
United Nations to cut 20% jobs amid funding shortfall - What US contributes and how UN budget works?— EXPLAINED
Over 60 offices, agencies, and operations of the United Nations have been asked to submit proposals by mid-June to reduce their staff by 20%. This initiative is part of a significant reform effort aimed at consolidating operations due to a severe funding shortfall, AP reported.
The UN Secretary General, Antonio Guterres, highlighted that the proposed job cuts are a result of diminishing UN resources over the past seven years, as several member countries either fail to pay their annual dues or do not pay them on time.
A funding shortfall is compelling the UN to reduce expenditure and freeze recruitment, affecting its capacity to implement mandated programmes and exposing the it to increasing 'reputational risk,' the fifth committee (Administrative and Budgetary) of UN discussed on May 19, 2025, while exploring the possible solutions as well.
Guterres also denied any connection between the job cuts and the withdrawal of foreign aid and other programmes by US President Donald Trump.
Notably, the proposal to reduce the workforce comes after President Trump announced funding cuts to the global organisation.
After entering the White House for the second time, Trump issued an executive order seeking a general review of all US contributions to the UN. Following this, the administration announced it would not resume funding for UNRWA.
Additionally, Trump issued an executive order halting most US foreign aid for ninety days and also announced withdrawal from the WHO, stating it 'continues to demand unfairly onerous payments from the United States.'
The US was expected to pay 22% of the regular budget of the UN. In 2024, of the 193 member countries, 152 paid their dues in full, including China, while 41 countries, including the United States, did not.
Since its founding in 1945, the US has remained the largest contributor to the UN. In 2023, the US contributed almost $13 billion, making up over a quarter of the total funding for the collective budget of the global body, according to the latest available data on the UN Chief System Executives Board for Coordination. Nearly 24 per cent of this total was assessed, 75 per cent was voluntary, while the rest came from other activities.
According to the UN Charter, all 193 member states of the United Nations must make payments to specific sections of the organization as a requirement for membership. This amount, paid annually, is known as the assessed contribution, which differs across countries based on a formula that considers gross national income, debt burden, and population and other factors.
These payments fund the regular budget of the UN, covering the administrative costs and expenses of core activities such as special political missions and peacekeeping operations.
In addition to these mandatory payments, countries can also make voluntary contributions. Several UN organisations, including the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), and the World Food Programme (WFP), primarily depend on these contributions, which are viewed as discretionary funding.
The job cuts include nearly 14,000 posts under the regular budget or 2,800 posts, AP quoted UN spokesman Stephane Dujarric.
This includes staff in the UN political and humanitarian offices, along with its agencies that assist refugees, promote gender equality, and address issues related to international trade, the environment, and urban development. UNRWA, the agency supporting Palestinian refugees is also included.
Multiple UN agencies were preparing to reduce their workforce or implement other cost-cutting measures. Officials have highlighted funding cuts primarily from the United States, cautioning that essential relief programs will be significantly impacted as a consequence.
The World Food Programme (WFP) may reduce its workforce by up to 30%, while the head of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) informed of plans to cut costs by 30% and reduce senior-level positions by 50%, according to internal memos obtained by the AP.
In addition to WFP and UNHCR, United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) and United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) are expected to make cuts, the report said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
Will the Donald Trump administration be forced to give billions of dollars in tariff refunds?
If the ruling is upheld it could mean the Trump administration will have to reimburse the substantial import duties already collected. (AI image) What will happen if the US trade court ruling against American President Donald Trump 's reciprocal tariffs is upheld? If that happens, it could necessitate the Trump administration to refund billions in import duties that have already been collected! On Wednesday, the US Court of International Trade (CIT) panel, comprising three judges, determined that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) did not authorise Trump to implement extensive tariffs or circumvent Congress's traditional authority over economic and commerce policies. Trump had referenced this 1977 legislation to validate most of his tariff implementations, particularly those announced on "'Liberation Day' in early April. According to a NewsWeek report, Todd Tucker, a trade specialist from the Roosevelt Institute in New York, shared on BlueSky on Thursday: "This will do tremendous damage to Trump's agenda. His whole second term seemed to be DOGE, deport, and (trade) deals." He further questioned: "On trade, in particular, why would any country waste time negotiating to lower his tariffs if he can't impose them in the first place?" The government has lodged an appeal with the Court of Appeals of the Federal Circuit, describing the CIT's decision as a "judicial coup." Experts suggest alternative methods remain available for Trump to implement his trade policies in response to the ruling. Will Trump Be Forced To Refund? The NewsWeek report said that if the ruling is upheld it could mean the Trump administration will have to reimburse the substantial import duties already collected. Whilst The Kobeissi Letter assessed collected tariff revenue at $10 billion since April 2, Newsweek's examination of Treasury Department records indicates potentially larger amounts. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Camden: If You Were Born Between 1940-1975 You Could Be Eligible For This Life Cover Reassured Get Quote Undo Also Read | 'Work of fiction…': Will Donald Trump bury US government in debt with multitrillion-dollar tax breaks? Even Elon Musk is concerned "I think that the court's order should lead CBP (US Customs and Border Protection) to suspend liquidation of entries going forward, which would mean that if the court's decision is ultimately upheld, importers can get their money back," stated William Reinsch, who served as under secretary of commerce for export administration during the Clinton administration and led the National Foreign Trade Council from 2001 to 2016. Importers, including American companies and overseas exporters who are bound by contract to pay import duties, might qualify for refunds. However, according to Reinsch's statement to Newsweek, consumers are "probably not" likely to receive any refunds following the CIT's ruling, despite having paid higher prices for imported products in recent months. "The people who paid the tariffs—the importers—might get their money back, but they would not be obligated to pass that on to consumers, although some might choose to do so as a matter of goodwill," he explained. He further expressed doubt about the success of any potential legal action by consumers against the government for compensation. According to the report, legal experts suggest that importers could potentially take legal action against the administration for goods that have already cleared customs procedures. The administration under Trump has recognised its obligation to reimburse specific tariff payments in cases where duties are subsequently eliminated or reduced. Following a decision in late April that determined certain tariffs should not be 'stacked' or applied cumulatively, Trump issued an executive order stating this would have retroactive application to particular tariffs. The order also confirmed that reimbursements for those who had paid increased import duties would be handled according to existing laws and standard CBP refund procedures. When announcements were made regarding exemptions to Trump's reciprocal tariffs, similar details were provided. The CBP has also issued instructions detailing how importers can seek refunds for duty payments on items where tariffs were later withdrawn or decreased. Also Read | 'Went COLD TURKEY, it was devastating for them…': Donald Trump slams China for 'violating' trade agreement with US - what went wrong this time? Tariff Impact: $34 billion losses and counting…and counting.. Meanwhile, corporate disclosures reveal that Trump's trade policies have resulted in companies losing more than $34 billion through decreased sales and increased expenses, as per Reuters' evaluation. This impact is likely to grow as businesses struggle with uncertainty surrounding tariffs, affecting operational decisions at major global corporations. Prominent organisations across three continents have seen significant setbacks. Notable examples include Apple, Ford, Porsche and Sony, which have either withdrawn or substantially reduced their profit projections. Most companies indicate that the unpredictable implementation of Trump's trade measures has rendered precise cost calculations unfeasible. The combined total of $33 billion represents calculations from 32 S&P 500 firms, three STOXX 600 enterprises and 21 Nikkei 225 organisations. According to financial experts, the actual business impact is expected to significantly exceed the currently reported figures. "You can double or triple your tally and we'd still say ... the magnitude is bound to be far greater than most people realize," said Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, professor at the Yale School of Management, according to the Reuters report. The broader implications could prove more severe, Sonnenfeld noted, pointing to possible reductions in consumer and business expenditure, alongside heightened inflation projections. Also Read | 'Even if we lose…': Donald Trump administration readying two-part strategy to impose reciprocal tariffs, says 'we will do it another way' Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays and public holidays . AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now


Time of India
37 minutes ago
- Time of India
British FM says Morocco's autonomy plan for Western Sahara 'most credible' solution
British foreign minister (AP) RABAT: British foreign minister David Lammy said on Sunday that Morocco's autonomy plan for the territory of Western Sahara was the "most credible" solution to the decades-long dispute, reversing London's long-standing position. Western Sahara, a mineral-rich former Spanish colony, is largely controlled by Morocco but has been claimed in its entirety for decades by the pro-independence Polisario Front, which is backed by Algeria. "The United Kingdom considers Morocco's autonomy proposal submitted in 2007 as the most credible, viable and pragmatic basis for a lasting resolution of the dispute," Lammy told reporters in Rabat, speaking alongside his Moroccan counterpart Nasser Bourita. Britain previously backed self-determination for the disputed territory, which Morocco claims as an integral part of its kingdom. "This year is a vital window of opportunity to secure a resolution before we reach 50 years of the dispute in November," said Lammy. The foreign minister also said it encouraged "relevant parties to engage urgently and positively with the United Nations-led political process". The United Nations considers Western Sahara a "non-self-governing territory" and has had a peacekeeping mission there since 1991, whose stated aim is to organise a referendum on the territory's future. But Rabat has repeatedly ruled out any vote where independence is an option, instead proposing an autonomy plan.


Mint
42 minutes ago
- Mint
Glitch in the Chinese system: Treasury Secy Scott Bessent drops surprising remark over ‘possible' Xi-Trump talk
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently appeared on a CBS interview on June 1, which started off with his take on the recent US-China trade scenario. The "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" show saw Bessent claim that President Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping will have a conversation soon amid the tariff standoff. Bessent claimed that he is "confident" that the details of a US-China trade agreement "will be ironed out" when they converse. During the show, Bessent stated that China is withholding its manufactured products from the rest of the world, which is otherwise necessary for the industrial supply chains of India, Europe, and other regions. This, according to him, is not what a reliable partner does. He also highlighted China's activities during COVID, saying, 'I think that what Secretary Hegseth did was remind everyone that during COVID, China was an unreliable partner, and what we are trying to do is to de-risk. We do not want to decouple, but we do need to de-risk, as we saw during COVID, whether it was with semiconductors, medicines, the other products we are in the process of de-risking.' Regarding the 'possible' talk between China and US, Bessent was quoted as saying, "Well, we will see what the consequences are. I am confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call, this will be ironed out. So- but the fact that they are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement- maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the President speaks with the Party chairman." When asked by show host Margaret Brennan about the fact that President Trump has said a few times that he was going to speak to President Xi, but no such conversation has happened so far, Bennett responded, saying, 'I believe we'll see something very soon, Margaret.' "I just got back from China last week. They're not scared, folks. This notion they're gonna come bow to America. I wouldn't count on that. And when they have a problem, they put 100,000 engineers on it, and they've been preparing for this for years," Bennett also said when asked further on Beijing.