logo
Man who killed German backpacker eligible for parole

Man who killed German backpacker eligible for parole

It has been almost 20 years since a young German backpacker was murdered in a picnic area of a national park.
The death of Birgit Brauer, whose body was found in Lucy's Gully, near Ōakura, southwest of New Plymouth, shocked two nations and led to an 18-day manhunt for her killer, Michael Scott Wallace.
Wallace, then a 44-year-old drug-taking transient with an extensive criminal history, went on to deny the murder but was found guilty by a jury.
He was sentenced in 2007 to life imprisonment with a non-parole period of 18 years.
This month, he became eligible for parole and, despite the time that has passed, the 63-year-old is still refusing to admit to killing Brauer.
Wallace made his first appearance before the Parole Board on May 14, at which he sought parole but was denied.
The panel determined he had "a long way ahead to go" before he could be released.
Wallace did not have an approved address at which he could reside if paroled, nor did he have a release proposal.
The board's decision, released to NZME this week, stated Wallace has not been motivated to complete recommended treatments and was considered to still be in the rehabilitative phase of his sentence.
It was also noted that he would undergo a formal assessment of psychopathy.
Wallace recently refused to discuss his criminal history with a psychologist, and while the decision stated he had at some point claimed he could not remember the murder, he told the board that was no longer his stance.
"He now says that he did not commit the offending," according to the decision, which was the position he took at trial. The fatal hitchhiking trip
On September 20, 2005, Brauer and Wallace's paths fatally crossed in the tiny town of Waitōtara.
There, she was picked up hitchhiking by Wallace as she travelled between Whanganui and New Plymouth.
He drove her to Lucy's Gully in Te Papa-Kura-o-Taranaki, formerly known as Egmont National Park, and bludgeoned her with a metal bar before unbuttoning her jeans, likely with sexual intent.
When Wallace was disturbed by a passing vehicle, he dragged Brauer into the bush and stabbed her in the chest. Her body was later found by a jogger.
Wallace disposed of evidence and eventually made his way to the Manawatū area, where, almost three weeks later, he was arrested.
He told police at the time that he did not want to hurt people, but he had, and he would be better off if police had shot him.
Meanwhile, Brauer's body was returned to Germany.
She was described by those who knew her as reserved yet open, honest and friendly. Brauer knew how to enjoy herself; she had a good sense of humour and was sometimes cheeky.
She was drawn to New Zealand by a love of nature and geography and soon became a keen All Blacks fan. Brauer loved New Zealanders' down-to-earth attitude and believed she was safe hitchhiking.
At Wallace's sentencing, Brauer's parents told the court that the events of 2005 would never leave them.
"To this day, we cannot believe Birgit is not with us. A criminal like him does not deserve to live," they said in their victim impact statement. The unforgettable case
A former top Taranaki detective said he wasn't surprised Wallace still denied killing the 28-year-old tourist, who had been on a working holiday in New Zealand when she was murdered.
Grant Coward became a household name when he led the high-profile investigation into the murder, during which he made a "we will catch you" promise to the killer.
Speaking to NZME this week, Coward, who received the Commissioner of Police's Silver Merit Award in 2008 for his role in the inquiry, recalled the murder as being callous and cold-blooded.
Now retired, Coward said the case had been "a real whodunit", and it was a team effort to track Wallace and help bring him to justice.
"It took longer than normal, but we got there in the end."
He said it was difficult to know if, or when, Wallace should be released.
But, he believed that if Wallace was not rehabilitative or admitting fault, he should have an extended period of imprisonment.
Coward said he had not maintained contact with Brauer's family, but she would be in his thoughts forever.
"I reflect on the cases that I've worked on, and she's right up there as someone who you remember, because of what happened."
Brauer was also someone Caryl Blomkvist remembered from time to time.
She and her husband, Fritz Blomkvist, hosted Brauer at their Whanganui farm in the final two weeks of her life, as part of the World Wide Opportunities on Organic Farms.
When Brauer left, the Blomkvists dropped her off at the edge of Whanganui so she could begin her hitchhiking journey, but not without a warning.
"We told her she shouldn't hitchhike," Blomkvist recalled when speaking to NZME this week.
"Then a cop came and banged on our door at 11pm that night. We were pretty shocked."
Blomkvist said Brauer's death was a traumatic time for everyone who knew her.
"We still think about her," she said, describing Brauer as pleasant and hardworking.
"She was no trouble. She spent her time quietly doing what we expected of her, very well. And she enjoyed reading her books and writing.
"She wasn't living a party life at all; she liked the quiet life and enjoyed being on the farm."
Blomkvist remained in contact with Brauer's mother, whom she said was a strong woman. Brauer's father has since died.
Blomkvist preferred not to comment on Wallace, only to say that what he did to Brauer was undeserved.
She said that she and her husband do not support him ever being released on parole. The unmotivated prisoner
After Wallace's conviction for murder, it was revealed he had an extensive criminal history dating back to dishonesty offending in 1976, as well as arson and violence.
In particular, he twice raped a woman in 1983, after attacking her husband and locking him in a closet.
He served a five-year sentence of imprisonment for the home invasion and sex attack before later committing armed robbery and being sent back to prison.
According to the recent parole decision, Wallace acknowledged at the hearing that he was guilty of his other crimes.
"It would be useful to understand from him why he thinks he committed that offending, even if he continues to deny the index murder offence," the board's decision stated.
While Wallace, who has not had any misconducts during his current sentence, was initially reluctant to speak with a psychologist in April for a risk assessment, he did, but refused to discuss his offending.
The psychologist's report detailed a long history of alcohol and drug use and referred to a formal assessment of psychopathy to be conducted.
Wallace, who has reimmersed himself in Te Ao Māori while in prison, has completed sessions with a one-to-one departmental psychologist, and a special treatment unit for high-risk violent offenders has been suggested.
But there were impediments to Wallace entering such treatment, including his denial of the murder and his belief that he would not work well in a group setting.
In the meantime, he will continue to undergo one-to-one treatment.
The board found it was important Wallace also complete a drug treatment programme, despite not being motivated to do so.
"Overall, Mr Wallace is still considered to be in the rehabilitative phase of his sentence, and therefore rehabilitation must be a priority."
An updated psychological risk assessment was ordered before his next parole hearing, scheduled for next year.
"So that the assessment is useful, we encourage Mr Wallace to discuss his offending history with the psychologist."
- Tara Shaskey, Open Justice reporter

