Adoptees urge new investigation and justice after South Korea confirms adoption abuses
'This is no longer just a matter for investigation. It's a matter for prosecution,' says adoptee group leader
Adoptee advocacy groups from all over the world gathered outside South Korea's Truth and Reconciliation Commission in Seoul on Thursday, calling for a new round of investigations — and legal accountability — over systemic malpractice in the country's intercountry adoption program.
The demonstration comes around two weeks after the independent commission on March 26 announced that it had identified human rights violations in 56 of the 367 adoption cases submitted since 2022.
As of March 26, the commission said it had completed investigations and issued reports for 98 cases — only about 26 percent of the total. Of those, 42 were dismissed due to 'insufficient evidence,' leaving just 56 cases officially recognized.
The remaining 267 cases have already been investigated, but their final reports are still being written. However, with the mandate for this TRC -- South Korea's second in history -- set to expire May 26, it remains unclear how many of these will result in official acknowledgment before this commission's mandate ends.
A TRC official cited the 'sheer scope and complexity' of the cases as the main reason for the delay.
'Our message is simple,' said Peter Moller, a lawyer born in Korea and adopted to Denmark, who is co-founder of the Danish Korean Rights Group. 'If all 367 adoptees cannot be recognized, a new commission must and shall be established — one that allows new applications.'
Moller stressed that the burden of proof should not fall on the adoptees themselves -- as victims whose records were deliberately destroyed or falsified, in other words, whose human rights were violated through illegal adoptions.
'That's how the rule of law works,' he said.
Advocates are also pushing for criminal prosecution — not just fact-finding.
'This is no longer just a matter for investigation,' said Min Young-chang, co-chair of the Adoption Solidarity Coalition. 'It's a matter for prosecution.' Min argued that the missing documentation itself signals wrongdoing, not a lack of evidence. 'Information that doesn't exist — that is the evidence,' he said.
Min called for certain cases to be referred to prosecutors and the National Assembly, if necessary.
Other speakers at the rally shared stories that reflect the long-term effects of South Korea's adoption policies.
Cho Min-ho, director of the Children's Rights Solidarity, recounted being labeled an orphan by the state despite having living parents. 'I was intentionally made into an orphan,' he said, condemning the erasure of identity as a violation of both Korean constitutional rights and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child.
Maite Maeum Jeannolin, a filmmaker and daughter of a Korean adoptee to France, highlighted the lasting consequences for adoptees' descendants. Under current Korean law, adoption records are permanently sealed after an adoptee's death — even from their own children. 'We deserve the right to understand it,' she said, referring to descendants' rights to search for their biological families.
Ben Coz, a Korean adoptee to the US and member of international network ibyangIN, called access to birth and adoption records 'a human right,' citing international child rights law and professional ethics standards. He encouraged adoptees and supporters in receiving countries to advocate for policy changes at home, as governments like Norway and the Netherlands open their own investigations.
He urged adoptees and allies abroad to contact lawmakers, noting that more countries — like Norway and the Netherlands — have launched their own investigations.
Many demonstrators said they were unable to apply to the current TRC before the application window closed and are now left without any path to official recognition or redress.
'This isn't history,' said Min, reacting to recent remarks by TRC Chair Park Sun-young, who called the adoption abuses 'a thing of the past.' Min disagreed, saying, 'It's still happening.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
8 hours ago
- Korea Herald
PM nominee to undergo parliamentary confirmation hearing next week
Rival parties will hold a two-day confirmation hearing for Prime Minister nominee Kim Min-seok next week, a lawmaker said Tuesday. Under the plan, the confirmation hearing will take place Tuesday and Wednesday next week, Rep. Lee Jong-bae of the People Power Party said. Lee heads the parliamentary confirmation hearing special committee. President Lee Jae Myung submitted a request to the National Assembly seeking a confirmation hearing for Kim on June 10. By law, the National Assembly is mandated to complete the confirmation hearing by June 25 and parliamentary evaluation by June 29. Kim, a former student activist turned four-term lawmaker, played a key role in Lee's presidential campaign. Meanwhile, the prime minister nominee underscored engagement with North Korea when asked about the possibility of resuming inter-Korean dialogue or a now-scrapped 2018 military tension reduction pact. "Whichever happens, wouldn't they be linked to dialogue?" Kim said in a press briefing with foreign journalists Tuesday, without elaborating when such events could take place. South Korea fully halted the inter-Korean accord in June last year over the North's cross-border balloon campaigns, after partially suspending it in 2023 in response to the North's launch of a military spy satellite. (Yonhap)
