
Opec must squeeze US shale much more to win oil price war
Benchmark US oil prices have dropped by nearly a quarter since January to US$61 a barrel, in response to Opec+'s strategy and concerns over trade wars. (File pic)
LONDON : Oil drillers in the US shale heartland are slowing down operations, a sign that the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries' (Opec) high-stakes price war is starting to pay off, but Saudi Arabia will need to exert a lot more pain to make a lasting impact on market share.
US oil producers upended the global market in the early 2010s, as the innovative 'fracking' drilling technique allowed them to tap vast onshore shale formations.
Consequently, the US, long the world's top oil consumer, became its leading producer as of 2018.
It currently pumps around 13.5 million barrels per day (bpd), around 13% of world supplies.
The rising tide of US oil has long irked the Opec, which has seen its market share steadily erode over the past two decades.
Saudi Arabia, Opec's de-facto leader, in 2014 sought to curb surging US output by flooding the market with cheap oil.
This effort bankrupted a number of shale producers, but it only temporarily paused the country's ascent as companies adapted to lower prices and the industry consolidated.
Price war redux
Riyadh and its allies, a group known as Opec+, are now giving it another go.
They surprised the market earlier this year by announcing that they would rapidly unwind 2.2 million bpd of production cuts introduced in 2024.
The group is expected to announce further increases in production later this week.
Benchmark US oil prices have dropped by nearly a quarter since January to around US$61 a barrel in response to Opec+'s strategy as well as concerns over US President Donald Trump's trade wars.
At these prices, many shale wells are not profitable, as frackers require an oil price of between US$61 and US$70 a barrel to expand production, according to a survey conducted by the Dallas Federal Reserve Bank.
Sure enough, nimble frackers have already responded by paring back drilling activities to conserve cash.
The number of US onshore oil drilling rigs dropped by eight to 465 last week, the lowest since November 2021, according to energy services firm Baker Hughes.
Crucially, drillers in the Permian Basin in West Texas and eastern New Mexico, which accounts for nearly half of US production, cut three rigs, bringing the total down to 279, also the lowest since November 2021.
Crude production from new Permian wells, a measure of productivity, slightly improved in April, but that was largely offset by declines in other basins.
Multiple indicators suggest activity is set to decelerate further.
Importantly, Frac Spread Count, which measures the number of crews actively performing hydraulic fracturing, has seen a 28% annual drop to 186, according to energy consultancy Primary Vision, an indication that production could fall sharply in the coming months.
Another measure to watch is drilled but uncompleted wells (DUCs), or partially completed wells that can start production quickly, offering operators flexibility to withhold production until market conditions improve.
DUCs have risen by 11% since December 2024 to 975 in the Permian Basin.
Down but not out
While the latest data on shale drilling activity suggests US production will continue to slow, it is far from falling off a cliff.
The US energy information administration reduced in May its forecasts for US production in 2025 and 2026 by around 100,000 bpd to 13.4 million bpd and 13.5 million bpd, respectively, compared with 13.2 million bpd last year.
Production in the Permian Basin is forecast to average 6.51 million bpd in 2025, down from its previous estimate of 6.58 million bpd.
However, that would still mark a significant increase from 6.3 million bpd in 2024.
Opec+ may find it even harder to have a sustainable impact now than it did in 2014 as the US shale landscape is significantly different from a decade ago.
True, 15 years of intensive oil and gas drilling have depleted a large chunk of the most profitable shale acreage.
However, shale drillers have in recent years adopted much stricter spending discipline, focusing on returning value to shareholders in contrast with last decade's focus on growing production.
Independent US oil and gas producers have so far reduced their planned 2025 spending commitments by an aggregate 4% to US$60 billion, while output is expected to remain largely flat, according to consultancy RBN Energy.
Also, production today is concentrated in the hands of far fewer companies, such as Exxon Mobil and Chevron.
These energy majors have developed highly efficient drilling techniques and boast strong balance sheets that leave them better equipped to withstand the Opec assault.
Current oil prices are therefore likely to temporarily curb US production but not lead to the type of sharp deceleration seen in 2014.
