logo
The reason Trump is spending as little time as possible at the Nato summit

The reason Trump is spending as little time as possible at the Nato summit

Telegraph5 hours ago

Donald Trump will spend as little time as possible on European soil next week when he heads to a crucial Nato summit for just 24 hours.
He was set to arrive in The Hague on Monday evening before returning to Washington on Wednesday, but the White House says he will now arrive on Tuesday.
A week after he left a meeting of the G7 in Canada early, apparently irritated at having to sit through a meeting on wildfires when his mind was on the Middle East, it will raise fears among allies that he has no time for the sorts of summits that underpin international diplomacy.
Karoline Leavitt, White House press secretary, said the shortened trip was not a snub, but a reflection of how Nato has tightened the schedule.
'The president is a man of efficiency. He wants to get things done,' she said. 'More action, less talk.'
Mr Trump has expressed his irritation with Nato in the past, even threatening to withdraw the US in protest at the way allies were shirking spending targets.
But relations have improved in recent years as member states have accepted Mr Trump's arguments.
His new schedule means he will still arrive in time for a leaders' dinner and will attend a session devoted to discussing allies' efforts to spend the equivalent of five percent of their gross domestic product on defence.
'He wants to see that happen,' said Ms Leavitt.
At the same time, the tight turnaround reflects Mr Trump's impatience with big, multilateral groups.
The president upended this week's G7 summit in Kananaski, Canada, hurrying home on Monday night to deal with the escalating conflict between Israel and Iran.
He had hinted at his frustration as he addressed the media beside Sir Keir Starmer during the afternoon.
He was asked about the chances of reaching a deal with Iran and said: 'As soon as we leave here we are going to do something. But I have to leave here. I have, you know, this commitment. I have a lot of commitments.'
With the Middle East in flames, he then had to sit through a session on tackling wildfires.
A former White House official said: 'He already thinks these meetings are a waste of time. I think you can see the timeline of a wildfire meeting followed by the announcement that he was leaving and draw your own conclusions.'
Nato had already accounted for Mr Trump's mercurial nature, condensing its format from three sessions to a single two-and-a-half-hour meeting.
Ms Leavitt said the president's travel plans simply reflected that shift.
'Nato has shortened its schedule,' she said. 'The president is rolling with the schedule that Nato has given us.'
Organisers have shortened the summit and drafted an abbreviated joint statement in part to avoid a repeat of Mr Trump's last Nato meeting. In 2019, he left early, abandoning a planned press conference after other leaders were caught on camera joking about him.
Brett Bruen, a former Obama official and president of the Global Situation Room, said the shortened trips were 'becoming a pattern.'
'He may not want to sit through a session on wildfires but it is the prerogative of the host of any of these summits to decide the agenda,' he said.
More to the point, side meetings and other interactions were the place where a lot of business got done.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pro-Palestinian foreigners in US arrested by Trump administration and ordered to be released
Pro-Palestinian foreigners in US arrested by Trump administration and ordered to be released

Reuters

time23 minutes ago

  • Reuters

Pro-Palestinian foreigners in US arrested by Trump administration and ordered to be released

WASHINGTON, June 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has faced judicial roadblocks while attempting to deport foreign pro-Palestinian students and protesters in the U.S., including on Friday when a judge ordered that Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil be released from immigration custody. Trump has labeled the protesters as antisemitic and extremist sympathizers. Protesters, including some Jewish groups, say the government wrongly conflates their criticism of Israel's assault on Gaza with antisemitism and their advocacy for Palestinian rights with support for extremism. Here are some prominent pro-Palestinian foreigners in the U.S. who were arrested without being charged with a crime, and subsequently ordered to be released by a judge: A prominent figure at Columbia University's pro-Palestinian protests against Israel's war on Gaza, Khalil was arrested by immigration agents in the lobby of his Manhattan university residence on March 8. Khalil, a Palestinian born and raised in a refugee camp in Syria, is a U.S. legal permanent resident and says he was punished for his political speech in violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which protects free speech rights. Khalil has previously condemned antisemitism and racism. His wife and son, who was born while Khalil was in prison, are U.S. citizens. In ordering Khalil's release on June 20, U.S. District Judge Michael Farbiarz said the government made no attempt to rebut evidence provided by Khalil's lawyers that he was not a flight risk nor a danger to the public. Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi was released from U.S. immigration custody on April 30. Mahdawi, born and raised in a refugee camp in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, was arrested earlier in April as he arrived for an interview for his U.S. citizenship petition. U.S. District Judge Geoffrey Crawford said Mahdawi did not pose a danger to the public and was not a flight risk. The judge drew parallels between the current U.S. political climate and the Red Scare and McCarthyism eras of the last century when thousands were targeted for deportation due to political views. Turkish Tufts University student Rumeysa Ozturk was released in early May after being held in an immigration detention center for over six weeks. Her lawyers said she was punished for co-authoring an opinion piece in a student newspaper that criticized the school's response to calls by students to divest from companies linked to Israel and to "acknowledge the Palestinian genocide." U.S. District Judge William Sessions said Ozturk, whose arrest video went viral, had raised a substantial claim that the sole reason she was being detained was "simply and purely the expression that she made or shared in the op-ed in violation of her First Amendment rights." A postdoctoral fellow at Georgetown University, Suri was released in mid-May, nearly two months after being taken into custody by federal immigration agents. Suri, who is from India and was on a U.S. student visa, is married to an American citizen who is from Gaza. Suri's lawyer denied the government's allegations that he supported Palestinian Islamist group Hamas.

