Iran strikes Israeli stock exchange building in Tel Aviv; Watch video
— qudsn (@qudsn)
(You can now subscribe to our
(You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel
Iranian missile strikes on Thursday hit multiple locations across Israel, including Tel Aviv and Be'er Sheva, with damage reported at the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange building, according to Al Jazeera and other local media.The building has been 'extensively damaged' after Iran fired dozens of ballistic missiles.This also comes after the Iranian strikes damaged a main hospital in southern Israel. Furthermore, Israel's Magen David Adom rescue service said Thursday that at least 32 people were injured following Iran's latest missile strikes.(More to come)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
24 minutes ago
- India Today
This Gulf War will Boomerang
Aap chronology samajhiye! Donald Trump, chasing a Nobel Peace Prize, is striking out. His buddy Vladimir Putin won't pause the Ukraine rumble, and Trump's claim of brokering an India-Pakistan ceasefire has more holes than a sieve. The only takers? Pakistan's military brass and the political leadership under their thumb, whose backsides were saved by the deal. Trump even coaxed their self-styled Field Marshal Asim Munir to nominate him for the Nobel, bribing him with a White House lunch. No selfies allowed, mind desperate Trump saw a chance to play peacemaker in Oman, where US and Iranian officials were set to negotiate on Sunday. Trump attempted to pre-empt Benjamin Netanyahu by striking a deal or something like it. Trump wanted to bolster his Nobel intentions, Tehran wanted to buy more time. Benjamin Netanyahu, fearing the lust for a 'deal' could jeopardise his plan trumped Trump. On Friday, Bibi set off the fireworks, hurling missiles at Iran. Trump, after a toddler-level tantrum, is now cheerleading for Bibi's war on Truth Social, while Netanyahu boasts of delivering a crushing defeat to Iran's mullahs. Newsflash: the only thing they're crushing is their own paracetamol stash, because this war is a headache with no or not, this war has two objectives: 1. Eliminate or severely degrade Iran's nuclear Regime change. Ayatollah out, a puppet years, Iran's been repeating about wiping Israel off the map. Israel, watching Iran's centrifuges, is convinced the mullahs are one tip away from a nuclear bomb. Tehran swears it's just brewing kesar tea in Qom. Netanyahu, well-versed in Persian promises, went for a bomb-now, talk-never plan. The US, after some grumbling, has joined the fireworks, with bunker-busters likely raining by the weekend. Iran's enriched uranium stash is buried deep in Qom's mountains. Israel's week-long bombing has scratched the surface, maybe pushing Iran's weapons programme back a decade. The damage to its nuclear sites is widespread yet only superficial. Not dead by a long shot. Even if the Fordow and Natanz stock goes bust, the Iranian regime will be back and this time for the bang. The so-called peaceful nuclear programme will fast-forward to bomb mode with a vengeance. Unless the regime brings us to Objective No. 2: Regime the missiles, Tehran's youth were regularly taking to the streets to chants of 'Marg bar Khamenei' or Death to Khamenei. Often risking their life and freedom. Now, Israel's bombs have united Iranians under the flag. They hate the mullahs and the IRGC, but you can't bomb people into loving the US or Israel. The regime, wobbly last week, is now strutting like a peacock in the monsoon. Even if the US and Israel eliminate the Ayatollah, a new turbaned cleric will walk in, same Shiacracy, different regime change requires boots on the ground, which the US, scarred from Iraq and Afghanistan, knows is like signing up for a never-ending soap. Only bloody and 10 body bags per Pakistan, the US's dodgy dost with a PhD in two-timing. Trump rolled out the red carpet for Asim Munir, who has just had a wholesome lunch at the White House, wondering how to pitch this to his awaam. Pakistan is a circus: its textbooks teach kids to hate Jews and Hindus with the zeal of a cricket fan. The Hindu bit softens over shared sanjha chulha stories in Punjab, but Israel? Zero love. Munir's already slipping intel to the US while texting 'solidarity, Islami biraadar' to Iran. If Trump demands more than just bases, read men and not just material, Munir is in deeper doo-doo than a Kanpur cow in a downpour. Trump's entire campaign was 'no boots, ever,' and his MAGA fans are already crying 'betrayal'. Iran is not even a flat desert like Iraq. It's more mountainous than Afghanistan. Boots on the ground has a very fat chance and if that happens, a slim chance of exiting without humiliation. Remember, Kabul in August 2021?advertisementHere's how this will most likely end: this war is a boomerang with worse aim than a drunk dart player. Iran, bruised and battered, will rise like a phoenix with a grudge. The mullahs, glowing with patriotic fervour, will flip their 'peaceful' nuclear programme to 'bomb mode' faster than Trump orders a burger and Diet Coke. Israel's pre-emptive strike will have handed Iran a reason to go full kaboom. The US? Stuck in another Middle East mess, with Trump tweeting 'tremendous victories' while the Pentagon hunts for an 'exit ramp'. There is a visible lack of coordination between Israel and the US, especially their leaders. This script has no endgame. And even if there is one, a war of attrition seldom follows the script. This war, like every misadventure from Kabul to Baghdad, is a masterclass in shooting your own foot while aiming for the moon.(Kamlesh Singh, a columnist and satirist, is director of news with India Today Digital)(Views expressed in this piece are those of the author)Tune InMust Watch
