
A Mother and Father Were Deported. What Happened to Their Toddler?
A Venezuelan family is calling for a 2-year-old to be returned to her mother after the U.S. authorities deported the mother to Venezuela on Friday without the child.
The girl's father was sent to a prison in El Salvador in March.
The toddler, Maikelys Antonella Espinoza Bernal, remains in foster care in the United States, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Officials said in a statement that the child was removed from her parents and from the manifest of her mother's deportation plane for her own 'safety and welfare.'
The Trump administration claims the girl's parents are members of Tren de Aragua, a Venezuelan gang, but it has not offered evidence to back this up.
The girl, known to many in her family as Antonella, is one of several children who have been swept up in President Trump's immigration crackdown in recent days. At least three children who are U.S. citizens were sent to Honduras this month with their mothers, decisions protested by the families' lawyers.
In the case of the Venezuelan toddler, the girl's mother, Yorely Bernal, 20, had entered the United States with her partner, Maiker Espinoza, and their child in May 2024, while President Joseph R. Biden Jr. was still in office.
There, according to the couple's relatives, the authorities told them their tattoos looked suspicious, took them into custody and sent the girl to foster care.
During Mr. Trump's first administration, family separations at the border drew anger and legal challenges, and eventually ceased to be used as a blanket policy. But separations continued to take place in limited instances during the Biden administration when officials believed there was a threat to the child.
It is unclear why officials separated the family members last year. Record searches indicate that neither parent has a criminal record in Venezuela or Peru, where they lived for several years, or in the United States, beyond their immigration offenses. In the United States the couple has lived only in immigration detention.
In 2022, Mr. Espinoza, now 25, was arrested in Peru on an allegation of domestic violence, but the case was closed and he never faced trial, according to records.
U.S. officials sent Mr. Espinoza to El Salvador on March 30 on one of five planes carrying Venezuelan men to a maximum-security prison. The Trump administration claims that all the Venezuelan men on those flights are members of Tren de Aragua, but it has provided little proof of this.
In late April, Ms. Bernal called her mother, Raida Inciarte, to tell her that she was going to be deported back to Venezuela, Ms. Inciarte said in an interview. American officials had told Ms. Bernal that Antonella would be coming with her, Ms. Inciarte said.
On the video call, Ms. Bernal showed her mother a document from immigration authorities bearing Antonella's name, which she claimed indicated the child would be leaving the United States with her.
But when Ms. Bernal boarded the deportation flight to Caracas, the Venezuelan capital, on April 25, her child was not there.
From her home in Maracaibo, Venezuela, Ms. Inciarte called on the American government to release the child, who she said has lived in four foster homes while her parents were in immigration detention over the past year. (Ms. Inciarte has been in touch with a case worker and the foster parents, she said.)
Her daughter, she said, had arrived home in Maracaibo on Sunday, and spent Monday morning crying in her bedroom.
'That little girl,' she said of the toddler, 'has a family that has been suffering every day for a year.'
The toddler is under the supervision of the Office of Refugee Resettlement, according to the Department of Homeland Security, referring to a part of the Department of Health and Human Services. An official at that office referred all questions to the D.H.S.
The Trump administration did not say when, or if, the child would be reunited with her family.
In its statement, Homeland Security said Mr. Espinoza was a 'lieutenant' of Tren de Aragua who oversees criminal operations, including a 'torture house,' and that Ms. Bernal directed the 'recruitment of young women for drug smuggling and prostitution.'
'President Trump and Secretary Noem take their responsibility to protect children seriously,' said the statement, referring to the department's secretary, Kristi Noem. 'We will not allow this child to be abused and continue to be exposed to criminal activity that endangers her safety.'
María Alejandra Fernández, 31, Mr. Espinoza's sister, said: 'My brother is not a criminal. He left Venezuela like many young people, looking for an opportunity to get ahead.'
The department did not respond to a request for more details about the allegations of gang connections.
Ms. Inciarte said the toddler's first foster homes were in the El Paso area. But Antonella was place in a new home in recent days, Ms. Inciarte said a foster mother told her, and now she wasn't sure where that home was located.
The new foster mother did not respond to messages from The New York Times.
