Marines detain first civilian in LA amid immigration raid protests
U.S. Marines deployed to Los Angeles on Friday for the first time detained a civilian as part of a protest against federal immigration raids, U.S. Northern Command (Northcom) confirmed to The Hill.
The Marines 'temporarily detained a civilian earlier today,' Northcom said in a statement, adding that forces may temporarily detain an individual in specific circumstances under Title 10.
'The temporary detention ends immediately when the individual(s) can be safely transferred to the custody of appropriate civilian law enforcement personnel,' the statement noted.
The incident reportedly took place at the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, where Marines earlier on Friday were charged with protecting the building.
Images circulated on social media showed Marines apprehending a man with his hands zip-tied behind his back
Reuters reported that the man, identified as Marcos Leao, 27, was handed over to civilians from the Department of Homeland Security.
Marcos, an Army veteran, told reporters that he was on his way to an office of the Department of Veterans Affairs when he crossed a yellow tape boundary and was asked to stop.
Around 200 Marines armed with rifles, riot control equipment and gas masks have been deployed to the streets of Los Angeles to join the more than 2,000 California National Guard troops already there. The service members, tasked with protecting federal property and personnel, will be joined by an additional 500 Marines and 2,000 Guard soldiers meant to accompany ICE agents on raids, according to officials.
While the troops are authorized to detain people, they are not allowed to arrest them, as the Posse Comitatus Act largely forbids the U.S. military from taking part in civilian law enforcement.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Los Angeles Times
40 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Why we are celebrating California's greatness in 101 restaurants right now
A truth of journalism: You conceive a long-term project and you set a publish date months in advance. You can't possibly predict what will be happening in the world on the day a project is scheduled to go live. This week, The Times published its first-ever guide to the 101 Best Restaurants in California, an undertaking that builds on our annual 101 Best Restaurants in Los Angeles tentpole and for which I traveled statewide for much of the past year. It arrives amid unsettling turbulence: accelerated immigration raids in Los Angeles and across California; President Trump's extraordinary deployment of U.S. Marines and National Guardsmen to L.A. and pursuant challenges to their presence in court; federal agents shoving U.S. Sen. Alex Padilla to the ground and cuffing him for interrupting a news conference with Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem; and countrywide planned 'No Kings' demonstrations to oppose the Trump administration's policies. Like most Angelenos, I have no patience for the mischaracterizations of Los Angeles in national conversation, particularly around the recent anti-ICE protests. My colleague Stephanie Breijo reported on how downtown's restaurants and bars are struggling, given the 8 p.m. curfew in areas that extend beyond the hot zones for anti-ICE protests. Breijo, Lauren Ng and Karla Marie Sanford also specifically asked vendors in Grand Central Market how they're weathering the moment. And Sanford talked with taqueros and other street vendors about their safety fears. Consider what these businesses have already endured in the last five years. So it's understandable to bookmark a list of great places to eat across California for another time … or? Take a scroll as a breather from the chaotic news cycle. Because if there's one positive effect out of the ugliness, it's that many Californians are feeling more united in spirit right now. Anyone who writes about food in Los Angeles or California considers the diversity of our communities constantly. It's implied in every narrative. Read about these restaurants and it couldn't be plainer: The glories of culinary California feeds and influences the nation, and the world would not exist without immigrants. Since starting with The Times in late 2018, I've written or co-written six annual guides to the 101 Best Restaurants in Los Angeles. Each year, I've tinkered with the same thought: What would it be like to take that guiding 101 number and expand it to the whole state? The idea was partly from experience. Months before moving to Los Angeles, while working as the national critic for Eater, I had joined colleagues in tackling a project naming California's 38 essential restaurants. Crisscrossing the state then only made me want to see, taste and understand more. Los Angeles is a cultural world of its own. It changes