Will Pope Leo XIV continue the Vatican's legacy on climate change?
A puff of white smoke, a procession of Swiss Guards, and Habemus Papus: we have Pope Leo XIV.
Most people knew little about Cardinal Robert Francis Prevost before he became head of the Catholic Church yesterday, but his views are now the subject of intense speculation and analysis.
What does the first US-born Pope's appointment mean for climate change and environmental issues? Will he be a strong successor to Pope Francis, who was credited with being an 'unflinching global champion of climate action'?
Time will tell, but there are reasons to be hopeful that the 69-year-old Pontiff will take up his predecessor's mantle on this vital global front.
New Pope Leo "is outspoken about the need for urgent action on climate change", according to the College of Cardinals Report, an initiative from an international team of Catholic journalists and researchers which profiles would-be Popes to help the cardinals make an informed choice.
Last November, during a seminar in Rome dedicated to discussing climate change, then-Cardinal Prevost stressed it is time to move 'from words to action.' He said the answer to this challenge must be based on the Social Doctrine of the Church.
'Dominion over nature' - the task which God gave humanity - should not become 'tyrannical,' he said. It must be a 'relationship of reciprocity' with the environment.
Prevost - who was president of the Pontifical Commission for Latin America and Prefect of the Dicastery for Bishops - cautioned against the 'harmful' consequences of technological development.
He reiterated the Holy See's commitment to protecting the environment, pointing to a simpler embrace of existing green technology, such as the Vatican installing solar panels and shifting to electric vehicles.
According to the College of Cardinals Report, "He aligns closely with Pope Francis' environmental priorities."
Prevost spent many years working as a missionary in Peru, where he also holds citizenship. Christine Allen, director and chief executive of Catholic aid agency CAFOD, says this means he 'brings with him the vital perspective of the Global South, elevating voices from the margins to centre stage.'
Pope Leo takes the top job at a critical moment in human history.
Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 are now 50 per cent higher than during pre-industrial times - largely due to burning fossil fuels. This has raised global temperatures by 1.3°c, unleashing a slew of increasing climate disasters - from heatwaves to droughts, floods and wildfires.
These are realities that US President Donald Trump's administration is seeking to suppress and avoid. As just the latest example in a litany of climate action cutbacks, the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration will no longer track the cost of climate change-fueled weather disasters.
The Cardinals will no doubt have considered Trump's outsized geopolitical influence when deciding to elect a Pope from the US.
And Leo has already shown that he is not afraid to stand up to the self-styled US strongman, and call out the perceived moral failings of his administration.
In February, his X account shared a post which was critical of the administration's deportation of a US resident to El Salvador, and then a critical comment piece written about a TV interview given by Vice-President JD Vance to Fox News.
"JD Vance is wrong: Jesus doesn't ask us to rank our love for others," read the first post, repeating the headline from the commentary on the National Catholic Reporter website.
As spiritual leader of the world's 1.4 billion Catholics, the Pope has a significant potential role to play in getting people to prioritise climate action and rallying the conscience of other world leaders.
During his pontificate, Pope Francis wrote two encyclicals - pastoral letters addressed to the whole world - on climate change.
Published ahead of the UN climate conference in 2015, his first, Laudato si': On Care For Our Common Home 'provided a clear moral imperative for taking climate action, supporting the Paris Climate Change Agreement,' according to Christiana Figueres, an architect for that landmark deal to limit global heating to 1.5C.
Pope Francis continually used his position to highlight issues of inequality in the consequences of climate change.
'Now more than ever, the world needs a strong and steadfast moral voice,' CAFOD chief Christine Allen wrote in a statement yesterday.
'Saint Pope John Paul II, and Popes Benedict and Francis, all spoke powerfully on climate change and the debt crisis as two of the most pressing issues of their time, and we look forward to working with the Vatican and Pope Leo XIV, to continue and strengthen this work in response to today's challenges.'
