
NY Times reporter filed HR complaint because editor threatened to ‘kill' him over story length
The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US
A New York Times reporter got into an 'epic blow-up' with his editor over a recent story about Harvard that resulted in the reporter filing a human resources complaint because he felt the editor threatened to 'kill' him if his initial draft was too long.
Before the Times published a triple-bylined report last month about some of Harvard's most prominent donors wanting to 'strike a deal' rather than fight the Trump administration, the high-stakes nature of the story resulted in tensions that boiled over as the deadline approached.
The incident was first reported by the Breaker newsletter. The Independent , meanwhile, was able to corroborate Breaker's report with three additional sources.
'According to two people familiar with the matter, [reporter Rob] Copeland and the New York Times business editor Ellen Pollock had an epic blow-up before the Harvard story ran,' Breaker noted. 'It resulted in a HR complaint about a 'death threat' and…Copeland taking time out from the paper.'
Copeland, the author of a bestselling book on famed Wall Street hedge-fund manager Ray Dalio, had drawn the ire of Pollock over delays in the story, prompting her to call him and his editor, Michael Corkery, into her office to hash it out. The story was seen as especially sensitive within the Times as many of the paper's reporters and alumni attended the prestigious Ivy League school. New York Times reporter Rob Copeland went to HR after editor Ellen Pollock said she'd 'kill' him if his draft on a high-stakes Harvard story was over 2000 words. (Getty Images)
According to sources familiar with the situation, Pollock yelled at Copeland for not staying on task and following her directions, eventually resulting in her telling the reporter that she would 'kill' him, Corkery, and herself if his draft came in over 2,000 words. Read More M&S marks 20 years of Gastropub range with Tom Kerridge ad
The tense argument and aftermath soon became the talk of the Grey Lady's newsroom, with one version spreading throughout the halls that threats of shooting were made during the heated dispute, though our sources note that this was not accurate.
For the most part, Times sources that spoke to The Independent indicated that Pollock was almost certainly joking when she issued her supposed 'death threat' to Copeland, something that isn't out of character for the highly respected journalist. At the same time, many reporters at the paper were 'baffled' that Copeland escalated the matter to HR.
'Ellen is a great journalist with a very direct approach, and most people who work for her understand that it's in the service of getting the best story,' one staffer said.
'Yes, obviously there was no way that Ellen was going to pull off a murder-suicide at The Times without clearing it with the masthead first,' the same staffer snarked when asked about the nature of Pollock's 'threat' to Copeland.
In the end, it was apparent that Copeland didn't see the humor in Pollock's and told her that she had committed an 'HR violation' and promptly filed a complaint. In the end, the veteran editor apologized.
' The Times is committed to fostering a productive and supportive workplace, and takes seriously all matters related to how our staff works together,' a New York Times spokesperson said in a statement.
As for the final product, the story – which Copeland co-wrote with Maureen Farrell and Michael Schmidt – came in at 2,282 words. 'Copeland, Corkery and Pollock remained alive at the time of our publication,' Breaker cheekily noted in their report. Read More Craft Media appoints Media Week Podcast host head of planning

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Southern Baptists move to end same-sex marriage in the US
Southern Baptists, whose faith includes over 12 million members in the US, have endorsed a ban to end same-sex marriage in America. The moment marks the first time the group has officially opposed the ruling in Obergefell v Hodges, the 2015 landmark Supreme Court case backing same-sex marriage. The votes on Tuesday came during the annual Southern Baptist Convention in Dallas, Texas, attended by over 10,000 church representatives. Experts say the evangelical group's values have increasingly shifted to align with the Christian right, a branch of conservatism that has gained momentum under US President Donald Trump. The Southern Baptists' resolution does not use the word "ban" directly. Instead, it calls for the "overturning of laws and court rulings, including Obergefell v. Hodges, that defy God's design for marriage and family". The resolution also calls "for laws that affirm marriage between one man and one woman". Any legal reversal of the Supreme Court's Obergefell decision would not lead automatically to a nationwide ban of same-sex marriage. Thirty-six states had already legalised same-sex marriage at the time of the ruling, and nearly 70% of Americans still support it, polls show. "What we're trying to do is keep the conversation alive," Andrew Walker, an ethicist at a Southern Baptist seminary