too quickly and covers too much ground, in many senses, to cement its definition. Which is why, with the L.A. 101 guide, it's always been thrilling to ask: Which mix of restaurants tells the most compelling, complete and delicious story about Los Angeles right now? A broader working answer to that question drove with me across the state. I did not rank the restaurants on this list, though of course I'm aware plenty of people crave stars and status to argue over. Ranking restaurants in Los Angeles once a year is hard enough. Take in the entries and you'll see that, for maximum usefulness, the named 101 restaurants are starting points. There was too much excellence to highlight at every level in California. It made sense in many cases to embed 'extra helpings' of restaurants similar in style or cuisine or geography. For instance, you might glance down the list of places in San Francisco — the U.S. capital of fine dining, full-stop — and say, 'These are out of my budget!' Keep reading, and you'll see I've also included more affordable dining recommendations in the city. Or you might be spending the afternoon in Orange County's Little Saigon district, so along with my favorite overall restaurant and pho shop, I mention some other area jewels. An early question I'm hearing about the California 101 project: 'What surprised you the most?' One answer: Among California's cities, I knew our state capital the least before this endeavor. I spent nearly two weeks there experiencing as much as I could. While I turned to peers (like my counterparts at the San Francisco Chronicle) for guidance in other areas, I relied on some unusually well-fed friends in Sacramento. I'm particularly remembering my second night, dining at a place that turned out to be solid but not exceptional, and I said to the three locals at my table: 'OK, so what do you all think is the absolute greatest restaurant in this city?' And they all looked at each other and said, pretty much in unison, 'Restaurant Josephine in Auburn.' So 30 seconds later, I was snagging the last reservation at 5:30 p.m. for the next night at Josephine, a worthy 30-mile drive up I-80 from the city's center. Over a California-French meal of deep-shelled oysters, duck liver mousse, garlicky escargot and a pork chop nestled among bacony cabbage with apples, the same group leveled their gazes at me as if to say, 'See?' I saw. And Kelly Dobkin put together a guide to eight bakeries with globally inspired croissants that are uniquely L.A.
Los Angeles Times
an hour ago
- Los Angeles Times
A historian of fascism is asked whether this was week was a turning point
Do you remember that day in March 2020 — five years and several eternities ago — when Tom Hanks tested positive for COVID-19, the NBA announced they were suspending their season and profound upheaval suddenly seemed inevitable? I've felt echoes of that feeling the past few days, as downtown businesses boarded up their windows and the facts on the ground grew ever more fantastical. Are we at the edge of some irreparable rupture in American democracy? Or is this just another strange and absurd chapter in a long series of them? On Sunday, the president sent federalized National Guard troops into a city against the will of the state's governor for the first time in 60 years. On Thursday, California's senior senator was tackled to the ground by federal agents and handcuffed at a news conference. Hundreds of active duty Marines were sent into the Los Angeles area, where for days they appeared to be performing heavily armed training exercises on what looked like a high school sports field. (A looming scoreboard, palm trees and jacaranda blooms were all visible behind their riot shields, according to a social media post from the U.S. Northern Command.) The president and the governor are having a momentous fight about constitutional rights in the courts, and flaming each other with insults and photoshopped memes on Truth Social and X. The ICE raids have thrown some Angelenos into a state of fear and virtual hiding. But for many others, ordinary life continues apace. Mayor Karen Bass has repeatedly cautioned that L.A. is being treated like 'a grand experiment' — a testing ground for President Trump to see if he can usurp the authority of Democratic mayors or governors in other states. Warning signs of democratic breakdown have been pointed out by scholars and Trump's critics since he took office for his first term in 2017 — so much so that many have grown numb to them. Has this week been any different? I called Federico Finchelstein, a historian of fascism and dictatorships who chairs the history department at the New School for Social Research in New York, to ask whether he saw this week as a turning point for the country. Finchelstein characterized Trump's federalizing of the California National Guard as a clear turn toward authoritarianism. He cited the move, along with attacks on the press and the judiciary and the manhandling of Sen. Alex Padilla on Thursday, as assaults on democratic norms that 'create the conditions for a further erosion of democracy.' But he hesitated about categorizing recent events as a turning point. It's hard while living in the middle of history to know precisely where you stand, he explained. 