AI tool put to test sifting public views on botox and fillers
Chris Vallance
Senior Technology Reporter Getty Images
An artificial intelligence (AI) tool has been used to sort through comments about botox and lip fillers, that were submitted as part of a public consultation, in what officials said was the first use of this kind in the UK.
Officials set the tool to work sifting responses to a Scottish government consultation on regulating non-surgical cosmetic procedures.
They found it came up with 'nearly identical' results, when compared to humans set the same task.
It is hoped the tool, dubbed 'Consult', will spare civil servants from similar time-consuming tasks in future, and save taxpayers an estimated £20m.
Consult is one of a planned set of government AI-powered tools that have collectively been dubbed 'Humphrey' after the wily senior civil servant, Sir Humphrey Appleby, from the classic 1980s sitcom Yes, Minister. The series often took aim at excessive bureaucracy in government.
In this trial the AI tool examined 2,000 submissions. But public consultations, which gather the views of UK citizens on issues under consideration by ministers, can generate tens of thousands of responses.
It was able to identify themes amongst the responses, and counted and catalogued answers accordingly – with human experts checking its work at both stages.
Consult's findings were then examined to see how they compared to a team of human experts working in parallel.
Technology secretary Peter Kyle said the initial success of the trial meant that Consult would be used across government 'very soon'.
'After demonstrating such promising results, Humphrey will help us cut the costs of governing and make it easier to collect and comprehensively review what experts and the public are telling us on a range of crucial issues,' he wrote.
The government hopes £45bn can be saved by wider public sector use of AI technology. 'Humans in the loop'
The government says that Consult is currently still in its trial stage and more evaluation will take place before any final decision to roll it out more widely.
There would always be 'humans in the loop' checking Consult's work, the government added.
Officials have also sought to address some of the persistent concerns about AI systems.
One is that they sometimes invent information – a failing known as 'hallucinating'.
Because the AI was only being asked to carry out a relatively limited task, officials said hallucination would not be a major problem.
Such AI tools, built using what are known as 'large language models' have also displayed bias, as they adsorb the prejudices inherent in the human-generated data on which they are trained.
But experts who worked with Consult had found it reduced bias overall, the government said, by removing opportunities for individual human analysts to 'project their own preconceived ideas'.
Consult has also been tested to check it can handle language containing spelling mistakes and other errors.
However, for now it only works in English, and responses in other languages spoken within the UK such as Welsh would need to be translated into English first.
READ SOURCE
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
10 minutes ago
- CBS News
When should retirees choose a HELOC over a reverse mortgage? Experts weigh in
We may receive commissions from some links to products on this page. Promotions are subject to availability and retailer terms. Retirees should closely compare their HELOC and reverse mortgage options before borrowing any equity from their home. Shkljoc/Getty Images Retirees are increasingly exploring home equity as a tool to manage their rising costs. While inflation affects all of us, retirees are particularly vulnerable to its effects because of their fixed incomes. However, because many seniors are homeowners, using home equity products could help them tap into their biggest asset. "Many retirees purchased their homes for significantly less than the current value and can enjoy the fruits of this value appreciation to be more comfortable in their later years," says Sarah DeFlorio, Vice President of Mortgage Banking at William Raveis Mortgage. Home equity lines of credit (HELOCs) and reverse mortgages are two popular home equity products, but they work very differently and are properly suited to different situations. If you're a current retiree or plan to retire soon and you own your own home, the below guide could help you choose the best lending tool for you. See how much equity you could borrow with a HELOC here. When should retirees choose a HELOC over a reverse mortgage? While every retiree has different financial circumstances, there are some broad guidelines for when each of these products may be more advantageous. Here's what to consider: When to consider a