
'Serious' accident at North Korea warship launch: State media
A major accident occurred at the launch ceremony for a new North Korean naval destroyer, state media reported Thursday, with leader Kim Jong Un calling the mishap a "criminal act".
At a ceremony to launch a new 5,000-ton vessel in the eastern port city of Chongjin on Wednesday "a serious accident occurred", the official Korean Central News Agency (KCNA) said.
South Korea's military said North Korea also fired "multiple unidentified cruise missiles" on Thursday, which were detected near the North's South Hamgyong province after being "fired toward the East Sea", also known as the Sea of Japan.
Blaming "inexperienced command and operational carelessness" for the destroyer's botched launch — which was observed by Kim — KCNA said there was a mishap which left "some sections of the warship's bottom crushed".
It said the accident managed to "destroy the balance of the warship".
Kim watched the entire incident and declared it a "criminal act caused by absolute carelessness", warning it "could not be tolerated".
He said the "irresponsible errors" of officials responsible would be "dealt with at the plenary meeting of the Party Central Committee to be convened next month".
South Korea's military said US and Seoul intelligence authorities assess that North Korea's "side-launch attempt" of the ship failed.
"The side-launch method used in this case is no longer employed by South Korea's military," Lee Sung-jun, spokesperson for the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters.
The vessel is currently listing in the water, Lee said, and based on its size and scale, it is believed to be similarly equipped to the 5,000-ton destroyer-class warship Choe Hyon, which North Korea unveiled last month.
Last month, Pyongyang's state media ran images of Kim attending a launching ceremony of Choe Hyon with his daughter Ju Ae, considered by many experts to be his likely successor.
North Korea claimed the vessel was equipped with the "most powerful weapons", and that it would "enter into operation early next year".
Some analysts said the ship could be equipped with short-range tactical missiles capable of carrying nuclear warheads — although North Korea has not proven it has the ability to miniaturise its atomic arsenal.
Russian connection?
The South Korean military has said the Choe Hyon could have been developed with Russian help — possibly in exchange for Pyongyang deploying thousands of troops to help Moscow fight Ukraine.
Ahn Chan-il, a defector-turned-researcher who runs the World Institute for North Korea Studies, said the warship involved in Wednesday's accident may have also been constructed with Russian assistance.
Chongjin, the North Korean city where the launch ceremony was held, is close to Russia's Vladivostok port, he noted.
"It's also likely that the projected timeline for the vessel — including when assembly would be completed and the ship launched — was shared with the Russian side," he told AFP.
"It appears the dock was hastily constructed, and multiple issues may have arisen during the shipbuilding process.
"With today's announcement, Pyongyang seems to be signalling not only to its own people, but also to the Russian side."
Strengthening the navy
North Korea confirmed in April for the first time that it had deployed troops to Russia to support Moscow in the Ukraine war.
Moscow and Pyongyang recently announced that they had started building the first road bridge linking the two countries.
North Korea also launched a flurry of ballistic missiles last year in violation of UN sanctions.
In March, Kim inspected a project to build a nuclear-powered submarine, asserting that "radically" boosting the navy was a key part of Pyongyang's defensive strategy.
Kim called at the time for the modernisation of the country's surface and underwater naval forces, including the development of warships.
Pyongyang has previously claimed to be developing underwater nuclear attack drones, which could unleash a "radioactive tsunami", but analysts have questioned whether it actually has such a weapon.
Washington — Seoul's key security ally — has in recent years ramped up joint military exercises and increased the presence of strategic US assets in the region to deter the North, such as an aircraft carrier and a nuclear-powered submarine.
Pyongyang has repeatedly declared itself an "irreversible" nuclear weapons state and routinely denounces joint US-South Korea drills as rehearsals for invasion.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Khaleej Times
a day ago
- Khaleej Times
Germany to boost military by up to 60,000 troops under new Nato targets
Germany needs up to 60,000 additional troops under new Nato targets for weapons and personnel, Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said on Thursday, as the alliance beefs up its forces to respond to what it sees as an increased threat from Russia. "We are stepping up to our responsibility as Europe's largest economy," Pistorius told reporters ahead of a meeting with his Nato counterparts in Brussels that signed off on the new targets. The fresh demands are tailored to the alliance's new defence plans - thousands of pages of secret documents drawn up for the first time since the end of the Cold War — that detail how allied forces would respond to a Russian attack on Nato. Translating these plans into the military tools needed, Nato found severe shortfalls in various areas - ranging from large formations of combat-ready ground troops to long-range weapons, sufficient ammunition stockpiles and secure communications. Pointing to the secret nature of the targets, Nato chief Mark Rutte only gave a rough outline of the gaps the alliance seeks to plug. "We have to invest in our air defence systems, we have to invest in our long-range missiles, we have to invest in our manoeuvrable land-formations, command and control systems - all of this has to happen," Rutte told reporters, adding that all this would require huge investments. In total, the Bundeswehr, Germany's armed forces, will need roughly 50,000 to 60,000 additional active soldiers across all branches of the military, said Pistorius. This would put the future strength of Germany's armed forces at between 250,000 and 260,000 troops. BIG CHALLENGE Last week, Reuters reported that Nato would ask Germany to provide seven more army brigades alone, or some 40,000 troops. Sources, who all spoke on condition of anonymity, put the target for the total number of brigades that Natoallies will have to provide in future at between 120 and 130, a hike of some 50% from the current target of around 80 brigades. Recruiting tens of thousands of extra troops will be a big challenge for Berlin, however, and will likely spark a fresh debate on whether conscription - suspended in 2011 - should be reintroduced. The Bundeswehr has not yet met a target of 203,000 troops set in 2018, and is currently short-staffed by some 20,000 regular troops, according to defence ministry data. Pistorius said the government would be faced with the question of whether the voluntary military service it aims to introduce will be sufficient to fill the Bundeswehr's ranks. Still, he warned that the military currently could not absorb a larger number of conscripts due to a lack of barracks and trainers. "Until we have such capacities, we'll have a voluntary service - and maybe beyond that if we are an attractive employer and win enough young men and women for the military who agree to serve for a longer time."


