Inaccurate claims about Philippine juvenile justice law surface online
"Go Kiko! Thanks to RA 9344, all 18 years old and below are protected against criminal liabilities only discernment (sic), they can kill, use drugs and they won't be held accountable by the LAW," reads a Facebook post published May 22, 2025.
"You could be stabbed by a child in Tondo or Mandaluyong, and they can't be jailed. THANK YOU, Senator KIKO! Because of you, all minors are protected from prosecution."
The post refers to Senator Francis Pangilinan and the Juvenile Justice and Welfare Act of 2006 (RA 9344), which he authored (archived link).
It also references the 2021 murder of the Maguad siblings in Cotabato, where 18-year-old Gwynn and 16-year-old Louis were stabbed to death by their 17-year-old adopted sister (archived link). The suspect initially posed as a survivor before later admitting she committed the crime with a friend, also a minor.
The post appears to suggest the suspects were not fully held accountable due to their age, framing the law as overly lenient toward youth offenders.
"The suspects should be imprisoned for life. The justice system in the Philippines really is something," reads the caption.
Image
Screenshot of false post taken June 7, 2025
After his failed 2022 vice presidential bid, Pangilinan made a political comeback as an independent senatorial candidate in the May 12 midterm elections, which saw disappointing results for President Ferdinand Marcos's party (archived link).
If Vice President Sara impeachment trial extends into the next Congress, Pangilinan will join in the case against his former opponent and Marcos's former ally turned political rival, who could be permanently barred from public office if convicted.
The claim spread widely across social media, triggering reactions from users who believed the law grants blanket immunity to juvenile offenders.
"I will never vote for him," one user said.
Another commented: "Hopefully this law gets repealed. Because of this law minors can easily commit crimes."
But legal experts told AFP the claims misrepresent the scope of the .
'Not automatically exempt'
The Juvenile Justice and Welfare System, established under a 2006 law sponsored by Pangilinan and amended in 2013, outlines specific provisions for holding minors accountable depending on their age and whether they acted with (archived link).
"The law clearly establishes that minors are not automatically exempt from criminal liability," , told AFP on May 30 (archived link).
Citing section 3, Villarin explained that children 15 and below are exempt from criminal liability under all circumstances but remain civilly liable and subject to intervention programs depending on the offence.
Meanwhile, "children above 15 but below 18 may be held criminally liable if they are proven to have acted with discernment, especially when the crime is punishable by more than 12 years of imprisonment, or if diversion is not appropriate or unsuccessful," she said.
, also told AFP on June 5 that the post "misrepresents both the intent and actual provisions of the law" (archived link).
He said the law had improved the juvenile justice system by creating ways to handle repeat and serious offences, including placing children who commit heinous crimes in intensive rehabilitation, while ensuring accountability matches their age and capacity for reform.
"It's important to note that this was never about excusing wrongdoing -- it's about making sure children are held accountable in a way that reflects their age, capacity and potential for reform," he said, noting that before the law was passed, children as young as nine were jailed as adults, exposing them to abuse, criminal influence and trauma.
Abitria said the Maguad siblings' case is a "powerful and painful example that accountability is very much possible" under the law.
"Two minors were found to have acted with discernment -- that is, the court was convinced they understood the nature and consequences of their actions. As a result, they were tried, found guilty and sentenced to 30 years of imprisonment," he said.
Philippine news outlet Inquirer.net reported in May 2022 that the court denied parole for both minors and that they were placed in the custody of the social welfare and development agency upon conviction (archived link).
The law mandates that children be placed in youth care facilities offering intensive intervention programs for serious or repeat offenders before being transferred to an adult correctional facility after turning .