HELOC A HELOC functions as a revolving line of credit taken from your home equity. Similar to a credit card, you can use your HELOC as often and as many times as you want, as long as you're within your credit limit. The easy access to cash and the ability to draw again and again makes a HELOC a good option for both one-time and ongoing expenses, as long as you're able to repay the balance. And because you'll have to repay the HELOC by the end of the repayment period (often a 10- to 20-year period that follows a 10-year draw period), it's a good option for retirees who are only looking for a temporary cash solution. "It's ideal if you need to fund a one-time project like a home upgrade, want to consolidate high-interest debt and pay it off on a timeline, plan to sell or downsize in the next few years, or want to preserve home value for heirs," says Michael Brennan, President at Nationwide Mortgage Bankers. "It also works well when you have other assets and just need a liquidity bridge." Explore your current HELOC rates and offers here to learn more. When to consider a reverse mortgage Unlike a HELOC, a reverse mortgage serves as a longer-term solution. You can pull money from your home, often in a single lump sum or a series of payments. Then, you won't have to repay the loan until the primary borrower either dies or sells the home. The nature of reverse mortgages makes them an option for retirees who need to borrow money they won't have to repay, at least not while they're still in the home. For example, if a retiree doesn't have sufficient savings and needs an influx of cash each month to help cover their bills, a reverse mortgage could be the answer. For example, let's say you've retired with less money than you hoped and don't have the option of bringing in additional income. You could get monthly payments from your reverse mortgage to help cover your budget shortfall. As you receive payments, your loan balance rises — it's the exact opposite of a traditional mortgage. And in most cases, you (or your heirs, after your death) would use the proceeds of your home sale to repay the loan. "It can offer predictable monthly payments or lump-sum cash to handle those rising costs without draining your 401(k) or IRA," says Brennan. It's worth noting, however, that reverse mortgages are are limited to homeowners 62 years or older. If you're a younger retiree and need to tap into your home equity, you'll have to explore other alternatives. Learn more about your reverse mortgage options here. HELOC vs. reverse mortgage: Which is right for you? When choosing between a HELOC and a reverse mortgage, it's important to consider what you need the money for and how long you need it. If you need the money for a one-off expense, a HELOC is often a good option. But if you're looking for an option to help cover your monthly expenses, a reverse mortgage may be a better fit. Similarly, the timeline is key. You'll have to pay back a HELOC by the end of the repayment period, which could be between 20 and 30 years after you open it. Meanwhile, you won't have to repay a reverse mortgage until you leave the home (or your heirs repay it on your behalf after you die). Therefore, if you can't swing the monthly payments on a HELOC, a reverse mortgage may be your only option. It's important to consider whether you hope to leave your home to your loved ones. When you borrow from a HELOC, you'll eventually repay the balance, meaning you'll restore your equity in the home. But with a reverse mortgage, you typically don't pay it back while you're living in the home. Therefore, in the event of your death, your heirs may be forced to sell your home to repay the balance. And because the loan accrues interest the entire time, the balance continuously rises. By the time the house is sold, there may not be any money left for your loved ones to inherit after the loan has been repaid. Finally, as with any other lending product, make sure you understand the cost and terms. Both HELOCs and reverse mortgages are a bit more complex than your standard installment loan, and both will have applicable fees and interest. "While reverse mortgages can provide needed cash flow for some retirees, particularly those on a fixed income, they've also developed a reputation for high fees, complex terms, and aggressive marketing, raising concerns about whether borrowers fully understand what they're signing up for," says Sean Briscoe, the Director of Products and Payments at Alliant Credit Union. "In contrast, HELOCs are more transparent, with straightforward repayment terms and fewer surprises." In either case, don't commit until you have a clear understanding of what you're borrowing and why, as well as your responsibilities as the borrower. The bottom line Tapping into your home equity can be a great way to get an influx of cash as a retiree, and HELOCs and reverse mortgages are two solutions to help you do that. However, neither of these solutions is right for every retiree, and it's important to analyze your unique situation to determine the optimal fit. If you aren't sure which direction to go, a financial planner or another knowledgeable professional can take a holistic look at your personal finances to advise you on the best option.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Dr. Scott Zoldi Named in Constellation Research's AI 150 List
