Zelenskyy leaves G7 with no Trump meeting or fresh arms support from US
KANANASKIS, Alberta: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy left the Group of Seven summit on Tuesday (Jun 17) with new aid from host Canada for its war against Russia but said diplomacy is in "crisis" having missed the chance to press US President Donald Trump for more weapons.
The G7 wealthy nations struggled to find unity over the conflict in Ukraine after Trump expressed support for Russian President Vladimir Putin and left a day early to address the Israel-Iran conflict from Washington.
A Canadian official initially said Ottawa had dropped plans for the G7 to issue a strong statement on the war in Ukraine after resistance from the United States.
Emily Williams, director of media relations for Prime Minister Mark Carney, later said no proposed statement on Ukraine had ever been planned.
Carney had started the day by announcing Ottawa would provide C$2 billion (US$1.47 billion) in new military assistance for Kyiv as well as impose new financial sanctions.
Zelenskyy said he had told the G7 leaders that "diplomacy is now in a state of crisis" and said they need to continue calling on Trump "to use his real influence" to force an end to the war, in a post on his Telegram account.
Although Canada is one of Ukraine's most vocal defenders, its ability to help it is far outweighed by the United States, the largest arms supplier to Kyiv. Zelenskyy had said he hoped to talk to Trump about acquiring more weapons.
After the summit in the Rocky Mountain resort area of Kananaskis concluded, Carney issued a chair statement summarising deliberations.
"G7 leaders expressed support for President Trump's efforts to achieve a just and lasting peace in Ukraine," it said.
"They recognised that Ukraine has committed to an unconditional ceasefire, and they agreed that Russia must do the same. G7 leaders are resolute in exploring all options to maximise pressure on Russia, including financial sanctions."
Canada holds the rotating G7 presidency this year. Other leaders do not need to sign off on G7 chair statements.
Trump did agree to a group statement published on Monday calling for a resolution of the Israel-Iran conflict.
"We had a declaration given the exceptional, fast moving situation in Iran," Carney told a closing news conference.
A European official said leaders had stressed to Trump their plans to be hard on Russia and Trump seemed impressed, though he does not like sanctions in principle.
Three European diplomats said they had heard signals from Trump that he wanted to raise pressure on Putin and consider a US Senate bill drafted by Senator Lindsey Graham, but that he had not committed to anything.
"I am returning to Germany with cautious optimism that decisions will also be made in America in the coming days to impose further sanctions against Russia," German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said.
G7 leaders agreed on six other statements, about migrant smuggling, artificial intelligence, critical minerals, wildfires, transnational repression and quantum computing.
KREMLIN SAYS G7 LOOKS 'RATHER USELESS'
Trump said on Monday he needed to be back in Washington as soon as possible due to the situation in the Middle East, where escalating attacks between Iran and Israel have raised risks of a broader regional conflict.
A White House official on Tuesday said Trump explained that he returned to the US because it is better to hold high-level National Security Council meetings in person, rather than over the phone.
Upon arriving at the summit, Trump said that the then-Group of Eight had been wrong to expel Russia after Putin ordered the occupation of Crimea in 2014.
The Kremlin said on Tuesday that Trump was right and said the G7 was no longer significant for Russia and looked "rather useless".
Many leaders had hoped to negotiate trade deals with Trump, but the only deal signed was the finalisation of the US-UK deal announced last month. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained at the summit after Trump left.