Korea Herald
11 hours ago
- Korea Herald
At 60, Seoul, Tokyo toast to what's next — not what was
Anchored by the slogan 'Joining Hands for a Better Future,' the reception commemorating 60 years of diplomatic normalization between Korea and Japan spotlighted a clear shared commitment to transform the two countries' relationship into a forward-looking, strategic partnership fit for today's turbulent world. Beneath the chandeliers of a ballroom brimming with guests from all walks of life — from diplomats and business leaders to young students — the air buzzed with optimism and the clinking of glasses at a reception hosted by the Japanese Embassy at the Lotte Hotel in Seoul on Monday evening. South Korea and Japan signed the Treaty on Basic Relations on June 22, 1965, and exchanged instruments of ratification on December 18 of that year, formally normalizing diplomatic ties. The year 2025 marks the 60th anniversary of that milestone. "The fact that Japan-Korea relations are becoming closer and developing is something no one can deny,' Japanese Ambassador to South Korea Koichi Mizushima told participants during the reception on Monday. "Amid today's shifting strategic environment, the importance of Korea-Japan relations continues to grow — and the relationship has now reached an irreversible stage." Back in 1965, annual travel between the two countries stood at just around 10,000. In 2024, it surpassed 12 million, averaging more than triple the 1965 total in a single day. Japan's investment in Korea has also soared, from $500,000 in 1965 to $6.12 billion in 2024, making it Korea's largest investor, Mizushima said. "Sixty years corresponds to a full cycle — a hwangap — in the East Asian cultural sphere where Japan and Korea are both located. In other words, one full cycle has passed since the normalization of Japan-Korea diplomatic ties,' Mizushima said. 'This signifies that Japan-Korea relations now stand at a new starting point. We must not remain complacent with the present, but instead support the next generation who will carry the future of both nations, and begin the next cycle to dramatically advance Japan-Korea relations with full momentum.' The evening vividly illustrated how far the two countries have come since the 1965 treaty, as relations evolved from government-to-government dialogue into a broad web of economic, cultural and people-to-people exchanges. The ballroom was filled with music as students at the Seoul Japanese School choir performed, including a Korean rendition of Spring in My Hometown. Arirang, a beloved Korean folk song, was also performed, sung and arranged by Japan's Mikage Project, a group dedicated to composing and reinterpreting traditional Japanese folk music. Korean pianist Lee Kyung-mi, who spent seven years in Japan from the age of nine and made her musical debut there, performed at the event, continuing her long-standing role as a cultural bridge between Korea and Japan through friendship concerts — even during strained diplomatic times. The event also featured a joint performance by Korean trot singer Kim Da-hyun and Japanese artist Azuma Aki. Both appeared on Korea-Japan King of Singers, the first-ever joint Korean-Japanese music competition show, co-produced by Korea's MBN and Japan's Fuji TV to promote friendship through music. "I hope that Korea-Japan relations will continue to develop in a stable and future-oriented manner based on the achievements and progress made thus far,' South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said in his congratulatory video message, adding that 'the two countries are important partners who must seek responses together amid rapidly changing international circumstances.' 'Joining hands for a better future — let us move forward together!' Akihisa Nagashima, special advisor to Japanese Prime Minister Ishiba Shigeru, underscored that "close communication and expanding the scope of cooperation between the two countries is not a choice but a necessity in light of today's grave international environment." Ryu Jin, chair of the Federation of Korean Industries and chair of Poongsan Corp., offered a toast on behalf of the Korean side, following a kagami-biraki ceremony — a traditional Japanese ritual that involves breaking open a sake barrel to symbolize harmony and new beginnings. 'The Korean business community is fully committed to supporting President Lee Jae-myung's new pragmatic administration in further developing future-oriented cooperation between our two countries,' Ryu said. 'Today, Korea-Japan relations stand at a new starting point for the next 60 years.' dagyumji@
Korea Herald
12 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Can South Korea afford a 4.5-day workweek?
