Pope Francis has died, aged 88. These were his greatest reforms and controversies
There were many unusual aspects of Pope Francis' papacy. He was the first Jesuit pope, the first from the Americas (and the Southern Hemisphere), the first to choose the name 'Francis' and the first to give a TED talk. He was also the first pope in more than 600 years to be elected following the resignation, rather than death, of his predecessor.
From the very start of his papacy, Francis seemed determined to do things differently and present the papacy in a new light. Even in thinking about his burial, he chose the unexpected: to be placed to rest not in the Vatican, but in the Basilica of St Mary Major in Rome – the first pope to be buried there in hundreds of years.
Vatican News reported the late Pope Francis had requested his funeral rites be simplified.
'The renewed rite,' said Archbishop Diego Ravelli, 'seeks to emphasise even more that the funeral of the Roman Pontiff is that of a pastor and disciple of Christ and not of a powerful person of this world.'
Straddling a line between 'progressive' and 'conservative', Francis experienced tension with both sides. In doing so, his papacy shone a spotlight on what it means to be Catholic today.
Between a rock and a hard place
Francis was deemed not progressive enough by some, yet far too progressive by others.
His apostolic exhortation (an official papal teaching on a particular issue or action) Amoris Laetitia, ignited great controversy for seemingly being (more) open to the question of whether people who have divorced and remarried may receive Eucharist.
He also disappointed progressive Catholics, many of whom hoped he would make stronger changes on issues such as the roles of women, married clergy, and the broader inclusion of LGBTQIA+ Catholics.
The reception of his exhortation Querida Amazonia was one such example. In this document, Francis did not endorse marriage for priests, despite bishops' requests for this. He also did not allow the possibility of women being ordained as deacons to address a shortage of ordained ministers. His discerning spirit saw there was too much division and no clear consensus for change.
Francis was also openly critical of Germany's controversial 'Synodal Way' – a series of conferences with bishops and lay people – that advocated for positions contrary to Church teachings. Francis expressed concern on multiple occasions that this project was a threat to the unity of the Church.
At the same time, Francis was no stranger to controversy from the conservative side of the Church, receiving 'dubia' or 'theological doubts' over his teaching from some of his Cardinals. In 2023, he took the unusual step of responding to some of these doubts.
Impact on the Catholic Church
In many ways, the most striking thing about Francis was not his words or theology, but his style. He was a modest man, even foregoing the Apostolic Palace's grand papal apartments to live in the Vatican's simpler guest house.
He may well be remembered most for his simplicity of dress and habits, his welcoming and pastoral style and his wise spirit of discernment.
He is recognised as giving a clear witness to the life, love and joy of Jesus in the spirit of the Second Vatican Council – a point of major reform in modern Church history. This witness has translated into two major developments in Church teachings and life.
Advertise with NZME.
Love for our common home
The first of these relates to environmental teachings. In 2015, Francis released his ground-breaking encyclical, Laudato si': On Care for Our Common Home. It expanded Catholic social teaching by giving a comprehensive account of how the environment reflects our God-given 'common home'.
Consistent with recent popes such as Benedict XVI and John Paul II, Francis acknowledged climate change and its destructive impacts and causes. He summarised key scientific research to forcefully argue for an evidence-based approach to addressing humans' impact on the environment.
He also made a pivotal and innovative contribution to the climate change debate by identifying the ethical and spiritual causes of environmental destruction.
Francis argued combating climate change relied on the 'ecological conversion' of the human heart, so that people may recognise the God-given nature of our planet and the fundamental call to care for it. Without this conversion, pragmatic and political measures wouldn't be able to counter the forces of consumerism, exploitation and selfishness.
Francis argued a new ethic and spirituality was needed. Specifically, he said Jesus' way of love – for other people and all creation – is the transformative force that could bring sustainable change for the environment and cultivate fraternity among people (and especially with the poor).
Synodality: Moving towards a Church that listens
Francis' second major contribution, and one of the most significant aspects of his papacy, was his commitment to 'synodality'. While there's still confusion over what synodality actually means, and its potential for political distortion, it is above all a way of listening and discerning through openness to the guidance of the Holy Spirit.