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

High Court Judge Urged To Consider Public Trust In McSkimming Case ‘Superinjunction' Decision
High Court Judge Urged To Consider Public Trust In McSkimming Case ‘Superinjunction' Decision

Scoop

time13 hours ago

  • Scoop

High Court Judge Urged To Consider Public Trust In McSkimming Case ‘Superinjunction' Decision

Press Release – Free Speech Union Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. The High Court judge has reserved her decision on whether to maintain the 'superinjunction' in Jevon McSkimming's case, which currently disables the media and public from discussing the details. The Free Speech Union urges the Court to consider the damage to public trust caused by excessive secrecy, says Stephen Franks, Free Speech Union Council Member. 'The Court should uphold the speech rights of all New Zealanders by allowing the media, and therefore the public, to scrutinise matters of genuine public interest. The public should be free to discuss the conduct of their officials and form their own opinions on matters. 'The media play a crucial role in enabling Kiwis to seek and receive information. The High Court set a dangerous precedent by limiting this freedom. The public's ability to discuss cases should be prioritised in court decisions. 'Even if a powerful individual is not charged or is found not guilty, the public should still have access to the facts in order to make their own informed judgments about his character. 'We urge the judge to consider the full weight of the damage done to public trust in courts, lawyers, and judges when they act as if only they can be trusted, while the 'little people' are kept in the dark. 'Suppression is bad, whatever the outcome.'