The Pope, she adds, 'is an important player on the global stage. He is one of the few people who can bridge political divides and bring world leaders together for the common good.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
France 24
a day ago
- France 24
Donald Trump signs travel ban on 12 countries
Also, Africa has immense international cultural influence. Nigerian filmmakers made a strong showing at this year's Cannes Film Festival in France, with Akinola Davies Jr.'s debut feature, My Father's Shadow, making history as the first Nigerian film selected for the official lineup, screening in the Un Certain Regard section. Earlier, I spoke to Peace Hyde, the producer behind the Netflix hit Young, Famous & African, now in its third season. She says that the impact that the continent's creatives are having is no accident, and there's more to come. Finally, in Burundi, Parliamentary elections were held on thursday. The ruling party was expected to win as it didn't face much opposition, with many rival political figures not being allowed to run. Amidst the tension, some of the boldest voices have come from the Catholic Church.
LeMonde
2 days ago
- LeMonde
Pope Leo and Putin hold 'constructive' call on Ukraine war, says Kremlin
Vladimir Putin discussed the war in Ukraine with Pope Leo in a telephone call on Wednesday, June 4, with the Kremlin claiming the Russian president wanted peace through diplomacy. Putin, however, also claimed "the regime in Kyiv is betting on an escalation of the conflict and carrying out acts of sabotage against civil infrastructure on Russian territory," it said in a statement. In the phone call, Putin "reaffirmed his interest in bringing about peace by political and diplomatic means," the Kremlin said, describing the call as "constructive." He did so "underlining that in order to come to a definitive, just and comprehensive settlement to the crisis, it was necessary to eliminate the deep-seated causes." That evoked language typically used to refer to a mix of sweeping demands regularly put forward by Russia, including limiting Ukraine's military, banning the country from joining NATO and massive territorial concessions. Ukraine has rejected those calls and demanded an unconditional ceasefire, which Russia refuses. The afternoon phone call was the first between the US-born pope and Putin since Leo became head of the world's Catholics last month. After taking office, the pontiff offered to mediate between leaders of countries at war – an offer that Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni later said meant hosting Ukraine peace talks at the Vatican. But Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov cast doubt on the idea, saying "it would be a bit inelegant for Orthodox countries to discuss (the conflict), on Catholic ground." On Wednesday, Putin thanked Leo for "his willingness to contribute to a settlement" of the conflict, the Kremlin said. 'Seek solutions to the conflict' The Vatican said in a statement that during the call with Putin, "the pope made an appeal for Russia to make a gesture that favours peace." Leo also "underlined the importance of dialogue for the realisation of positive contacts between the parties and to seek solutions to the conflict." The two men talked about the humanitarian situation and the need to favour aid where necessary, and the exchange of prisoners between Russia and Ukraine. In addition, the pope offered his thanks for Russian Orthodox Patriarch Kirill, a close supporter of Putin, for his good wishes at the start of his pontificate. He "emphasized how common Christian values can be a light that helps to seek peace, defend life and seek true religious freedom," the Vatican statement said. Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Holy See has been at odds with Kirill, who has described the conflict as a "holy war." More than three years into Russia's grinding invasion, which has cost tens of thousands of lives, Russia and Ukraine have opened direct talks searching for a way to end what has become Europe's largest conflict since World War II. At a second round of negotiations on Monday, the two sides swapped documents with their terms for a ceasefire and agreed to a large-scale prisoner exchange, which could go forward this weekend.