FICO Chief Analytics Officer recognized as a changemaker shaping the future of AI and digital transformation BOZEMAN, Mont., June 10, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--FICO (NYSE: FICO) Global analytics software company, FICO celebrates its chief analytics officer Dr. Scott Zoldi for being recognized by Constellation Research on its 2025 Artificial Intelligence (AI) 150, an elite list of executives leading AI transformation efforts around the globe. In just a short span, the rise of AI has sparked a wave of disruption and innovation across every industry. Leaders have been quick to harness this momentum, using AI to fast-track transformation and amplify their strategic influence. Responsible for AI and analytic innovation across FICO's products and technology solutions, Dr. Zoldi is listed as an inventor on 103 patents, in collaboration with other data and analytic scientists, and is also named on an additional 40+ patent applications in process. Selection in the AI150 is an accomplishment that recognizes Dr. Zoldi's ability to continually invent and operationalize key AI innovation and reflects FICO's position as an Industry leader promoting the Responsible use of AI. "It is an honor to be recognized as one of the AI150, the industry's most influential AI executives driving AI transformation across various industries," said Dr. Scott Zoldi, chief analytics officer at FICO. "We are living through the Golden Age of AI, and it is imperative for enterprises to innovate and operationalize at scale. AI is a powerful transformative tool, and innovation, AI development standards, AI blockchain governance, and expertise in AI operationalization can ensure AI technology provides meaningful scalable impact and precise decisions for business around the world." "In the Age of AI, we can expect AI to be infused in every part of the business. This rapidly evolving field has pioneers, policy shapers, and practitioners that will transform industries," said R "Ray" Wang, founder and CEO at Constellation Research. "The AI150 is our attempt to identify a small slice of the innovators and change agents that are making substantial contributions to the advancement of this revolution." Fueled by nominations from peers, industry thought leaders, technology vendors, and analysts, the six-month selection process for the AI150 list identified the executives leading real change. Each honoree showcases a deep understanding of how digital and exponential technologies are reshaping the business landscape and is actively steering their organization to thrive amid this ongoing transformation and beyond. "In the era of digital transformation, the Chief AI Officer is not just a role but a catalyst for innovation, driving the corporate revolution with the power of artificial intelligence," said Mark Minevich, global AI strategist, a president of Going Global Ventures and strategic partner to Mayfield Venture Capital. The full listing can be found here: About FICO FICO (NYSE: FICO) powers decisions that help people and businesses around the world prosper. Founded in 1956, the company is a pioneer in the use of predictive analytics and data science to improve operational decisions. FICO holds more than 200 US and foreign patents on technologies that increase profitability, customer satisfaction and growth for businesses in financial services, insurance, telecommunications, health care, retail and many other industries. Using FICO solutions, businesses in more than 80 countries do everything from protecting 4 billion payment cards from fraud, to improving financial inclusion, to increasing supply chain resiliency. The FICO® Score, used by 90% of top US lenders, is the standard measure of consumer credit risk in the US and has been made available in over 40 other countries, improving risk management, credit access and transparency. Learn more at Join the conversation at & For FICO news and media resources, visit FICO is a registered trademark of Fair Isaac Corporation in the U.S. and other countries. View source version on Contacts Julie Huangpress@ Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
21 minutes ago
- Forbes
Federal Disaster Tax Breaks Are Big, But Which Declarations Count?