The Trump administration has said that Tren de Aragua has 'invaded' the United States, which the president is using to justify the rapid deportations of hundreds of Venezuelans and to fulfill a campaign promise to take a hard line against undocumented immigrants.
Ms. Bernal and Mr. Espinoza fled economic and political crises at home in Venezuela, their families said, and met while living in Peru. She worked at a fast food stand. He worked as a bricklayer and in ironwork, until opening a business as a barber, said his sister, Ms. Fernández, who lives in Venezuela.
Antonella was born in Lima on Feb. 8, 2023, according to her birth certificate, which lists the couple as her parents. When the girl was 1, Ms. Bernal and Mr. Espinoza decided to follow a growing flow of migrants to the United States, said their families.
Salaries in Peru were low, said Ms. Inciarte, and the situation wasn't improving in Venezuela.
'They got excited,' she said, 'and set out to pursue the American dream.'
The couple left Peru, and — with their child in tow — crossed Ecuador, Colombia, the Darién jungle, which connects South America with Panama and Central America. In Mexico, they were briefly kidnapped by what Mr. Espinoza's sister described as 'coyotes,' or migrant traffickers.
Last May, the families said, the two turned themselves in at the U.S. border.
From detention, Ms. Bernal told her mother in a call that the authorities believed her tattoos — she has many — made her a 'gang member.'
But it wasn't until Mr. Trump took office, said the families, that the accusations became more specific: The government believed that they were members of Tren de Aragua.
Ms. Bernal's tattoos include her parents' birth years inscribed on her neck, as well as a lightning bolt, a small flame and a serpent, her mother said. Mr. Espinoza's tattoos include the cartoon characters Yosemite Sam and Marvin the Martian, according to a statement he gave to the authorities, as well as a cross, a crown and a compass with a plane.
Internal government documents indicate that the U.S. authorities are citing tattoos to label people as members of Tren de Aragua, though there is little evidence that the gang uses tattoos as markers of membership.
In her conversations with the foster parents over the last year, Ms. Inciarte, said the parents described Antonella as 'sweet' and 'independent' for a toddler. But they also noted that the girl cried when she moved among families and seemed confused about who she belonged to.
This anguished the grandmother, who worried about 'psychological damage,' she said.
'Today she wakes up with one mother,' she said, 'tomorrow she has another.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
18 minutes ago
- UPI
Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
A proposed federal act would raise the federal minimum wage law to $15 an hour on January 1, two U.S. senators announced on Tuesday. The Service Employee International Union was fighting for that wage in 2021 (pictured). File Photo by Tasos Katopodis/UPI | License Photo June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure. Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers. "For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch. "One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added. Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities. "We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said. "A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close." "Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added. Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation. If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years. Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024. Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023. President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour. California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Conference of Mayors Statement on the Situation in Los Angeles
WASHINGTON, June 10, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- Today, U.S. Conference of Mayors President Columbus (OH) Mayor Andrew Ginther released the following statement on the situation in Los Angeles, California. "The streets of American cities are no place for the U.S. military. Law enforcement is a local responsibility, and America's mayors support Mayor Bass as she works with state authorities to promote order in her city. Protest, carried out peacefully, is a bedrock of our democracy. However, violence, theft, and destruction of property can never be tolerated. We have every confidence that Mayor Bass and state officials can manage the situation. The authorities there have the experience, training and resources to maintain peace and protect the rights of legitimate protestors. "With crime plummeting across the country, mayors have demonstrated their ability to promote public safety. Troops should never be deployed to cities without the request of state and local authorities. The U.S. Conference of Mayors stands firmly behind the rights of mayors to determine the best public safety strategies for their individual cities. We urge the president to work constructively with local and state authorities as we all strive to make our cities and the nation stronger." About the United States Conference of Mayors – The U.S. Conference of Mayors is the official nonpartisan organization of cities with populations of 30,000 or more. There are more than 1,400 such cities in the country today, and each city is represented in the Conference by its chief elected official, the mayor. Follow our work on X, Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Threads, and Medium. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE U.S. Conference of Mayors

Washington Post
19 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Sending the National Guard is bad. Arresting 3,000 a day is worse.