It involves hierarchy and lay people transparently and honestly discerning together, in service of the mission of the church. Synodality is as much about the process as the goal. This makes sense as Pope Francis was a Jesuit, an order focused on spreading Catholicism through spiritual formation and discernment.
Drawing on his rich Jesuit spirituality, Francis introduced a way of conversation centred on listening to the Holy Spirit and others, while seeking to cultivate friendship and wisdom.
With the conclusion of the second session of the Synod on Synodality in October 2024, it is too soon to assess its results. However, those who have been involved in synodal processes have reported back on their transformative potential.
Archbishop of Brisbane, Mark Coleridge, explained how participating in the 2015 Synod 'was an extraordinary experience [and] in some ways an awakening'.
Catholicism in the modern age
Francis' papacy inspired both great joy and aspirations, as well as boiling anger and rejection. He laid bare the agonising fault lines within the Catholic community and struck at key issues of Catholic identity, triggering debate over what it means to be Catholic in the world today.
He leaves behind a Church that seems more divided than ever, with arguments, uncertainty and many questions rolling in his wake. But he has also provided a way for the Church to become more converted to Jesus' way of love, through synodality and dialogue.
Francis showed us that holding labels such as 'progressive' or 'conservative' won't enable the Church to live out Jesus' mission of love – a mission he emphasised from the very beginning of his papacy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
25-05-2025
- Scoop
Church Abuse Survivors Dismayed By New Zealand Catholic Bishops Pastoral Statement On Fighting Hopelessness
The New Zealand Catholic Bishops published a Pastoral Statement, 22 May 2025, on 'Fighting Hopelessness in the Jubilee Year of Hope.' Survivors of abuse respond. For the New Zealand Catholic bishops to speak up for the cause of peace and justice while denying peace and justice to victims of abuse within the Catholic Church of New Zealand is a far cry from genuine faith, justice, compassion, and hopefulness. Church leaders moralising on the world stage when their actions do not align with their words makes their pastoral statements hypocritical, sanctimonious, and insincere. For the New Zealand Catholic bishops to hide their actions behind prayer and press releases while ignoring the plight of victims and survivors within their dioceses makes their pastoral statements nothing more than hollow words. Denying a compassionate response to complainants, not treating victims with respect and fairness, blocking proper investigations into abuse complaints, setting lawyers onto victims, and name-calling survivors, negates the bishops' moral credibility for a pastoral statement on fighting hopelessness. The time has long passed for church leaders to practice what they preach. Victims and survivors of church-based abuse deserve the 'compassion, respect, and fairness' promised by the New Zealand bishops, in positive actions and not in meaningless pastoral statements. This positive action is needed from all people of goodwill as spoken about in the bishops' Pastoral Statement. The social sin of Catholics themselves to not hold their church leaders to account remains a major problem.
Scoop
23-05-2025
- Scoop
The Only Good Catholic Is A catholic With A Small ‘c'
Opinion – Martin LeFevre – Meditations To idealists, imagination is the greatest gift and highest capacity we have as human beings. It isnt, insight is. But imagination is what leading lights of the left believe is the fount of spirituality and a just world. It's mind boggling, but to a significant degree, the left is placing its hopes for a better world in the new Catholic pope. There is no surer sign of the bankruptcy of insight and ideas from people who still care about the Earth, the poor and the marginalized. The legacy left is beginning to acknowledge that the roots of the global crisis lie much deeper than political and economic analysis. But liberalism's prominent voices offer only lip service to 'tending to the spiritually exhausted,' repeating bromides about 'the importance of hope and the power of storytelling.' Those who point out the inadequacy of such philosophical and spiritual shallowness are called 'particularly pernicious climate doomers propagating misery and incorrect narratives about how screwed we all are.' Apparently, the worst sin 'above all, is climate doomers guilty of failing to use their imagination.' To idealists, imagination is the greatest gift and highest capacity we have as human beings. It isn't, insight is. But imagination is what leading lights of the left believe is the fount of