Cost of traffic congestion in Galway will be equivalent of almost €1,000 a year for each inhabitant
The cost of
traffic
congestion in
Galway
will be equivalent to almost €1,000 per year for every one of its inhabitants by 2040, a new
Department of Transport
report suggests.
The report suggests there will be substantial increases to the cost of congestion in
Cork
and
Waterford
too, with a doubling overall across the three metropolitan areas.
The greatest impact to be felt in Galway, however, where the cost per head of population will reach €891 if action is not taken, well ahead of the equivalent figures for Cork and Waterford at €309 and €207 respectively and almost on a par with
Dublin
, where it is estimated the economic cost is set to be €1,047 per year in 15 years' time.
The Economic Cost of Congestion in the Regional Cities 2022-2040 report suggests the combined cost of traffic congestion in the three metropolitan areas will increase from €98.6 million in 2022 to €226.5 million in 2040 with the cost in Galway expected to more than treble from €35.3 million to €106.9 million.
READ MORE
A similar report for Dublin published in December 2023 suggested the cost of congestion in the capital had been €336 million in 2022 and was on course to reach €1.5 billion in 15 years' time.
All of the figures involved are at 2016 prices, when an earlier study was conducted, and are based on current plans and policies.
In the new report, Galway also stands out due to the expectation its congestion problems will be more spread across the day, more than doubling at lunchtime, rather than being driven to a substantial extent, as in the other cities observed, by worsening problems during rush hours, especially the morning one.
'Travel patterns in Galway will be different to other cities due to the employment patterns and industry and increasing share of congestion experienced by goods vehicles,' the report says.
[
Decades of 'daily frustration' over traffic end as Killaloe-Ballina bridge opens
Opens in new window
]
The authors suggest significant infrastructure projects currently in the pipeline, particularly in Cork, will deliver some benefits over the latter half of this decade but that congestion and the costs associated with it will then start to rise more quickly again during the 2030s.
'Results show that planned transport interventions in each city's transport strategies will have an impact in reducing the overall cost of congestion. However, they are not sufficient to offset most of the increased cost, which is driven by factors such as population, employment and economic growth.'
Government projections for the three cities suggest they will experience an increase in population of almost 150,000, an increase of about 40 per cent on current numbers.
The report suggests a variety of mitigating actions could help reduce the impact with greater numbers of people working from home potentially reducing the cost involved by between 21 per cent and 31 per cent by 2040.
It says, however, that increased public and active transport options will be needed to curb the scale of the increases.
A key difference between the regional cities and Dublin, it suggests, is the greater proportion of private cars involved outside of the capital, 75 per cent of vehicles involved, compared with 48 per cent, with lower figures for public transport, cycling and walking.
'This reflects the insufficient scale and coverage of the public-transport network as well as poor frequency and accessibility in regional cities,' the report finds. 'These results indicate that road space may be occupied by single- or low-occupancy vehicles and reducing private cars from the road will be a key measure to reduce congestion in regional cities.'
