NY Times reporter filed HR complaint because editor threatened to ‘kill' him over story length
The latest headlines from our reporters across the US sent straight to your inbox each weekday Your briefing on the latest headlines from across the US
A New York Times reporter got into an 'epic blow-up' with his editor over a recent story about Harvard that resulted in the reporter filing a human resources complaint because he felt the editor threatened to 'kill' him if his initial draft was too long.
Before the Times published a triple-bylined report last month about some of Harvard's most prominent donors wanting to 'strike a deal' rather than fight the Trump administration, the high-stakes nature of the story resulted in tensions that boiled over as the deadline approached.
The incident was first reported by the Breaker newsletter. The Independent , meanwhile, was able to corroborate Breaker's report with three additional sources.
'According to two people familiar with the matter, [reporter Rob] Copeland and the New York Times business editor Ellen Pollock had an epic blow-up before the Harvard story ran,' Breaker noted. 'It resulted in a HR complaint about a 'death threat' and…Copeland taking time out from the paper.'
Copeland, the author of a bestselling book on famed Wall Street hedge-fund manager Ray Dalio, had drawn the ire of Pollock over delays in the story, prompting her to call him and his editor, Michael Corkery, into her office to hash it out. The story was seen as especially sensitive within the Times as many of the paper's reporters and alumni attended the prestigious Ivy League school. New York Times reporter Rob Copeland went to HR after editor Ellen Pollock said she'd 'kill' him if his draft on a high-stakes Harvard story was over 2000 words. (Getty Images)
According to sources familiar with the situation, Pollock yelled at Copeland for not staying on task and following her directions, eventually resulting in her telling the reporter that she would 'kill' him, Corkery, and herself if his draft came in over 2,000 words. Read More M&S marks 20 years of Gastropub range with Tom Kerridge ad
The tense argument and aftermath soon became the talk of the Grey Lady's newsroom, with one version spreading throughout the halls that threats of shooting were made during the heated dispute, though our sources note that this was not accurate.
For the most part, Times sources that spoke to The Independent indicated that Pollock was almost certainly joking when she issued her supposed 'death threat' to Copeland, something that isn't out of character for the highly respected journalist. At the same time, many reporters at the paper were 'baffled' that Copeland escalated the matter to HR.
'Ellen is a great journalist with a very direct approach, and most people who work for her understand that it's in the service of getting the best story,' one staffer said.
'Yes, obviously there was no way that Ellen was going to pull off a murder-suicide at The Times without clearing it with the masthead first,' the same staffer snarked when asked about the nature of Pollock's 'threat' to Copeland.
In the end, it was apparent that Copeland didn't see the humor in Pollock's and told her that she had committed an 'HR violation' and promptly filed a complaint. In the end, the veteran editor apologized.
' The Times is committed to fostering a productive and supportive workplace, and takes seriously all matters related to how our staff works together,' a New York Times spokesperson said in a statement.
As for the final product, the story – which Copeland co-wrote with Maureen Farrell and Michael Schmidt – came in at 2,282 words. 'Copeland, Corkery and Pollock remained alive at the time of our publication,' Breaker cheekily noted in their report. Read More Craft Media appoints Media Week Podcast host head of planning
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UK will sanction Israel ministers Ben-Gvir and Smotrich, Times reports
LONDON (Reuters) -Britain and other international allies will formally sanction two far-right Israeli ministers, Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, following their conduct over the war in Gaza, the Times reported on Tuesday. London will join Canada, Australia, New Zealand and other nations in freezing the assets and imposing travel bans on Israel's national security minister Ben-Gvir - a West Bank settler - and finance minister Smotrich. Britain's foreign office did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the report. Britain, like other European countries, has been ramping up the pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government to end the blockade on aid into Gaza, where international experts have warned that famine is imminent. London last month suspended free trade talks with Israel for pursuing "egregious policies" in the occupied West Bank and Gaza, summoned its ambassador, and announced further sanctions against West Bank settlers. Foreign minister David Lammy, who called Israel's recent offensive "a dark new phase in this conflict," has previously condemned comments by Smotrich on the possible cleansing and destruction of Gaza and relocation of its residents to third countries.