AFP has debunked more misinformation on the Philippine midterm elections here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
AFP
37 minutes ago
- AFP
Video shows militants abducting Malian soldiers, not Nigerian troops
'Sorosoke!!! Shocking clip of some bandits boldly loading men of the Nigerian army on bikes after raiding their camp,' reads the caption of an Instagram post circulating in Nigeria since June 7, 2025. The term 'bandits' in Nigeria refers to organised criminal gangs. Image Screenshot showing the false post, taken June 16, 2025 'Sorosoke' is a Yoruba expression meaning 'speak up'. It became a popular slogan during Nigeria's 2020 protests against police brutality (archived here). Liked more than 2,000 times, the video shows men in military uniform being forced onto motorcycles by gunmen wearing turbans. Comments below the post questioned the identity of the captured soldiers. 'This is chad army not Nigerian army (sic),' wrote one user, while another said the incident happened in 'Burkina Faso, that's where you can get those types of bikes'. The video was published by an account called 'Sorosoke Gossip' which posts lifestyle content and general news about Nigeria. However, the video does not show Nigerian soldiers being abducted by bandits. Clip from Mali At the 0'54' mark in the one-minute clip, AFP Fact Check noticed a Malian military patch stitched to the sleeve of one of the abducted soldiers. The visible part of the logo reads 'FAMa', an acronym for Forces Armees Maliennes, or the Malian army. Image Comparison of the Malian armed forces logo as it appeared in an AFP photo (left) and on the sleeve of an abducted soldier in the video Using Google Lens to conduct reverse image searches on keyframes from the video, we were led to a June 8, 2025, X post by Brant Philip, a terrorism researcher focusing on West Africa and the Middle East. In it, he described how the Al-Qaeda-backed Jama'at Nasr al-Islam wal-Muslimin (JNIM) fighters killed scores of Malian soldiers in the Boulkessi military camp near the Burkina Faso border on June 1, 2025. AFP had reported on the incident, saying the Malian army said it lost at least 30 soldiers but security sources and a local official said they believed the death toll to be at least 60 (archived here). One of the videos in Philip's posts shows 30 seconds of the clip in the false post, with the media logo of the JNIM at the top right corner (archived here). JNIM then displays the loot and the prisoners captured, 8 days later their fate is still unknown, JNIM could keep them for a prisoner swap in the future 5/5 — Brant (@brantphilip1978) June 8, 2025 Nigerian army spokesperson Onyechi Anele also told AFP Fact Check that the video in the claim 'does not involve Nigerian troops'.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
What happens to Europe's space ambitions if NASA cuts joint missions
While the European Space Agency (ESA) waits to see whether the United States will cut 19 of their joint programmes, experts say the relationship between the two governments will likely not go back to the way it was. NASA's 2026 technical budget request, which was released earlier this month, details possible cuts to programmes such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a space probe that measures gravitational waves, Envision, ESA's first mission to Venus to measure its different atmospheres, and NewAthena, the world's largest X-ray observatory. The budget also cuts funding to certain components of Moon missions after Artemis III, a mission that would bring humans back to its surface in 2027. The cancellations are in the name of finding a more 'sustainable and cost-effective' lunar exploration strategy. The bill still needs to be approved by Congress, which could likely be in the autumn. Alberto Rueda Carazo, research fellow with the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) think tank, said he has never seen any NASA budget like it. 'Whether or not Congress restores the money, the message is clear: Washington's science commitments can vanish overnight,' he told Euronews Next. ESA said at a press conference last week that 19 of its research projects might be impacted by the proposed NASA budget cuts. The ones where mitigation would be needed are the LISA, Envision and NewAthena. Without NASA contributions to these projects, Carazo said the missions might 'slip years,' possibly pushed back 'well into the 2030s,' and risk cancellation. The questions that these three missions address, like the mergers of black holes, hot-plasma physics and the history of Earth-size planets, would 'remain unanswered for at least a decade,' he said. Ludwig Moeller, ESPI's director, believes that the LISA programme will continue in the future with or without NASA. 'I think the objective of what LISA wants to do is perfectly understood,' he said. 