Opec+ will therefore need to deepen and extend its price war for many months if it seeks to fundamentally change the oil production balance of power.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
12 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
US court refuses to lift block on Trump's government overhaul
Donald Trump directed government agencies to identify targets for mass layoffs in February. (AP pic) WASHINGTON : A US appeals court today refused to allow president Donald Trump's administration to carry out mass layoffs of federal workers and a restructuring of agencies, leaving a lower court order in place that blocked the sweeping government overhaul. The decision by the San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals means that, for now, the Trump administration cannot proceed with plans to shed tens of thousands of federal jobs and shutter many government offices and programs. US district judge Susan Illston in San Francisco on May 22 blocked large-scale layoffs at about 20 federal agencies, agreeing with a group of unions, non-profits and municipalities that the president may only restructure agencies when authorised by Congress. A ninth circuit three-judge panel today, in a 2-1 ruling, denied the Trump administration's bid to stay Illston's decision pending an appeal, which could take months to resolve. The administration will likely now ask the US Supreme Court to pause the ruling. 'The Trump administration will immediately fight back against this absurd order,' the White House said in a statement. 'A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the executive branch.' A coalition of plaintiffs praised the ruling: 'The ninth circuit's decision today rightfully maintains the block on the Trump-Vance administration's unlawful, disruptive, and destructive reorganisation of the federal government.' The appeals court said the administration had not provided any evidence it would suffer an irreparable injury if the lower court order remained in place and said plaintiffs were likely to prevail. 'The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the constitution,' said the majority opinion from judge William Fletcher, who was appointed by Democratic president Bill Clinton. He was joined by judge Lucy Koh, who was appointed by Democratic president Joe Biden. Judge Consuelo Callahan, who was appointed by Republican president George W Bush, dissented, saying the administration was likely to succeed on appeal and had suffered irreparable harm from having its policy blocked. Government overhaul Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Along with blocking layoffs, Illston barred the department of government efficiency (DOGE) from ordering job cuts or reorganisation at federal agencies. Dozens of lawsuits have challenged DOGE's work on various grounds, including claims that it violated labour and privacy laws and exceeded its authority, with mixed results. Two judges had separately ordered the Trump administration to reinstate thousands of probationary employees, who are typically newer hires and were fired en masse in February, but appeals courts paused those rulings. Musk joined a farewell event in the Oval Office with Trump yesterday, marking the end of his active involvement with the administration. Trump in February also directed government agencies to work with DOGE to identify targets for mass layoffs as part of the administration's restructuring plans. The Republican president urged agencies to eliminate duplicative roles, unnecessary management layers and non-critical jobs, while automating routine tasks, closing regional offices and reducing the use of outside contractors. Most federal agencies have announced plans to lay off large numbers of workers, including 10,000 staffers at health agencies. In today's case, the unions and groups that sued said only congress has the authority to create agencies, shape their missions and decide their funding levels, and that large-scale layoffs undermine that power. Illston, also an appointee of Clinton, had said in her ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to suffer a range of irreparable harms if the layoffs were implemented. She said, for example, that a US department of labour office in Pittsburgh that researches health hazards facing mineworkers would lose all but one of its 222 employees. Illston gave similar examples at local offices of Head Start, which supports early learning, the farm service agency and the social security administration.


Free Malaysia Today
12 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Trump says Chinese students in US will ‘be okay'
International students make up just under 6% of the US university population. (AFP pic) WASHINGTON : US President Donald Trump told reporters late yesterday he wanted to assure Chinese international students in the country that they would be fine amid his administration's crackdown on academia. Trump's administration this week said it would specifically target permissions for Chinese students, in its latest broadside against US higher education. But when asked yesterday what message he would send to Chinese college students in the country, Trump insisted: 'They're going to be okay. It's going to work out fine.' 'We just want to check out the individual students we have. And that's true with all colleges,' he told reporters. The softer tone comes after a judge on Thursday extended a temporary block on Trump's bid to prevent Harvard from enrolling international students. US secretary of state Marco Rubio vowed on Wednesday to 'aggressively' revoke visas to students from China. Rubio has already yanked thousands of visas, largely over students' involvement in activism critical of Israel's offensive in Gaza, but also over minor traffic violations and other infractions. The Trump administration has been in an ongoing showdown with academia, and Harvard in particular, demanding it provide a list of students that the government is interested in, something the prestigious university has declined to do. 'I don't know why Harvard's not giving us the list. There's something going on because Harvard is not giving us a list,' Trump said yesterday. 'They ought to give us a list and get themselves out of trouble,' he insisted, suggesting that 'they don't want to give the list because they have names on there that supposedly are quite bad.' At graduation ceremonies this week, Harvard University president Alan Garber received a one-minute standing ovation when he called for universities to stand 'firm' in the war the Trump administration has waged against students and schools. 'We want people that can love our country and take care of our country and cherish our country,' Trump said yesterday. International students on average make up just under 6% of the US university population – far below Britain, the second top destination for international students, where the figure is 25%.


Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
US court blocks Trump's mass layoffs and agency restructuring plans, White House likely to appeal to Supreme Court
Appeals court denies White House bid to stay May 22 decision Ruling prevents Trump administration from shedding jobs, shuttering offices White House likely to ask Supreme Court to pause May ruling WASHINGTON, May 31 — A US appeals court yesterday refused to allow President Donald Trump's administration to carry out mass layoffs of federal workers and a restructuring of agencies, leaving a lower court order in place that blocked the sweeping government overhaul. The decision by the San Francisco-based 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals means that, for now, the Trump administration cannot proceed with plans to shed tens of thousands of federal jobs and shutter many government offices and programmes. US District Judge Susan Illston in San Francisco on May 22 blocked large-scale layoffs at about 20 federal agencies, agreeing with a group of unions, nonprofits and municipalities that the president may only restructure agencies when authorised by Congress. A 9th Circuit three-judge panel yesterday, in a 2-1 ruling, denied the Trump administration's bid to stay Illston's decision pending an appeal, which could take months to resolve. The administration will likely now ask the US Supreme Court to pause the ruling. 'The Trump administration will immediately fight back against this absurd order,' the White House said in a statement. 'A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch.' A coalition of plaintiffs praised the ruling: 'The Ninth Circuit's decision today rightfully maintains the block on the Trump-Vance administration's unlawful, disruptive, and destructive reorganisation of the federal government.' The appeals court said the administration had not provided any evidence it would suffer an irreparable injury if the lower court order remained in place and said plaintiffs were likely to prevail. 'The executive order at issue here far exceeds the president's supervisory powers under the Constitution,' said the majority opinion from Judge William Fletcher, who was appointed by Democratic President Bill Clinton. He was joined by Judge Lucy Koh, who was appointed by Democratic President Joe Biden. Judge Consuelo Callahan, who was appointed by Republican President George W. Bush, dissented, saying the administration was likely to succeed on appeal and had suffered irreparable harm from having its policy blocked. Government overhaul Illston's ruling was the broadest of its kind against the government overhaul that was spearheaded by Trump ally Elon Musk, the world's richest person and CEO of electric vehicle maker Tesla. Along with blocking layoffs, Illston barred the Department of Government Efficiency from ordering job cuts or reorganisation at federal agencies. Dozens of lawsuits have challenged DOGE's work on various grounds, including claims that it violated labor and privacy laws and exceeded its authority, with mixed results. Two judges had separately ordered the Trump administration to reinstate thousands of probationary employees, who are typically newer hires and were fired en masse in February, but appeals courts paused those rulings. Musk joined a farewell event in the Oval Office with Trump yesterday, marking the end of his active involvement with the administration. Trump in February also directed government agencies to work with DOGE to identify targets for mass layoffs as part of the administration's restructuring plans. The Republican president urged agencies to eliminate duplicative roles, unnecessary management layers and non-critical jobs, while automating routine tasks, closing regional offices and reducing the use of outside contractors. Most federal agencies have announced plans to lay off large numbers of workers, including 10,000 staffers at health agencies. In yesterday's case, the unions and groups that sued said only Congress has the authority to create agencies, shape their missions and decide their funding levels, and that large-scale layoffs undermine that power. Illston, also an appointee of Clinton, had said in her ruling that the plaintiffs were likely to suffer a range of irreparable harms if the layoffs were implemented. She said, for example, that a US Department of Labor office in Pittsburgh that researches health hazards facing mineworkers would lose all but one of its 222 employees. Illston gave similar examples at local offices of Head Start, which supports early learning, the Farm Service Agency and the Social Security Administration. — Reuters