‘She's wrong': Trump throws Tulsi Gabbard under the bus on Iran
‘She's wrong': Trump throws Tulsi Gabbard under the bus on Iran

Telegraph

time26 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

‘She's wrong': Trump throws Tulsi Gabbard under the bus on Iran

Donald Trump has said that Tulsi Gabbard and the US intelligence community is 'wrong' about Iran's nuclear capabilities. The US president doubled down on his claim that his own government officials are mistaken about how close Iran is to building a nuclear bomb when challenged by a reporter on Friday. 'What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon?', Mr Trump was asked outside Air Force One. 'Your intelligence community have said they have no evidence that they are at this point.' 'Well then my intelligence community is wrong,' Mr Trump responded, before asking: 'who in my intelligence community said that?' 'Your director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard,' the reporter replies, before the president retorts: 'She's wrong.' Mr Trump added: 'Within a matter of weeks, or certainly within a matter of months, they're going to be able to have a nuclear weapon. We can't let that happen.' In March, Ms Gabbard told Congress the intelligence community 'continues to assess that Iran is not building a nuclear weapon and Supreme Leader Khamenei has not authorised the nuclear weapons program he suspended in 2003.' She also said the US was closely monitoring Iran's nuclear program, noting that the country's 'enriched uranium stockpile is at its highest levels and is unprecedented for a state without nuclear weapons.' Its the second time Mr Trump has directly contradicted Ms Gabbard on the issue, with the US president saying on Thursday that he did not 'care what she thinks'. Speaking aboard Air Force One on his return from the G7 summit in Canada, Mr Trump told reporters: 'I think they were very close to having a weapon.' Ms Gabbard later told CNN that her comments had been taken out of context and that she was on 'the same page' as Mr Trump. General Erik Kurilla, who leads US forces in the Middle East, recently testified to Congress that Iran could produce enough nuclear material for 10 weapons in three weeks. However, he did not say how long it would take to assemble the pieces into a bomb. On Thursday, Mr Trump's press secretary said Iran could produce a nuclear bomb 'within weeks'. 'Let's be very clear, Iran has all that it needs to achieve a nuclear weapon,' she said. 'All they need is a decision from the Supreme Leader to do that, and it would take a couple of weeks to complete the production of that weapon, which would of course pose an existential threat not just to Israel, but to the United States and to the entire world.' A senior intelligence official said Mr Trump was right to be concerned because its uranium enrichment far exceeds what would be needed for domestic purposes. Another senior administration official said Iran was as close to having a nuclear weapon as it could be without having one. Both spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive issues. Mr Trump's contradiction of Ms Gabbard echoed his feuds with US spy leaders during his first term, when he viewed them as part of a 'deep state' that was undermining his agenda. Most notably, he sided with Vladimir Putin in 2018 when asked if Moscow had interfered in the 2016 election, saying Mr Putin was 'extremely strong and powerful in his denial.'

Move to unseat Mike Lee gains steam after Utah senator's tweets mock Minnesota political shootings
Move to unseat Mike Lee gains steam after Utah senator's tweets mock Minnesota political shootings

The Independent

time34 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Move to unseat Mike Lee gains steam after Utah senator's tweets mock Minnesota political shootings

The movement to unseat Republican Representative Mike Lee of Utah is gaining traction as he faces backlash for his posts about the shootings of two Minnesota politicians last week. Last week, Democratic state Representative Melissa Hortman and her husband were fatally shot in their Minnesota home. State Senator John Hoffman and his wife were also shot in their home, but survived. Two days later, officials arrested and charged Vance Boelter with two counts of second-degree murder and attempted murder in connection with the shootings. After the shootings, Lee wrote on X: 'This is what happens when Marxists don't get their way.' In another post, he posted a photo of Boelter with the caption 'Nightmare on Waltz Street.' The caption appeared to be a reference to Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a Democrat. Lee has since deleted the posts. Now, federal and state lawmakers alike are slamming Lee for sharing the posts in the wake of the deadly shooting. Utah State Senator Nate Blouin, a Democrat, told The Bulwark he's getting messages from constituents asking him to hold Lee accountable. Fellow Democratic lawmakers in Utah say they've been similarly flooded with emails from constituents who want to donate to support efforts to unseat Lee, according to The Bulwark. But Blouin told The Bulwark he doesn't think a Democrat like him could win Utah 'at a statewide level.' However, he would support rallying behind an independent challenger, he added. 'We're not going to win with a Democrat right now in Utah at a statewide level. It is not going to happen. I love the optimism, but it is not a reality,' Blouin told the outlet. 'We've got a lot of work to do on the ground level to convince people that Democrats aren't, you know, demons and eating babies trying to make everyone have an abortion.' A senior staffer for Minnesota Senator Tina Smith also wrote a scathing email to Lee, The Salt Lake Tribune reports. The staffer, who knew Hortman, said they were speaking 'through enormous grief.' 'It is important for your office to know how much additional pain you've caused on an unspeakably horrific weekend,' the email read. 'I am not sure what compelled you or your boss to say any of those things, which, in addition to being unconscionable, also may very well be untrue.' 'You exploited the murder of a lifetime public servant and her husband to post some sick burns about Democrats,' the message continued. 'Did you see this as an excellent opportunity to get likes and retweet[s]? Have you absolutely no conscience? No decency?' Smith told CNN on Monday she also confronted Lee in person. She recalled telling Lee: 'You need to take responsibility and accountability for what you are saying and doing out there in the social media world.' Gabi Finlayson, founder of a Democratic consulting firm in Utah, told The Bulwark that Lee's posts 'really broke something open in Utah.' 'There certainly is a lot more urgency,' Finlayson said. 'The idea that we truly have to get him out of office is no longer a theoretical thing or just a liberal idea. It is a moral imperative.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store