'I don't think we will lose the discovery in the medium term'. Carazo said it could also affect Europe's leadership in fundamental astrophysics, the branch of astronomy that studies the physical structure of stars and other celestial bodies. The hardest hit of the research programmes, according to Carazo, is the ExoMars mission carrying the Rosalind Franklin rover. NASA provides the launch and descent hardware for the craft to fly so the programme cannot continue unless Europe is able to find and build a heavy-lift alternative. Josef Aschbacher, ESA's director general, said in a recent press conference that no cuts or cancellations were coming until the US 'finalises' its position, but that no matter the decision made by Congress, ESA would be 'ready' and 'well-prepared' to react. There are also possible impacts for Europe's Moon mission aspirations, because if the NASA cuts are approved, Carazo said Europe's 'two principal avenues into the Artemis architecture would disappear'. The ESA builds European Space Modules (ESMs) that provide electricity and oxygen to Orion, the spacecraft picked by NASA for the Artemis missions to the surface of the Moon. The NASA cuts would mean that the assembly line in Bremen, Germany, would finish the hardware for the flights but would have nothing scheduled after 2028. That could mean an 'early shut down' of the production line and the associated supply chain, Carazo added. The ESA also contributes three key elements for Gateway, the first international space station to be built around the Moon. Like the ESM parts, the Gateway hardware that's been built 'would have nowhere to go,' and Europe would lose a 'guaranteed, sustained presence in cislunar space'. There are other knock-off effects to consider regarding Europe's aspirations to study the Moon, he added. 'European astronaut seats after Artemis III would vanish, and key technologies that ESA is counting on for a later lunar-surface architecture—closed-loop life support, high-power solar-electric propulsion—would be delayed, widening the capability gap Europe had hoped to close in the 2030s,' he added. It is quite easy for NASA to get out of deals with the ESA or other partners, even if a contract has been signed, Carazo said. NASA contracts fall under the US Federal Acquisition Regulation, where the government has a 'termination for convenience' clause that lets them cancel any contract they want so long as they pay for costs already incurred. 'If Congress deletes the line item, NASA is legally obliged to stop spending, give ESA formal notice and negotiate a settlement; there is no binding dispute-resolution clause that could force the United States back in,' Carazo said. 'A pull-out would be diplomatically and politically messy but completely lawful'. The US has done this before by exiting its ExoMars programme obligations in 2012 under the Obama administration, Carazo added. Withdrawing from this project, in particular for a second time, 'would cement the perception that US commitments last no longer than a presidential term'. Europe's best bet while waiting for the American position to become clear is to offer to absorb a bigger share of the mission and ground costs while also investing in homegrown hardware to supply ESA's future missions, Carazo added. The most immediate consequence of the NASA cuts would be a 'permanent dent in Washington's reputational capital,' Carazo said. A 'diversification' of partners to assist with the ESA missions would follow so that 'no single foreign veto can stall an ESA flagship [programme] again.' ESA is looking to broaden relationships with Canada, Japan and India and while no deals are actively being pursued with China, it remains an option that could be explored, Carazo added. 'All of this reshapes the diplomatic map of space science, diluting US soft power,' Carazo said, adding that projects like China's International Lunar Research Station could start to 'woo European participation'. This is not the first time that Europe has discussed its sovereignty in space, according to Ludwig Moeller, ESPI's director. In 2023, an expert group released a report that noted Europe has 'no independent human launch capacity' and 'relies on non-European partners to send humans to space,' according to a press release about the report. The NASA budget cuts are bringing up this discussion again, Moeller added, along with questions of how much Europe should be investing in security and defence. 'The two points, security, defence and exploration are both on the agenda to an extent that I don't think in the history of Europe has ever existed,' he said. 'This … disruption is unique.' Part of the sovereignty discussion is how Europe is developing domestic supply chains to build the necessary hardware for NASA-vulnerable missions like the ExoMars, according to Daniel Neuenschwander, ESA's director of human and robotic exploration in last weeks media briefing. For example, Neuenschwander said that critical parts for the ExoMars rover, like an americium radioisotope heater unit (RHU) could be built in Europe to sustain future Moon missions. Yet, Moeller said Europe is not ready to give up on a transatlantic relationship that is built on shared values. '[Space exploration] really takes a village and the USA is still part of that village… in a different size, maybe in a different shape,' he said. '[But] Space exploration is a decadal task, it's not a transaction of the day'. National data protection authorities should see easier cooperation in cross-border privacy cases under