Mum's tribute to teenage son killed in Salford motorbike crash
The mother of a teenager who was killed in a motorbike crash has paid tribute to her "loving, caring, funny and genuine" sonKaine Darby, 17, was travelling on the motorbike with another boy, 16, when they collided with a car on Lower Broughton Road, Salford, on 22 May. The pair were taken to hospital but later died from their injuries. Kaine's mother Danielle Hughes said: "I will miss you so much, and so will your two little sisters who love you and looked up to you."
She told her son in the tribute he had been "doing so well considering everything you have been through over the last few years". Ms Hughes said she did not condone behaviour that had taken place at the scene after the crash including vandalism and "motorbikes riding around". She said: "This is not what Kaine would have wanted. We want peace and to remember Kaine calmly, surrounded by his loved ones."This has shocked the whole family. It was a tragic accident that should never have happened that I don't want to tarnish Kaine's legacy."Police said the driver of the car stayed at the scene to help officers and no arrests had been made.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio Manchester on Sounds and follow BBC Manchester on Facebook, X, and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
26 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Angela Rayner blocks plans for huge film studio in countryside village
Angela Rayner has blocked plans for a new film studio the size of 66 football pitches in a Berkshire village. The Housing Secretary said plans for the studios, which would have been the third-largest in the UK, would have been harmful to the green belt and backed claims they were 'simply not needed'. Greystoke Land, an investment company, applied for planning permission to build the complex next to the village of Holyport, near Maidenhead, in 2022. The £260 million plans included sound stages, workshops, offices, a multi-storey car park and a roundabout. It would also have included a 'media village' with a virtual reality studio and an area for open-air filming. Studios 'simply not needed' Councillors at the Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead rejected the application in March 2024, as they agreed with a planning report that said green belt development should only be allowed in 'very special circumstances' and that the studios were 'simply not needed'. The council said the case for the studio was 'overstated' because several others had already been built nearby. It also made the case that less TV and film are being made in the UK, citing statistics from the British Film Institute that the production volume fell by a quarter between 2022 and 2024. The company argued that the studios would provide economic benefits to the local area, and that the threat to green belt land had been 'exaggerated' by the council. The site, which spans more than 100 acres, is currently made up of fields on either side of a narrow lane near the village of Holyport, which dates back to the 13th century and was once home to the British racing driver Stirling Moss. The studio developers said the project offered 'the opportunity to create an entirely new film studio complex directing hundreds of millions of pounds of new investment into the local economy, and creating hundreds of new jobs'. Not considered 'alternative sites' The company's appeal was heard in November, then 'called in' by Ms Rayner's department for a final decision to be taken by ministers. She agreed with planning inspectors that 'there is likely to be sufficient capacity within existing studio space' for the industry in Berkshire and the rest of the South East 'for the immediate future'. She also argued that Greystoke had not searched enough for 'reasonably alternative sites' that would not have such a significant impact on the green belt. Responding to the appeal, the junior minister Matthew Pennycook said Ms Rayner was 'not persuaded that a clear and convincing need case has been demonstrated'. In a letter published on Friday, he insisted that the Government supports 'the growth of the creative industries in the UK'. But he said that the harm to green belt land 'is not clearly outweighed by other considerations and therefore there are no very special circumstances which would justify this development'. Labour to reduce green belt protections It comes despite Labour plans to relax protections for the green belt, which the Government said would help drive economic growth and the housing supply. Countryside campaigners have opposed the reforms, which made it easier to receive planning permission for green belt projects, especially on sites that have already been developed, now known as the 'grey belt'. Sir Keir Starmer said in December that he wanted to 'get the balance right with nature and the environment'. But he said that 'a human being wanting to have a house' would be the Government's priority, rather than protecting unspoiled land or commercial developments. The new grey belt is defined as green belt land that 'does not strongly contribute to green belt purposes,' which include limiting urban sprawl, stopping towns merging into one another and preserving historical character.
