House Health votes 13-12 against bill to repeal Certificate of Need in WV
Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, urges the House Health Committee to vote down House Bill 2007 during debate on Monday. Pushkin was the only legislator to speak on the bill during Monday's meeting. (Perry Bennett | West Virginia Legislative Photography)
Lawmakers on the West Virginia House Health Committee on Monday voted down a committee substitute for a bill that would have, as it was proposed, repealed the Certificate of Need process statewide.
The policy push to repeal Certificate of Need, or CON, was announced by Gov. Patrick Morrisey as a priority for his administration during his State of the State address earlier this month. On Monday, members of the House Health Committee voted 13-12 against House Bill 2007, dealing a major blow to that priority.
A bill in the Senate that would repeal CON is still moving through the Legislature, however, and could be brought up for consideration by the Senate Health Committee at any time.
Monday was at least the second time that the House Health Committee has quashed efforts to totally repeal CON in the state. In 2022, with three members absent and not voting, the body voted 12-10 against a similar bill that would have done away with the process completely.
CON is a regulatory process, overseen by the West Virginia Health Care Authority, that requires entities looking to create or expand health care services in the state to receive a legal document proving those new services fit an unmet need in the area.
Through the Health Care Authority, those interested in obtaining a Certificate of Need receive technical assistance before applying to see what need they are meeting. Services are approved through a needs methodology and different services — such as hospice care, ambulatory centers, clinics, private practices and specialty services — have different methodologies.
During his State of the State, Morrisey called the process 'big government activism at its worst' and promised that by repealing it, the state would 'move toward the free market.'
Proponents for the repeal believe that doing away with the laws will allow more competition in health care across West Virginia. Those against repeal worry that doing away with the process will hurt West Virginia's more rural and vulnerable populations, where a lack of regulation could threaten what services are offered to the 75% of residents who are government payers, meaning their health insurance comes from Medicare, Medicaid or the Public Employees Insurance Agency.
Last week, people packed into the House Health Committee meeting as 12 speakers addressed lawmakers on their beliefs regarding the total repeal of CON. While the version of the bill voted down this week was notably different than that initially proposed — and, therefore, what Thursday's speakers testified on — it would have majorly restructured CON.
There was little discussion or debate from committee members before Monday's vote.
The proposed committee substitute they voted down would have removed swaths of state code regarding CON while leaving in place moratoriums on the creation or expansion of certain health care services, including for methadone, nursing homes, hospice care and more.
The bill would have completely eliminated the Health Care Authority and given oversight responsibilities for hospitals to the West Virginia Attorney General, who would have been tasked with ensuring that 'the conduct of the hospital or health care provider furthers the policy goals of the state.' The attorney general, per the bill code, would have monitored reimbursement rates set by hospitals, the costs of services offered, the kinds of services available in regions and more. Any increases in rates charged would have had to be approved by the attorney general.
Other oversight would have come from the cabinet secretary for the state Department of Health and, to a certain degree, the Legislature, according to comments given by counsel for the committee.
Legislative action would have been needed to allow for certain medical services, counsel said. Specifically, if a hospital was struggling or closed and another hospital system wanted to take over its services, lawmakers would have needed to pass a law allowing the takeover.
Del. Mike Pushkin, D-Kanawha, proposed an amendment to the bill on Monday that would have lifted the existing moratorium for methadone clinics. That moratorium, he said, has created a 'not well regulated monopoly' for treatment providers.
Lawmakers on the committee denied Pushkin's amendment via voice vote.
Speaking on the bill overall, Pushkin said he believed it was 'flawed' and 'not well thought out.'
'I think we've created more problems once again,' Pushkin said.
No other members of the committee offered thoughts on the bill during Monday's meeting.
Pushkin, later in Monday night's meeting, made a motion to reconsider the initial vote on HB 2007. Following a short recess, lawmakers voted down that motion via voice vote and the original vote of 13-12 stood against the bill.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
43 minutes ago
- Politico
House GOP finalizes tweaks to keep megabill on track in Senate
House Republicans have finalized changes to the party-line tax and spending package the House passed last month, to keep the bill in compliance with Senate rules. An early copy of the amendment House Republicans plan to adopt this week, first obtained by POLITICO, would make changes to biofuel policy and other provisions. By nixing items the Senate parliamentarian has flagged, the bill will retain its 'privilege' and can pass the Senate without having to overcome the filibuster. House GOP leaders plan to approve the tweaks in the Rules Committee later Tuesday and adopt them on the floor on Wednesday, according to House Majority Leader Steve Scalise.
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brevard County election 2025 results for Florida Senate District 19, House District 32
Who are the winners and losers in the June 10, 2025, Brevard County special election? Voters in Brevard County cast ballots with their picks in the Florida Senate District 19 and Florida House District 32 races. The winners of the April 1 Republican primary election faced Democratic candidates in Tuesday's special general election. The Florida Senate District 19 election will fill the seat left vacant by Randy Fine, who resigned to run for Congress representing the Daytona Beach area. Primary winner Republican Debbie Mayfield faced Democrat Vance Ahrens. Florida's House District 32 seat was vacated by Debbie Mayfield, who is seeking to return to the Florida Senate after being term-limited out and winning this seat in November. The Florida Supreme Court ruled that she was eligible to once again seek her former Senate seat in the special election. Republican Brian Hodgers won the primary and faced Democrat Juan Hinojosa in the special general election. ➤ Dig Deeper: Ultimate voter guide to Brevard County June 10, 2025, special general elections Follow along below for the latest election results, continually updated until all ballots are counted. Polls close at 7 p.m. local time. Any voters waiting in line at 7 p.m. will have the opportunity to cast a ballot. Use the Brevard County voter information look-up to check your voter registration and party status. To find your Brevard County polling place, check the voter precinct look-up or your voter information card. To see a sample ballot for your Brevard County precinct, check the county elections office website. Support local journalism by subscribing to Florida Today. This article originally appeared on Florida Today: Brevard County election results: Florida D19, House D32


Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Chicago-based American Medical Association to ask Senate to investigate RFK Jr.'s firing of vaccine committee members
The Chicago-based American Medical Association plans to ask a U.S. Senate committee to investigate Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s decision to overhaul a key vaccine advisory group, the medical association said in an emergency resolution passed Tuesday. The House of Delegates at the AMA, which is the nation's premier doctors' group, adopted the emergency resolution at its annual meeting in Chicago. The adoption came just one day after Kennedy, who is the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary, announced that he had removed all 17 members of the Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. That advisory committee is tasked with making recommendations on the use of vaccines to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which then sets U.S. adult and childhood immunization schedules. Kennedy said he planned to replace the 17 members with new members. 'Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda,' Kennedy said in a news release Monday. 'The public must know that unbiased science — evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest — guides the recommendations of our health agencies.' It's a move, however, that's met with sharp criticism, including from the American Medical Association. Kennedy has long been a vaccine skeptic, putting him at odds with doctors and scientists who tout vaccines as life-saving. The American Medical Association's emergency resolution also says that it will send an open letter to Kennedy asking him to reverse his recent changes to the committee. And the association will 'identify and evaluate alternative evidence-based vaccine advisory structures,' according to the resolution. On Monday, outgoing American Medical Association President Dr. Bruce Scott said in a statement that the advisory committee has long been a trusted source of science and data-driven guidance on vaccines. 'Today's action to remove the 17 sitting members of ACIP undermines that trust and upends a transparent process that has saved countless lives,' Scott said. 'With an ongoing measles outbreak and routine child vaccination rates declining, this move will further fuel the spread of vaccine-preventable illnesses.'