Liberals at risk of losing South Australian marginal seat of Sturt: Exit poll
The Liberal Party is at risk of losing the blue-ribbon South Australian electorate of Sturt, early exclusive exit polling has revealed.
Liberal incumbent James Stevens secured 37.8 per cent of the primary vote in the poll conducted by NewsWire, which asked 193 voters across three booths how they marked their first preference vote.
Labor challenger Claire Clutterham nabbed 71 votes, or 36.8 per cent of the vote, and Greens candidate Katie McCusker secured 30 votes, or 15.5 per cent.
Independent candidate Verity Cooper scored 12 votes, or 6.2 per cent of the vote, One Nation contender Peter Bogatec secured five votes, or 2.6 per cent of the vote and Family First candidate Joshua Mervin won two votes, or 1 per cent of the vote.
Mr Stevens' first preference vote share in the poll marks a five-point fall from his 2022 performance, where he secured 43.1 per cent of primary votes.
His Labor challenger in 2022 secured 30.7 per cent of first preferences.
Mr Stevens holds Sturt with a tight 0.5 per cent margin, and if there is a fall in his first preference vote share on election night, he could lose the seat to Labor.
The Liberals have held the seat, which covers Adelaide's eastern suburbs to the Adelaide Hills, since 1972, and it was previously held by former Coalition defence minister Christopher Pyne.
The sample size of the exit poll, however, is small, and the poll took in just three booths: The Glynde Lutheran Church, Campbelltown Uniting Church and the Kensington RSL.
The poll also assumes voters told the truth when responding to how they marked their ballot paper.
And Australia's preferential system of voting means a poll of first preferences only offers an indication of the possible final outcome.
Francis Ajo, speaking with NewsWire at the Campbelltown Uniting Church booth, said he shifted his vote from Liberal to Labor.
'I used to be a Liberal but I've changed for this election,' Mr Ajo said.
'Labor has been very consistent in their messaging and their campaign, about what they would like to do.
'Whereas the Liberals, every week seems to be a different policy.
'Their policies have to be more consistent. Not just jump from one to another,' he said.
Former foreign minister Alexander Downer, speaking with NewsWire at the Kensington RSL booth, said the election had failed to 'excite the imagination' of the Australian public.
'The parties are offering them benefits on borrowed money, but they are not talking a lot about how they are going to stop prices rising,' Mr Downer said.
'I think in every political contest. It should be a contest of ideas. And this election, it hasn't really come across as much more than a managerial debate, manage the place better than you do.
Nothing much has happened that has inspired the public.'
All major opinion polls point to the return of a minority or majority Labor government.
Mr Downer expressed confidence the Liberal Party could rebuild, even if it suffered a defeat on Saturday night.
'They were in power for nine years, then they lost in 2022. It's only three years on.
'It's improbable they would win back in just three years on, and the fact that people are talking about it is a bit of an indictment of the current government.
Father and daughter Jeremy and Hannah Moore voted at the Kensington RSL booth.
Mr Moore voted Labor while Ms Moore voted Greens.
'There is a connection between the Greens and Labor,' Mr Moore said.
'Labor needs the Greens and the Greens need Labor.'
Ms Moore said she voted for the Greens because they were more 'progressive' than Labor.
'They're focused on serious climate action, they are more community focused,' she said.
She said Palestine was also an important factor in her vote for the Greens.
Irene Tolios voted for the Liberals at the Glynde Lutheran Church and said she had done so looking for the closest major party to One Nation and Clive Palmer.
'I want the closest to that opinion,' she said.
Housing was a central issue for her, she said, and expressed alarm on the impact of immigration on available housing stock.
'I've just come from the rental market and it's very tough,' she said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves
Defence industry Specialist Brent Clark says it is not unusual for governments to do reviews of defence partnerships. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's upcoming review of the AUKUS security partnership. 'Quite clearly, Australian companies would be concerned about the review; however, I think it is important to not let ourselves get ahead of where we are right now,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an unusual event for governments to do reviews. 'I would think that the Trump administration would be remiss if they actually weren't doing the review into AUKUS.'

Sydney Morning Herald
7 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin
It would appear as through Parnell McGuinness (' JD Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong ', June 8) and similar-minded conservative commentators such as Sky News After Dark, are continuing on their ideologically driven warpaths oblivious to the voice of the Australian people as expressed in the May 3 election. While these media darlings of the right still want to rant and rave and feed each other's egos with negativity, doom and gloom, the great mass of Australians are getting on with life, comfortable with their government which is safe, stable, secure and focused on traditional Australian positive values of a fair go, kindness and friendliness. To become relevant again and play a meaningful role in modern Australia, the right-wing media needs to jettison these antagonistic Trump-like approaches which were clearly rejected by the Australian people. Warren Marks, Richmond (Tas) Parnell Palme McGuinness warns against the suppression of ideas, quoting the US vice president's controversial advice to the Munich Security Conference in February that 'governments must listen to and respect their citizens'. However, she, like JD Vance, can't resist cherry-picking just which ideas and citizen groups are worthy of respect. She uses the case of the phrase 'identified as' being currently questioned and 'no longer [deemed] acceptable' by some activists, as an example of 'groups trying to control public conversation'. But is this really a 'kind of slippery censorship', or just the progression of an idea so it more accurately conveys the lived experience of a group? Wasn't JD Vance's speech realistically more of an attempt to control? It's a shame Palme McGuinness sabotages her own argument, adopts the culture war cover, and portrays progressive ideas as threats. Everyone counts, Parnell. Kerrie Wehbe, Blacktown EVs not for me After 60 years of driving, I recently explored the hybrid option (' The sweet spot: How to get the most out of your super and the pension', June 8). I currently drive a diesel SUV, and being a self-funded retiree, I receive no government pension. I spend about $100 per fortnight on fuel. The hybrid currently comes with no spare wheel and no tow-bar, which I need to tow my boat. The changeover figure is $12,000 in the dealer's favour. The cost of a one-off tow-bar is an extra $2000, and a spare wheel costs a couple of hundred more. That equates to about six years' driving if I continue to use diesel. There is no government incentive for me to change. Free rego for all EV-driving retirees might sway me. I think I will stay with my diesel as I am not that green. David Sayers, Gwandalan Undeserved reward This just brings discredit to the whole honours system (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', June 8). The highest honours go to those who have already achieved a higher role in society, often just for doing what that job requires. Isn't achieving that position (and the salary that goes with it) reward enough? Meanwhile, those who make a real sacrifice and give true service to others might receive a lower honour (when nominated), if any at all. In the case of the honour given to Scott Morrison, one hopes that it is primarily because most ex-PMs have historically received a similar award. Otherwise, it wouldn't seem to be merited. The citation says it's for 'his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal'. Doesn't that come with the job of being PM? His role in the pandemic overlooks the refusal to require those already wealthy to pay back JobKeeper payments for which they were ultimately found to be ineligible, the 'stroll-out' of vaccines, and the needless antagonism of China over the pandemic's origins (which damaged Australia's trade). And the value of the AUKUS deal remains questionable. And then there are the multiple ministries, robo-debt, claims to not hold a hose, and statements that women protesters were lucky not to be shot. I predict that this will prompt many other letters to the editor.

Sky News AU
8 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'