Workers cheer shorter week, but employers warn of hidden costs With President Lee Jae Myung now in office, one of his most eye-catching campaign pledges — introducing a 4.5-day workweek — is facing questions over whether it can really work. For many workers, the proposal is a welcome one. 'I can't even describe how much I hope this happens,' said Kim Ji-eun, a 39-year-old office worker in Seoul. 'Right now, I leave work exhausted every Friday evening and have barely enough time to rest, let alone enjoy life or take care of my kids. Just half a day more would mean a real chance at balance.' Kim's view is widely shared. According to a recent survey by business networking platform Remember, 7 in 10 salaried workers out of more than 11,000 surveyed said they would prefer a four-day workweek. In a different survey by Saramin, 86.7 percent of employees said they prefer a four-day workweek, and of those more than 60 percent said they would take the shorter hours even if it meant a lower salary. But the reality is more complicated. South Korea is widely known for its grueling work culture. In 2022, South Koreans worked an average of 1,901 hours annually — 149 hours more than the OECD average. The country's job market is also notoriously rigid, largely due to labor laws that make it difficult for employers to dismiss regular workers, contributing to a stark divide between secure, permanent jobs and unstable, non-regular employment. "Shaped by decades of regulations that prioritize employment stability over labor market agility, rigid legal frameworks and cultural norms make it difficult for companies to reward excellence or address underperformance. This makes it risky for businesses to experiment with reduced work hours," Kim Seong-hee, a labor professor at Korea University, told The Korea Herald. At the same time, the country ranks low in terms of labor productivity. According to the Korea Labor Institute, South Korea placed 33rd out of 38 OECD countries in 2023, with hourly productivity at $44.4 — just 57 percent of the United States' output at $77.9 and 65 percent of Germany's. Employers worry that without a significant leap in productivity, a reduced workweek would only add to their burden. 'Some pioneering firms might adopt a four-day or 4.5-day workweek to attract talent,' said Sohn Kyung-shik, chairman of the Korea Employers Federation, at a presidential forum last month. 'But for many companies, this change would be a serious strain.' Mixed signals from labor and business South Korea's largest labor union, the Federation of Korean Trade Unions, has taken the opposite stance. At a press conference in April ahead of the presidential election, the union pushed for the introduction of a four-day workweek. 'Seventeen percent of Korean workers still put in more than 48 hours per week — more than twice the EU average of 7.3 percent,' the group said, citing long work hours as a pressing national issue. Pointing to successful pilot programs in countries like Iceland, France, the UK and the US, the union argues that advances in automation, AI and platform labor models demand an overhaul in how working time is structured. 'If work is changing, then the standard of what we consider acceptable labor hours must also evolve,' the federation stated. If implemented, the 4.5-day week would reduce the legal workweek from 40 to 36 hours. Coupled with another Lee campaign pledge to abolish the fixed-salary overtime system known as the 'inclusive wage system,' business groups say they fear a compounded cost burden. Law firm Lee & Ko warned that just as the adoption of the five-day workweek in 2003 imposed added costs without wage cuts, the proposed shift — especially with inclusive wage reform — could significantly impact corporate operating costs. Still, labor law experts say shorter work hours may be inevitable. 'A reduction in working hours aligns with global trends, and no major political party in Korea is actively opposing the idea,' the firm noted in its report after the election. The firm expects phased implementation alongside flexible work arrangements. Addressing structural gaps The road ahead is not without conditions. Law firm Yulchon emphasized in a recent report that labor productivity must improve first. With Korea's low hourly labor productivity, the firm argued that 'reducing working hours without lowering wages is only socially sustainable if accompanied by productivity growth.' Park, a labor expert at a law firm, advised that companies prepare for the change by adopting practical measures, such as encouraging the use of annual leave, offering more flexible working hours, and updating existing legal frameworks to maximize the use of flexible work arrangements. 'From redesigning work environments and staffing plans to ensuring fair compensation levels, the private sector must begin preparing for structural transformation," Park said. However, labor experts warn that without careful planning, a reduced workweek could exacerbate inequality in Korea's dual labor market — one dominated by secure jobs in big corporations and the public sector, and another filled with low-paid, unstable work in small businesses and services. The service sector's low productivity adds to the challenge. According to the Korea Productivity Center, the value-added productivity per service worker is only 64 percent of the OECD average, while manufacturing productivity exceeds the OECD average — illustrating Korea's dichotomy of 'developed manufacturing, underdeveloped services." This imbalance means shorter workweeks could result in reduced income and job insecurity for the vast majority of workers in the service sector if reforms do not also address deeper structural issues. Experts agree that any meaningful attempt to adopt a 4.5-day workweek must go hand-in-hand with comprehensive labor reform — one that considers the realities of small businesses, non-regular workers and platform-based labor. 'In today's changing work environment, the old formula of 'more hours equal more productivity' doesn't hold up, especially in manufacturing,' said Kwon Hyuk, a labor professor at Korea University. 'What matters now is when and how effectively the work is done.' Kwon warned that implementing a shorter workweek only at large firms or government offices could deepen inequality. 'We need to strengthen the competitiveness of small businesses and fix the labor market's dual structure before we move forward with such a policy,' he said.