TOPSHOT - A home burns during the Palisades Fire in Pacific Palisades, California, on January 8, ... More 2025. At least five people have been killed in wildfires rampaging around Los Angeles, officials said on January 8, with firefighters overwhelmed by the speed and ferocity of multiple blazes. (Photo by AGUSTIN PAULLIER / AFP) (Photo by AGUSTIN PAULLIER/AFP via Getty Images) Disaster victims get big tax benefits from federal disaster declarations. In fact, it can make your wildfire settlement tax free. As such, you might logically assume that it is always 100% whether your particular disaster gets the helpful federal nod from FEMA. But in the case of wildfires, is it always so clear? The tax law defines a Federally declared disaster as 'any disaster subsequently determined by the President of the United States to warrant assistance by the Federal Government under the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act,' commonly known as the Stafford Act. It has three principal types of disaster relief declarations for wildfires: Only two wildfires appear to have obtained their FEMA disaster declarations as Declared Emergencies since 2019, the 2020 Oregon Wildfires (designated EM-3542-OR) and the 2021 California Caldor Fire (designated EM-3571-CA). Declared Emergencies are less common for wildfires, perhaps because there is a separate avenue for wildfires, Fire Management Assistance Declarations under Section 420 of the Stafford Act. Some wildfires are given Major Disaster Declarations, including the recent 2025 LA fires. Historically, so were the 2015 California Butte Fires (DR-4240-CA), the 2017 North Bay Fires (DR-4344-CA), and 2018 Woolsey Fire and Camp Fire (DR-4407-CA). Major Disaster Declarations qualify victims for the widest scope of direct federal assistance through FEMA via Any wildfire with a Major Disaster Declaration clearly qualifies as a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. Section 1.165-11(b)(1) of the IRS Regulations says a Federally declared disaster 'includes both a major disaster declared under Section 401 of the Stafford Act and an emergency declared under section 501 of the Stafford Act.' These two types of declarations are specifically included within the definition of a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. How about the third category? Section 1.165-11(b)(1) is silent about Fire Management Assistance Declarations, the third major type of declaration for wildfires. But the statutory language suggests that a Federally declared disaster means any declaration under the Stafford Act. Plainly, Section 420's Fire Management Assistance Declarations are federal relief so seem to be covered. Fire Management Assistance Declarations usually do not provide or authorize the same scope of direct federal assistance to wildfire victims as Major Disaster Declarations. However, Section 165(i)(5) of the tax code only requires that the disaster be determined by the President to 'warrant assistance by the Federal Government' under the Stafford Act. Providing money, equipment, supplies, and FEMA personnel to a State or local government to assist in wildfire containment and recovery efforts appears to fall within the definition of 'assistance by the Federal Government' under the Stafford Act. Many recent major wildfires received disaster declarations under Section 420's Fire Management Assistance provisions. The LA fires in 2025, including in Pacific Palisades were not originally Major Disaster Declarations, but Federal Management Assistance Declarations. However, on the day after they were granted relief under The Fire Management Assistance provisions of Section 420, they were then also the subject of a Major Disaster Declaration under Section 401. This supplemental disaster declaration is important for victims for non-tax reasons, but the Fire Management Assistance Declaration was arguably already sufficient to qualify the fire as a Federally declared disaster for tax purposes. Many wildfires remain disasters declared only under Section 420's Fire Management Assistance relief provisions without a Major Disaster Declaration, and this is arguably enough to unlock the tax benefits. Fire Management Assistance relief under Section 420 of the Stafford Act appears to often be granted for wildfires for the same purpose that a Declared Emergency declaration would be used outside of the wildfire context. There have only been two wildfires nationwide that have been identified as Declared Emergencies since 2019, compared to 305 fires that received a Fire Management Assistance Declaration. There are differences between the two types of declarations. However, both are usually granted to help state and local governments deal with emerging disasters that need to be contained, or to help with rescuing and immediate medical treatment of victims. The regulations under Section 165 of the tax code suggest that Declared Emergencies under Section 501 of the Stafford Act are considered Federally declared disasters for tax purposes, regardless of whether they later result in a Major Disaster Declaration. It would be unusual if similar federal assistance usually provided in the wildfire context, and also under the Stafford Act, would not be treated similarly as a Declared Emergency for income tax purposes. Some devastating wildfires are not designated as disasters by FEMA under any provisions of the Stafford Act. For example, the Mountain View Fire of 2020 burned for nearly a month, consuming nearly 21,000 acres in California, destroying 80 buildings (damaging many more) and killing at least one person. This fire was not large enough for FEMA to consider it outside of the combined capability of the California state and local governments and relief organizations to address without federal involvement. Therefore, the Mountain View Fire was designated by California as a state disaster, but not a federal disaster by FEMA. A disaster declaration by a state is NOT sufficient to qualify a disaster as a Federally declared disaster for federal tax purposes. It is easy to get confused, but no state-declared disaster that is not a federally declared disaster has a disaster description and designation on the FEMA website. There is no FEMA disaster declaration page for the 2020 Mountain View Fire, under the EM, DR, or FM prefixes. For state-declared disasters that are not Federally declared disaster, the main federal recognition of the disaster is not by FEMA. The SBA way offer relief, but that is not sufficient to make a state-declared disaster a Federally declared disaster for income tax purposes.