Carney also invited non-G7 members Mexico, India, Australia, South Africa, South Korea and Brazil, as he tries to shore up alliances elsewhere and diversify Canada's exports away from the United States.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
US defence firms chase European military spending wave
FILE PHOTO: An Anduril Industries Fury autonomous air vehicle (AAV) is displayed at the 55th International Paris Airshow at Le Bourget Airport near Paris, France, June 17, 2025. REUTERS/Benoit Tessier/File Photo PARIS - U.S. defence giants, backed by a strong Congressional delegation from Washington, used the Paris Airshow to showcase cutting-edge technologies and court European partners as they seek to tap into rising regional military spending. Many European nations have pledged to significantly increase defence budgets in response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine and as U.S. President Donald Trump's administration has threatened to scale back military support for the region. That tension has been notably absent at this week's Paris Airshow, where U.S. lawmakers and arms manufacturers pledged greater transatlantic partnership as Europe ramps up spending on everything from artillery shells and fighter jets to missile defence systems. "We understand that our allies and partners are a force multiplier, so we are stronger when we are working together," U.S. Senator Jerry Moran, a member of Trump's Republican party, told reporters at the show, the world's largest aerospace and defence gathering. Moran, whose delegation was supporting U.S. weapons makers, said it was in Paris to send a message that the U.S. "is a dependable and reliable partner". The conciliatory tone stands in stark contrast to the Trump administration's recent string of disparaging remarks about Europe and its defence industry. "I think antagonising our allies does not make us stronger," Democrat Senator Jeanne Shaheen told reporters in Paris, expressing her desire to cement defence relations with Europe. RELIANCE ON U.S. Despite pledges by many European nations to boost military self-sufficiency, the continent remains heavily reliant on U.S. defence manufacturers. For instance, Europe buys American-made fighter jets and missiles from Lockheed Martin, Patriot missile defence systems from Raytheon Technologies and military jets and helicopters built by Boeing. In emerging military areas, like artificial intelligence, drones and satellite constellations, U.S. tech firms like Anduril, Palantir and Elon Musk's SpaceX are far ahead. U.S. firms are hoping to press home their advantage as European military spending surges, including through partnerships which are a way to soften any potential diplomatic tensions, delegates said. U.S. drone-maker Anduril and German defence giant Rheinmetall said on Wednesday they will link up to build military drones for European markets, in a sign of Europe leveraging American technology to boost military capabilities. Thomas Laliberty, president of Land & Air Defense Systems at Raytheon, said there were no easy replacements for its weapons in Europe and he expected the firm to maintain a long-term footprint on the continent, including through new partnerships. Laliberty said Raytheon was close to announcing a plan to manufacture Stingers - a lightweight air defence missile used by Ukrainian forces against Russia - in Europe. "For immediate needs, Raytheon is well positioned to support the European demand," Laliberty told reporters in Paris. "We have a very bright future here." Boeing, which won a contract from Trump's administration to develop the next-generation F-47 fighter jet this year, said Europe and the U.S. would remain long-term partners despite political wobbles, partly to hold off the Chinese threat. "Nobody can do it themselves - maybe the Chinese can try, but certainly the rest of us, we are going to have to work together," said Turbo Sjogren, Boeing's general manager for government services. "To do otherwise takes too long and will be unaffordable." The chairman of Italian aerospace and defence group Leonardo, Stefano Pontecorvo, added that U.S. participation in some European programmes would be "unavoidable" in coming years due to the defence technologies available to them. EUROPE TOO SLOW European rivals were bullish about their future growth prospects but said budget constraints and a lack of regional alliances were holding back progress, conceding that they would continue to need significant U.S. support. "National sovereignty matters but fragmentation is detrimental. We need to find a way to hit a balance," Leonardo CEO Roberto Cingolani told reporters on Tuesday. Jean-Brice Dumont, head of air power, defence and space at Airbus, said Europe's dependence on the U.S. was "very high". "Zero dependency on the U.S. I believe is a dream. We have a need for interoperability that drives some U.S. needs," said Dumont, whose firm makes the Eurofighter Typhoon fighter jet with Britain's BAE Systems and Italy's Leonardo, as well as Earth observation satellites and drones. Italian Defence Minister Guido Crosetto said Europe had "too much bureaucracy" compared to the U.S. and needed to adapt to a new military era of faster, cheaper and more nimble technology. "Either Europe adapts its industry to these new parameters - different from those with which it has lived until four years ago - or it will have huge competitors, and not only the American ones," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
an hour ago
- Straits Times
Trump's bid to bar foreign students from Harvard threatens Kennedy School's lifeblood