The Sun
26 minutes ago
- The Sun
Huge ‘Jack & the Beanstalk' tree towers over our homes – it's grotesque & irresponsible… but council won't chop it down
A GIANT "Jack and the beanstalk" tree is ruining locals' lives - but the council won't chop it down. Residents in Winchester, Hants, slammed the "grotesquely irresponsible" and "ludicrous" 45 foot high oak. 9 9 9 They say the tree was planted around 50 years ago by a previous homeowner on Canon Street who just "wanted something to do". But now it has branched into an "out of proportion" eyesore which overshadows the gardens of nearby properties - where the average house price is more than £600,000. However, the council have refused to cut it down and placed it under a protection order. The authorities said residents from a neighbouring street "appreciated" the tree. The decision has sparked outrage among locals who are actually dealing with the daily repercussions of such an overwhelming tree. Orla Williams, 40, moved into her terraced Grade II Listed home with her partner around two years ago. The doctor said after moving in, several residents went to her about the oak. She explained: "They were concerned that it is getting very large and that it could cause damage to their properties and potentially harm to people if it gets any larger, so they wanted it to be taken down. "We applied to the council to have it removed and someone came to look at it. "[The tree officer] said that they want to put a tree protection order on it." The mum-of-two also told how an "awful lot of detritus" falls from the tree in autumn and winter. She added: "We appreciate that the tree is beautiful but it's the wrong tree in the wrong place. "It is quite sad to remove something like that but it is only going to get bigger and potentially cause damage to lots of properties which is the main concern. "The council said they were concerned about removing it because it's one of the only trees in the area. 9 9 9 "All of the local residents seem to be of the opinion that unfortunately, it's the wrong tree in the wrong place." According to a council report, the tree officer visited Orla after receiving notice from the couple that it was due to be felled. But he found the tree met the criteria for a provisional protection order, which was issued in February of this year. A Winchester County Council meeting will take place next week to decide whether the tree status will change or not. There are nine residents in total who have objected to the order. Mark Pocock, a retired resident living on Canon Street, slammed the council's decision to protect the tree as "ludicrous". He said: 'As trees grow older they become more brittle. "If it were to fall and damage properties or persons, I would say the responsibility would be entirely with the council – not the owners of those properties. "I think putting a tree protection order on is grotesquely irresponsible of the council. 'It could be a danger to property and life." Nick Goff, 80, said he fears if the tree continues to grow, the roots underneath will damage a medieval wall in his garden, which was built in the Tudor era. The retired British Airways pilot said: "The issue is that in 10 years time, that will be double the height and double the width. 'It put on six feet last year it it's going to put on another six feet this year." He commissioned an independent report from a tree consultancy business. The report stated while the tree, which is still a "teenager" is in "good physiological condition". But the officer also found it is "a large sized tree in a very small area" and so the tree protection order is "unjustified". The report also stated "the possibility of longer term damage to the retaining walls and footings of the adjacent properties as entirely foreseeable". "Some guy planted this as something to do 40 years ago," Mr Goff continued "Now, we have got Jack and the Beanstalk. "It's not a historic tree – it's a silly mistake." However, the council report issued ahead of next week's meeting claimed these concerns were "speculative" and the tree "contributes meaningfully to local biodiversity and visual amenity". It added: "It is also the last significant tree in an area of land between Canon Street and St Swithun's Street, enhancing the character of the conservation area." Retired resident Graham Rule, 62, blasted the decision as "irresponsible". He said: "We all love trees but that shouldn't be there. "The people who want the protection order, they don't live here – its totally irresponsible." Winchester County Council was contacted for comment. 9 9 9
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
Unite union had ‘pervasive fraud environment', auditors say
One of Britain's biggest trade unions had a 'pervasive fraud environment', a leaked auditors' report has concluded. Global tax advisory firm BDO found there had been a culture at Unite that 'did not challenge the appropriateness of transactions' and failed to ensure appropriate financial reporting. It concluded 'dominant personalities and a weak control environment facilitated opportunities to commit fraud' at the union. The audit was ordered by general secretary Sharon Graham shortly after she entered her role in 2021 amid questions about accounting and spending on building a hotel and conference centre in Birmingham. Its findings were presented to the union's executive council on Friday. Unite said the probe uncovered a £53.8 million 'impairment' related to the difference between the original valuation of the Birmingham project used to calculate the 'book value' by the auditors at the time, and the real value. The BDO report also said there had been 'unusual relationships' between former senior staff and Unite's customers and suppliers, according to the BBC which obtained a copy of the 35-page document ahead of its publication. In response, Ms Graham, who has pledged to strengthen internal governance practices, said: 'On behalf of Unite's 1.2 million-plus members, I promised on my election that I would uncover the truth about historic alleged corruption related to the Birmingham hotel project. 'This process has quite frankly been an ugly one, where I have endured attacks and smears from those with much to lose, but they have not deterred me. 'The re-audit is in its final stages and as we move to completion, I will ensure steps are taken so that this can never happen again and we have already started the process of getting our money back. 'Over the last three years of my leadership, I have refocused our union on to the jobs, pay and conditions of our members and we have secured a union that is financially strong and able to fight for workers.'
