where the army operates against Hezbollah despite a ceasefire; and in Syria, where two rockets fired at the Golan this week led to widespread IDF retaliation. Another shift is how the country views its army – and what kind of army it needs. October 7 shattered the notion that Israel could rely on a small, smart army, heavily dependent on technological wizardry. Sophisticated systems are vital, but they're not enough. Also required are large numbers of ground troops – widely deployed: in Gaza, across Judea and Samaria, along the Lebanese and Syrian borders (even, now, in Syria itself), on the Golan Heights, in the Jordan Valley, and along the Egyptian border. The model of a lean, hi-tech army – once the pride of defense planners – no longer suffices. Hi-tech warfare has its place, but so do massed ground forces. And Israel simply doesn't have enough of them. So where will they come from? The dream that aliyah from the West would fill the ranks remains largely that – a dream. Meanwhile, there's a large pool of healthy, military-aged men not being tapped. And that pool is in Bnei Brak, not Brooklyn. For decades, the political system kicked this can down the road. October 7 ended that game. There's growing recognition that the old formula no longer works – and the anger over the inequality is not going away. That anger will almost certainly manifest at the ballot box. By law, elections must be held by October 2026. But they may come sooner if the haredi parties follow through on threats to leave the government if legislation to their liking on the conscription issue is not passed. Either way, the next election will revolve around two defining issues: the failures of October 7 and haredi conscription. The numbers make clear what's at stake. More than 80,000 haredi men are currently exempt from service. Meanwhile, the IDF says it needs 10,000 more soldiers in the short term to meet operational demands. Last June, the High Court ruled that the long-standing exemptions for yeshiva students had no legal basis – setting the stage for this moment. Since then, the government has been under pressure to pass new legislation restoring the exemptions, or face widespread conscription orders. That clock has now run out. On Tuesday, a last-ditch meeting was held between haredi leaders and Likud MK Yuli Edelstein, chairman of the Knesset Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee, in search of a compromise. It failed. Bills have already been introduced to dissolve the Knesset, though Netanyahu is meeting with the key actors in this drama to try to avert that outcome. Edelstein – now a central figure in the crisis – is refusing to back down from two core demands: individual sanctions on draft dodgers, and high recruitment quotas for haredim. Anything less, he argues, would be a farce. 'A law without effective personal sanctions... is not conscription – it's evasion,' he said this week. 'I have opposed this all along.' For this, Edelstein has come under fire not only from the haredi parties, but also from within Likud. Some accuse him of taking a hard line for political gain during a national crisis. Rumors are swirling that Netanyahu may fire him. However, Edelstein insists that the law emerging from his committee will not be a fig leaf – it will be a genuine solution addressing the country's long-term security needs. The haredi parties, meanwhile, are out of patience and threatening to bolt if a bill to their liking isn't passed. Ironically, if they do bring down the government, it would be a government that has given them more power and influence than nearly any in history – a 'dream' coalition. Why blow it up? Because they've climbed so high up a tree that the only way to get down and save face is chopping the tree down completely. Promises were made. Redlines drawn. And now, any compromise might be seen by their base as betrayal. Since Rosh Hashanah, haredi leaders have been threatening to walk if legislation isn't passed. First the deadline was Rosh Hashanah. Then Hanukkah. Then the budget in March. Then Shavuot. Each deadline came and went – no bill, no walkout. That pattern erodes their credibility – not just with the general public, which increasingly sees these threats as empty, but also within their own community. And that community is growing anxious. Benefits are being cut. Sanctions are being enforced. Travel restrictions are being discussed. If haredi politicians can't deliver results, they risk losing not just leverage in the coalition – but their own public's trust. MEANWHILE, THE political map is beginning to stir ahead of potential elections. Most notably: former prime minister Naftali Bennett's return. With the exception of pro-Netanyahu Channel 14, all polls show that if Bennett runs, he wins – and emerges as the largest party. That said, Bennett has historically polled about 50% higher than he performs at the ballot box, so the numbers must be treated cautiously. Still, his return and the entry of other new (or new-old) players would shake up the electoral map. Others are positioning themselves as well. Former national security adviser Giora Eiland, now a regular media commentator, has hinted he may join Avigdor Liberman's Yisrael Beytenu Party. A new wave of figures – reservists, bereaved parents, and former hostages – may also enter the field, offering a different kind of political capital: one built on personal experience, not slogans. The ideological landscape is also revealing. A Midgam poll this week of 1,000 Jewish Israelis found 66% identify with the Right or Center-Right. Just 14% identify with the Left or Center-Left. The rest see themselves as centrists. This has clear implications for party strategy heading into elections – whenever they come. One party defying expectations – at least until recently – was The Democrats, the Labor-Meretz merger led by Yair Golan. Despite Meretz failing to enter the Knesset last time and Labor winning just four seats, Golan had been polling in the double digits. That was until May 20, when he said Israel kills babies 'as a hobby.' Since then, he's slipped several seats in the polls. That comment may cost him more than votes – it could cost him coalition options. If Bennett wins and tries to form a government without a Netanyahu-led Likud (if the prime minister does not lead the party, all kinds of coalition possibilities emerge), Otzma Yehudit, or the Religious Zionist Party, he'll face a choice: Golan, who maligned soldiers, or the haredim, who refuse to serve. Neither option will be popular. Elections – or even the smell of elections – always bring the promise of change. But they also bring complications. This time will be no different – whether the vote is this fall, next summer, or October 2026.