updated rules that were rubber stamped by the EU institutions on Monday evening. The European Commission planned to fix shortcomings in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – which entered into force in 2018 – by introducing an update in 2023 that was aimed at accelerating decisions and harmonizing procedural rules. Under the GDPR, national regulators must transfer cases to watchdogs based in other member states when the company is headquartered in another country. But this cross-border system has been panned by privacy advocates as complaints can take years to resolve. In Monday's trilogue – the inter-institutional negotiations between the Commission, the European Parliament and the member states – the parties agreed on a mechanism to resolve complaints more swiftly through measures to facilitate consensus-building. In addition, the rules introduce a 15-month deadline in which an investigation must be completed. It can be extended by 12 months in the most complex cases. Poland's Minister for Digital Affairs, Krzysztof Gawkowski, called the deal 'a big step towards improving cooperation' between the data protection authorities. Agustín Reyna, Director General of Consumer group BEUC said in a response that 'the agreement marks some progress for those like us, who have been frustrated to see the GDPR's enforcement as its Achilles heel.' Reyna added that it is 'important given the power of multinationals and the snail pace of GDPR enforcement for the last years.' NOYB's Max Schrems, a privacy lawyer and activist, told Euronews that while there are some benefits, like deadlines, "the overall result will be less rights and less enforcement for citizens." "This law is a disgrace as it allows authorities to even enforce less and cut out citizens from procedures about their own rights. The procedure is also needlessly complex and will generate much more work for authorities," he said, adding that this may be subject to annulment by the Courts, because "it ignores basic procedural principles and logic." The provisional agreement will need a formal confirmation by the member states and the Parliament. Last month, the Commission presented a simplification package to offer relief to small mid-cap companies burdened by the current scope of the GDPR. Currently, companies with fewer than 250 employees are exempt from the data privacy rules to reduce their administrative costs, the Commission now proposes to extend this derogation to the so-called small mid-cap companies of up to 500 staff members.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
EU clinches deal to ease cross-border data protection cooperation
While the European Space Agency (ESA) waits to see whether the United States will cut 19 of their joint programmes, experts say the relationship between the two governments will likely not go back to the way it was. NASA's 2026 technical budget request, which was released earlier this month, details possible cuts to programmes such as the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), a space probe that measures gravitational waves, Envision, ESA's first mission to Venus to measure its different atmospheres, and NewAthena, the world's largest X-ray observatory. The budget also cuts funding to certain components of Moon missions after Artemis III, a mission that would bring humans back to its surface in 2027. The cancellations are in the name of finding a more 'sustainable and cost-effective' lunar exploration strategy. The bill still needs to be approved by Congress, which could likely be in the autumn. Alberto Rueda Carazo, research fellow with the European Space Policy Institute (ESPI) think tank, said he has never seen any NASA budget like it. 'Whether or not Congress restores the money, the message is clear: Washington's science commitments can vanish overnight,' he told Euronews Next. ESA said at a press conference last week that 19 of its research projects might be impacted by the proposed NASA budget cuts. The ones where mitigation would be needed are the LISA, Envision and NewAthena. Without NASA contributions to these projects, Carazo said the missions might 'slip years,' possibly pushed back 'well into the 2030s,' and risk cancellation. The questions that these three missions address, like the mergers of black holes, hot-plasma physics and the history of Earth-size planets, would 'remain unanswered for at least a decade,' he said. Ludwig Moeller, ESPI's director, believes that the LISA programme will continue in the future with or without NASA. 'I think the objective of what LISA wants to do is perfectly understood,' he said. 