Activists demand update on 'offensive' Edinburgh Castle cafe name
The Redcoat Cafe found itself at the centre of intense controversy earlier last year, when it reopened after a refurbishment and Scots discovered the name on social media.
The backlash saw calls for a 'swift rebrand', and a petition calling for the 'deeply offensive' name to be changed was set up and gathered more than 5000 signatures.
In response, Historic Environment Scotland (HES) pledged to review the name of the cafe, as well as the name of the Jacobite function room.
READ MORE: Tom Devine weighs in on Edinburgh Castle's Redcoat Cafe row
At the time, a spokesperson for HES said: 'We have listened to the strong feelings on both sides of the debate about the name of the cafe at Edinburgh Castle.
"The name has been in place since 1992 and reflects the military history which is told throughout the castle, however, the way we interpret history is constantly evolving.
"As part of our new visitor experience plans for Edinburgh Castle in the coming financial year, the names of both the cafe and the function room will be reviewed and any changes communicated in due course.'
Come the end of the referred-to financial year, running from April 6, 2024, until April 5, 2025, activists are now calling for an update on the review.
READ MORE: The UK now officially admits it's arming Israeli extremists – but won't stop
"I think it's taken far too long for this review to take place. It's been well over a year. The issue was raised back in February of last year, and here we are in May 2025. Surely by now, they could have come to a conclusion," Sean Clerkin told The National.
Clerkin (below) and other activists delivered a letter to the cafe calling for customers to boycott the cafe if management did not concede to demands for a name change in March 2024.
He added: "What I believe happened is that after the initial criticisms, they hoped the controversy would die down. They were probably just planning to keep the name and let everything quietly fade away.
"But that's not going to happen. Too many people oppose the name. It would be like opening a café in Dublin and calling it the Black and Tan Cafe — it's the exact same thing.
"The name must be changed. It's important because it reflects something much bigger. The continued use of the Redcoat Cafe name at Edinburgh Castle sends a message that Scotland is not in an unequal union.
READ MORE: 'A magnificent effort': New independence hub opens with weekly Gaelic classes
"Having a name like that at one of our most iconic landmarks is a symbol of colonization.
"To change that perception, the name must be dropped — along with any lingering ties to British symbolism.
"This review needs to conclude soon, and the outcome should be clear: the name has to go."
When asked for an update on the review, and clarification on whether it had been delayed, a HES spokesperson said: "As highlighted previously, the review is part of wider visitor experience plans for Edinburgh Castle, this work is ongoing and a decision on the names will be taken in line with this in due course."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
32 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
‘Momentum is building': Green industries praise clean energy rules for new homes
With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The renewable energy sector, alongside green campaigners, have welcomed the 'common sense' proposals. Trevor Hutchings, chief executive of the Renewable Energy Association (REA) said: 'The growth of solar power has been one of the UK's biggest renewable energy success stories, demonstrating without a doubt that we don't have to choose between lowering our emissions and lowering household energy bills. 'Today's announcement – which the REA has long campaigned for – takes this one step further – not only enabling thousands of future homeowners to experience the benefits of affordable and clean power, but supercharging growth in the British renewable energy industry and driving forward our energy transition.' Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, said: 'The age of solar is well and truly upon us, with millions of households up and down the country already benefiting from generating their own free electricity from the sun. 'With the Future Home Standard expected in the autumn, momentum is building behind Great Britain's rooftop revolution.' Mike Childs, head of policy, science and research at Friends of the Earth, called the move 'plain common sense' but warned that ministers must act to help decarbonise homes that are already built. 'The Spending Review next week must ensure that the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan is sufficiently funded so that that everyone can enjoy these benefits, and no one is left behind because they can't afford the changes,' he said. Greenpeace UK's head of politics Ami McCarthy said: 'It's extraordinary that such a common-sense solution has taken so long to be rolled out, and this Government deserves full credit for this breakthrough. 