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
How India's disavowal of SCO statement signals a new realism in global politics
— Amit Kumar and John Harrison As the Israel-Iran conflict rages on, India has distanced itself from the statement issued by the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) last week, condemning Israel's military strikes on Iran. As one of the most influential members of the SCO, currently chaired by China, India dissociated itself from the statement and said it didn't even participate in the discussion. This diplomatic friction within the 10-member bloc is more than a technical disagreement. It poses a critical question: What does the SCO's statement criticising Israel reveal about China, and what does India's quick withdrawal from it indicate about global politics? The answer opens a window into the dynamics of rising powers, shifting alliances, and the strategic contest to control not just geography, but global narratives. At first glance, the SCO's intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict might seem like a bold assertion of a regional security body stepping up to global relevance. But the deeper context matters. The Israel-Iran relationship has long been defined by hostility, espionage, and proxy warfare. Israel's strikes on June 13, deep into Iranian territory, marked a dangerous escalation in a conflict that often teeters on the edge of a regional war. But why would the SCO – a forum traditionally focused on Central Asian stability and counterterrorism – involve itself in the conflict so visibly? The answer lies in the bloc's new composition, particularly the recent inclusion of Iran as a full member, and more fundamentally, in the growing centrality of China within it. What looks like a gesture of support for a fellow member is, more subtly, a reflection of the SCO's transformation into a geopolitical lever for Chinese diplomacy. By positioning the SCO as a moral counterbalance to Western-aligned military action, it looks like China is seeking to extend the SCO's relevance far beyond its founding mandate. This pivot also suggests that China is attempting to redefine the normative language of international conduct, one that seemingly aligns less with UN charters or US-led alliances and more with a China-centric worldview that selectively invokes sovereignty, non-intervention, and regional stability based on who benefits from the narrative. Behind the SCO's statement lies a bold, if underappreciated, strategy. China is no longer content to merely participate in global forums. It is repurposing them. By mobilising the SCO to speak collectively against Israel, China was not just defending Iran; rather it was testing a model of bloc-based legitimacy that could challenge Western diplomatic hegemony. The symbolism was potent – a group representing over 40 per cent of the world's population speaking in unison against a close US ally. This messaging also marks a subtle recalibration of China's non-interference doctrine. Beijing is no longer sitting on the fence when its strategic partners are involved. Whether by abstaining from condemning the October 7 Hamas attacks or by amplifying Iranian grievances through multilateral forums, China is beginning to act with strategic asymmetry. It remains non-confrontational with the West on its own borders, yet assertive when it comes to Western partners in volatile regions like West Asia. Such moves reveal China's attempt to build a moral alternative to US exceptionalism, not by mimicking Western institutions, but by gradually bending others, like the SCO, into ideological alignment. Through carefully orchestrated diplomatic theater, China is reshaping the perception of who holds the moral high ground, casting itself as a defender of sovereignty and stability against Western chaos. India's prompt disavowal of the SCO statement was neither accidental nor reactionary. It was a calibrated act of diplomatic insulation – a move designed to protect its carefully balanced relationships with both Iran and Israel, while also signalling its discomfort with China's dominance over the SCO's voice. In doing so, India reaffirmed a principle that is becoming the hallmark of its foreign policy in the multipolar age: alignment without entanglement. What makes India's move even more significant is its context within the global narrative competition. China may have tried to portray the SCO condemnation as reflective of a broader anti-Israel, implicitly anti-Western consensus, and India, had it stayed silent, would have been passively co-opted into that message. But India's refusal disrupted the choreography. It showed that multilateralism, in a world of self-confident middle powers, can no longer be orchestrated so easily. Moreover, India's action speaks to a subtle transformation in its global identity. It no longer sees itself as a bridge between East and West, nor as a swing state, but as a sovereign power center shaping its own trajectory in the global order. In distancing itself from the SCO statement, India is rather projecting a future in which it refuses to let other powers define its strategic posture, even within forums it has co-founded or supports. The incident reveals more than a disagreement between two members of a regional bloc. It exposes the tectonic shifts in global governance. China's attempt to manufacture a diplomatic consensus