The findings will are expected to influence policymaking at the department in the coming years.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Nama chief makes good on Lenihan order not to ‘mess it up'
The late minister for finance Brian Lenihan, who set up the National Asset Management Agency (Nama) in 2009, left five words ringing in the ears of agency chief executive Brendan McDonagh shortly before he passed away 14 years ago this week. 'Brendan, don't mess this up,' Lenihan told McDonagh in their last meeting before he died, the Nama chief recalled to reporters on Wednesday. When Nama took over €72 billion of mainly toxic commercial property loans from five banks for a discounted price of €32 billion, the fear was that it would lose billions. Even when Ireland was at the end of an international bailout programme in 2013, members of the rescue team told Department of Finance officials that Nama would likely end up with a €10 billion shortfall. READ MORE It wasn't helped by Nama overpaying to the tune of €5.4 billion for the loans in the first place – adhering to a long-term economic value method forced upon it by legislation to lessen the holes that Nama transfers would trigger in the domestic banks' balance sheets. Many objectives have been projected on to Nama over the years, such as fixing the housing crisis , by virtue of the swathes of land it controlled; contributing more to the common good; and providing more homes for social housing, even though local authorities ended up accepting only about 2,400 of the almost 7,000 units offered over the years. Nama's remit widened about 13 years ago to deliver thousands of homes and develop land in the Dublin docklands . But Nama's core objective, enshrined in the very Act that set it up, was to obtain the best achievable financial return for the State. It made enemies along the way. Try finding a developer that has much good to say about dealing with Nama officials over the years – even ones that it agreed to work with, while enforcing against others. It's not difficult to find critics, too, in the halls of Leinster House. But it is now on track to deliver a lifetime surplus of €5.05 billion – having upgraded its forecast on Wednesday by €250 million – by the time it is wound down at the end of this year. Adding the €5.4 billion it first needed to recoup to break even on the original overpayment actually brings the total financial gains for the State to more than €11 billion. Lenihan would surely have approved of that outcome.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
How the ‘like' button was used by social media companies to turbocharge their business models
The 'like' button and its palette of variations is used about 160 million times a day globally and it is now the most widely used symbol of affirmation in the digital world. The story of how and why it quickly established this status in the noughties, how social platforms have exploited it to turbo boost their business models since and its future in the world of artificial intelligence is the subject of a fascinating new book, Like: The Button that Changed the World . Bob Goodson, co-author of the book with Martin Reeves, played an important role in the button's development. While he says that, as with most innovative breakthroughs, no one person can claim to have developed the like button single-handedly, he was one half of a two-person team at the then start-up online directory Yelp that developed the first button that allowed users to stay on the same page after clicking. Yelp, which is now a $1 billion business, was also the first to put multiple emotional buttons on a web page. Then as now, the big issue was engagement. READ MORE 'In the early years of the web, about 5 per cent of people created content and 95 per cent simply consumed it and that was a real problem for platforms who wanted to grow,' he tells The Irish Times. 'Putting content on the web in its early days was a really geeky thing to do. They were technical issues, there was dial up, joining forums, it was very male-dominated and women didn't feel safe on the internet. This was before the nice graphical interfaces were introduced and it was all text-based. Yelp and others were thinking about ways of bringing the barrier down and introducing 'likes' proved a real winner.' Today, Goodson runs a Silicon Valley-based firm, Quid, whose AI models are used by many of the top Fortune 50 companies, while Reeves is chairman of Boston Consulting Group's business strategy think-tank BCG Henderson Institute. Their book explores the psychology of likes and finds evolutionary motives. Likes boost survival chances by contributing to the friendship, communication and hierarchy that maximises social learning. We have evolved to get a buzz from liking and that applies to both giving and receiving. A positive reaction to a social-media post causes a frisson of excitement and a feel-good surge and this is the psychological territory that the like button taps into. Interestingly, it doesn't work in reverse. Pioneers who tried 'don't like' buttons soon dropped them as they found users hated them. The thumb symbol is another enduring feature of the like button and many of the variations also incorporate elements of the hand. 