spirituality and a just world. To insist on seeing and remaining with things as they are, is, to an idealist, 'like bringing poison to a potluck.' Imagining a better world not only prevents one from seeing the world as it is however; it precludes meeting the challenges of the polycrisis, because to project an ideal — an idea of what should be — is to escape from facing, understanding and thereby changing what is. For the comfortably agnostic or the dogmatically atheistic, 'tending to the spiritually exhausted' goes no deeper than 'meditating on an antique violin as a symbol of sustainability.' Such tawdry blather contributes to hopelessness almost as much as Trump's demented policies. A 'climate doomer,' it turns out, is someone who doesn't subscribe to the theology of hope, imagination and storytelling, but points out that 'embracing uncertainty because history is full of surprises' is self-serving bullshit. Why is it foolish to believe history is full of surprises? Because life is full of surprises, while human history is variations on the ancient themes of conflict and war, greed and exploitation. Human nature hasn't changed since fully modern humans emerged tens of thousands of years ago, and the implacable culmination of the egoistic and fragmentary aspects of human nature are what we're up against in the digital age. Superficial spirituality becomes downright absurd when progressive editors quote Catholic theology in their editorials: 'Every one of us, whether we were born in the United States of America or on the North Pole, we are all given the gift of being created in the image and likeness of God, and the day we forget that is the day we forget who we are.' Does anyone, even a Mass-attending Catholic, believe that humans 'have been created in the image and likeness of God' anymore? That would make God one small Supreme Being. Antiquated theological issues notwithstanding, there's an urgent question: Can the left bring new, transformative insight into the relationship between the spiritual dimension and the political dimension? We can. The problem for progressives arises in trying to cut the global polycrisis to fit the Procrustean bed of inane doctrines such as man was created in the image of God, and irrelevant institutions like the Roman Catholic Church. On the political level, certainly the idea that a 'leftwing economic populism' can counter rightwing white nationalism is a non-starter. The left does not need economic populism anymore than it needs the theology and leadership of the Catholic Church. It needs new insights that infuse the political dimension with authentic spiritual experiences of wholeness and holiness in the individual. The irony is that the very progressives who accuse others of a failure of imagination are guilty of it, since they take human nature, and political and religious institutions, as givens, and continue to believe that activism with respect to them will bring about radical change. Clearly, until we stop giving priority to national governments and religious institutions, nothing is going to change. With regard to one of the two remaining superpowers, the USA, its pathocracy has become a circus-like diversion from the rapacious power of transnational capitalism. With respect to the other superpower, China, the ruthless suppression of individual freedom belies the fear of losing control. And since control is an illusion, the CCP has reason to fear. As far as the Catholic Church, I don't see how anyone can take a religion composed of costumed cardinals, bloated bishops and pedophile priests seriously. Even if the Church cleans up its act and gives away its wealth to the poor as Jesus taught, its beliefs and doctrines, rituals and traditions are not spiritual, but antithetical to experiencing immanence. Politically, the left's boilerplate theology of hope and storytelling is as irrelevant and ineffective in meeting the global crisis of consciousness (manifesting outwardly as the polycrisis), as the core Christian precept that 'we are all created in the image and likeness of God.' The left is looking to the pope because the world desperately needs an effective moral conscience. However, it's not going to come from any organized religion, or national government or inter-national institution. Nor is it going to come from AI, which will be smarter but no more intelligent than the human beings who program it. What can we do? We can ignite a psychological revolution within ourselves, and help create a global body of world citizens of great insight and moral suasion. Whole people who don't identify with a nation or religion and eschew power in perpetuity. The latter won't be possible without the former. And without a psychological revolution, the foreseeable future is very dark indeed. You don't have to be an oracle to see that.