'Now ministers need to urgently reform the UK's energy system as a whole and stop gas from setting the price of electricity so that everyone, whether living in a new build or not, gets to enjoy the lower bills that cheap, clean renewable power can bring.' Under the proposed changes, developers must meet solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's flood area – and those that cannot must install a 'reasonable amount of solar coverage'. The changes will be subject to practical limits with flexibility in place for new homes surrounded by trees or with lots of shade overhead, the Government said. Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson praised the move after ministers previously rejected his 'Sunshine Bill' – a similar law which would have seen new builds come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard. The Cheltenham MP told the PA news agency: 'This news will help us fight the cost-of-living crisis by lowering people's energy bills while reducing carbon emissions too. 'I've been campaigning on this since long before I was an MP and was determined to build on its success after I was elected. 'I welcome today's news from the Government and I'm pleased we can all look forward to a brighter future – but there will be more work to do to ensure solar for new builds begins without delay.' Housebuilders largely welcomed the announcement but warned against introducing burdensome paperwork which may harm the Government's efforts to reach its target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Neil Jefferson, chief executive at the Home Builders Federations, said: 'Moving forward, as we look to meet the more challenging carbon reductions set by Government, we will see solar PV panels on the overwhelming majority of new homes. 'We welcome recognition from Government that there needs to be flexibility around the number of panels on roofs in some locations, to reflect orientation and house design. 'We need to ensure the process to agree the number of panels in such locations is workable and not overly bureaucratic such that it does not delay attempts to increase housing supply.' Mark Wakeford, national chairman of the National Federation of Builders, said: 'Solar panels on new homes make sense because they lower bills and progress the clean energy revolution we so desperately need. 'Credit must also be given for recent announcements on grid investment and connection reforms, as these were important challenges to recognise and solve for a rooftop revolution to happen in practice.'
Western Telegraph
an hour ago
- Western Telegraph
‘Momentum is building': Green industries praise clean energy rules for new homes
The Energy Department (Desnz) said on Friday that the future homes standard (FHS), which will be published in autumn, is expected to require new residential properties to have solar panels and low-carbon heating by default. With a significant amount of the UK's carbon footprint coming from gas heating of homes, the FHS will require new housing in England to produce fewer carbon emissions than those built under current regulations. The renewable energy sector, alongside green campaigners, have welcomed the 'common sense' proposals. Trevor Hutchings, chief executive of the Renewable Energy Association (REA) said: 'The growth of solar power has been one of the UK's biggest renewable energy success stories, demonstrating without a doubt that we don't have to choose between lowering our emissions and lowering household energy bills. 'Today's announcement – which the REA has long campaigned for – takes this one step further – not only enabling thousands of future homeowners to experience the benefits of affordable and clean power, but supercharging growth in the British renewable energy industry and driving forward our energy transition.' Chris O'Shea, chief executive of Centrica, said: 'The age of solar is well and truly upon us, with millions of households up and down the country already benefiting from generating their own free electricity from the sun. 'With the Future Home Standard expected in the autumn, momentum is building behind Great Britain's rooftop revolution.' Mike Childs, head of policy, science and research at Friends of the Earth, called the move 'plain common sense' but warned that ministers must act to help decarbonise homes that are already built. 'The Spending Review next week must ensure that the forthcoming Warm Homes Plan is sufficiently funded so that that everyone can enjoy these benefits, and no one is left behind because they can't afford the changes,' he said. Greenpeace UK's head of politics Ami McCarthy said: 'It's extraordinary that such a common-sense solution has taken so long to be rolled out, and this Government deserves full credit for this breakthrough. 