Rocky Mountain Chocolate: Fiscal Q4 Earnings Snapshot
DURANGO, Colo. (AP) — DURANGO, Colo. (AP) — Rocky Mountain Chocolate Factory Inc. (RMCF) on Tuesday reported a loss of $2.9 million in its fiscal fourth quarter.
On a per-share basis, the Durango, Colorado-based company said it had a loss of 37 cents.
The confectionery producer and retailer posted revenue of $8.9 million in the period.
_____
This story was generated by Automated Insights (http://automatedinsights.com/ap) using data from Zacks Investment Research. Access a Zacks stock report on RMCF at https://www.zacks.com/ap/RMCF
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
'We have to dismantle a 40-year-old supply chain': Toy company appeals to the Supreme Court over Trump's tariffs
Two toy companies are asking the Supreme Court to hear their tariff lawsuit before lower courts do. Two courts have ruled the tariffs illegal in separate cases on different grounds. The CEO of a plaintiff company says his company is facing an emergency and "time is of the essence." President Donald Trump's tariffs may face their final fate at the Supreme Court soon. Two Illinois-based educational toy companies filed an emergency request Tuesday asking the Supreme Court to take up their case as soon as possible, rather than letting it continue to play out in lower courts since "it will inevitably fall to this Court to resolve it definitively." Toy companies Learning Resources and hand2mind filed an initial suit on April 22, challenging Trump's use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act to impose tariffs without going through Congress. "For months, we've had dozens of people working full-time or part-time on addressing all aspects of the tariffs — you can hardly imagine anything more disruptive," Rick Woldenberg, CEO of Learning Resources, told Business Insider. "This is an emergency, and so time is of the essence." The IEEPA tariffs have thus far been ruled unlawful by both the US District Court in the District of Columbia and the Court of International Trade on different grounds in separate lawsuits, including Woldenberg's case filed in Washington, DC. But in both instances, the Court of Appeals has stayed the injunction on the tariffs. "In light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims, challenges to the IEEPA tariffs cannot await the normal appellate process," wrote Pratik A. Shah, the lawyer for the case, in the petition to the Supreme Court. Learning Resources and hand2mind are not the only businesses to have sued over Trump's tariffs. At least two similar lawsuits, one from a small women-owned business in Florida and the other from five owner-run businesses across various states, are facing similar court proceedings. Neither has thus far appealed to the Supreme Court, as their cases are also stayed by federal appeals courts. The lawsuits share the common argument that Trump has overstepped his authority by imposing tariffs under IEEPA, a law they said does not give the president unilateral power to impose trade duties. The toy companies are specifically suing over Trump's 10% baseline tariff on most imports and an additional 20% tariff on Chinese goods, which the president said were responses to national security concerns and drug trafficking. "There are no rules, we don't know what our costs are, and we are generally given 36 hours of advance notice to change how we operate our business," Woldenberg said. "We have to dismantle a 40-year-old supply chain. There are tremendous amounts of costs associated with that which are not recoverable in any way, shape, or form." It is uncommon for the Supreme Court to intervene before a lower court rules, and the Court's next term starts in October. Data show businesses and consumers are feeling the impacts of the tariffs. In the month of May, retail and food services sales faced a larger drop than economists had expected, down 0.9% compared to April. The National Association of Home Builders Housing Market Index also shows worse sentiment for June than Bloomberg experts had expected, at just 32 points. A score above 50 is generally considered a favorable outlook on home sales. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comments. Read the original article on Business Insider Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
US toy retailers grapple with effects of trump's tariffs
US toy retailers are facing mounting challenges as the trade tariffs imposed by former President Donald Trump continue to squeeze margins and complicate sourcing strategies. With nearly 80% of toys sold in the United States produced in China, many businesses are reporting delayed shipments, rising costs and even legal action—all as hopes hinge on the expiry of a temporary tariff pause in early July. Retailers are contending with a web of overlapping tariffs on Chinese imports, where duty rates now stack as high as 145% in some cases—far above the 30% headline figure quoted by officials. Smaller toy importers are disproportionately affected, with many forced to increase prices or eat some of the added costs to stay afloat. Alignable reports that over 57% of small retailers expect revenue losses due to this uncertainty. The combination of high tariffs and shifting trade policy has caused substantial supply chain delays. Companies such as Basic Fun! rushed to forward-ship container loads while the tariffs were temporarily reduced from 145% to 30%—an effort that offered short-term relief but failed to eliminate ongoing uncertainty. Multiple firms have also started cutting orders or narrowing