in Kentucky who wrote the resolution, told the New York Times. Although the resolution is non-binding, it comes from a large, influential faction of President Trump's base and sends a direct message to the White House. Eighty-five percent of white evangelical Protestants are likely to be Republican voters, according to a 2024 Pew Research survey. "I think there is a confidence that (Trump) will have their backs," Kristin Du Mez, a Calvin University history professor specializing in religion and politics, told the BBC. "In some ways, it's an uphill battle," she said. "But I do think they sense that there's been this shift, that there may be a window opening, and that they think this is the right time to press this issue." She described a "transactional element" to the relationship between evangelicals and Trump, whose Supreme Court nominations helped end national abortion rights. Evangelicals also played a "very prominent" role overturning Roe v Wade, the landmark Supreme Court ruling that protected abortion for nearly 50 years before it was overturned in 2022, said Ms Du Mez. She said she believes evangelicals may be using the same blueprint to end same-sex marriage. "I know some of the leaders have pointed to Roe v Wade as a model of the need to play the long game," she said. Trump's message on same-sex marriage has been mixed over the years, telling CNN in 2015 that he supported "traditional marriage" then, in a 60 Minutes interview in 2016, saying he was "fine" with same-sex marriage. In his second term, however, he has launched a campaign against diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) with multiple directives targeting LGBTQ groups. This includes banning transgender people from serving the military, and revoking a Biden-era executive order preventing discrimination "on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation". Fear and anxiety in LGBTQ communities have grown as a result, leading some international organisations to boycott World Pride in Washington DC this year. And although public support largely remains behind same-sex marriage, the Southern Baptists' resolution has added to LGBTQ groups' sense of alarm. "This is a very visible example of how attacks on the LGBTQ+ community as a whole have intensified, even as politicians take aim at transgender people as a tactic to divide us," Laurel Powell, Human Rights Campaign communications director, said in a statement to the BBC. "We will never stop fighting to love who we love and be who we are."


New York Post
28 minutes ago
- New York Post
Walmart heiress Christy Walton's anti-Trump ad fuels MAGA-led call for boycott of retailer
Walmart could become the target of a MAGA-led boycott after an heiress to the retail fortune funded a full-page ad in the New York Times promoting a nationwide protest movement against President Trump. The ad, run by the 'No Kings' movement, calls on Americans to 'mobilize' on Saturday — Flag Day and Trump's birthday — in order to 'reject authoritarianism.' Trump is planning to hold a massive military parade in Washington, DC on that day. 5 Christy Walton funded an anti-Trump ad in the New York Times. Getty Images The heiress, Christy Walton, is the widow of John T. Walton, son of Walmart founder Sam Walton. Though she holds no active role in Walmart's operations, she retains a roughly 1.9% stake in the company and has an estimated net worth of $19.3 billion, according to Forbes. The 'No Kings' movement is planning roughly 1,500 protests nationwide to counter Saturday's military parade — but notably absent from the list of protest sites is DC. The ad, which appeared in Sunday's edition of the Times, does not name Trump directly but criticizes efforts that undermine civil rights and democratic values. It reads, in part, 'The honor, dignity, and integrity of our country are not for sale,' and includes a QR code linking to a map of more than 1,800 planned protests set to take place nationwide. Reaction from Trump's MAGA allies was swift — with many directly or indirectly calling for a boycott of the nation's largest retailer. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Kari Lake, a former Arizona gubernatorial candidate and now a White House special advisor, posted on X (formerly Twitter): 'Do you shop at Walmart?' Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-Fla.) wrote on X: 'Walmart heiress Christy Walton is funding full-page color ads in the New York Times for 'No Kings Day,' a nationwide counter-protest scheduled for Trump's birthday, organized by the far-left group Indivisible.' 'Looks like the Walmart dynasty is big mad about China tariffs,' the lawmaker wrote. The hashtag @BoycottWalmart started gaining traction on X on Wednesday, with some social media users branding Christy Walton a 'traitor.' 