
US anti-disinformation guardrails fall in Trump's first 100 days
The moves could have national security implications, experts warn, granting US adversaries such as Russia and China more freedom to sow disinformation as geopolitical rivalries intensify.
Combined with social media platforms scaling back content moderation -- and Meta's suspension of third-party fact-checking in the United States -- these developments have left researchers concerned that it may become even harder for the public to separate fact from fiction.
The National Science Foundation recently cancelled hundreds of research grants that it said were "not aligned" with the agency's priorities, including projects focused on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) as well as misinformation and disinformation.
Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), charged with cutting government spending, praised the NSF's "great work" in cancelling 402 "wasteful" DEI grants -- a move the agency said saved $233 million.
"Shocking that understanding how people are misled by false information is now a forbidden topic," said Lisa Fazio, an associate professor of psychology at Vanderbilt University, confirming that her NSF grant to examine "how false beliefs form (and) how to correct them" had been cancelled.
"Our work will continue but at a smaller scale," she wrote on the platform Bluesky.
Several of the terminated grants were focused on health misinformation as well as artificial intelligence and deepfake detection on tech platforms, researchers said, at a time when scams fueled by cheap and widely available AI tools are rapidly proliferating.
'Censorship'
"Research on how technology impacts society is critical to holding powerful tech platforms accountable," said Becca Branum, a deputy director at the nonprofit Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT).
"Shielding companies from criticism by defunding research is censorship that should trouble all of us."
The cuts came just days after Secretary of State Marco Rubio shut down the State Department's Counter Foreign Information Manipulation and Interference (R/FIMI) hub, which tracked and countered disinformation from foreign actors.
"By shutting down the office, Rubio has opened the American information space to the likes of Russia, China, and Iran," said Benjamin Shultz, lead researcher at the American Sunlight Project, an anti-disinformation watchdog in Washington.
In a report this month, the anti-disinformation firm Alethea said it had uncovered a Russian network seeking to sow mistrust in US defense and military programs.
The targets of the network, linked to a Russian influence operation known as "Portal Kombat," included the US giant Lockheed Martin and the F-35 fighter jet program.
The R/FIMI was previously known as the Global Engagement Center (GEC), and once had dozens of employees operating with a budget of around $60 million.
Rubio justified its closure, saying in a statement that it was the responsibility of government officials to "preserve and protect the freedom for Americans to exercise their free speech."
'Truth and facts'
The GEC, established in 2016, had long faced scrutiny from Republican lawmakers, who accused it of censoring and surveilling Americans.
Its closing leaves the State Department without a dedicated office for tracking and countering disinformation from US rivals for the first time in over eight years.
The move comes as Rubio unveiled wider plans to restructure the State Department, cutting positions and shuttering specialized programs.
The Trump administration is also targeting officials who had been examining foreign interference in US elections.
The administration has reassigned several dozen officials working on the issue at the FBI and forced out others at the Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), reports said.
"As we approach 100 days of Trump 2.0, it's harder than ever to believe that American politics -- and society writ large -- have reached a place where truth and facts are optional," said Shultz.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
Ukraine boycott world judo champs as Belarusians compete under flag
Belarusians Aliaksandr Sidoryk and Yahor Varapayeu are on the entry list in the under 90kg category, flying their country's flag, something they have been prohibited from doing since the start of the invasion on February 24, 2022. According to the Ukrainian Judo Federation, a decision by the International Judo Federation (IJF) Executive Board in mid-May authorised Belarusian judokas to represent their country under their flag from June 1. The IJF is the first international federation recognised by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to formalise the return of the Belarusian flag. The IJF authorised Russian and Belarusian judokas to compete under neutral banners from March to September 2022, before banning them in accordance with IOC recommendations. On March 28, 2023, the IOC recommended international federations allow athletes with Russian and Belarusian passports to participate under neutral banners and under strict neutrality conditions, maintaining the exclusion for team competitions. Ukraine boycotted the 2023 World Judo Championships due to a decree from the Ukrainian Ministry of Sports prohibiting athletes in its official delegations from participating in competitions featuring Russians or Belarusians. This decree was amended on July 26, 2023, and now only applies to "athletes representing the Russian Federation or the Republic of Belarus," allowing them to compete against athletes under a neutral banner. For the 2025 World Judo Championships in Budapest, no Ukrainians are on the entry list and Russian judokas are competing under a neutral banner. When contacted by AFP about the return of the Belarusian flag and the Ukrainian boycott, the IOC did not immediately respond. The IJF's decision, however, directly violates IOC recommendations, which have been consistent since the end of March 2023.


France 24
44 minutes ago
- France 24
Hundreds of civilians were tortured by Wagner mercenaries in Mali: report
The victims, who were interviewed by a consortium of reporters led by investigative outlet Forbidden Stories, spoke from a refugee camp in neighbouring Mauritania about waterboarding, beatings with electrical cables and being burned with cigarette butts. The investigation revealed that the use of illegal detentions and systematic torture, which sometimes led to death, was similar to that which occurred in Ukraine and Russia. The investigation, which was conducted in conjunction with France 24, Le Monde and IStories, identified six detention sites where the Russian paramilitary group held civilians between 2022 and 2024, but the actual number could be much higher, it said. Mali's ruling junta, which seized power in coups in 2020 and 2021, broke off ties with former colonial power France and pivoted towards Russia for political and military support after coming to power. The country never officially admitted Wagner's presence, insisting it only worked with Russian instructors. Nonetheless, last week a Telegram channel affiliated with Wagner announced that the Russian paramilitary group was leaving Mali. Its personnel will be reintegrated into its successor, Africa Corps, another paramilitary group with links to the Kremlin, according to diplomatic and security sources who spoke with AFP. For more than three years, Mali had relied on Wagner in its fight against jihadists who have killed thousands across the country. The paramilitary group's brutal methods on the ground in Mali have been regularly denounced by human rights groups. A UN report accused Mali's army and foreign fighters of executing at least 500 people during a March 2022 anti-jihadist sweep in Moura -- a claim denied by the junta. Western governments believe the foreign fighters were Wagner mercenaries. Last April, bodies were discovered near a Malian military camp, days after the army and Wagner paramilitaries arrested dozens of civilians, most from the Fulani community.


Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Ukraine and Russia exchange more prisoners of war under Istanbul deal
Ukraine and Russia carried out another exchange of prisoners of war on Thursday, based on the Istanbul deal of 2 June. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that the latest swap focused on "severely wounded and seriously ill warriors." Ukraine's Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of the POW issued a statement, saying "this is part of a major exchange that continues in phases." "These soldiers require urgent medical care and will receive full assistance, including psychological rehabilitation and financial compensation for their time in captivity," the coordination HQ said. Kyiv is not revealing how many Ukrainian defenders have been exchanged at each stage. Ukrainian authorities are expected to release this information once the exchange is completed. Kyiv announced that many of the severely injured soldiers who had returned home on Thursday had served in combat operations across Donetsk, Luhansk, Kharkiv, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions. Some of the returned soldiers have been considered "missing" while many have been in Russian captivity for over three years. Kyiv and Moscow have been carrying out prisoner-of-war swaps for the last couple of days. During the Istanbul talks, the sides have agreed to exchange young soldiers under 25 and the severely injured and sick POWs. They have also agreed to repatriate the bodies of the soldiers. On Wednesday, Ukraine said it brought back the bodies of 1,212 fallen defenders. The repatriation was carried out through a coordinated effort involving the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), the Armed Forces, the Interior Ministry, the Ombudsman's Office, the State Emergency Service, and other national security and defence institutions. The International Committee of the Red Cross also supported the operation. Officials emphasised that investigative and forensic teams from the Interior Ministry and the Health Ministry are working to identify the bodies in the shortest possible time. Vladimir Medinsky, aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin and the head of the Russian delegation at the Istanbul talks, claimed that Ukraine released the remains of 27 Russian service members. The Ukrainian side did not disclose how many Russian bodies were handed over to Moscow. After the meeting in Turkey on 2 June, Medinsky said that Russia would transfer 6,000 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers and officers. A viral video which shows three different chatbots speaking in their own "secret language" has amassed hundreds of thousands of views across various social media platforms. The clip shows three chatbots engaging in a phone call in English, in which they discuss "an employee's badge number". When the machines realise that they are all speaking to other bots, they ask each other whether they should switch to "Gibberlink", prompting them to start emitting high-pitched noises, in what appears to be something out of a science-fiction film. Gibberlink — a term which combines "gibberish" and "link" — is real. While use of the technology is limited, it enables AI engines to communicate in their own language. EuroVerify asked Anton Pidkuiko, who co-founded Gibberlink, to review a number of online clips. "Many of the videos are imitating an existing technology — they show phones which aren't really communicating and there is no signal between them, instead the sounds have been edited in and visuals have been taken from ChatGPT." Fake online videos purporting to show Gibberlink software have begun to emerge after the technology was created in February by Pidkuiko and fellow AI engineer Boris Starkov, during a 24-hour tech hackathon held in London. The pair combined ggwave — an existing open-source technology that enables data exchange through sound — with artificial intelligence. So, although AI can communicate in its own language, it is not "secret", as it is based on open-source data and is coded by humans. For Pidkuiko, the technology is comparable to QR codes. "Every supermarket item has a bar code which makes the shopping experience much more efficient." "Gibberlink is essentially this barcode — or think of it as a QR code — but over sound. Humans can look at QR code and just see black and white pieces. But QR codes don't scare people." While the use of Gibberlink technology is very limited at present, its creators believe it will become more mainstream, "as it stands, AI is able to make and receive phone calls," Pidkuiko said. "With time, we will see an increase in the number of these robot calls — and essentially more and more we will see that one AI is exchanging." Although this technology presents the risk of stripping humans of meaningful interactions, as well as replacing a further swath of unnecessary jobs, for Pidkuiko Gibberlink, it would be a means of maximising efficiency. "If you manage a restaurant and have a phone number that people call to book tables, you will sometimes receive calls in different languages," stated Pidkuiko. "However, if it's a robot that can speak every language and it is always available, the line is never blocked and you will have no language issues." "Another way the technology could be used, is if you want to book a restaurant, but don't want to ring 10 different places to ask if they have space, you can get AI to make the call and he restaurant can get AI to receive it. If they can communicate more quickly in their own language, it makes sense", concluded Pidkuiko. However, fears around what could happen if humans become unable to interpret AI communications are real, and in January the release of AI software DeepSeek R1 raised alarm. Researchers who had been working on the technology revealed they incentivised the software to find the right answers, regardless of whether its reasoning was comprehensible to humans. However, this led the AI to begin spontaneously switching from English to Chinese to achieve a result. When researchers forced the technology to stick to one language — to ensure that users could follow its processes — its capacity to find answers was hindered. This incident led industry experts to worry that incentivising AI to find the correct answers, without ensuring its processes can be untangled by humans, could lead AI to develop languages that cannot be understood. In 2017, Facebook abandoned an experiment after two AI programmes began conversing in a language which only they understood.