Graduates from Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government celebrating their commencement ceremony on May 29. PHOTO: AFP - When 35-year-old Oscar Escobar completed his term as the youngest elected mayor in his Colombian hometown in 2023, he was accepted into a programme at Harvard University's John F. Kennedy School of Government tailored to aspiring global leaders like him. If the Trump administration gets its way, Mr Escobar may be among the last foreign students for the foreseeable future to attend the Kennedy School, widely considered one of the world's best schools for preparing future policymakers. In May, the Department of Homeland Security sought to revoke Harvard's ability to enrol international students and force those who are there to transfer or lose their legal status. It accused the university of 'fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party'. In early June, President Donald Trump doubled down by issuing a proclamation to bar US entry for foreign nationals planning to study at Harvard, and directed the State Department to consider revoking visas for those already enrolled. Mr Trump argued that Harvard has tolerated crime on campus and that its relationships with China threatened national security. Harvard said the orders – which affect thousands of students – were illegal and amounted to retaliation for rejecting the government's demands to control its governance and curriculum, among other things. It said it was addressing concerns about antisemitism and campus threats. A federal judge has temporarily blocked both orders while the courts review legal challenges, but if allowed to stand, they would represent a huge blow to Harvard, and the Kennedy School in particular. Over the past five years, 52 per cent of Kennedy students have come from outside the US, the school's media office said. With students from more than 100 countries, it is 'the most global' school at Harvard. White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a response to a Reuters request that the proclamation 'is carefully tailored towards limiting the risks foreign students at Harvard may pose to national security and campus safety'. The Department of Homeland Security did not respond to questions for this story and referred Reuters to its previous statements. A spokesperson for the State Department declined to respond to questions about Harvard and the Kennedy School, saying it did not comment on pending litigation. The large foreign contingent is a big part of why the school has been so successful as a training ground for future leaders, including Americans, said Professor Nicholas Burns, a Kennedy School professor and a former US diplomat. 'It's by design,' Professor Burns said in an interview, referring to the number of international students. 'It's a decision that the Kennedy School leadership made because it replicates the world as it is.' Kennedy counts an impressive list of foreign leaders among its alumni, including former Mexican president Felipe Calderon and former Canadian prime minister Pierre Trudeau. Another is Ms Maia Sandu, who was elected president of Moldova in 2020 after she graduated. She has since emerged as an important regional voice against Russian influence, spearheading the country's drive to join the European Union and taking a stand against Russia's invasion of Ukraine. 'At Harvard, I met interesting people from all over the world, everyone with his or her own story,' Ms Sandu said in a 2022 address to Kennedy School graduates. 'And, very quickly, I realised that my country was not the only one which had been struggling for decades. I realised that development takes time.' 'Soft power' For the school's defenders, foreign students bring more benefits than risks. They say educating future world leaders means boosting US 'soft power', a concept coined in the 1980s by Harvard political scientist Joseph Nye, later a Kennedy School dean, to refer to non-coercive ways to promote US values such as democracy and human rights. Singapore Prime Minister Lawrence Wong, a Kennedy School graduate who must now navigate the rivalry between the US and China in South-east Asia, has acknowledged the influence of American culture on him. He says he decided to study in the US in part because his favourite musicians were Americans. In 2024, Mr Wong posted a TikTok video of himself playing Taylor Swift's 'Love Song' on acoustic guitar, dedicating the performance to teachers. To be sure, the Kennedy School has courted its share of controversies – including criticism over who it accepts into its programmes and who it invites teach and speak to its students. A notable example came in 2022 when Kennedy's Carr Centre for Human Rights Policy offered a fellowship to Mr Kenneth Roth, former executive director of Human Rights Watch, and then rescinded it. Mr Roth said at the time he believed the school caved to pressure from supporters of Israel who believed HRW had an anti-Israel bias. Kennedy denied that, but eventually reversed course amid widespread criticism that it was limiting debate. For Mr Escobar, smiling as he posed for graduation photos with his family in May, completing his studies at Kennedy was a bittersweet moment. 'If this university cannot receive international students anymore, of course we are missing an opportunity,' said Mr Escobar, who has since returned to Colombia to work on the presidential campaign of leftist politician Claudia Lopez, also a former Harvard fellow. 'If what President Donald Trump wants is to make America great again, it will be a mistake.' REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Iran's supreme leader says any US strikes on Iran will have serious consequences
