Containerized SAM System That Fires Soviet Air-To-Air Missiles For Ukraine Breaks Cover
We now have our first look at the containerized Gravehawk surface-to-air missile system, which uses repurposed Soviet-era heat-seeking R-73 air-to-air missiles as interceptors, that the United Kingdom and Denmark have developed for Ukraine. Gravehawk is the latest in a series of what have become commonly referred to as 'FrankenSAMs,' which leverage existing capabilities within the Ukrainian armed forces' arsenal to help rapidly provide badly needed additional air defenses.
Forces News in the United Kingdom was first to publish the pictures and video of Gravehawk, and to report on additional details about the system and its development. British authorities first disclosed the existence of the Gravehawk project in January, but provided only limited information and no visuals at that time.
The slightly mad scientists at the UK MOD have revealed the Gravehawk surface-to-air missile system for Ukrainian service. The entire SAM system fits in a standard shipping container, carries a pair of converted R-73 AAMs, and can be quickly deployed off the back of a flatbed. pic.twitter.com/BTF0b7LjCg
— OSINTtechnical (@Osinttechnical) February 12, 2025
It took a U.K. Ministry of Defense element called Taskforce Kindred and an unspecified group of private contractors approximately 18 months and six million pounds (almost $7.5 million based on the rate of conversion at the time of writing) to develop Gravehawk, according to Forces News. The unit cost is around one million pounds ($1.24 million). The entire system fits inside a modified ISO shipping container with a retractable roof. Two Gravehawks have been delivered to Ukraine to date and have already been used in combat, and the country is set to eventually get 15 more of them.
Forces News' report indicates that Gravehawk is intended to be emplaced on the ground before use, and it is unclear if it can be employed while it is still on the back of a truck. An eight-wheeled Leyland DAF truck equipped with the Demountable Rack Offload and Pickup System (DROPS) capable of relatively quickly loading and unloading containers is seen alongside Gravehawk in the imagery that has now been released.
When it comes to targeting, Gravehawk has a retractable sensor system containing at least one infrared camera that is used to spot and track targets, and cue the R-73 missiles to them, per Forces News. The main fire control unit fits inside a Pelican-like case as seen below.
As TWZ has previously written about the R-73, also known to NATO as the AA-11 Archer:
'The R-73, in air-launched form, has a maximum range of 18.6 miles against a head-on target of 8.7 miles against a tail-on target. A ground-launched application would have reduced range since the missile wouldn't benefit from the speed and altitude parameters of the launch aircraft. In this case, it's perhaps more relevant to look at the seeker range of the R-73, which would remain broadly the same for ground launch: 6.2-7.5 miles.'
…
'The R-73 is a high-off-boresight (HOBS) weapon, with a seeker that can articulate in any direction much farther than a traditional heat-seeking air-to-air missile with a fixed non-HOBS seeker that stares directly forward. Aided by a helmet-mounted sight, the Archer can be launched in air-to-air engagements against targets with off-boresight angles of +/-75 degrees. This gives the R-73 the potential to be a particularly potent, albeit improvised threat for locking onto and engaging dynamic targets with minimal assisting sensors when used in a surface-launched form.'
R-73's HOBS seeker looks to be particularly important in this case given that Gravehawk's launch rails otherwise offer a fixed field of fire.
There is also a clear relationship between Gravehawk and another FrankenSAM the United Kingdom previously supplied to Ukraine that uses the AIM-132 Advanced Short-Range Air-to-Air Missile (ASRAAM) as its interceptor and that was mounted on a 6×6 Supacat High Mobility Transporter (HMT). Both systems notably appear to use similar, if not identical sensor systems.
Though not necessarily as mobile as the Supacat-based system, Gravehawk's containerized nature does still offer considerable flexibility when it comes to positioning and repositioning it. It also has the benefit of being less obvious as a valuable air defense system while on the move than other types in Ukrainian service.
Gravehawk's development is said to have been prompted largely by Russian long-range kamikaze drones and cruise missile threats, which could also point more to static employment defending critical infrastructure. The system is also said to be capable of engaging fixed-wing aircraft and helicopters. Bolster Ukraine's air defenses, in general, has been a key focus of the country's Western partner for years now. Earlier on in the conflict, there were concerns that the Ukrainian military's stock of surface-to-air missiles for its existing Soviet-era air defense systems would run dry.
The passive nature of the Gravehawk's infrared sensors means that it is not vulnerable to detection by Russian electronic warfare systems, unlike surface-to-air missile systems that rely on active radars. That also means they are unlikely to show up in any electronic order of battle of Ukrainian defenses used for route planning for drone and cruise missile attacks.