'Now ministers need to urgently reform the UK's energy system as a whole and stop gas from setting the price of electricity so that everyone, whether living in a new build or not, gets to enjoy the lower bills that cheap, clean renewable power can bring.' Under the proposed changes, developers must meet solar panel coverage equivalent to 40% of the building's flood area – and those that cannot must install a 'reasonable amount of solar coverage'. The changes will be subject to practical limits with flexibility in place for new homes surrounded by trees or with lots of shade overhead, the Government said. Liberal Democrat MP Max Wilkinson praised the move after ministers previously rejected his 'Sunshine Bill' – a similar law which would have seen new builds come with solar panels equivalent to at least 40% of their ground floor area as standard. The Cheltenham MP told the PA news agency: 'This news will help us fight the cost-of-living crisis by lowering people's energy bills while reducing carbon emissions too. 'I've been campaigning on this since long before I was an MP and was determined to build on its success after I was elected. 'I welcome today's news from the Government and I'm pleased we can all look forward to a brighter future – but there will be more work to do to ensure solar for new builds begins without delay.' Housebuilders largely welcomed the announcement but warned against introducing burdensome paperwork which may harm the Government's efforts to reach its target to build 1.5 million new homes by 2029. Neil Jefferson, chief executive at the Home Builders Federations, said: 'Moving forward, as we look to meet the more challenging carbon reductions set by Government, we will see solar PV panels on the overwhelming majority of new homes. 'We welcome recognition from Government that there needs to be flexibility around the number of panels on roofs in some locations, to reflect orientation and house design. 'We need to ensure the process to agree the number of panels in such locations is workable and not overly bureaucratic such that it does not delay attempts to increase housing supply.' Mark Wakeford, national chairman of the National Federation of Builders, said: 'Solar panels on new homes make sense because they lower bills and progress the clean energy revolution we so desperately need. 'Credit must also be given for recent announcements on grid investment and connection reforms, as these were important challenges to recognise and solve for a rooftop revolution to happen in practice.'
ITV News
2 hours ago
- ITV News
Badenoch: 'We will likely need to leave' the ECHR
Kemi Badenoch says she believes Britain will "likely need to leave" the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). Delivering a speech on Friday, the Conservative leader said she was launching a review into Britain's membership of the treaty, which underpins human rights law. "I have always said, that if we need to leave the convention, we should - and having now considered the question closely, I do believe that we will likely need to leave," she said. But Badenoch insisted she was launching the review to prevent a similar situation to Brexit: "We saw that holding a referendum without a plan to get Brexit done, led to years of wrangling and endless arguments... We cannot go through that again," she told reporters. The ECHR was a dividing issue in last year's Conservative leadership election, with Badenoch's rival Robert Jenrick championing the idea that Britain should pull out. Critics of the treaty want to leave it because they believe it has been used to frustrate attempts to deport migrants from Britain. Hitting out at the influence of the treaty on the British legal system, Badenoch said it has become a "sword used to attack democratic decisions and common sense". "This use of litigation as a political weapon is what I am calling lawfare. It isn't just damaging our security, it's also damaging our prosperity", she told reporters. The commission looking into leaving the ECHR will be led by Lord Wolfson of Tredegar, the shadow attorney general. Five 'common sense' questions will be asked by the investigation, branded a series of 'tests' by Mrs Badenoch. These include whether the UK can 'lawfully remove foreign criminals and illegal migrants to their home country or elsewhere — even if they have family here or claim they could be at risk if sent home', and if the Government can stop veterans being 'pursued by vexatious legal attacks'. The Commission will also look at whether British citizens receive preference ahead of migrants for 'scarce public services', if prison sentences 'actually reflect Parliament's intentions', and how to prevent 'endless legal challenges' to planning applications. The Conservative leader will set out whether she plans to leave the ECHR at the Tory conference in October, when the investigation will report back. Elsewhere, the head of the Council of Europe warned that rising migration may result in changes to how the ECHR operates. Alain Berset, the secretary-general of the Council of Europe, told The Times: 'We are witnessing a world where things are changing rapidly. 'It is accelerating. We see this, and it means that it is normal that we must also adapt to this. We need adaptation. We need discussion about the rules that we want to have, and there is no taboo.'