DUBAI: Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei responded on Wednesday (Jun 18) to US President Donald Trump's call for the country to surrender, warning that any US strike will have "serious irreparable consequences". Iranians do not respond well to threats, he said in a televised address, adding that the country will not accept an imposed peace or war. A flurry of social media posts from Trump on Tuesday, including a demand for Iran's unconditional surrender and a post musing about killing Khamenei, increased speculation that he could bring the United States into the war. A source familiar with internal discussions said Trump and his team were considering a number of options, which included joining Israel in strikes against Iranian nuclear sites. Iran had conveyed to Washington that it would retaliate against the United States for any direct participation, its ambassador to the United Nations in Geneva, Ali Bahreini, said. He said he already saw the US as "complicit in what Israel is doing". "We will not show any reluctance in defending our people, security and land - we will respond seriously and strongly, without restraint." Thousands of people were fleeing Tehran on Wednesday after Trump said they should leave the capital, while a source said Trump was considering options that include joining Israel in attacking Iranian nuclear sites. An Israeli military official said 50 Israeli jets had struck around 20 targets in Tehran overnight, including sites producing raw materials, components and manufacturing systems for missiles. Israel told residents in a southwestern area of Tehran to evacuate so its air force could strike. Iran responded with a fresh volley of missiles at Israel, and a new warning that it would respond against the United States if Washington joined the war. Roads north out of Tehran were jammed with traffic. "We left Tehran this morning. My children were frightened, and we're going to stay at my brother's house near Karaj," Alireza, 37, a businessman, told Reuters by phone. Arezou, 31, had made it out of the capital and was in the nearby resort town of Lavasan. "We will stay here as long as this war continues. My friend's house in Tehran was attacked and her brother was injured. They are civilians," she told Reuters. "Why are we paying the price for the regime's decision to pursue a nuclear programme?' Iran has been exploring options for leverage, including veiled threats to hit the global oil market by restricting access to the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz, the world's most important shipping artery for oil, which it controls. A Former Iranian Economy Minister Ehsan Khandouzi, said on X that Iran should quickly start requiring permission for tankers transiting the strait, a move he said would be "decisive" if implemented quickly. Iran's Oil Ministry and Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment. BAN ON FILMING Inside Iran, the biggest attacks since war with Iraq in the 1980s have wiped out an echelon of senior leadership. Authorities are intent on preventing panic and shortages, and fewer images of destruction have been allowed to circulate than in the early days of the bombing, when state media showed pictures of explosions, fires and flattened apartments. A ban on filming by the public has been imposed. Authorities have placed limits on how much fuel can be purchased. Oil Minister Mohsen Paknejad told state TV that restrictions were in place to prevent shortages but there would be no problem supplying fuel to the public. With Khamenei's main military and security advisers killed by Israeli strikes, the leader's inner circle has been narrowed, raising the risk that he could make strategic errors, according to five people familiar with his decision-making process. Iranian officials have reported at least 224 deaths, mostly civilians, though that toll has not been updated for days. In Israel, Iran's retaliatory strikes are the first time in decades of shadow war and proxy conflict that a significant number of missiles fired from Iran have penetrated defences, killing Israelis in their homes. Since Friday, Iran has fired around 400 missiles at Israel, some 40 of which have pierced through air defences, killing 24 people, all of them civilians, according to Israeli authorities. Explosions were heard over Tel Aviv on Wednesday. The military said two barrages of Iranian missiles were launched toward Israel in the first two hours of Wednesday morning. Iran's semi-official Mehr news agency reported clashes early on Wednesday between security forces and unidentified gunmen in the city of Rey, south of Tehran, adding that assailants may be linked to Israel and intended to carry out "terrorist operations in densely populated areas of the capital". Reuters could not independently verify the situation there. Iranian news websites said Israel was attacking a university linked to Iran's Revolutionary Guards in the country's east, and the Khojir ballistic missile facility near Tehran, which was also targeted by Israeli airstrikes last October. TRUMP KEEPS WORLD GUESSING Trump's social media posts - which have ranged from diplomatic offers to end the war to threats to join it - have created uncertainty over his intentions. The US has so far taken only indirect actions in the conflict, including helping to shoot down missiles fired toward Israel. But Washington has capabilities that Israel lacks, including massive bombs able to destroy Iran's nuclear enrichment plant, built deep under a mountain at Fordow. On Tuesday he mused about killing Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei: "We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding," he wrote on Truth Social. "We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now ... Our patience is wearing thin." Three minutes later Trump posted, "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!" The US is deploying more fighter aircraft to the Middle East and extending the deployment of other warplanes, three US officials told Reuters. A source with access to US intelligence reports said Iran had moved some ballistic missile launchers, but it was difficult to determine if they were targeting US forces or Israel. Iran, for its part, has lost much of its capability to retaliate against Israel through proxy fighters close to Israeli borders during the past 20 months of Israel's war in Gaza. Israel has pounded Iranian allies Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon. Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad, propped up by Iran through 13 years of war, was toppled last year.
