logo
A Tufts student was on her way to dinner with friends. Then an ICE officer in disguise detained her

A Tufts student was on her way to dinner with friends. Then an ICE officer in disguise detained her

Independent27-03-2025

Rumeysa Ozturk was on her way to an Iftar dinner to break Ramadan fast with her friends when a man in a black hooded sweatshirt approached her and grabbed her wrists. She screamed.
Another man in a ball cap and hooded sweatshirt then walked behind her, pulling out a badge from under his hoodie before grabbing Ozturk's phone from her hand.
Other plain-clothes agents surrounded her with neck gaiters covering their faces, according to footage of her arrest near her apartment in Massachusetts. Of the six agents who surrounded her, all but one wore masks.
'Can I just call the cops?' she can be heard saying.
'We are the police,' one agent said before removing her backpack and placing her in handcuffs.
Her arrest — captured in full view of a surveillance camera on March 25 — has sent chills among student activists and civil rights groups after a string of similar incidents targeting international students for their Palestinian advocacy.
Who is Rumeysa Ozturk?
Ozturk is a student at Tuft University's doctoral program for Child Study and Human Development. She graduated with a master's degree from the Teachers College at Columbia University, according to her LinkedIn.
'I am passionate about researching children's and adolescents' digital media and technologies for caring, kind, and compassionate media environments,' she writes. 'As an interdisciplinary media researcher and developmental scientist in training, I research children's and adolescents' positive development in a media-embedded, globalized, and connected world.'
A profile from Columbia's Teachers College says her research interests include 'representation in children's television, media literacy, and prosocial development.'
She also co-founded an independent children's media initiative in Istanbul and, in her free time, she enjoys 'reading picture books, hiking, baking (without recipes), and binge-watching cartoons and animations.'
'My graduate studies ... have been rewarding not only by providing a strong foundation in developmental science but also because it initiated the beginnings of friendships with a wonderful team of colloquies and international friends,' she said at the time. 'I will always remember the inspiration, innovation, and a shared passion for education and child development that surrounded me at Teachers College.'
Last year, in response to Israel 's ongoing devastation of Gaza, Ozturk co-authored an op-ed in The Tufts Daily newspaper calling on the university to divest from companies with direct or indirect ties to Israel in an effort to hold Israel accountable 'for clear violations of international law.'
'Credible accusations against Israel include accounts of deliberate starvation and indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians and plausible genocide,' the op-ed says.
The op-ed was written by four students and endorsed by 32 others.
Ozturk is among dozens of students and professors identified by Canary Mission, a pro-Israel campaign that maintains a database intended to blacklist and intimidate activists the group accuses of promoting 'hatred of the USA, Israel and Jews.' The op-ed appears to be the group's only alleged evidence against her.
Canary Mission appeared to take credit for her arrest on March 27, writing that 'sources point to her Canary Mission profile as the primary cause.'
A statement from the Department of Homeland Security claimed Ozturk 'engaged in activities in support of Hamas ' — designated as a terrorist group behind the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that sparked its retaliatory campaign in Gaza — but did not provide evidence of the allegations against her.
'Rumeysa has been my student, colleague, friend for over a decade,' Northeastern University psychologist Reyyan Bilge wrote. '[D]oes not carry a hateful bone in her body let alone being antisemitic. I wholeheartedly vouch for her and unless we speak up, these horrific events will continue to happen!'
Ozturk's attorney filed a petition of habeas corpus challenging her arrest and detention. Massachusetts District Judge Indira Talwani gave federal officials until Friday to respond to the complaint, and Ozturk cannot be moved outside the state without at least 48 hours of advance notice to the court, according to Talwani's order.
Her attorney Mahsa Khanbabai told The Independent on March 26 that she did not know where she was.
By that night, despite a court order preventing her removal from the state, Ozturk was sent to a detention facility in Louisiana.
The Independent has requested comment from ICE.
Trump's 'disappearance' of international students
Ozturk's arrest follows similar actions from federal authorities targeting student activists and students who have merely spoken in support of Palestine, none of whom have been accused of committing any crime. Donald Trump 's administration has zeroed in on campus activism at prestigious universities, where Israel's war in Gaza has provoked a wave of demonstrations and protest encampments demanding an end to U.S. support for Israel's devastation.
In an email to the Tufts community following her arrest, university president Sunil Kumar said the school was informed her visa had been revoked.
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrew Joy Campbell called the footage of Ozturk's arrest 'disturbing.'
'Based on what we now know, it is alarming that the federal administration chose to ambush and detain her, apparently targeting a law-abiding individual because of her political views,' she said. 'This isn't public safety, it's intimidation that will, and should, be closely scrutinized in court.'
The state's congressional delegation has also condemned the arrest and demanded Ozturk's release from detention.
'This arrest is the latest in an alarming pattern to stifle civil liberties,' Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren said in a statement. 'The Trump administration is targeting students with legal status and ripping people out of their communities without due process. This is an attack on our Constitution and basic freedoms — and we will push back.'
Senator Ed Markey said 'disappearances like these are part of Trump's all-out assault on our basic freedoms.'
'This is authoritarianism, and we will not let this stand,' he said.
Democratic Rep. Ayanna Pressley, whose district includes Tufts campus, called Ozturk a 'peaceful protestor, grad student [and] my constituent who has a right to free speech [and] due process.'
'Now she's a political prisoner,' Pressley said. 'Free her now.'
Democratic Rep. Jake Auchincloss said while he disagrees with Ozturk's op-ed, he has also been allowed to share his opposing view. 'That's how America works,' he wrote. 'Revoking her visa because of her political viewpoint is not how America works.'
Warnings of a 'climate of fear and repression' against free speech
Press freedom groups have also sounded alarms over the administration's apparent collaboration with activist groups to target First Amendment -protected speech.
'Efforts to deport students based on their speech or protected activism undermine America's commitment to free expression,' Tyler Coward, lead counsel for government affairs for the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, told The Independent. 'If ICE detained Ozturk based on her op-ed or activism, it's a worrying escalation in an already fraught environment for college students here on student visas.'
If Ozturk was arrested solely because of the op-ed, 'it is absolutely appalling,' said Seth Stern, director of advocacy for the Freedom of the Press Foundation.'
'No one would have ever believed, even during [Trump's] first term, that masked federal agents would abduct students from American universities for criticizing U.S. allies in student newspapers,' he said. 'Anyone with any regard whatsoever for the Constitution should recognize how fundamentally at odds this is with our values and should be deeply repulsed as an American, regardless of political leanings. Canary Mission is aptly named — it may serve as the canary in the coal mine for the First Amendment.'
On March 25, university professors and academic organizations from across the country filed a lawsuit accusing the Trump administration of violating the First Amendment through a 'climate of fear and repression' on college campuses.
'Out of fear that they might be arrested and deported for lawful expression and association, some noncitizen students and faculty have stopped attending public protests or resigned from campus groups that engage in political advocacy,' according to the lawsuit.
That same day, a federal judge in Manhattan blocked the Trump administration from deporting Yunseo Chung, a Columbia University student and lawful permanent resident who was the victim of the government's 'shocking overreach,' vilifying her political views and constitutionally protected right to protest, according to her attorneys.
Columbia graduate Mahmoud Khalil, a lawful permanent resident and prominent student activist accused by the Trump administration of organizing 'pro- Hamas ' attacks on campus, is currently battling his removal from the United States after his shocking arrest in front of his wife, a U.S. citizen who is eight months pregnant. He has also not been charged with any crime.
He is currently detained in Louisiana as his case moves jurisdictions to a federal court in New Jersey.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Live Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' over its nuclear programme
Live Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' over its nuclear programme