'I don't think we will lose the discovery in the medium term'. Carazo said it could also affect Europe's leadership in fundamental astrophysics, the branch of astronomy that studies the physical structure of stars and other celestial bodies. The hardest hit of the research programmes, according to Carazo, is the ExoMars mission carrying the Rosalind Franklin rover. NASA provides the launch and descent hardware for the craft to fly so the programme cannot continue unless Europe is able to find and build a heavy-lift alternative. Josef Aschbacher, ESA's director general, said in a recent press conference that no cuts or cancellations were coming until the US 'finalises' its position, but that no matter the decision made by Congress, ESA would be 'ready' and 'well-prepared' to react. There are also possible impacts for Europe's Moon mission aspirations, because if the NASA cuts are approved, Carazo said Europe's 'two principal avenues into the Artemis architecture would disappear'. The ESA builds European Space Modules (ESMs) that provide electricity and oxygen to Orion, the spacecraft picked by NASA for the Artemis missions to the surface of the Moon. The NASA cuts would mean that the assembly line in Bremen, Germany, would finish the hardware for the flights but would have nothing scheduled after 2028. That could mean an 'early shut down' of the production line and the associated supply chain, Carazo added. The ESA also contributes three key elements for Gateway, the first international space station to be built around the Moon. Like the ESM parts, the Gateway hardware that's been built 'would have nowhere to go,' and Europe would lose a 'guaranteed, sustained presence in cislunar space'. There are other knock-off effects to consider regarding Europe's aspirations to study the Moon, he added. 'European astronaut seats after Artemis III would vanish, and key technologies that ESA is counting on for a later lunar-surface architecture—closed-loop life support, high-power solar-electric propulsion—would be delayed, widening the capability gap Europe had hoped to close in the 2030s,' he added. It is quite easy for NASA to get out of deals with the ESA or other partners, even if a contract has been signed, Carazo said. NASA contracts fall under the US Federal Acquisition Regulation, where the government has a 'termination for convenience' clause that lets them cancel any contract they want so long as they pay for costs already incurred. 'If Congress deletes the line item, NASA is legally obliged to stop spending, give ESA formal notice and negotiate a settlement; there is no binding dispute-resolution clause that could force the United States back in,' Carazo said. 'A pull-out would be diplomatically and politically messy but completely lawful'. The US has done this before by exiting its ExoMars programme obligations in 2012 under the Obama administration, Carazo added. Withdrawing from this project, in particular for a second time, 'would cement the perception that US commitments last no longer than a presidential term'. Europe's best bet while waiting for the American position to become clear is to offer to absorb a bigger share of the mission and ground costs while also investing in homegrown hardware to supply ESA's future missions, Carazo added. The most immediate consequence of the NASA cuts would be a 'permanent dent in Washington's reputational capital,' Carazo said. A 'diversification' of partners to assist with the ESA missions would follow so that 'no single foreign veto can stall an ESA flagship [programme] again.' ESA is looking to broaden relationships with Canada, Japan and India and while no deals are actively being pursued with China, it remains an option that could be explored, Carazo added. 'All of this reshapes the diplomatic map of space science, diluting US soft power,' Carazo said, adding that projects like China's International Lunar Research Station could start to 'woo European participation'. This is not the first time that Europe has discussed its sovereignty in space, according to Ludwig Moeller, ESPI's director. In 2023, an expert group released a report that noted Europe has 'no independent human launch capacity' and 'relies on non-European partners to send humans to space,' according to a press release about the report. The NASA budget cuts are bringing up this discussion again, Moeller added, along with questions of how much Europe should be investing in security and defence. 'The two points, security, defence and exploration are both on the agenda to an extent that I don't think in the history of Europe has ever existed,' he said. 'This … disruption is unique.' Part of the sovereignty discussion is how Europe is developing domestic supply chains to build the necessary hardware for NASA-vulnerable missions like the ExoMars, according to Daniel Neuenschwander, ESA's director of human and robotic exploration in last weeks media briefing. For example, Neuenschwander said that critical parts for the ExoMars rover, like an americium radioisotope heater unit (RHU) could be built in Europe to sustain future Moon missions. Yet, Moeller said Europe is not ready to give up on a transatlantic relationship that is built on shared values. '[Space exploration] really takes a village and the USA is still part of that village… in a different size, maybe in a different shape,' he said. '[But] Space exploration is a decadal task, it's not a transaction of the day'. National data protection authorities should see easier cooperation in cross-border privacy cases under updated rules that were rubber stamped by the EU institutions on Monday evening. The European Commission planned to fix shortcomings in the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – which entered into force in 2018 – by introducing