5 The ad, run by the 'No Kings' movement, calls on Americans to 'mobilize' on Saturday. x/RepLuna 'Boycott Walmart!' wrote longtime Trump supporter Roger Stone, who added: 'The Walmart Heiress subsidizes insurrection. Next up peaceful protest outside all of their stores to encourage people not to shop there. Essentially what left-wing stooges did to Tesla. Let's go.' The Post reached out to Christy Walton for comment. Organizers say the decision to forgo a demonstration in the nation's capital is intentional, casting it as a refusal to legitimize what they call a political spectacle. The parade is expected to commemorate both the 250th anniversary of the US Army and Trump's 79th birthday. Trump has issued a warning to anyone planning to protest Saturday's military parade, saying demonstrators will be met with a 'very big force.' 5 Kari Lake, a special adviser to the White House, suggested that consumers boycott Walmart. Ron Sachs – CNP for NY Post Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said on Wednesday that the president 'supports the right of Americans to peacefully protest' and that 'is not the majority of the behavior that we have seen taking place in Los Angeles' — a reference to riots that broke out following immigration raids by ICE. Leavitt also bristled at suggestions that Trump views himself as a king, telling reporters at the White House on Wednesday: 'The president views himself as the President of the United States of America. This is a constitutional republic, and we want to see all of our citizens be proud of the country in which they are given the privilege and the blessing to live…' Christy Walton, who inherited much of her fortune after her husband died in a 2005 plane crash, has since focused largely on philanthropy and environmental initiatives, maintaining a relatively low profile in public life. 5 Christy Walton is an heiress to the Walmart fortune. Walmart is one of the world's largest retailers. REUTERS Christy Walton's history of political involvement is limited, though she has previously supported educational and cultural causes, including funding the film adaptation of 'Bless Me, Ultima.' Her support for the 'No Kings' campaign marks one of the rare instances in which a member of the Walton family has backed a movement widely perceived as critical of Trump. Walmart, seeking to distance itself from the controversy, quickly issued a statement to The Post. 'The advertisement from Christy Walton [is] in no way connected to or endorsed by Walmart,' said spokesperson Joe Pennington, who added that Walton 'has no active role in company decisions.' 5 Christy Walton is the sister-in-law of Rob (far left), Alice (center) and Jim Walton (right). She was married to their late brother, John T. Walton, son of Walmart founder Sam Walton. Getty Images 'We condemn violence, including when it's directed towards law enforcement, and the damaging of property,' Pennington added. 'As a company with associates and customers in the Los Angeles region, we remain focused on their safety and that of impacted communities.' Trump recently urged Walmart to 'eat the tariffs' by absorbing the increase in prices that are likely to result from levies his administration has imposed on foreign imports. Nonetheless, pictures on social media purported to be taken of products sold at Walmart indicate that prices have spiked — though a spokesperson for the retailer told The Post that 'pricing fluctuations are a normal course of business and are influenced by a variety of factors.'


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Hispanic-Serving College Program Is Discriminatory, Lawsuit Argues
The state of Tennessee and the group that successfully sued Harvard to stop race-conscious college admissions is challenging a federal program that provides tens of millions of dollars a year to colleges that serve Hispanic students. The lawsuit, brought by Students for Fair Admissions, targets a program to support so-called Hispanic Serving Institutions, which include schools that meet a threshold of 25 percent Hispanic enrollment. The complaint says the program violates state and federal anti-discrimination laws and the Constitution because it provides a benefit — additional federal funding — to those schools. All public institutions of higher learning in Tennessee serve Hispanic and low-income students, the lawsuit says, yet none of them qualify for these grants because their Hispanic enrollment is below 25 percent. 'The H.S.I. program does not pursue the general welfare,' says the complaint, which was filed in federal court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. 'It pursues the welfare of one ethnic group at the expense of everyone else, including other Hispanic students whose schools miss an arbitrary ethnic cutoff.' The lawsuit is part of a volley of challenges in recent years against schools and programs, including scholarships and internships, that use racial or ethnic criteria. Conservative activists have filed multiple lawsuits since the Supreme Court effectively struck down affirmative action college admissions in 2023, in litigation brought by Students for Fair Admissions. The targets of litigation often close the program rather than devote the substantial resources needed to defend it in court. A group called the American Alliance for Equal Rights has filed at least 10 lawsuits alleging discrimination in various public and private programs, including the nonprofit, venture capital and legal arenas. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.