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Yes, the rule of law is in danger from Trump. But there's an even greater threat
For the past five months, myself and others in the legal world have criticized the illegality and unconstitutionality of President Donald Trump's extreme executive actions. Last month, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced that Harvard could no longer enroll international students — and that those already attending needed to transfer. There is no doubt that the administration hopes that if it can force Harvard to capitulate, it will send a message to all colleges. Indeed, Noem explicitly posted on X, 'Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.' It is a blatant illegal act of reprisal against Harvard to target its international students. But, lost in the legalese, I fear we have at times failed to pay sufficient attention to the basic lack of humanity in so many of these actions. What about those 6,700 international students who are enrolled? Where are they supposed to attend school next year? What does it mean to tell a doctoral student in the midst of laboratory research to transfer? President Donald Trump's policies and actions are cruel. We can't lose sight of that. The students are simply the collateral damage for the Trump administration's efforts to make Harvard cower. We see that same dynamic now playing out on the streets of Los Angeles. In deporting undocumented individuals, the Trump administration could return them to their home countries, which is the standard procedure. Instead, it has moved hundreds of people to a brutal maximum-security prison in El Salvador. Not one of these individuals has been convicted of any crime to warrant imprisonment. We know that some were taken by mistake. And even if they had been convicted of a crime, why the inhumane conditions of the Terrorism Confinement Centre in El Salvador? Another group of individuals was deported to a U.S. Naval base in Djibouti, apparently on their way to be held in South Sudan. Apart from violating court orders, there is no apparent reason for this other than to move those deported as far from the United States as possible and to harsh conditions. The cruelty is stunning and unprecedented. And that's the point. As the ongoing events in Los Angeles show, Trump's aggressive and even cruel use of ICE are designed to provoke an understandably angry reaction. And he is using that as an excuse for an unprecedented nationalization of California national guard troops to send a message that he will not hesitate to use military force to stop demonstrations. This inhumanity of those at the top of government sends a message to those who carry out its policies. Stories of awful actions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents abound. There was a horrifying picture of a teenage girl pinned to the ground by police as her mother was apprehended by ICE agents to be deported. There was the story of a 4-year-old child suffering from cancer being deported without essential medications. And there was a 10-year-old U.S. citizen with brain cancer who was apprehended with her family in Texas while they were on their way to receive medical care. Even during the first Trump administration, ICE agents would not go into schools, churches or hospitals. But that policy has been revoked, and now parents are afraid to send their children to school, people are afraid to worship and many will not seek needed medical care, even when they have communicable diseases that can infect others. The lack of humanity is reflected in the Trump budget bill passed by the House of Representatives. It is estimated that 11 million people will lose their health insurance coverage if it is enacted. People will suffer and die due to the lack of access to medical care. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that over 3 million people — and it says that may be a low estimate — will lose food assistance because of cuts to the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the largest food assistance program. How many children will go to bed hungry and be malnourished because of this cut? The elimination of the U.S. Agency for International Development and its assistance will lead to countless deaths in foreign countries due to a lack of food and medicine. There is a heartlessness at the core of so many of the Trump administration's actions. For the past 45 years as a law professor, I have concluded each semester by telling my students that it is not enough to contemplate and to argue effectively. As lawyers, they have an obligation to care — to care about those affected by their advocacy and their work. But where is the caring by those who are now running the federal government? Myself and others have extensively written about the assault on the rule of law. It's also our duty to speak about the war on compassion. We have talked about democracies that have become authoritarian, but we haven't talked enough about societies where the government cares so little for humanity and the horrors that have resulted. At a time when our society is deeply divided over policy, can't we still share a commitment that children be treated humanely? Can't we all agree that no one should needlessly suffer? Can't we all condemn unnecessarily cruel Trump administration policies? In fighting to uphold the law, we also must not lose sight that we are fighting for the human beings who are protected by it.
Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Oil-Rich University of Texas Wants to Cash In on AI, Crypto and Power
Markets Magazine Wealth The system—with an endowment second only to Harvard's—is diversifying into wind and solar energy at a fraught time for renewables. Scores of wind turbines, each as tall as a 50-story building, rise into the desert sky. Solar panels, 800,000 in all, cover a patch of scrubland almost the size of London's Heathrow Airport. Rows of computer servers whir loudly in a chilled cryptocurrency data warehouse that could cover two New York City blocks. The University of Texas System manages the land under all these new projects, which are generating cash for hundreds of thousands of students. UT has long relied on the money it makes leasing the rights to what's beneath its vast property in the Permian Basin: oil and natural gas from North America's richest trove. And the miles of pipelines carrying liquid gold below the windmills and solar farms remain key to its wealth. Thanks to record years of fossil fuel production and investment gains, UT has a $47.5 billion endowment, ranking No. 2 in higher education, after Harvard University's.