an update in 2023 that was aimed at accelerating decisions and harmonizing procedural rules. Under the GDPR, national regulators must transfer cases to watchdogs based in other member states when the company is headquartered in another country. But this cross-border system has been panned by privacy advocates as complaints can take years to resolve. In Monday's trilogue – the inter-institutional negotiations between the Commission, the European Parliament and the member states – the parties agreed on a mechanism to resolve complaints more swiftly through measures to facilitate consensus-building. In addition, the rules introduce a 15-month deadline in which an investigation must be completed. It can be extended by 12 months in the most complex cases. Poland's Minister for Digital Affairs, Krzysztof Gawkowski, calledthe deal 'a big step towards improving cooperation' between the data protection authorities. Agustín Reyna, Director General of Consumer group BEUC said in a response that 'the agreement marks some progress for those like us, who have been frustrated to see the GDPR's enforcement as its Achilles heel.' Reyna added that it is 'important given the power of multinationals and the snail pace of GDPR enforcement for the last years.' NOYB's Max Schrems, a privacy lawyer and activist, told Euronews that while there are some benefits, like deadlines, "the overall result will be less rights and less enforcement for citizens." "This law is a disgrace as it allows authorities to even enforce less and cut out citizens from procedures about their own rights. The procedure is also needlessly complex and will generate much more work for authorities," he said, adding that this may be subject to annulment by the Courts, because "it ignores basic procedural principles and logic." The provisional agreement will need a formal confirmation by the member states and the Parliament. Last month, the Commission presented a simplification package to offer relief to small mid-cap companies burdened by the current scope of the GDPR. Currently, companies with fewer than 250 employees are exempt from the data privacy rules to reduce their administrative costs, the Commission now proposes to extend this derogation to the so-called small mid-cap companies of up to 500 staff members. WhatsApp said that users will start seeing adverts in parts of the app, as owner Meta Platforms moves to cultivate a new revenue stream by tapping the billions of people who use the messaging service. Advertisements will be shown only in the app's Updates tab, which is used by as many as 1.5 billion people each day. However, they will not appear where personal chats are located, developers said. 'The personal messaging experience on WhatsApp isn't changing, and personal messages, calls and statuses are end-to-end encrypted and cannot be used to show ads,' WhatsApp said in a blog post on Monday. It is a big change for the company, whose founders Jan Koum and Brian Acton vowed to keep the platform free of ads when they created it in 2009. Facebook purchased WhatsApp in 2014 and the pair left a few years later. Parent company Meta Platforms Inc. has long been trying to generate revenue from WhatsApp. WhatsApp said ads will be targeted to users based on information like their age, the country or city where they're located, the language they're using, the channels they're following in the app, and how they're interacting with the ads they see. WhatsApp said it will not use personal messages, calls and groups that a user is a member of to target ads to the user. Meta said that any data sharing on WhatsApp and any of its other apps for ad targeting was optional. Last year, the European Commission signalled that without ads being optional, the move fails to comply with its Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). The European Centre for Digital Rights (noyb), led by privacy activist Max Schrems said that Meta's 'Pay or Okay' approach effectively forces users to choose between privacy and affordability. "Meta is doing exactly the opposite of what EU law requires," Schrems said in a statement. "The data of its various platforms gets linked, and users are tracked for advertising without any genuine choice. Without freely given consent, linking data and showing personalised advertising is clearly illegal," he added. Noyb said it would examine Meta's actions and "initiate procedures against the company "if necessary". The details depend on Meta's practical implementation and therefore cannot yet be assessed conclusively. Schrems said he expected a WhatsApp exodus to the messaging app Signal. 'Signal works just as well as WhatsApp, but is non-profit and donation-funded," he said. WhatsApp unveiled three advertising features on Monday as it tries to monetise the app's user base. Channels will also be able to charge users a monthly fee for subscriptions so they can get exclusive updates. Business owners will also be able to pay to promote their channel's visibility to new users. Most of Meta's revenue comes from ads. In 2025, the Menlo Park, California-based company's revenue totalled $164.5 billion (€142 billion) and $160.6 billion (€138 billion) of it came from advertising.
