
Trump Says US Intelligence Wrong About Iran Not Building Nuclear Bomb
United States President Donald Trump has said his director of national intelligence was 'wrong' when she testified that Iran was not building a nuclear weapon and that Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had not re-authorised the country's suspended nuclear weapons programme.
The comments come after Trump earlier this week cast doubt on Tulsi Gabbard's March 25 report to Congress, in which she reiterated the US intelligence community's assessment. On Tuesday, Trump told reporters, 'I don't care' that the intelligence community's finding contradicted his own claims, saying Iran was in the late stages of developing a nuclear weapon.
But speaking on Friday, Trump went further.
A reporter asked, 'What intelligence do you have that Iran is building a nuclear weapon? Your intelligence community said they have no evidence.'
The president responded, 'Then my intelligence community is wrong. Who in the intelligence community said that?'
'Your DNI [director of national intelligence], Tulsi Gabbard,' the reporter replied.
'She's wrong,' Trump said.
Gabbard appeared to come to Trump's defence later on Friday.
'America has intelligence that Iran is at the point that it can produce a nuclear weapon within weeks to months, if they decide to finalize the assembly,' she wrote in a social media post. 'President Trump has been clear that can't happen, and I agree.'
However, that statement does not contradict her earlier assessment that Iran is not building a weapon. No known US intelligence assessment concludes that Iran is weaponising its nuclear programme.
It is extremely rare for a US president to openly contradict the country's intelligence community, with critics accusing Trump of flagrantly disregarding evidence to justify potential direct US involvement in the fighting, according to Al Jazeera's senior political analyst Marwan Bishara.
'This is not just one person, one team saying something,' Bishara said. 'It's the entire intelligence community in the United States. That he would dismiss them … it's just astounding.'
Speaking on Friday, Trump also appeared to downplay the prospect of the US brokering a ceasefire agreement between Iran and Israel, saying he 'might' support such a deal, while adding, 'Israel's doing well in terms of war, and I think you would say that Iran is doing less well.'
'It's hard to make that request right now. When someone's winning, it's harder than when they're losing,' he added.
Reporting from Washington, DC, Al Jazeera's Heidi Zhou Castro noted that Trump was 'really making a point that he's not going to make an effort to ask Israel to ease up on its aerial bombing of Iranian targets'.
'It seems that Trump is very squarely on Israel's side as things are progressing, and … it appears that he is not leaning towards the diplomacy route, though, again, he is giving himself that two weeks' time to make a final decision,' she said.
Trump on Thursday said he would take two weeks to decide the US response to the conflict. Experts say the decision would likely be transformative.
The US is seen as one of the few countries with the leverage to pressure Israel to step back from the brink of wider-scale regional war.
At the same time, the involvement of the US military is seen as key to Israel's stated mission of completely dismantling Iran's nuclear programme, which hinges on destroying the underground Fordow enrichment plant.
A successful attack on the facility would require both Washington's 30,000-pound (13,000kg) GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator and the B-2 bombers needed to deliver it.
Speaking to reporters on Friday, Trump also downplayed the potential role of European countries in de-escalating the situation. That came hours after Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi met the top diplomats from France, the UK, Germany and the EU in Geneva.