ICE agents making arrests in the parking lot of a Home Depot helped set off mass protests in Los Angeles. But that wasn't an isolated incident. Immigration and Customs Enforcement is increasingly taking actions at courthouses, restaurants and other spaces it previously stayed away from. President Donald Trump and his top aides have long favored harsh immigration policies. But what's shifted in recent weeks is that the administration has set a specific goal of ICE arresting at least 3,000 people per a quota may help Trump accomplish his goals, but it is leading to overly aggressive tactics that are deeply unsettling Americans across the country. It was perhaps inevitable that a president who promised to deport more people than his predecessors would implement an arrest quota. In the first months of Trump's tenure, the number of deportations and ICE arrests wasn't that much higher than when President Joe Biden was in office. That reportedly frustrated Trump administration officials, particularly Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller. So last month, Miller and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi L. Noem privately gave ICE leaders — and then publicly confirmed — the goal of making 3,000 arrests per day. The administration also replaced ICE's leadership with people it felt would be more aggressive. That's a huge increase: The agency was making between 700 and 900 arrests per day at the end of Biden's term and the start of Trump's. And it appears this new policy is being carried out. ICE officials say they arrested 2,267 people on June 3 and 2,368 on June 4. It's possible these numbers are being inflated by the agency to please Trump and Miller. But there are articles in news outlets across the country about unprecedented ICE enforcement actions in their communities, so I believe the agency is going beyond its usual moves. But this policy is misguided. Quotas are problematic in many contexts. I support increased gender and racial diversity but am wary of organizations trying to hire a set number of women and people of color. In law enforcement, they are more troublesome. Police officers operating under quota systems feel pushed to make arrests for minor offenses. They sometimes target not the most dangerous people but those who are easiest to apprehend. That's what's happening now. Undocumented immigrants showing up to court hearings, working at clothing stores or looking to get Home Depot customers to hire them for day labor are probably not leading human trafficking organizations on the side. I am deeply concerned that ICE will soon start making arrests at schools and hospitals, since those are other places where you can arrest lots of people at once — few of whom will be armed or dangerous. I am opposed to these arrests in part because I don't support Trump's overarching goals of deporting 1 million immigrants a year and creating a climate in which other undocumented immigrants return to their native countries on their own. But you could argue that while Trump did not specifically campaign on 3,000 arrests per day, he promised to crack down on undocumented immigrants, and Americans elected him, so the public wants this. It's hard to determine why people voted for a candidate and what kind of mandate that gives them. But even if Trump campaigned explicitly on arresting 3,000 people a day, we should be wary of that policy — and not just because quotas generally aren't smart. This particular quota is excessive. If ICE arrested 3,000 a people a day, that would add up to about 1.1 million arrests after a year. There are about 11.7 million undocumented people in the United States. So if no individual was arrested more than once, about 9 percent of undocumented immigrants would be arrested in a given year under this policy. Arresting 9 percent of any group would almost certainly result in the other 91 percent being constantly worried about being arrested or jailed. And because about three quarters of undocumented immigrants are from Central or South America, some U.S. citizens and authorized residents who are Brown almost certainly will be unjustly arrested or questioned by ICE. This arrest quota echoes stop-and-frisk policies many police departments used to employ. At the height of that approach, there were about 350,000 stops of the 1.9 million Black New Yorkers. Basically every Black New Yorker had to be on guard for being stopped and frisked, and a judge invalidated the program on the grounds that it was racially discriminatory. Miller and Trump may want all 11.7 million undocumented immigrants to live in terror. But the rest of us shouldn't. The overwhelming majority of those people came to the United States seeking a better life. If we want to deter future immigrants, cracking down on employers who hire undocumented people and making it harder to enter the country in the first place are obvious solutions. Making life excessively difficult for people already here will probably discourage future migrants, but the U.S. government should not be in the business of rushing into restaurants and courthouses with guns to arrest people for the purpose of scaring others into leaving the country. Many Democratic politicians and political commentators have criticized Trump for deploying the National Guard over the objections of California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, to stop the protests of ICE's actions in Los Angeles. But Presidents Dwight D. Eisenhower and Lyndon B. Johnson rightly invoked the National Guard, without support from governors, to integrate schools and defend civil rights marches respectively. The problem isn't that Trump is using the National Guard; it's that he's using the National Guard to defend a policy that will target people of color indiscriminately and inhumanely. The quota must go.