There is a question of how deep Ukraine's stocks of R-73s, which also arm its MiG-29 Fulcrum and Su-27 Flanker fighters, might be, but the missiles have already been in growing use in the surface-to-air role. In addition to Gravehawk, Ukraine has already fielded modified 9K33 Osa (NATO designation SA-8 Gecko) wheeled air defense vehicles armed with these missiles instead of their usual 9M33 interceptors. The Ukrainian military also has R-73-armed uncrewed surface vessels (USV). Whether or not Gravehawk could be adapted to fire other missiles like the aforementioned AIM-132 or U.S.-made AIM-9 Sidewinders, which Ukraine has also received for air-to-air and surface-to-air use, is unclear.
It's also worth noting here that the conflict in Ukraine is not the first time we've seen R-73s and other Soviet-era air-to-air missiles adapted for the air-to-air role. Iranian-backed Houthi militants in Yemen did so years ago.
Interestingly, 'the Ukrainians initially didn't want Gravehawk, instead they wanted more air-to-air missiles and F-16 Fighting Falcons,' according to Forces News. 'But having seen it in action they are now apparently sold on it – and want lots more.'
Gravehawk's emergence does now come amid newly serious questions about the future of foreign military assistance for Ukraine, especially from the United States. President Donald Trump said today that he will start negotiations to end the conflict with Russia's President Vladimir Putin. At the latest gathering of the multi-national Ukraine Defense Contact Group earlier today, U.S. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also said Ukraine's desire to regain territory Russia has occupied since 2014 is unrealistic, as are its ambitions for NATO membership.
European partners like the United Kingdom look set to be even more important for Ukraine in the near future. The U.K. Ministry of Defense's initial disclosure of Gravehawk came as part of an announcement of an additional 4.5 billion pounds ($5.6 billion) in planned military aid for Ukrainian Forces this year.
With Gravehawk already combat-proven, a growing number of them look set to be valuable additions to Ukraine's air defense arsenal and that will allow the country to make expanded use of R-73 missile stockpiles in the surface-to-air role.
Contact the author: joe@twz.com

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
8 hours ago
- Business Insider
Trump signs Executive Order intended to ‘strengthen the nation's cybersecurity'
President Donald Trump signed an Executive Order to strengthen the nation's cybersecurity by 'focusing on critical protections against foreign cyber threats and enhancing secure technology practices,' the White House announced. The Order 'amends problematic elements of Obama and Biden-era Executive Orders' and directs the Federal government to advance secure software development, the White House stated. Publicly traded companies in the cybersecurity space include Check Point (CHKP), CrowdStrike (CRWD), CyberArk (CYBR), F5 Networks (FFIV), Fortinet (FTNT), Gen Digital (GEN), Okta (OKTA), Palo Alto Networks (PANW) and Qualys (QLYS). Companies working in the quantum computing space include D-Wave Quantum (QBTS), Quantum (QMCO), Rigetti Computing (RGTI), Sealsq (LAES), Quantum Computing (QUBT) and Honeywell (HON). Confident Investing Starts Here:


USA Today
9 hours ago
- USA Today
Toyota's EV evolution: Three new models are coming to redefine the brand
Toyota's EV evolution: Three new models are coming to redefine the brand Show Caption Hide Caption Self-driving tech coming to personally owned vehicles Waymo & Toyota have announced a partnership to co-develop autonomous vehicle platforms, aiming to integrate Waymo's self-driving technology into Toyota's POV's. Cheddar The vehicles are an overdue response to critics who said Toyota was hostile to electric vehicles. 