their product lines in anticipation of possible disruptions, especially during crucial retail periods like the lead-up to Christmas. Several toymakers have taken legal action against the administration. Learning Resources, an Illinois-based educational toy producer with around 500 employees, has sued the federal government, arguing Trump exceeded his authority under IEEPA in imposing steep tariffs. St Paul's Mischief Toy Store has joined similar litigation claiming the 145% levy is unconstitutional. These challenges follow broader legal rulings, such as a Federal Trade Court decision in late May blocking the so-called 'Liberation Day' tariffs under IEEPA—though that ruling remains stayed during appeal. Meanwhile, larger toy manufacturers are proactively shifting production to countries like Vietnam, India and Indonesia. Major brands such as Mattel, Hasbro and MGA Entertainment have accelerated their transition away from China—MGA, for instance, plans to boost output from alternate sites from around 15% to 40% in the next six months. The current 90-day tariff reduction is set to expire in early July, re-establishing uncertainty for importers who must rapidly adapt or lock in alternative supply chains. Analysts warn that sustained high duties may lead to permanent business closures in the SME sector, reduced innovation capacity and higher prices at the checkout for consumers—especially families with school-age children. With courts mulling the legality of the tariffs and retailers racing to diversify their sourcing, the US toy industry remains on edge. Any extension or change in tariff policy could determine whether small toymakers and independent stores survive the current economic squeeze—or succumb to rising costs and regulatory the shifting tariff landscape with real-time data and market-leading analysis. Request a free demo for GlobalData's Strategic Intelligence . "US toy retailers grapple with effects of trump's tariffs" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas stops providing new funding for border wall construction
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — Texas has stopped putting new money toward building a U.S.-Mexico border wall, shifting course after installing only a fraction of the hundreds of miles of potential barrier that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott set out to construct four years ago. State lawmakers this month approved a new Texas budget that does not include continued funding for the wall, which had been a multibillion-dollar priority for Abbott as part of a sprawling immigration crackdown. He even took the unusual step of soliciting private donations for construction, saying in 2021 that many Americans wanted to help. On Tuesday, Abbott's office said President Donald Trump's aggressive efforts to curb immigration allowed the state to adjust. The halt in funding was first reported by The Texas Tribune. 'Thanks to President Trump's bold leadership, the federal government is finally fulfilling its obligation to secure the southern border and deport criminal illegal immigrants," Abbott spokesman Andrew Mahaleris said. 'Because of these renewed federal assets in Texas, our state can now adjust aspects of state-funded border security efforts.' The state has completed 65 miles (104 kilometers) of border wall since construction began. The Texas border with Mexico is roughly 1,200 miles (1,931 kilometers). The wall has gone up at a slow pace as the state has navigated the drawn-out process of buying private land and confronting local opposition in some places. Abbott announced plans for the wall at a time when large numbers of migrants were showing up at the border, saying in 2021 that he believed a combination of state-owned land and volunteered private property would "yield hundreds of miles to build a border wall.' The number of migrant crossings has fallen dramatically this year. 'There was no need for it in the first place,' said Scott Nicol, a board member for Friends of the Wildlife Corridor, a habitat preservation group in the Rio Grande Valley. He has criticized the wall as ineffective. "The only thing that's changed is the political dynamic,' he said. The new budget approved by Texas lawmakers allocates about $3.4 billion for border security for two years. That amount will not be used to build out new projects for the wall and instead go to the Texas Department of Safety and the Texas National Guard, the main agencies responsible for Operation Lone Star, Abbott's key immigration program launched in 2021 during the Biden administration. The money allocated for border security is nearly half the $6.5 billion that was dedicated to immigration efforts the last time lawmakers earmarked the state budget two years ago. Funds previously allocated for the wall will allow work on it to continue through 2026 and 'will set the federal government up for success,' said Republican Sen. Joan Huffman, the lead budget writer in the state Senate. The agency responsible for constructing the wall has about $2.5 billion remaining in funding to cover up to 85 additional miles (135 additional kilometers) of the wall by 2026, according to a statement made in April by Texas Facilities Commission executive director Mike Novak, whose agency is overseeing construction of the project. 'This wall should have never been built, it's useless,' said Bekah Hinojosa, co-founder of the South Texas Environmental Justice Network. "It divides our community.' ___ Lathan is a corps member for the Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues.