Local France
3 days ago
- Local France
OPINION: 130 years on, the Dreyfus affair still matters to France and the world
In 1894 an obscure Jewish French army captain was falsely convicted of espionage and treason. Alfred Dreyfus spent five years alone in a cage on Devil's Island in the French Caribbean before he was pardoned and finally rehabilitated in 1906. For many decades 'the Dreyfus case' divided France. To the Catholic fundamentalist, antisemitic and ultra-patriotic Right, his guilt – no matter the lack of evidence - became an article of patriotic faith. To the Left, and not just the Left, the struggle to prove his innocence symbolised the importance and the fragility of the democratic and personal freedoms won by the French Revolution. On Monday, the National Assembly voted unanimously to promote Dreyfus to the rank of brigadier general 90 years after his death. Until relatively recently, any unanimous parliamentary decision on the Dreyfus case in France would have been unthinkable. Advertisement This week's vote managed to be both unanimous and controversial. Of the 577 deputies, only 197 voted. Thirty-eight were from the far-right Rassemblement National, direct descendants of the Vichy regime of 1940-44 which rehabilitated the senior officers who lied and cheated to frame Dreyfus. Forty-one of the pro-Dreyfus votes came from the hard-Left La France Insoumise, which has been accused in recent months of anti-semitism in its unconditional support for the Palestinian cause. The centrist Modem party, the party of the prime minister François Bayrou, refused to take part. They said that the vote, sponsored by their coalition partners, Renaissance, the party of President Emmanuel Macron, gave the far-right and the hard-left a cheap opportunity to white-wash their anti-semitism. There may be some truth in that but it misses a larger point. The Dreyfus case IS partly about anti-semitism. The persecution of Captain Alfred Dreyfus persuaded Theodor Herzl, the father of Zionism, that the future for the Jewish people was the creation of a Jewish state. But 'the case' is also about something broader - something which threatens democratic values in the 2020s as much as it did in the 1890s. The trampling of the rule of law in the name of patriotism? Politics in which facts do not shape political opinions but quasi-religious beliefs establish bogus facts? We are confronted in 2025 with the same issues which the novelist Emile Zola addressed in 1898 in his celebrated front-page article on the Dreyfus case under the banner headline: 'J'accuse'. Twenty-seven years ago, in a speech to mark the centenary of Zola's article, President Jacques Chirac said: 'The Dreyfus Affair…tore French society apart, divided families, split the country into two enemy camps, which attacked each other with exceptional violence ... It was a reminder, that the forces of darkness, intolerance and injustice can penetrate to the highest levels of the state.' The last sentence is prophetic and chilling. Chirac might have been speaking about Donald Trump. Advertisement In that centenary year of the Zola article, I interviewed Nelly Wilson, a British academic who was an expert on both Zola and Dreyfus. Ms Wilson, who died in 2017, came to Britain in 1945 at the age of 15 as one of 150 young concentration camp survivors invited to settle by the UK government. 'It is perhaps not so surprising that the (Dreyfus) affair remains so vivid in the French mind,' she told me in 1998. 'It describes a conflict at the heart of French political psychology which has not changed so very much to this day. On the one hand, a fierce nationalism and a temptation to justify almost anything for raisons d'etat ; on the other hand, a fierce attachment to justice for the individual, for the rights of the individual.' Nelly Wilson believed that the Dreyfus case changed the course of French history. It discredited the forces of extreme nationalism, anti-semitism, clericalism and nostalgic royalism which might otherwise have pushed France into a kind of proto-fascism or Francoism 30 years before Hitler, Mussolini or Franco. That conflict is still with us but is no longer at the centre of French politics alone. It can be seen in the lies and law-trampling of President Trump, in the brutal creed of Vladimir Putin and in the kleptocratic rule of Viktor Orban in Hungary. Advertisement And, yes, the 'temptation to justify almost anything for raisons d'etat ' also describes the murderous and cynical forever war for his own survival waged by Benjamin Netanyahu in Israel. The Dreyfus affair has never had quite the same resonance outside France (Jewish communities apart). In the early 20th century, British newspapers wrote puzzled or mocking articles, demanding to know what all the fuss was about. The parallels are not exact but you can see similar comments today minimising the Trump administration's wrongful arrest and imprisonment in El Salvador of Kilmar Abrego Garcia. We should no longer ask why France is obsessed with Alfred Dreyfus. History has told us, and continues to tell us, that 'the case' was about more than anti-semitism and far more than the persecution of one innocent man.