3 new EVs are the Lexus ES, the Toyota bZ Woodland and the Toyota CH-R. Toyota showcased the upcoming vehicles in May at its North American HQ in Plano, Texas. Critics who believed Toyota would remain a perpetual EV laggard are about to be proven wrong. The world's largest automaker was slow to begin its deployment of electric vehicles, but it's a legendarily fast follower. Toyota measures twice and cuts once, and the cutting just began. Toyota and Lexus brands will make up for lost ground with three new EVs slated for sale in the United States this year and next ― Lexus ES, Toyota bZ Woodland and Toyota CH-R. That's on top of major upgrades to the pair it already sells here, the lackluster Toyota bZ4X, now badged the bZ, and Lexus RZ. What took them so long The vehicles are an overdue response to critics who said Toyota was hostile to electric vehicles. Company statements praising the hybrids it specialized in at the expense of EVs fostered that impression, even suggesting the two related and complementary technologies were somehow at odds. They're not, and the spin toward hybrids understandably infuriated environmental groups who had been among Toyota's biggest supporters as the automaker popularized the fuel-saving technology in the early 2000s. EV updates: Toyota's electric vehicle is about to get a major upgrade. Here's why it could use one It was dizzying to hear the automaker that rode the Prius to global leadership cast as an environmental villain. The disappointing 2023 bZ4X, Toyota's first mass-produced EV, fueled arguments that Toyota only talked a good environmental game. My recent drive of a 2026 bZ ― Toyota dropped the "4X" for model year 2026 ― proved Toyota took the criticism seriously, reworking its drivetrain and other systems with unusual haste. Toyota's seldom the first with a new technology. Its reputation for quality and durability rests on continually refining proven systems, not being first to market. It's unlikely Toyota's upcoming burst of EVs will break much new ground, but it'd be a shock if they don't work pretty much as advertised, first time and every time. Toyota's not an early adopter. The millions of people who buy its vehicles don't want it to be. Toyota's unprecedented EV rollout Toyota showcased the upcoming vehicles in May at its North American HQ in Plano, Texas. I drove the bZ there and expect to drive all of them, over the next few months. I'll report on them as it happens. Prices for all the vehicles will be announced closer to when sales begin. All should come with Tesla-style NACS charging ports. Until then, here's what we know by model: 2026 Toyota bZ Renamed and vastly improved from its predecessor ― the 2022-25 bZ4X ― this compact SUV now has competitive range and power. Key facts: On sale this fall Maximum range increases 25% to 314 miles Power increase more than 50% to 338 hp Faster New lights and body-color exterior trim salvage what had been a cluttered appearance 2026 bZ Woodland A midsize SUV developed alongside the nearly identical Subaru Trailseeker, the Woodland shares its architecture with the bZ, but is about is about 6 inches longer. We can hope it doesn't share the Subie's cloying slogan: Powered by love. Key facts: On sale early 2026 Standard all-wheel drive 375 hp Up to 260 miles range 8.3 inches of ground clearance 3,500-pound towing capacity 2026 Toyota CH-R The sporty little 2026 CH-R revives the name of an oddly styled little SUV, but graces it with looks reminiscent of the bigger Toyota Crown Signia hybrid. A compact, expect it to fit between the bZ and Woodland. With its arrival, the Toyota brand will have entries in three key vehicle segments. The new CH-R aims to be Toyota's first sporty EV, promising 0-60 mph in about 5 seconds. Key facts: On sale in 2026 338 hp 290-mile range 74.7 kWh battery 2026 Lexus RZ Lexus' first EV, the midsize RZ, gets updates in line with the bZ. A bigger battery increases range, new motors boost power, and charging speed improves. It will also be the first Lexus EV to have a model in the brand's performance sub-brand, F Sport. The RX 550e F Sport will reach 60 mph in 4.1 seconds. Key facts: On sale this fall Up to 402 hp 300-mile range Bigger battery 'M Mode' mimics a manual transmission, via paddle shifters More shade from glass roof 2026 Lexus ES Lexus' popular midsize sedan gets the biggest changes in its history, moving to a new architecture that supports both EVs and hybrids. The car is longer, wider and taller than the current ES. The sleek ES is by far the brand's best looking sedan ever, embodying the Lexus theme: 'Experience elegance and electrified sedan.' The 2026 ES raises two immediate questions: Will there be a plug-in hybrid? Does the ES foreshadow an EV version of the next-generation Camry? Key facts: On sale in 2026 Front- and all-wheel drive 338 hp from ES 500e Up to 300-mile range 0-60 mph 5.4 seconds Contact Mark Phelan: mmphelan@ Follow him on Twitter @mark_phelan. Read more on autos and sign up for our autos newsletter. Become a subscriber.

Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Polling on Elon Musk Is a Warning for Republicans
Donald Trump says he issurprised and disappointed with Elon Musk over the messy public meltdown of their partnership. He also should be wary. It's not Musk's ownership of one of the most influential social media platforms that should give the president pause. Nor is it the billionaire tech mogul's status as the world's richest man, with a recent history of bankrolling Republican causes. It's Musk's stratospheric popularity with the Republican base, as revealed in the polls. Musk is not about to overtake Trump himself as the dominant figure in the party, to be clear. But the jilted former 'special government employee' is uniquely suited to become a chaos agent who could terrorize the GOP — potentially wreaking havoc on Trump's legislative agenda and the party's midterm election plans. Musk's tenure leading the Department of Government Efficiency captured the GOP's imagination, even if it ended ingloriously. While Democrats and independents quickly soured on Musk's leadership, Republicans are still enthralled. In the most recentEconomist/YouGov Poll, 76 percent of Republicans viewed Musk favorably, compared to just 18 percent who viewed him unfavorably. A late AprilNew York Times/Siena College poll placed his favorability rating among Republicans at 77 percent. Despite the furor over his slashing budgetary cuts, the scrutiny for DOGE's secretive approach and the criticism for failing to deliver on his initial promises of $1 or $2 trillion in savings, Musk's popularity with the GOP base has stayed fairly consistent. That may change after Musk's scorched earth break-up with Trump, but the odds aren't great. Musk's standing within the GOP has remained remarkably high since the beginning of the Trump administration — over 70 percent in most polls. That makes him far more popular than House Speaker Mike Johnson, Senate Majority Leader John Thune and almost everyone else in the party. The only national Republicans more popular than Musk? Trump and his vice president, JD Vance. Trump's approval rating within the party is 87 percent, according to the Economist/YouGov poll. Vance'sfavorability rating is 80 percent. In part, that's because the grassroots have beendeep believers in Musk's DOGE mission from the start. Nearly 90 percent of the party supports cutting the size of government. A similar share believes DOGE has beeneffective at cutting government spending, reports a recent Harvard-Harris poll. (Democrats and independents are far more skeptical of DOGE's accomplishments, and of Musk himself. The Economist/YouGov poll reports just 15 percent of Democrats and 34 percent of independents view him favorably). The Trump-era GOP is a party where staffers feel free to publicly attack principals, where elected officials regularly attack each other for deviations from MAGA orthodoxy and where the unofficial mantra is Trump's 'fight, fight, fight.' Yet for days after Musk's initial broadsides against the 'big, beautiful bill,' no one — not even Trump, who's known for nuking even the mildest of critics — laid a glove on Musk. The silence was a tacit acknowledgement of a new apex predator in the political and media ecosystem, a Godzilla to Trump's King Kong. The stature accorded by Musk's DOGE portfolio, its alignment with traditional Republican values surrounding government spending and budget deficit reduction, his limitless wealth and social media megaphone make him a uniquely dangerous rival, not just for Trump but for the party as a whole. He is partWilliam Hearst and partHoward Hughes, not so much a threat to win the party's affection from Trump as he is a potential bomb that could blow up the party's plans. Musk boasts his own base of support that exists outside traditional partisan boundaries, particularly marked by the parasocial relationship young men have with him. That makes him a danger to the fragile coalition Republicans relied on in 2024. The president still retains his party's loyalty and deep affection. But Musk knows MAGA's pressure points. He's been in the room where MAGA happened, on stage at the rallies, present for the Cabinet dog-and-pony shows. The old axiom about never picking fights with those who buy ink by the barrel applies here: It's a bad idea to feud with a tycoon who can not only deplatform you, but trash you to his220 million followers. There are limits to Musk's reach — his bruising, polarizing run atop DOGE made him a pariah on the left and a political liability in a general election context. But his ability to dominate the attention economy makes him uniquely suited to upend Trump's agenda on Capitol Hill and Republican efforts to hold on to Congress in 2026. Like Trump, Musk learned fast about politics. When he embarked on his crusade to sink the sweeping tax-cut package, he recognized the precise language to employ to cut through the noise and provoke a reaction from the GOP base — 'a disgusting abomination,' he called it, '[a] massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' Musk also knew exactly how to trigger the president. He picked at the impeachment scab, suggested Trump couldn't have won the White House without his help and predicted Trump's tariffs will cause a recession. Musk went straight for the jugular by suggesting the president's name appears in records of the investigation into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein; of course, it's already public that Trump and others have been referenced in court documents related to the case and Trump has not been accused of wrongdoing. But Musk fueled the GOP base's penchant for conspiracy theories by claiming records 'have not been made public.' It's a page ripped straight out of Trump's playbook, timed to perfection just as MAGA adherents are growing restless with the Justice Department over its failure to deliver evidence of 'deep state' involvement in one of the leading conspiracies animating the far right. Musk also managed to roll a grenade into the Capitol, where he's already underminedGOP congressional leadership by blasting them by name, and emboldened hardliners who were likely to be steamrolled. His potential for mischief remains considerableeven in the event of a personal truce with Trump since the megabill, if it passes the Senate, still must make it back through the House. If it seems like the GOP cavalry has been slow to aid Trump so far, that's because Musk strikes fear into officeholders who can easily envision him funding primary challenges and hounding them on social media. And it's not just the individual electeds who have cause for concern. Musk on Thursday floated the idea of creating a new political party 'that actually represents the 80% in the middle' in an online X poll. In less than 24 hours, more than 5 million votes had been cast.