'Europe is not going to be able to help,' the US president said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Ya Libnan
4 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Iran warns: Any country that supplies Israel with arms is a legitimate target
Iranian Armed Forces Spokesman was quoted as that 'any country that is sending military equipment to Israel is considered as complicit in the aggression and a legitimate target for us' The spokesman for the Khatam al-Anbia Headquarters, affiliated with the Iranian Armed Forces, stated in a televised speech that, 'Based on the intelligence of the Iranian Armed Forces, the aggressive Zionist regime—despite possessing the most modern and expensive air defense systems in the world, and with comprehensive support from the United States—has lost a significant portion of its radar and defensive capabilities as a result of the effective and painful strikes launched by the Iranian Armed Forces' missile and drone units, and is now facing a shortage of ammunition and military equipment.' He noted, 'In this context, we warn that the sending of any military equipment or radar systems by sea or air by any country with the aim of supporting the Zionist regime will be considered as complicity in the aggression against the Islamic Republic of Iran and will be considered a legitimate target for the Islamic Republic's Armed Forces.' This comes as Israeli attacks on Iranian territory continue, while the Iranian Revolutionary Guard has responded to Israel with waves of missiles and drones since June 13. ELNASHRA


Ya Libnan
4 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Israel-Iran war live: ‘No nuclear material' at Iran centrifuge workshop hit by Israel, IAEA says
The UN nuclear watchdog confirmed Saturday that an Israeli strike had hit a centrifuge manufacturing workshop at Iran's Isfahan nuclear site, but said that the attack would have 'no radiological consequences' due to the lack of nuclear material at the site. SUMMARY The Israeli military Saturday said it launched a fresh wave of strikes on Saturday in the area of southern Iran's Bandar Abbas, targeting drones storage sites and a weapons facility. As Israel continues to strike Iran's nuclear facilities and military targets, Foreign Minister Gideon Saar claimed said in an interview that by his country's own assessment, it had 'already delayed for at least two or three years the possibility for them to have a nuclear bomb'.Loud blasts were heard Saturday in the Iranian capital, AFP journalists said, as fighting raged between the two foes for the ninth day. It was not immediately clear whether the blasts heard in central and northern Tehran were the result of incoming Israeli strikes or Iranian air defence fire. Loud blasts were heard Saturday in the Iranian capital, AFP journalists said, as fighting raged between the two foes for the ninth day. It was not immediately clear whether the blasts heard in central and northern Tehran were the result of incoming Israeli strikes or Iranian air defence fire. AFP FRANCE 24


Ya Libnan
4 hours ago
- Ya Libnan
Pakistan to nominate Trump for Nobel Peace Prize
Pakistan to nominate President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize for helping end the India Pakistan war Highlights ISLAMABAD, June 21 (Reuters) – Pakistan said on Saturday it would recommend U.S. President Donald Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, an accolade that he has said he craves, for his work in helping to resolve the recent conflict between India and Pakistan. Some analysts in Pakistan said the move might persuade Trump to think again about potentially joining Israel in striking Iran's nuclear facilities. Pakistan has condemned Israel's action as a violation of international law and a threat to regional stability. In May, a surprise announcement by Trump of a ceasefire brought an abrupt end to a four-day conflict between nuclear-armed foes India and Pakistan. Trump has since repeatedly said that he averted a nuclear war, saved millions of lives, and grumbled that he got no credit for it. Pakistan agrees that U.S. diplomatic intervention ended the fighting, but India says it was a bilateral agreement between the two militaries. 'President Trump demonstrated great strategic foresight and stellar statesmanship through robust diplomatic engagement with both Islamabad and New Delhi, which de-escalated a rapidly deteriorating situation,' Pakistan said. 'This intervention stands as a testament to his role as a genuine peacemaker.' Governments can nominate people for the Nobel Peace Prize. There was no immediate response from Washington. A spokesperson for the Indian government did not respond to a request for comment. Trump has repeatedly said that he's willing to mediate between India and Pakistan over the disputed Kashmir region, their main source of enmity. Islamabad, which has long called for international attention to Kashmir, is delighted. But his stance has upended U.S. policy in South Asia, which had favored India as a counterweight to China, and put in question previously close relations between Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. On Friday, Trump gave a long list of conflicts he said he had resolved, including India and Pakistan and the Abraham accords in his first term between Israel and some Muslim-majority countries. He added: 'I won't get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.' Pakistan's move to nominate Trump came in the same week its army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, met the U.S. leader for lunch. It was the first time that a Pakistani military leader had been invited to the White House when a civilian government was in place in Islamabad. Trump's planned meeting with Modi at the G7 summit in Canada last week did not take place after the U.S. president left early, but the two later spoke by phone, in which Modi said 'India does not and will never accept mediation' in its dispute with Pakistan, according to the Indian government. Mushahid Hussain, a former chair of the Senate Defence Committee in Pakistan's parliament, suggested nominating Trump for the peace prize was justified. 'Trump is good for Pakistan,' he said. 'If this panders to Trump's ego, so be it. All the European leaders have been sucking up to him big time.' But the move was not universally applauded in Pakistan, where Trump's support for Israel's war in Gaza has inflamed passions. 'Israel's sugar daddy in Gaza and cheerleader of its attacks on Iran isn't a candidate for any prize,' said Talat Hussain, a prominent Pakistani television political talk show host, in a post on X. 'And what if he starts to kiss Modi on both cheeks again after a few months?' Reuters