logo
Who is the artist of Trump portrait in Colorado controversy?

Who is the artist of Trump portrait in Colorado controversy?

The Hill24-03-2025

President Trump doesn't appear to be a fan of Colorado Springs artist Sarah Boardman, or at least her portrait of him hanging in the Colorado Capitol for nearly six years.
Trump trashed the image in a social media post on Sunday as 'truly the worst' and demanded its removal.
'(Boardman) must have lost her talent as she got older,' he added on Truth Social.
British-born Boardman, who is in her 70s, has painted many portraits, including one of President Obama that hangs alongside Trump's in the Colorado Capitol.
According to the biography on her website, she worked in airline travel and business before shifting her focus to art. She began studying at the Wiesbaden Herzfeld School of Art in Germany in 1986, focusing on the techniques of the Old Master Painters.
'Sarah has always been passionate about painting portraits, being particularly intrigued by the depth and character found deeper in her subjects,' her website reads. 'Sarah believes that the ultimate challenge is to capture the 'personality, character and soul' of an individual in a two-dimensional format.'
Boardman didn't immediately respond to The Hill's requests for comment, but she told the Colorado Times Recorder in a 2019 interview that she wanted the portrait to be neutral. In her submission for Colorado's national competition to paint Trump's likeness, she described his expression in her preferred image as 'serious, non-confrontational, thoughtful.'
'The portrait is not designed for just one faction of the population,' she told the Times Recorder while the painting was underway. 'I love painting portraits, and each one brings different challenges and highlights.'
The Colorado Capitol Building Advisory Committee selected Boardman for the job after she presented two Trump sketches and four photos of the president with different expressions and stylistic features, the Times Recorder reported.
The artist described the image in the submission as 'direct and show(ing) confidence, courage and purpose.'
The depiction initially faced backlash from some Colorado Democrats who opposed honoring Trump because of his policies. Boardman acknowledged that portraits often elicit anger 'directed at the subject, not the actual piece of art.'
'There will always be dissent, so pleasing one group will always inflame another,' she said. 'I consider a neutrally thoughtful, and non-confrontational, portrait allows everyone to reach their own conclusions in their own time, in addition to that approach being more durable over time.'
Boardman compared the Democrats' criticism to Republicans' opposition to her painting of Obama when it was first displayed.
'Being president is the qualification for entry into the gallery, and I respect that qualification on face value as I did with the portrait of President Obama,' she said.
Colorado Senate Republicans led the ceremony when the portrait was added to a third-story wall alongside past presidents at the state Capitol in 2019. Boardman later expressed her gratitude online to 'all the dignitaries, staff, donors and visitors who attended and made this a wonderful event!'
'Feeling very grateful for this opportunity,' she wrote.
Republican lawmaker Kevin Grantham, president of the state Senate at the time of the portrait's initial planning, spearheaded an online fundraiser in 2018 to get the $10,000 needed to commission Trump's portrait after the nonprofit Colorado Citizens for Culture was unable to secure donations.
'It's only fitting that a populist, such as the president, would have the first crowd-funded campaign for a presidential portrait,' Grantham said at the time.
Grantham, a Trump supporter who was a member of the advisory committee that picked Boardman for the job, wasn't immediately available to speak with The Hill about Trump's criticism.
During his campaign for reelection in 2024, Trump, who turns 79 in June, sold digital trading cards that featured virile depictions of himself as a cowboy, superhero and astronaut, among other images.
Trump wrote in his Truth Social post Sunday evening that he would rather have no portrait up in the Colorado Capitol than the image currently displayed and claimed that 'many people from Colorado have called and written to complain.'
He blamed Colorado Gov. Jared Polis (D) for issues with the image.
'Nobody likes a bad picture or painting of themselves, but the one in Colorado, in the State Capitol, put up by the Governor, along with all other Presidents, was purposefully distorted to a level that even I, perhaps, have never seen before,' Trump wrote.
Polis, who took office in January 2019, was not governor at the time of the bipartisan group's selection of Boardman and wasn't involved in the portrait's unveiling ceremony.
A Polis spokesperson told The Hill, 'Gov. Polis was surprised to learn the President of the United States is an aficionado of our Colorado State Capitol and its artwork. The State Capitol was completed in 1901, and features Rose Onyx and White Yule Marble mined in Colorado, and includes portraits of former Presidents and former governors. We appreciate the President and everyone's interest in our capitol building and are always looking for any opportunity to improve our visitor experience.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts
4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