Police begin fresh search for ‘signs of' Madeleine McCann's body
Police begin fresh search for ‘signs of' Madeleine McCann's body

NZ Herald

timea day ago

  • NZ Herald

Police begin fresh search for ‘signs of' Madeleine McCann's body

View of dismantled base camp at the end of the three-day search for remains of Madeleine McCann at Barragem do Arade Reservoir on May 25, 2023 in Silves, Portugal. Photo / Getty Images Police investigating the disappearance of Madeleine McCann will begin fresh searches on Tuesday, near where the 3-year-old went missing in Portugal in 2007. Some 30 German police officers are expected to comb over 21 private plots of land after they were given permission to fly into the country by Portuguese

Murder a WW1 loose end
Murder a WW1 loose end

Otago Daily Times

timea day ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Murder a WW1 loose end

Cyril Cromar, a New Zealand soldier murdered in the German city of Cologne in 1919. — Otago Witness, 4.8.1925 An echo of the war which principally affects Dunedin has now reached finality. It's a hard life The matter is that of the murder of Private Cyril Cromar, of the 1st Otago Infantry Battalion, by a German on the banks of the Rhine in 1919. Mr W.O. Clark, of Dunedin was in company with the deceased and two young women, Clark being on one seat with his friend and Cromar some 100 yards away on another seat with his friend. Suddenly several German larrikins came on the scene and surrounded Cromar and behaved in a threatening manner. At that moment Clark ran up and, just before he reached Cromar, a shot was fired, and the latter fell dead. The German police assisted the military police and five of the assailants were arrested and sentenced to three years' imprisonment. One man escaped, and it was not until early last year while alighting from the Berlin express at Cologne that a German detective recognised the man. He was arrested and brought before the court and remanded. As the Army Council decided that Mr Clark's evidence was essential, the New Zealand Government was communicated with and, as a result, Mr Clark was requested to go to Cologne as a witness at the trial of Fram Swaboda, which will take place when Mr Clark reaches Cologne. It is understood that Swaboda is to be represented at the trial by Dr Steiner, a leading German counsel. Mr Clark would depart aboard the Corinthic at Wellington on June 11 and would therefore leave Dunedin on Tuesday next. Have you ever, or never, sat uncomfortably in church, with a sensation that the posterior bones and the naked wood of the pew were too closely combined? Have you shifted uneasily, trying hard to keep mind and ear attentive to prayer and praise and discourse? Well, if the answer is in the affirmative, as conscientiously it surely must be, think of Heaven. You sing of Jerusalem the Golden, and of the special place reserved for you — and you dream with lazy religiosity of harps and jasper pavements and golden crowns and cushy seats. — by 'Wayfarer' Throwing a wobbly It is not clear why Mr Holland, as leader of the official Labour Party, thought it necessary or politic to champion the cause of the revolutionary firebrand against whom the Attorney-General, exercising statutory powers, has thought right to issue an order of deportation. He cannot be in agreement with the wild doctrines expounded by the undesirable visitor in the interests of IWW propagandism. From him, however, the seamen's and waterside workers' organisations in Wellington have apparently taken their cue, and they have passed resolutions of protest against the issue of an order of deportation. "The constitution I believe in is that of the IWW, and if we study it a bit more and allow some of these so-called foreigners to come in and help us, we shall probably make this country a little better than it is to-day"; such is the mildest profession of faith of the man who is to be deported, and it was preceded by more extravagant utterances. Sir Francis Bell has pointed out that it is not unlawful or seditious to advocate the wildest forms of Socialism or Communism; "what is unlawful and seditious is to advocate murder and violence as legitimate methods for the attainment of political ends." — editorial Not on a Sunday At a meeting of the Dunedin Presbytery yesterday morning the Rev J. McCosh (East Taieri) reported that, as there were rumours that a Sunday train service would be instituted from Dunedin to Mosgiel, a petition was being circulated and was receiving strong support from all the Protestant churches in Mosgiel and the surrounding country. A very large number of residents of the district had signed the petition urging the Railway Department not to commence services on Sundays and, if it had no effect locally, it was intended to send a deputation to place the petition before the Minister of Railways in Wellington. The Moderator (the Rev W. Simpson) said that the matter was already before the Public Questions Committee. He had been informed that the Port Chalmers railwaymen did not like working on Sundays. The Presbytery approved of the action of the Mosgiel churches. — ODT, 3.6.1925 (Compiled by Peter Dowden)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store