
Memo to Starmer: Stand up for the two-state solution
With a smiling and evidently self-satisfied Israeli PM Netanyahu beside him, President Trump on Tuesday made an announcement on the future of Gaza and the West Bank, which, even by his standards, was nothing short of outrageous.
Driving a coach and horses through international law and norms, Trump's words amounted to planning the ethnic cleansing and forced displacement of some two million Palestinians from Gaza and called into question the sovereignty of the West Bank.
It was his remarks about the West Bank that were most troubling. Sovereignty in the West Bank is not up for debate. The West Bank, along with Gaza, are the Occupied Palestinian Territories. They belong to Palestinians.
Should the US move in to somehow 'own' the territory in Gaza and embark on a reconstruction programme (paid for presumably by Arab Gulf states) to turn Gaza into a ' Middle East Riviera,' and the West Bank be handed over to Israel, this would be the end of the state of Palestine and the long prized two-state solution.
Trump has managed to achieve a rare example of international consensus, with virtually all world powers condemning his harebrained idea. In the UK, David Lammy stated that 'we must see Palestinians live and prosper in their homelands in Gaza and the West Bank'.
Within the region, Saudi Arabia issued an 'unequivocal rejection of any infringement on the legitimate rights of the Palestinian people, whether through Israeli settlement policies, the annexation of Palestinian lands, or attempts to displace the Palestinian people from their land'. Jordan and Egypt have also made clear that they will have no part in these plans, such as they are.
As for peace, Trump's announcement, should he follow through, will likely undermine talks on the second stage of the Gaza ceasefire. This fragile truce must hold. But where a shared basis for further ceasefire talks had been reached after months of negotiations, Trump's comments now risk throwing that into jeopardy. I fear for the hostages as much as I do for the Palestinian lives in that scenario.
The Palestinian Liberation Organisation are also highly suspicious of the US giving the green light to Israel's annexation of the West Bank, something that would doubtless lead to yet more conflict. And more generally, any hopes the US and Israel might have had for the great 'prize' of normalisation of Israeli relations with Riyadh will surely be ditched.
In all, this is a recipe for more conflict and while Netanyahu might be able to cling on to power it will do absolutely nothing for Israel's security. It will also give succour to bad actors and risk inflaming already tense inter-community relationships, including in our communities in the UK.
That is why we join with our allies in Europe, the Arab world and the Global South to do everything we can to dissuade Trump and his cohorts from enacting this crazy plan, using all peaceful and diplomatic means at our disposal.
A UN Security Council emergency meeting must be called immediately to make this clear. We must condemn in the strongest terms this flagrant attempt to ride roughshod over international law and forcibly displace a people from their homeland.
Enough war, destruction and death in the Middle East. We must preserve the ceasefire and give the Palestinians a political horizon for their own state that will restore hope in this blighted region. One thing that the UK government could do now is to join the 145 UN member states that have already recognised that state on 1967 lines, something that parliament called for a decade ago.
This government keeps talking about recognition 'at a time that is conducive to a peace process '. This statement may have made sense in the 1990s but it no longer fits. What we are now talking about is ensuring the survival of Palestine as a country. Recognition would send a clear message to the US administration and the Netanyahu regime that we will have no truck with land grabs of the sort that Trump's ideas imply.
Britain has a proud history, contributing to the establishment of the international rules-based order. What Trump is doing is anathema to that – a total contradiction of British values both at home and abroad.
So, my message to the British government and the international community is simple. If you say you believe in international law and a two-state solution, now is the time to act like it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Dramatic move by Pentagon hint Trump could be siding with another billionaire amid Musk fallout
The Pentagon appears to be contemplating pivoting away from Elon Musk 's SpaceX following the almighty blowup between President Donald Trump and the world's richest man earlier this week. The fallout appears to be impacting the nation's space program as the Trump administration looks toward another billionaire to replace Musk in the race to Mars. Officials at NASA and the Pentagon quietly reached out to SpaceX's competitors, urging them to accelerate development of alternative rockets and spacecraft. Decisions appear to have been taken quickly after Musk made a defiant threat to pull SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, a lifeline to the International Space Station, after Trump first threatened to cancel SpaceX's lucrative government contracts. 'It turned really terrifying,' one NASA official admitted to the Washington Post after initially finding the feud 'entertaining.' Although Musk eventually walked back his threat, the damage was done. Officials from NASA and the Pentagon, already uneasy with their reliance on SpaceX, were rattled to the core. SpaceX has become indispensable as it transports astronauts and cargo to the ISS, launches sensitive military satellites, and operates Starlink, the world's largest satellite constellation. The flare-up served to remind officials of the risks of tying national interests to a mercurial billionaire. 'When you realize that he's willing to shut everything down just on an impulse … that kind of behavior and the dependence on him is dangerous,' a former space agency official said. NASA insiders said Musk's threat 'crossed a line,' invoking memories of the 2018 episode when Musk smoked marijuana during a podcast interview, which prompted NASA to launch a safety investigation into SpaceX. The clash was also inflamed by the White House's decision to abruptly withdraw Jared Isaacman's nomination as NASA Administrator. Isaacman, closely aligned with Musk, had twice flown to space aboard SpaceX vehicles. In the aftermath, government officials reached out to Jeff Bezos's Blue Origin, RocketLab, and Stoke Space, querying when their rockets might be ready to shoulder critical missions. Fatih Ozmen, CEO of Sierra Space, which is developing the Dream Chaser spaceplane, confirmed that NASA was 'working closely' with his company stating, 'NASA mentioned to us that they want diversity and do not want to rely on a single provider.' For some insiders, it wasn't hard to connect the dots: Jeff Bezos, the founder of Blue Origin, has long been a rival to Musk. Now, with the Biden-era antagonism between Trump and Bezos thawing, some see a political recalibration. Bezos' Blue Origin has lagged behind SpaceX for years, but its New Glenn rocket is finally gaining traction, albeit slowly. The Pentagon's recent 'lanes' strategy to diversify launch providers now looks prescient, with officials seeking to avoid 'overreliance on any single provider or solution.' A source familiar with the Defense Department's strategy said the White House sees an opening to back Bezos as a counterweight to Musk's volatility. 