Scoop
23-05-2025
- Scoop
The Only Good Catholic Is A Catholic With A Small ‘c'
It's mind boggling, but to a significant degree, the left is placing its hopes for a better world in the new Catholic pope. There is no surer sign of the bankruptcy of insight and ideas from people who still care about the Earth, the poor and the marginalized. The legacy left is beginning to acknowledge that the roots of the global crisis lie much deeper than political and economic analysis. But liberalism's prominent voices offer only lip service to 'tending to the spiritually exhausted,' repeating bromides about 'the importance of hope and the power of storytelling.' Those who point out the inadequacy of such philosophical and spiritual shallowness are called 'particularly pernicious climate doomers propagating misery and incorrect narratives about how screwed we all are.' Apparently, the worst sin 'above all, is climate doomers guilty of failing to use their imagination.' To idealists, imagination is the greatest gift and highest capacity we have as human beings. It isn't, insight is. But imagination is what leading lights of the left believe is the fount of spirituality and a just world. To insist on seeing and remaining with things as they are, is, to an idealist, 'like bringing poison to a potluck.' Imagining a better world not only prevents one from seeing the world as it is however; it precludes meeting the challenges of the polycrisis, because to project an ideal -- an idea of what should be -- is to escape from facing, understanding and thereby changing what is. For the comfortably agnostic or the dogmatically atheistic, 'tending to the spiritually exhausted' goes no deeper than 'meditating on an antique violin as a symbol of sustainability.' Such tawdry blather contributes to hopelessness almost as much as Trump's demented policies. A 'climate doomer,' it turns out, is someone who doesn't subscribe to the theology of hope, imagination and storytelling, but points out that 'embracing uncertainty because history is full of surprises' is self-serving bullshit. Why is it foolish to believe history is full of surprises? Because life is full of surprises, while human history is variations on the ancient themes of conflict and war, greed and exploitation. Human nature hasn't changed since fully modern humans emerged tens of thousands of years ago, and the implacable culmination of the egoistic and fragmentary aspects of human nature are what we're up against in the digital age. Superficial spirituality becomes downright absurd when progressive editors quote Catholic theology in their editorials: 'Every one of us, whether we were born in the United States of America or on the North Pole, we are all given the gift of being created in the image and likeness of God, and the day we forget that is the day we forget who we are.' Does anyone, even a Mass-attending Catholic, believe that humans 'have been created in the image and likeness of God' anymore? That would make God one small Supreme Being. Antiquated theological issues notwithstanding, there's an urgent question: Can the left bring new, transformative insight into the relationship between the spiritual dimension and the political dimension? We can. The problem for progressives arises in trying to cut the global polycrisis to fit the Procrustean bed of inane doctrines such as man was created in the image of God, and irrelevant institutions like the Roman Catholic Church. On the political level, certainly the idea that a 'leftwing economic populism' can counter rightwing white nationalism is a non-starter. The left does not need economic populism anymore than it needs the theology and leadership of the Catholic Church. It needs new insights that infuse the political dimension with authentic spiritual experiences of wholeness and holiness in the individual. The irony is that the very progressives who accuse others of a failure of imagination are guilty of it, since they take human nature, and political and religious institutions, as givens, and continue to believe that activism with respect to them will bring about radical change. Clearly, until we stop giving priority to national governments and religious institutions, nothing is going to change. With regard to one of the two remaining superpowers, the USA, its pathocracy has become a circus-like diversion from the rapacious power of transnational capitalism. With respect to the other superpower, China, the ruthless suppression of individual freedom belies the fear of losing control. And since control is an illusion, the CCP has reason to fear. As far as the Catholic Church, I don't see how anyone can take a religion composed of costumed cardinals, bloated bishops and pedophile priests seriously. Even if the Church cleans up its act and gives away its wealth to the poor as Jesus taught, its beliefs and doctrines, rituals and traditions are not spiritual, but antithetical to experiencing immanence. Politically, the left's boilerplate theology of hope and storytelling is as irrelevant and ineffective in meeting the global crisis of consciousness (manifesting outwardly as the polycrisis), as the core Christian precept that 'we are all created in the image and likeness of God.' The left is looking to the pope because the world desperately needs an effective moral conscience. However, it's not going to come from any organized religion, or national government or inter-national institution. Nor is it going to come from AI, which will be smarter but no more intelligent than the human beings who program it. What can we do? We can ignite a psychological revolution within ourselves, and help create a global body of world citizens of great insight and moral suasion. Whole people who don't identify with a nation or religion and eschew power in perpetuity. The latter won't be possible without the former. And without a psychological revolution, the foreseeable future is very dark indeed. You don't have to be an oracle to see that.