Telegraph

time42 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Live Israel ‘ready to strike Iran' over its nuclear programme

Israel is considering launching a military strike against Iran in the coming days without American support, Western officials say. The officials said fears of either no deal or a weak deal between Donald Trump and the Islamic Republic to curtail its nuclear programme had forced Israeli strategists to consider a unilateral attack against Tehran. It comes as the UN nuclear watchdog's board of governors found that Iran had broken its non-proliferation agreement for the first time in 20 years. The governors demanded Iran provide answers 'without delay' in a long-running investigation into uranium traces found at several locations that Tehran has failed to declare as nuclear sites. In response to the ruling, the Islamic Republic said it had no choice but to respond by establishing a new enrichment facility in a 'secure location'. A senior Iranian official told Reuters that Tehran will not abandon its right to uranium enrichment because of mounting frictions in the region, adding that a 'friendly' country had alerted Tehran over a potential military strike by Israel.

Bid to dissolve Israeli parliament defeated in vote
Bid to dissolve Israeli parliament defeated in vote

BreakingNews.ie

timean hour ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Bid to dissolve Israeli parliament defeated in vote

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's government survived an attempt to dissolve parliament early on Thursday. Most of Mr Netanyahu's ultra-Orthodox coalition partners joined him in voting against a Bill that would have forced them to register for military service while the country is at war. Advertisement The vote was the most serious challenge to the government since the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, the biggest security failure in Israel's history and the trigger for the ongoing war in Gaza. The Bill's failure means no other Bill to dissolve Knesset can be submitted for at least six months, shoring up Mr Netanyahu's embattled coalition. The ultra-Orthodox parties are furious that the government has failed to pass a law exempting their community from mandatory military service. Ultra-Orthodox Jewish men block a highway during a protest against army recruitment in Bnei Brak, Israel (Leo Correa/AP/PA) The issue has long divided the Jewish Israeli public, especially during the 20-month war in the Gaza Strip. Advertisement Israel's opposition had hoped the public anger over the exemptions would help topple the government. But just two of the 18 ultra-Orthodox members of the Knesset, Israel's parliament, supported the bill to dissolve. Most Haredi MKs agreed to vote against the bill after foreign affairs and defence committee chairman Yuli Edelstein said he and the ultra-Orthodox parties had reached an understanding on the basis of a new draft law, which they will continue discussing over the coming week. Military service is mandatory for most Jews in Israel but the politically powerful ultra-Orthodox, who make up roughly 13% of Israeli society, have traditionally received exemptions if they are studying full-time in religious seminaries. The ultra-Orthodox, also known as Haredim, or 'God-fearing' in Hebrew, say that integrating into the army threatens their traditional way of life. Advertisement Each year, roughly 13,000 ultra-Orthodox men reach the conscription age of 18, but less than 10% enlist, according to parliament's state control committee, which held a hearing examining the issue. Israel is engaged in the longest active war in the country's history, which has stretched its military to the breaking point. The Haredim's widespread refusal to serve, and threats to topple the government during war-time, have enraged many Israelis, especially those who have served multiple rounds of reserve duty.

