Iran says no threat to UN nuclear watchdog chief, inspectors after call for execution
Iran said Sunday it posed no threat to the head of the UN nuclear watchdog and its inspectors after an Iranian newspaper called for the execution of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Rafael Grossi.
'No, there is not any threat' against the inspectors or the director general, Iran's ambassador to the United Nations, Amir Saeid Iravani, said in an interview with US broadcaster CBS when asked about calls in an ultra-conservative newspaper for the agency's chief to be executed as a spy.
The ambassador said inspectors in Iran were 'in safe conditions.'
On Saturday, Argentina condemned what it said were threats against Argentine Grossi after Iran rejected his request to visit nuclear facilities bombed by Israel and the United States.
Tehran has accused Grossi of 'betrayal of his duties' for not condemning the Israeli and US strikes on Iran's nuclear sites this month, and Iranian lawmakers voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA which he leads.
On Friday, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on X that 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent.'
Iran has said it believes an IAEA resolution on June 12 that accused Iran of ignoring its nuclear obligations served as an 'excuse' for the 12-day war Israel launched on June 13.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Arab News
an hour ago
- Arab News
Israel steps up Gaza bombardment ahead of White House talks on ceasefire
CAIRO/JERUSALEM: Palestinians in northern Gaza reported one of the worst nights of Israeli bombardment in weeks after the military issued mass evacuation orders on Monday, while Israeli officials were due in Washington for a new ceasefire push by the Trump administration. A day after US President Donald Trump urged an end to the 20-month-old war, a confidant of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was expected at the White House for talks on a Gaza ceasefire, Iran, and possible wider regional diplomatic deals. But on the ground in the Palestinian enclave there was no sign of fighting letting up. 'Explosions never stopped; they bombed schools and homes. It felt like earthquakes,' said Salah, 60, a father of five children, from Gaza City. 'In the news we hear a ceasefire is near, on the ground we see death and we hear explosions.' Israeli tanks pushed into the eastern areas of Zeitoun suburb in Gaza City and shelled several areas in the north, while aircraft bombed at least four schools after ordering hundreds of families sheltering inside to leave, residents said. At least 38 people were killed in Israeli strikes on Monday, health authorities said, including 10 people killed in Zeitoun and at least 13 killed southwest of Gaza City. Medics said most of the 13 were hit by gunfire, but residents also reported an airstrike. The Israeli military said it struck militant targets in northern Gaza, including command and control centers, after taking steps to mitigate the risk of harming civilians. There was no immediate word from Israel on the reported casualties southwest of Gaza City. The heavy bombardment followed new evacuation orders to vast areas in the north, where Israeli forces had operated before and left behind wide-scale destruction. The military ordered people there to head south, saying that it planned to fight Hamas militants operating in northern Gaza, including in the heart of Gaza City. NEXT STEPS A day after Trump called to 'Make the deal in Gaza, get the hostages back,' Israel's strategic affairs minister Ron Dermer, a confidant of Netanyahu's, was expected on Monday at the White House for talks on Iran and Gaza, an Israeli official said. In Israel, Netanyahu's security cabinet was expected to convene to discuss the next steps in Gaza. On Friday, Israel's military chief said the present ground operation was close to having achieved its goals, and on Sunday, Netanyahu said new opportunities had opened up for recovering the hostages, 20 of whom are believed to still be alive. Palestinian and Egyptian sources with knowledge of the latest ceasefire efforts said that mediators Qatar and Egypt have stepped up their contacts with the two warring sides, but that no date has been set yet for a new round of truce talks. A Hamas official said that progress depends on Israel changing its position and agreeing to end the war and withdraw from Gaza. Israel says it can end the war only when Hamas is disarmed and dismantled. Hamas refuses to lay down its arms. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said that Israel has agreed to a US-proposed 60-day ceasefire and hostage deal, and put the onus on Hamas. 'Israel is serious in its will to reach a hostage deal and ceasefire in Gaza,' Saar told reporters in Jerusalem. Austrian Foreign Minister Beate Meinl-Reisinger, speaking in Jerusalem on Monday alongside her Israeli counterpart, told reporters that Vienna was very concerned about the humanitarian situation in Gaza, which she described as 'unbearable.' 'Let me be frank, the suffering of civilians is increasingly burdening Israel's relations with Europe. A ceasefire must be agreed upon,' she said, calling for the unconditional release of hostages by Hamas and for Israel to allow the uninterrupted flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. Israel says it continues to allow aid into Gaza and accuses Hamas of stealing it. The group denies that accusation and says Israel uses hunger as a weapon against the Gaza population. The US has proposed a 60-day ceasefire and the release of half the hostages in exchange for Palestinian prisoners and the remains of other Palestinians. Hamas would release the remaining hostages as part of a deal that guarantees ending the war. The war began when Hamas fighters stormed into Israel on October 7 2023, killed 1,200 people, most of them civilians, and took 251 hostages back to Gaza in a surprise attack that led to Israel's single deadliest day. Israel's subsequent military assault has killed more than 56,000 Palestinians, most of them civilians, according to the Gaza health ministry, displaced almost the whole 2.3 million population and plunged the enclave into a humanitarian crisis. More than 80 percent of the territory is now an Israeli-militarized zone or under displacement orders, according to the United Nations.


