What Is Wrong With Men? Let Michael Douglas Explain.
WHAT IS WRONG WITH MEN: Patriarchy, the Crisis of Masculinity, and How (of Course) Michael Douglas Films Explain Everything, by Jessa Crispin
Michael Douglas is one of the last actors who could 'open' a movie, back when movies were something that opened and shut firmly rather than flowing and receding into a general pool of content. He is an original nepo baby: a sapling carved after his mighty oak father, Kirk, down to the indentation on their chins. And to the author Jessa Crispin, he is a symbol of how everything started to go terribly wrong for men in our time.
Crispin's byline has long made me sit up straighter. At 23, in 2002, she founded Bookslut, one of the earliest literary blogs, declaring when she shut it down 14 years later, 'I just don't find American literature interesting. I find M.F.A. culture terrible.'
She has also dissed The Paris Review and The New Yorker, calling the latter a 'dentist magazine.' In The New York Times's Opinion section, she likened Ivanka Trump's book 'Women Who Work' to 'the scrambled Tumblr feed of a demented 12-year-old who just checked out a copy of Bartlett's Familiar Quotations from the library.'
She's like the Patti LuPone of literary critics.
Crispin has produced hybrids of memoir and cultural analysis about her upbringing in Kansas and travels in Europe, and a feminist manifesto provocatively titled 'Why I Am Not a Feminist.' She almost lost me with an 'Artist's Way'-type book about tarot, but 'What Is Wrong With Men,' which argues that Douglas's portrayals in the '80s and '90s provide a kind of road map for the current masculinity crisis, has reeled me back. Like Absolut and cranberry: What a pairing!
Douglas's most durable role, the one that earned him a best actor Oscar, is Gordon 'Greed is good' Gekko, the rapacious, pinstriped, slick-haired investor and corporate raider in Oliver Stone's 'Wall Street' (1987). Disturbingly, 21st-century finance bros find that performance inspiring. And yet Crispin's chapter on the movie, which discusses the consequences of banking deregulation, monster mergers and the decline of unions, is her most glancing.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
17 minutes ago
- CBS News
Pennsylvania food banks worry about SNAP cuts in federal government's proposed budget bill
Food banks fear that if the budget bill heading to the U.S. Senate gets passed, thousands of people in Pennsylvania will go hungry. The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program helps nearly 2 million Pennsylvanians put food on the table. "For every meal the food bank provides, SNAP provides nine meals," said Jennifer Miller, CEO of the Westmoreland Food Bank. Leaders from the Westmoreland Food Bank and Feed Pennsylvania came together with the secretaries of the Pennsylvania Departments of Human Services and Agriculture to discuss how proposed federal changes would impact the most vulnerable in the state. They said the House-passed reconciliation bill would cut nearly $300 billion from the SNAP program through 2034. "We have existing work requirements in SNAP, but this bill would make them more strict. And as a result, we believe at least 140,000 Pennsylvanians could lose access to food assistance that helps people be healthy enough to go to work in the first place," Pennsylvania Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Val Arkoosh said. Food banks fear they will see substantially more people lining up for food. "We are not equipped to absorb the massive demand that would result from reduced access to federal nutrition programs. Food banks cannot replace the scale, the reach and the stability of the SNAP program," Miller said. "If enacted, these cuts would eliminate more meals per year distributed by the entire charitable food network in this country," said Julie Bancroft, CEO of Feeding Pennsylvania. State Agriculture Secretary Russell Redding said losing SNAP dollars would also hit farm families. "Roughly 25 cents of every grocery dollar spent goes straight back to the farm, 25 cents for every dollar for food purchased at the grocery store," Redding said. Arkoosh said the proposed cuts would cost the state over $1 billion more annually. "The result would be devastating for Pennsylvania families and for our economy," Arkoosh said. Many believe the fight is not over, though. "You all have a role in contacting your senators, your congressperson, letting them know how this impacts our commnity, our neighbors, our friends," Westmoreland County Commissioner Ted Kopas said.
CNN
20 minutes ago
- CNN
Three attacks in two months: Why American Jews are on edge
CNN's Bianna Golodryga breaks down the three high-profile recent attacks on Jewish elected officials, diplomats and community events that are putting American Jews and government officials on edge.
New York Times
27 minutes ago
- New York Times
Acting FEMA Chief Told Staff He Didn't Know About U.S. Hurricane Season
The acting head of the Federal Emergency Management Agency told employees on Monday that he did not know the United States has a hurricane season, according to two people who heard the remarks and said it was unclear if he was serious. The official, David Richardson, has served in the Marines and worked in the Department of Homeland Security's Countering Weapons of Mass Destruction Office. After he joined FEMA in May, some FEMA workers expressed concern about his lack of experience in emergency management. The remark, coming a day after the start of the Atlantic hurricane season, could deepen those concerns. The two people who described the comment asked not to be identified because they were not authorized to speak publicly. The Department of Homeland Security, which oversees FEMA, said in a statement that Mr. Richardson was joking. The agency statement said FEMA would be focused on disaster response this hurricane season and said the Trump administration is in the process of reforming an agency it believes is bloated. Even if the comment was a joke, the timing would be questionable. The hurricane season, which began on Sunday and lasts through Nov. 30, is considered the agency's most challenging period, during which the country is the most vulnerable to large-scale devastating disasters that can overwhelm state and local disaster managers. In addition, FEMA has just gone through a major reduction in staffing. During the same meeting, according to the two people, Mr. Richardson told agency employees that FEMA should plan to respond to this year's hurricane season the same way the agency responded to last year's hurricane season. But employees have expressed concern with that approach because of the agency's reduced staff. Since the start of the Trump administration, FEMA has lost about a quarter of its full-time staff, including one-fifth of the coordinating officers who manage responses to large-scale disasters, according to a former senior official. The departures came after pressure from the Department of Government Efficiency, previously led by Elon Musk, for a massive culling of federal workers. Mr. Richardson's predecessor at FEMA was Cameron Hamilton, who was pushed out in early May, a day after telling members of Congress that FEMA was vital to communities 'in their greatest times of need' and should not be eliminated. The comment appeared to be in conflict with President Trump, who has suggested the agency be eliminated. On his first full day as acting administrator, Mr. Richardson told the agency's employees that if any of them tried to obstruct his agenda, 'I will run right over you.'