The two-state solution is a delusion
The two-state solution is a delusion

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

The two-state solution is a delusion

Next week, the United Nations is convening a high-level conference to discuss the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine. One might assume that, in the face of Israel's ongoing starvation and carnage in Gaza, states are gathering to mount a decisive, coordinated response to force Israel to cease fire and allow aid into the strip. They are not. Instead, the global community is assembling to revive the tired framework of the two-state solution, with some states perhaps opting for the mostly symbolic gesture of recognizing a Palestinian state. Co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, the convening parties reaffirm the idea that the two-state solution is 'the only viable path to just, lasting and comprehensive peace'. But France itself has reportedly backed away from its plan to recognize a Palestinian state even before the conference began. The two-state solution has become little more than a diplomatic theater, an incantation repeated with no intention, even according to its most passionate supporters. As Palestinians are undergoing a genocide in Gaza – a characterization now in near consensus among legal and genocide experts – the revival of the two-state language reads like a smokescreen. Last year, amid a crescendo in calls for the two-state solution, Israel approved the largest land theft in the West Bank in over three decades, further fragmenting the occupied territory and obliterating any meaningful prospect for a sovereign Palestinian state in it. The two-state solution has not only become detached from reality, but for too long steered the discussion away from reality itself. This is not an isolated development. Since the launch of the so-called peace process in the mid-1990s, Israeli settlements, always expanding and always with settler violence, have multiplied at breakneck speed, rather than the opposite. Just last month, Israel approved a plan for 22 new settlements in the West Bank. These decades of settlement expansion and de facto annexation have effectively gutted any viable basis for the two-state paradigm, even according to its own metrics. The truth is that the two-state solution has become a delusion – a mantra repeated to mask an entrenched one-state reality. From the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, Israel controls the lives of all Palestinians, without equal rights, without equal representation, and with a system built to preserve Jewish supremacy. This system has long constituted apartheid, now affirmed as such by the international court of justice for violating prohibitions on racial segregation and the crime of apartheid. And yet the two-state delusion persists. This mantra continues to prop up the illusion that Israeli occupation is on the brink of ending – if only more states recognize the Palestinian state and if only Palestinians and Israelis would just sit down and talk. But three decades of so-called peace negotiations have yielded nothing but deeper entrenchment of Israeli occupation, systematic land theft and escalating subjugation of Palestinians. Despite this, most states – including the unelected Palestinian Authority – cling to the two-state delusion as if it were around the corner, and as if it could finally deliver justice and peace. It won't. It's time for the international community to confront the simple truth: the two-state solution is not just a fantasy – it has always been a misdiagnosis. If world leaders are serious about resolving the question of Palestine, they must abandon failed frameworks and confront root causes. That begins with the Nakba. Arabic for 'catastrophe', the Nakba refers to the process culminating in 1948, when Zionist militias displaced more than 750,000 Palestinians from their homes and destroyed more than 530 Palestinian villages to establish the state of Israel. But 77 years later, it's clear the Nakba was not just an event – it was the instantiation of a new structure. Put simply, the Nakba never came to an end. The 1948 Nakba inaugurated a regime that continues to destroy, fragment and reconfigure Palestinian life. It is a process premised on ongoing displacement and dispossession. But that is not all. Today, what may be called the Nakba regime not only sustains the world's longest refugee crisis since the second world war, but it also stratifies Palestinians into a legal caste system: citizens of Israel, residents of Jerusalem, West Bankers, Gazans and refugees – each subject to a different kind of violence, all designed to obstruct Palestinian self-determination. A reckoning with the Nakba is long overdue. It brings to the surface vital and unresolved legal, moral and historical questions: the status of lands conquered in 1948, the right of return for refugees, the inferior status of Palestinian citizens of Israel and the universal right of Palestinians to self-determination, regardless of where they live or what legal category they fall into. For decades, world governments have dodged these questions in favor of two-state delusions. But progress demands clarity, not just comfortable mantras. In protests, people often chant, 'No justice, no peace' – a reminder that these concepts are not synonymous. In Palestine, this slogan speaks to a deeper truth: with or without statehood, the Palestinian cause will endure if its origins are not addressed. Reckoning with the Nakba is a prerequisite for justice, let alone peace. Until states face this basic premise – and act on it – the reality on the ground will continue to defy any high-level diplomatic gathering. The two-state solution will remain what it has always been: a delusion. Rabea Eghbariah is a human rights lawyer and a doctoral candidate at Harvard Law School

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store