Arab News
2 hours ago
- Arab News
If Israel cannot stand alone, why do we let it?
The Israeli genocide in Gaza, along with the escalating regional wars it has ignited, has brought two chilling truths into focus: first, Israel is deliberately and aggressively undermining the security and stability of the entire Middle East and, second, Israel is utterly incapable of surviving on its own. These two assertions, though seemingly distinct, are inextricably linked. For, if those who relentlessly sustain Israel — militarily, politically and economically — were to finally withdraw their support, the Middle East would not be the powder keg it has been for decades, a situation that has catastrophically worsened since Oct. 7, 2023. Though no oversimplification is intended, the brutal reality is that all it would take is for Israel to withdraw from Gaza, allowing the devastated, genocide-stricken Strip the faintest chance to heal. More than 56,000 Palestinians, including some 17,000 children, have been brutally slaughtered since the commencement of this war, a horrifying tally that is expected to surge dramatically when comprehensive investigations into the missing are finally conducted. Only then could the process of returning to some semblance of normality begin, where the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people must be fiercely championed within an international system built, at least theoretically, on unwavering respect for basic human rights and international law. The abhorrent 'might makes right' maxim would have to be utterly expunged from any future political equation. Middle Eastern countries, both Arab and Muslim, must rise to the occasion, stepping up decisively to aid their brethren and to ensure that Israel is powerless to divide their ranks. For Israel, this demand is simply impossible, a nonstarter — and understandably so from its colonial perspective. Why? There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse Dr. Ramzy Baroud 'Invasion is a structure, not an event,' the influential scholar Patrick Wolfe famously asserted. This profound statement unequivocally means that Israel's wars — commencing with the ethnic cleansing of Palestine during the Nakba of 1948 and through all subsequent wars and military occupations — were not random historical coincidences, but rather integral components of an enduring structure of power designed to eliminate the indigenous population. This renders as false the notion that Israel's behavior since Oct. 7 has been solely driven by revenge and is devoid of strategy. We could perhaps be excused for failing to initially grasp this distinction, given the grisly, unspeakable nature of the Israeli actions in Gaza. However, the language emanating from Israel has been chillingly clear about its true motives. As Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared on the day of the Hamas attacks, 'we will turn Gaza into a deserted island.' That has always been an intrinsic, unchanging part of Israel's colonial structure and it will remain so unless it is decisively reined in. But who possesses the will and power to rein in Israel? Israel operates through a network of enablers; benefactors who have long viewed its existence as an indispensable fortress serving the interests of Western colonialism. 'The connection between the Israeli people and the American people is bone deep … We're united in our shared values,' US President Joe Biden declared with striking conviction in July 2022. Without even bothering to question those 'shared values,' which somehow permit Israel to perpetrate a genocide while the US actively sustains it, Biden was undeniably honest in his stark depiction that the relationship between the two countries transcends mere politics. Other Western leaders blindly parrot the same lines. The unfolding genocide, however, has spurred some Western — and a multitude of non-Western — governments to courageously speak out against the Israeli war and Netanyahu and his extremist ideology in unprecedented ways. For some of these countries, notably Spain, Norway, Ireland and Slovenia, the proverbial 'bond' is demonstrably 'breakable' and their support is most certainly not 'unequivocal.' There are various theories as to why some Western governments dare to challenge Israel, while others stubbornly refuse. That important discussion aside, shattering the bond between Israel and the West is critical, not only for a just peace to finally prevail, but for the very survival of the Palestinian people. Governments like that of Spain are doing what many had thought was not possible only a few years ago Dr. Ramzy Baroud The nearly 21 agonizing months of unrelenting Israeli genocide have taught us a brutal lesson: Israel is a vassal state, utterly unable to fight its own wars, defend itself or even sustain its own economy without the direct and massive support of the US and others. Prior to the war, there were occasional outbursts from Israeli officials proclaiming that Israel was an independent country, not 'another star on the US flag.' These voices have largely been silenced, replaced by a constant stream of begging and pleading for the US to come to Israel's rescue. While Palestinians continue to stand with legendary courage to resist the Israeli military occupation and apartheid, those who genuinely care about international law, justice and peace must take decisive action by directly confronting governments that persist in helping Israel sustain its genocide in Gaza and destabilization of the Middle East. Governments like that of Spain are doing what many had thought was not possible only a few years ago. Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez is powerfully advocating for the suspension of the EU-Israel Association Agreement, an extensive trade deal that has been in place since 2000, due to 'the catastrophic situation of genocide.' If more governments were willing to adopt a similar, uncompromising stance, Israel would be choked off, at least from acquiring the weapons it uses to carry out its barbaric genocide. It is our collective responsibility to march in lockstep behind such courageous voices and demand uncompromising accountability, not only from Israel but also from those who are actively sustaining its settler-colonial structure.


Al Arabiya
2 hours ago
- Al Arabiya
Iran decries ‘destructive' conduct by IAEA chief
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian told his French counterpart Emmanuel Macron that Tehran halted cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog due to what he called the agency chief's 'destructive' behavior towards the Islamic republic, his office said Monday. 'The action taken by parliament members... is a natural response to the unjustified, unconstructive, and destructive conduct of the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency,' Pezeshkian told Macron in a phone call late Sunday, according to a presidency statement.