'They want someone who's predictable,' the person said to The Post. Even Congress appeared to be spooked by the behavior. A key committee demanded updates on Boeing's long-delayed Starliner capsule, which has struggled to match the reliability of Musk's Dragon. NASA, under pressure, said Friday that Starliner's next mission could come 'early 2026,' though it remains unclear whether it will fly astronauts or cargo only. Indeed, just how reliant NASA were on SpaceX was illustrated last year when American astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams were left on the International Space Station by Boeing's troubled Starliner capsule. Wilmore and Williams had set off for an eight-day Starliner test flight that swelled into a nine-month stay in space Boeing, which has taken $2 billion in charges on its Starliner development, faces a looming decision by NASA to refly the spacecraft uncrewed before it carries humans again. Boeing spent $410 million to fly a similar uncrewed mission in 2022 after a 2019 testing failure. Reflying Starliner uncrewed 'seems like the logical thing to do,' Williams said, drawing comparisons with Elon Musk's SpaceX and Russian capsules that flew uncrewed missions before putting humans aboard. She and NASA are pushing for that outcome, Williams added. 'I think that's the correct path,' said Williams, who is 'hoping Boeing and NASA will decide on that same course of action' soon. Results from Starliner testing planned throughout the summer are expected to determine whether the spacecraft can fly humans on its next flight, NASA officials have said. Todd Harrison, a defense analyst at the American Enterprise Institute, likened Musk's social media post to 'an embargo of the space station.' 'Musk was saying he is going to cut NASA off from its own laboratory in space,' he added. Harrison also recalled Musk's refusal to activate Starlink Internet for a Ukrainian military strike in 2022, a decision that raised alarms about national defense being at the mercy of a single CEO. 'The nation's missile defenses could be held hostage to the twittering whims of Elon Musk,' Harrison warned. Former NASA astronaut Garrett Reisman, who worked at SpaceX, voiced the fears of many in the astronaut corps: 'When your hopes and dreams are tied up in this, you can't help but think, "Oh my goodness, am I going to fly in space?"' Meanwhile, Trump, who once championed Musk as a visionary, appears to be cooling. His allies note that the president has no tolerance for perceived disloyalty and Musk's defiance has not gone unnoticed. Some aides believe Trump's sharp pivot is personal as much as political. RocketLab's CEO Peter Beck had previously warned how Musk's acquisition of Twitter, now rebranded as X, and his flirtation with politics could backfire. 'It certainly makes people uncomfortable. At the end of the day, if you're delivering important national security missions, the buck stops with the CEO,' Beck said. Pentagon officials remain wary, not least because few companies have rockets certified for critical national security missions. Blue Origin's New Glenn has flown once, and United Launch Alliance's Vulcan only twice. RocketLab's Neutron has yet to launch at all. SpaceX's Falcon 9 still dominates, launching with near clockwork precision. But now, Trump's administration appears ready to gamble on fostering competition, even if it means leaning more heavily on Bezos. 'Sierra Space stands ready,' Ozmen declared. Others in the sector are similarly jockeying for position, sensing that Musk's once-unshakable grip may be loosening.


Scottish Sun
30 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Donald Trump slams ‘big-time drug addict' Elon Musk as toxic feud intensifies
It came after the Tesla billionaire linked Mr Trump to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) DONALD Trump called Elon Musk a 'big-time drug addict' as his spat with the world's richest man intensified. The US President is said to have blasted his billionaire ex-backer as reliant on ketamine in phone calls. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 2 Donald Trump called Elon Musk a 'big-time drug addict' as his spat with the world's richest man intensified Credit: AFP It came after the Tesla billionaire linked Mr Trump to paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. Their feud went public on Thursday night as both men used their own social media platforms — X and Truth Social — to insult each other. Mr Musk, 53, turned on the US leader, calling his Congressional spending bill a 'disgusting abomination' on Wednesday. The President, 78, has called it his 'big, beautiful bill', but Mr Musk believes it will increase national debt by an unsustainable amount. It triggered the ugly public bust-up, with Musk calling for Trump to be impeached and accusing him of being a close associate of Epstein. Yesterday, Mr Musk deleted the post, which was seen hundreds of millions of times. The Washington Post reported Mr Trump used private calls to urge his allies not to pour fuel on the fire and told Vice President JD Vance to be cautious. But the President, whose campaign took £250million from Mr Musk, is also said to have become weary with the tycoon's alleged drug use. He called Mr Musk an 'addict' in the calls and claimed he 'lost his mind' after leaving the administration. The businessman previously admitted using ketamine, but it is alleged he became so hooked last year it affected his kidneys. Trump insists Elon Musk is lashing out at 'big beautiful bill' for personal reason as he admits he's 'disappointed' in Tesla boss Mr Musk officially left the government last week but said he would remain as a 'friend and adviser' to Mr Trump. The President last night said he had 'no intention' of speaking to Mr Musk, adding: 'I think it's a very bad thing because he's very disrespectful'.


NBC News
44 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump: Elon Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democratic candidates
In a new phone interview with NBC News, President Trump on Saturday said there would be 'serious consequences' if tech mogul Elon Musk funds Democratic candidates to run against Republicans who vote in favor of the GOP's sweeping budget bill. NBC News' Kelly O'Donnell and 'Meet the Press' moderator Kristen Welker have the 7, 2025