USA Today

time27 minutes ago

  • USA Today

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts

4 Social Security changes Washington could make to prevent benefit cuts Show Caption Hide Caption Biden criticizes Trump administration's handling of Social Security Social Security overhaul sparks criticism from Biden over service disruptions, layoffs and automation as Trump defends changes as efficiency. Straight Arrow News Social Security is an important source of income for millions of Americans, but the program has a serious financial problem. Costs have increased faster than revenues in recent years because the aging population is growing more quickly than the working population. As a result, the trust fund, the financial account that pays benefits, is on track to be depleted within a decade. Specifically, the Congressional Budget Office estimates the trust fund will be exhausted in 2034. That would eliminate one source of revenue (i.e., interest earned on trust fund reserves), and the remaining tax revenues would only cover 77% of scheduled payments. That means a 23% benefit cut would be necessary in 2035. Fortunately, the lawmakers in Washington have several years to find a better solution. Here are four Social Security changes that could prevent deep, across-the-board benefit cuts. 1. Apply the Social Security payroll tax to income above $400,000 Social Security is primarily funded by a dedicated payroll tax, which takes 6.2% of wages from workers and employers. But some income is exempt from the payroll tax. Specifically, the maximum taxable earnings limit is $176,100 in 2025. Income above that threshold is not taxed by Social Security. Importantly, the Social Security program is projected to run a $23 trillion deficit over the next 75 years as it's strained by shifting demographics. But the deficit could be slashed by applying the payroll tax to more income. For instance, including income above $400,000 would eliminate 60% of the 75-year funding shortfall, says the University of Maryland. 2. Gradually increase the Social Security payroll tax rate to 6.5% over six years Under current law, the Social Security payroll tax rate is 6.2% for workers and their employers. But gradually raising that figure would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit. For example, increasing thetax rate by 0.05% annually over a six-year period would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. Now that I've discussed two possible changes, let's step back and look at the big picture. There are basically three ways to resolve Social Security's financial problems: (1) increase revenue, (2) reduce costs or (3) some combination of the first two options. The changes discussed so far would increase revenue, but the next two changes would cut benefits. However, they are more subtle cuts than the 23% across-the-board reduction that would follow trust fund depletion. 3. Gradually increase full retirement age to 68 by 2033 Workers are eligible for retirement benefits at age 62, but they are not entitled to their full benefit — also called the primary insurance amount (PIA) — until full retirement age (FRA). Anyone that claims before full retirement age receives a smaller payout, meaning they get less than 100% of their PIA. FRA is currently defined as 67 years old for workers born in 1960 or later, but raising the figure would reduce the long-term deficit. For instance, increasing FRA to 68 years old by 2033, meaning it would apply to workers born in 1965 or later, would eliminate 15% of the 75-year funding shortfall, according to the University of Maryland. 4. Reduce benefits for retired workers with income in the top 20% Social Security benefits are determined as percentages of two bend points. Specifically, income from the 35 highest-paid years of work is adjusted for inflation and converted to a monthly figure called the average indexed monthly earnings (AIME) amount. The AIME is then run through a formula that uses two bend points to determine the PIA for each worker. Modifying the second (highest) bend point would eliminate a portion of the long-term deficit by reducing benefits for high earners. For instance, the University of Maryland estimates that reducing benefits for individuals with income in the top 20% could reduce the 75-year funding deficit by 11%. Here's the big picture: The four changes I've discussed would eliminate 101% of Social Security's $23 trillion funding shortfall, which would prevent across-the-board benefit cuts in 2035. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY. The $23,760 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets"could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. One easy trick could pay you as much as $23,760 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. JoinStock Advisorto learn more about these strategies. View the "Social Security secrets" »

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store