'It's very difficult to know what is the exact outcome of this sort of militarization of politics,' Finchelstein said. 'What we know is that democracy is at the other end, and this path is towards either disabling, denigrating or even destroying democracy. It's hard to know where it ends.' The outcome would also depend on more than Trump's next move, according to the historian. History has shown that when anti-democratic attempts are met with institutional and public resistance, they are less likely to succeed, Finchelstein said. 'In other words, this is not the end of the story,' he told me. A selection of the very best reads from The Times' 143-year archive. Have a great weekend, from the Essential California team Julia Wick, staff writerKevinisha Walker, multiplatform editor How can we make this newsletter more useful? Send comments to essentialcalifornia@ Check our top stories, topics and the latest articles on
Axios
2 hours ago
- Axios
Eight chaotic days shake Trump's grip on the presidency
President Trump began the week of his 79th birthday reeling from his explosive public breakup with Elon Musk. He ended it with tanks in the capital, Marines in Los Angeles, a Democrati c senator dragged away in handcuffs, thousands of protests planned nationwide, and a new war in the Middle East. Why it matters: In a year already brimming with "holy sh*t" moments, the past eight days have brought unprecedented new intensity, stakes and challenges to Trump's presidency. Zoom in: America is on edge. Trump became the first president since the Civil Rights Era to federalize the National Guard without a governor's consent — sending troops to L.A. to quash protests sparked by his administration's immigration raids. Democrats, led by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, have accused Trump of blatantly defying the Constitution and pouring gasoline on the fire by deploying 700 Marines on domestic soil. When Sen. Alex Padilla (D-Calif.) tried to confront Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem at a press conference Thursday, he was forcibly removed and handcuffed. Between the lines: Trump officials want this fight, eager to flex executive power and frame Democrats as defenders of undocumented immigrants and violent agitators. But the backlash is threatening to spiral beyond the White House's control. Millions of people are expected to join "No Kings" protests in nearly 1,800 cities on Saturday — the largest single-day demonstrations against Trump since his return to power. Expect an extraordinary split-screen as Trump celebrates not only his birthday, but a massive military parade in Washington that he's dreamed of since his first term. "For those people that want to protest, they're going to be met with very big force," Trump warned this week, dismissing the demonstrators as "people that hate our country." Zoom out: With unrest boiling over at home, Israel's unprecedented attack on Iran suddenly threatened to unravel Trump's crowning foreign policy achievement from his first term: "No new wars." Trump had publicly urged Israel not to strike Iran while he actively pursued a nuclear deal with the Iranians, and even assured allies that the U.S. would not participate in the operation. Israel did it anyway — bombing nuclear sites, assassinating top generals and scientists, and sabotaging missile facilities in one of the most sophisticated covert strikes in the history of the Middle East. The intrigue: Trump now claims that the wildly successful operation — which he told Axios used "great American equipment" — could make it easier to reach a nuclear deal with Iran. But his MAGA base is deeply uneasy. Iran has launched retaliatory missile attacks against Israel, which U.S. forces helped the intercept. Oil prices have surged, and the threat of Iran targeting U.S. assets in the region remains very real. Opposition to the "forever wars" in Iraq and Afghanistan helped fuel Trump's political rise — and many of his most loyal supporters view any new Middle East entanglement as a betrayal of that legacy. "[D]rop Israel. Let them fight their own wars," MAGA isolationist Tucker Carlson wrote in a post accusing the U.S. of complicity in the attack. "What happens next will define Donald Trump's presidency." The bottom line: The pace of news in the Trump era, both at home and abroad, makes it exceedingly difficult to distinguish the chaotic from the consequential.