'We think there's something very powerful about the hand. Monks in the 14th century used to draw hands with pointing fingers in the margins of manuscripts, called manicules. People have been interested in interacting with text like this for as long as it has been written down,' Goodson notes. Liking is a form of content creation. When you click a like you are putting your mark down forever. If you are not careful, it could cost you your job — Bob Goodson Facebook 's adoption of the like button was the key development for the 'like economy' and provided a huge boost to its fortunes from 2009 onwards. Others quickly followed. As analytics became more and more powerful, like data has become a digital gold mine, allowing platforms to customise content to users and sell that user data to those wanting to reach them. The like button greases the wheels of this model and the algorithms here are the secret sauce, guarded carefully. As the authors put it: 'Your use of a platform can reveal behaviour you don't even reflect on or recognise about yourself. The timing of your activity on the site, for example, can say a lot about the typical rhythm of your day, and the emotional valence of your postings can serve as a kind of mood ring you didn't know you were wearing. Like poker players highly adept at spotting tells, the social-media platforms you use pick up on signals you're not conscious of transmitting.' Secrecy is a recurring theme. 'It's a neat trick on the part of the platforms, giving their product away for free to users without being too explicit about the fact that, in fact, those users are the product.' Not that consumers seem to be too bothered. Arguably having goods and services pitched at you isn't a problem if the algorithm is serving up things that you've told it you are actually interested in – whether you've done that consciously or unconsciously. More worryingly is the effect of likes and/or the lack of them, on the more vulnerable. Children are a particular area of concern in regard to issues such as self-esteem, Goodson acknowledges. 'Social media is a powerfully addictive thing because of the game the platforms are playing for attention, and they will use whatever works. It has created an experience that requires a lot of self-discipline and awareness to keep it healthy. There's a growing belief that children are not ready for it. We're now seeing regulation in this area, such as in Australia, which is prohibiting under-16s from using platforms. My expectation is that trend will continue and that there will need to be stronger protections and regulations for younger people.' Likes are not a trivial matter for those of any age, however, as many public figures have found to their extreme cost. 'Liking is a form of content creation. When you click a like you are putting your mark down forever. If you are not careful, it could cost you your job.' Likes are also playing an important role in the ongoing development of AI, albeit in a different way. 'There are like buttons in the chat apps. They use thumbs up and thumbs down because it won't offend the model. They want you to interact with it because it will improve performance of the large language model. It's just as important. We also think the like data that the platforms hold are very important data sets to train the models. It could be a real competitive advantage for Meta and X .' Reeves and Goodson have produced a thoughtful, well researched and easily accessible book on this subject, exploring the deep significance of what appears to be simple and intuitive feature that we take for granted, but one that in fact has a profound influence on our lives. It gets a thumbs up. Like: The Button That Changed the World, by Martin Reeves and Bob Goodson, is published by Harvard Business Review Press
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
EirGrid paid former boss Mark Foley €347,000 last year after he stepped down as court case loomed
EirGrid paid former chief executive Mark Foley more than €347,000 last year, when he resigned from the national grid company following a car crash that led to a prosecution, figures show. Judge Anne Watkin dismissed a District Court case against Mr Foley for drink-driving in October, after ruling that a blood test showing him to have been four times over the alcohol limit could not be admitted as evidence. Mr Foley resigned as chief executive on April 12th last year, days before his case was first mentioned before Dún Laoghaire District Court on April 16th. EirGrid's annual report shows that the State company paid him €347,076 in total in 2024, including notice payments and pension contributions. READ MORE That included a basic salary to that date of €135,000, plus a €173,076 notice payment on his resignation, along with pension contributions of €32,000 and benefits of €7,000. 'On April 12th 2024 Mr Foley gave notice in accordance with the terms of his contract of his decision to retire as chief executive,' the report states. 'Payments were made to Mr Foley in lieu of notice and accrued holidays in accordance with the terms of his contract of employment to the total of €173,076,' it notes. EirGrid's financial year covers the 12 months to the end of September. Mr Foley's basic pay for 2024 of €134,000 was less than the €234,000 that he received in 2023, when he served for a full year. His 2024 pension contribution of €32,000 also trailed the previous year's payment of €66,000. EirGrid paid its chairman, Brendan Touhey, €21,600 in fees while board members who served for the full financial year received €12,600 each. Will rent reform make building apartments viable? Listen | 40:12 Martin Corrigan, EirGrid's chief governance officer, stepped into the company's top post on an interim basis in April last year while the board sought a successor to Mr Foley. As he was not an executive director, the company's annual report does not include details of his pay. Cathal Marley took over as chief executive in April, joining from fellow State utility Gas Networks Ireland, where he had held the same role. The Government last year approved a €50,000 boost to the annual salary for the top job at EirGrid, bringing basic pay to €300,000. The move followed representations from former minister for the Environment Eamon Ryan. EirGrid will publish details of Mr Marley's pay and benefits in next year's annual report. The State company runs the national grid in the Republic, and owns the North's grid company, System Operator Northern Ireland. The group posted a €10 million profit last year and paid the State a €4 million dividend.