through the SCO is emblematic of a broader ambition. It seeks to build a non-Western geopolitical ecosystem where legitimacy flows from shared grievance, not shared values. In this system, countries like Iran find a voice not because of shared vision, but because of shared opposition to the US-led order. At the same time, India's dissent points to a new realism in global politics. Multipolarity is not about blocs competing with one another. It is about a growing number of states refusing to be defined by any bloc at all. India's stance implies that true global influence now depends on agility, narrative independence, and the ability to defy both Western and Eastern orthodoxy. If China's rise is defined by the repurposing of institutions like the SCO into ideological tools, India's ascent is marked by its refusal to be absorbed into any ideological project, not of its own making. This divergence in strategy, one building a club of allies, the other cultivating freedom of motion, may well define the contours of the coming global order. In trying to turn the SCO into a stage for its foreign policy theatre, China revealed both its growing capabilities and its limitations. While it may script the lines, not all actors will follow. India's silent refusal to play the part it was assigned shows that even in the age of emerging powers, autonomy, not alignment, remains the highest currency of diplomacy. India's disavowal of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation statement on Israel's attack against Iran reaffirmed a principle that is becoming the hallmark of its foreign policy in the multipolar age: alignment without entanglement. Comment. Critically examine the aims and objectives of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. What importance does it hold for India? By positioning the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation as a moral counterbalance to Western-aligned military action, is China seeking to extend the bloc's relevance far beyond its founding mandate? Multipolarity is not about blocs competing with one another. It is about a growing number of states refusing to be defined by any bloc at all. Explain with examples. Virus of Conflict is affecting the functioning of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation; In the light of the above statement point out the role of India in mitigating the problems. (Amit Kumar is a PhD candidate at the Birla Institute of Technology & Science, Pilani, Rajasthan, India. Dr. John Harrison is an Associate Professor at Rabdan Academy, specialising in homeland security.) Share your thoughts and ideas on UPSC Special articles with Subscribe to our UPSC newsletter and stay updated with the news cues from the past week. Stay updated with the latest UPSC articles by joining our Telegram channel – IndianExpress UPSC Hub, and follow us on Instagram and X.
Hindustan Times
25 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India to begin evacuating citizens wishing to leave Israel
New Delhi: India announced on Thursday that it will begin evacuating Indian nationals who want to leave Israel in view of the clashes with Iran, with arrangements being made for them to leave via land borders because of airspace restrictions. The evacuation of Indians from Israel will be done under Operation Sindhu, initially launched by the Indian government on Wednesday for getting Indian citizens in Iran to safety. 'In view of the recent developments between Israel and Iran, the Government of India has decided to evacuate from Israel those Indian nationals who wish to leave,' the external affairs ministry said in a statement. 'Their travel from Israel to India will be facilitated through the land borders and thereafter by air to India,' the statement added. This is being done in view of airspace restrictions over Israel since the clashes with Iran erupted over the past weekend. The Indian embassy in Tel Aviv will be responsible for arrangements for evacuating the Indians. All Indian nationals in Israel were requested to register with the embassy in Tel Aviv. The embassy has also set up a 24x7 control room to assist the Indians. The Indian embassy reiterated its earlier advisories urging Indian citizens in Israel to remain vigilant and strictly follow safety guidelines issued by Israeli authorities and the Home Front Command. The number of Indians in Israel has swelled to more than 32,000 in recent months as Israeli authorities stepped up the recruitment of blue collar workers, primarily for the construction sector, to replace Palestinian labour. Indian workers, including care-givers and professionals, are spread across Israel. The Indian government accords the highest priority to the safety and security of Indian nationals and will continue monitoring the situation closely. 'The embassy remains continuously in touch with the community with a view to extending all feasible assistance,' the statement said. There have been no reports so far of casualties among the Indian nationals in Israel. A few Indian students in Tehran were injured earlier this week when an Israeli air strike hit a students dormitory. Hostilities between Israel and Iran continued for the seventh day, with Iranian missiles hitting four sites in central and southern Israel, including Soroka hospital, while Israeli forces attacked Iran's Arak heavy water reactor. Iran launched some 20 ballistic missiles at Israel on Thursday. Israeli defence minister Israel Katz has said that 'eliminating' Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is one of his country's objectives.