The National
2 days ago
- The National
Best photos of June 5: From new Indian recruits in Kashmir to dawn prayers on Mount Arafat
• Increase defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027 but given 'turbulent times it may be necessary to go faster' • Prioritise a shift towards working with AI and autonomous systems • Invest in the resilience of military space systems. • Number of active reserves should be increased by 20% • More F-35 fighter jets required in the next decade • New 'hybrid Navy' with AUKUS submarines and autonomous vessels


The National
2 days ago
- The National
Red Cross booth at AI defence conference offers stark reminder of technology's potential threat to civilians
The exhibition booth for the International Committee for the Red Cross at the AI+ military defence conference in Washington definitely stands out – that's the whole point. 'When technology makes it into a battlefield, it's going to have consequences,' Jonathan Horowitz, legal adviser to the Red Cross, said at the ICRC 's exhibit, which focused on the potential problems in the use of artificial intelligence conflicts. The ICRC's booth at the Walter E Washington Convention Centre was surrounded by exhibits from some of the world's most influential companies with US military defence contracts, along with other entities from around the world. Palantir, Lockheed Martin, Booz Allen Hamilton, Google and Microsoft all had a large presence at the AI+ event. The three-day conference was organised by the Special Competitive Studies Project, which describes itself as a group that 'seeks to recapture the competitive mindset and unifying national mission from past eras, and then adapt them to the age of AI and 21st-century strategic rivalry'. Proponents of AI on the battlefield say that it can help minimise casualties and enhance capabilities, but critics say the technology is far from perfect, missing nuances that get lost in the fog of war and often including developers' biases. Critics also point out that the fast-developing implementations of AI in military landscapes have the potential to disregard international standards. "Just because technology is new doesn't mean you can use it in unconstrained ways," Mr Horowitz said. "We want to remind people here what those rules are, and you can find the rules in the Geneva Conventions, in international humanitarian law." He said that while the ICRC is concerned about the use of AI in war, it also sees its potential in improving the lives of civilians amid conflict. "It could give militaries better awareness of where hospitals or critical infrastructure are located, and with that knowledge militaries should know not to attack those locations," he explained. Yet the concern raised in recent months is that once AI platforms are handed over to various militaries, there's little accountability for how they're used. Microsoft recently carried out an internal review in response to recent accusations that its AI technology was being used to harm civilians in the war in Gaza. While it found "no evidence" its products were being used in such a way by the Israeli military, it pointed out the potential for the software and platforms to be used on highly secure, independent military networks of militaries, limiting the company's investigation. The company is not alone in facing criticism over how its AI technology is used. Alphabet-owned Google, Scale AI and Palantir have faced similar accusations. At the AI+ conference, demonstrators echoed concerns over the potential harm the technology poses to civilians, particularly in Gaza, with protesters interrupting various speeches and panel discussions. Mr Horowitz added that in the months ahead, ICRC will continue working to "solve the puzzle" with AI and militaries to "for the embedment of civilians, who often are the ones that suffer the most in armed conflict." "We include a new set of recommendations on AI decision support systems and the top of our priorities is the need to retain human control and judgment within those systems," Mr Horowitz said of the ICRC's updated guidance on the technology. The organisation recently submitted its AI military recommendations to the UN Secretary General. In that document, the ICRC expresses concern about the use of AI in automatic weapon systems along with the implementation of AI to expedite military decision-making. It also seeks to raise awareness about the potential for AI to increase the speed at which misinformation and disinformation spreads, potentially contributing to and even encouraging violence. "This submission is intended to support states in ensuring that military applications of AI comply with existing legal frameworks and, where necessary, in identifying areas where additional legal, policy or operational measures may be required," the document concludes.