
G7 leaders fail to reach ambitious joint agreements on key issues after Trump's exit
KANANASKIS, Alberta — Six of the Group of Seven leaders discussed Russia's war in Ukraine and the Israel-Iran conflict but failed to reach major agreements on those and many other top issues — wrapping up a summit that was forced to try and show how the wealthy nations' club might still shape global policy despite the early departure of U.S. President Donald Trump.
Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and his counterparts from the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Japan were joined during Tuesday's final sessions by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO chief Mark Rutte.
'We need support from allies and I'm here,' Zelenskyy said, before adding, 'We are ready for the peace negotiations, unconditional ceasefire. I think it's very important. But for this, we need pressure.'
The remaining leaders agreed to jointly attempt to combat what they called non-market policies that could jeopardize global access to critical minerals. They also pledged to limit the downsides of artificial intelligence on jobs and the environment, while still embracing the potential of the 'technological revolution.'
There was consensus on other issues, but though the summit was meant to showcase unity on top global concerns, no joint statement on the conflict in Ukraine was released.
Zelenskyy had been set to meet with Trump while world leaders were gathering in the Canadian Rocky Mountain resort of Kananaskis, but that was scrapped. The U.S. also previously signed an agreement granting American access to Ukraine's vast mineral resources.
A senior Canadian official said the U.S. opposed a joint statement on Ukraine amid its efforts to promote negotiations with Russia. The official said it only became clear during the summit's first day on Monday that there wouldn't be a joint statement — though other attendees suggested no consensus agreement was seriously on the table.
The official spoke on condition of anonymity due to not being authorized to discuss summit deliberations.
In Trump's absence, the remaining six leaders held an extensive session on Ukraine. Lacking unanimity, individual leaders also met with Zelenskyy to reassure him of their support.
The summit also was largely overshadowed by a showdown over Iran's nuclear program that could escalate. Israel launched an aerial bombardment campaign against Iran, and Iran has hit back with missiles and drones.
French President Emmanuel Macron warned against the U.S. and other powers pushing for regime change in Iran, suggesting it could destabilize the greater Middle East.
'I believe the greatest mistake today would be to pursue regime change in Iran through military means, as that would lead to chaos,' Macron said.
Before leaving, Trump joined the other leaders in issuing a statement saying Iran 'can never have a nuclear weapon' and calling for a 'de-escalation of hostilities in the Middle East, including a ceasefire in Gaza.' Getting unanimity — even on a short and broadly worded statement — was a modest measure of success.
Macron said Carney fulfilled his mission as G7 host by preserving the unity of the multilateral organization. 'We shouldn't ask the Canadian presidency to resolve every issue on earth today. That would be unfair,' said Macron, who will host the G7 next year.
Carney said in his final remarks Tuesday evening that Trump's early exit was about the 'extraordinary' situation in the Middle East, not anything that occurred during the summit.
'There was no problem,' Canada's prime minister said. 'Mr. Trump felt it was better to be in Washington, and I can understand that.'
Carney said Canada would impose new economic sanctions against Russia and was releasing its own statement offering 'unwavering support for a secure and sovereign Ukraine.' Asked if the U.S. pushed to soften any possible joint statement from the gathered leaders on Ukraine, Carney said he consulted with Trump while preparing the language his own country used.
Still, Trump's departure only served to heighten the drama of a world on the verge of several firestorms — and of a summit deprived early of its most-watched world leader. `
'We did everything I had to do at the G7,' Trump said while flying back to Washington. But things were getting awkward even before he left.
After the famous photo from the G7 in 2018 featured Trump and then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel displaying less-than-friendly body language, this year's edition included a dramatic eye-roll by Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni as French President Emmanuel Macron whispered something in her ear during a Monday roundtable.
That, and concerns about the Russia-Ukraine war, little progress on the conflict in Gaza and now the situation in Iran have made things all the more tense — especially after Trump imposed severe tariffs on multiple nations that risk a global economic slowdown.
Members of Trump's trade team remained in Canada to continue discussing tariffs, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, who sat at the table as world leaders met with Zelenskyy.
Trump's stance on Ukraine also put him fundamentally at odds with the other G7 leaders, who are clear that Russia is the aggressor in the war. The U.S. declined to join new sanctions against Russia, with Trump saying, 'When I sanction a country, that costs the U.S. a lot of money, a tremendous amount of money.'
Trump also said at the summit that there would have been no war in Ukraine if G7 members hadn't expelled Putin from the organization in 2014 for annexing Crimea. Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov said the G7 now looks 'very pale and quite useless' compared to 'for example, such formats as the G20.'
Additionally, the U.S. president has placed greater priority on addressing his grievances with other nations' trade policies than on collaboration with G7 allies.
He has imposed 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum, as well as 25% tariffs on autos. Trump is also charging a 10% tax on imports from most countries, though he could raise rates on July 9, after the 90-day negotiating period set by him would expire.
One bright spot for Trump during the summit came when he and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer signed a trade framework that was previously announced in May. Trump said British trade was 'very well protected' because 'I like them, that's why. That's their ultimate protection.'
But, while announcing that agreement, Trump brandished pages spelling out the deal and dropped them. Starmer stooped to pick them up, later explaining that he was compelled to ditch diplomatic decorum because anyone else trying to help risked spooking the president's security team.
'There were quite strict rules about who can get close to the president,' Starmer said, adding that he was 'just deeply conscious that in a situation like that it would not have been good for anybody else to have stepped forward.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Insider
14 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Geopolitical Chaos in the Middle East Emboldens Shell's (SHEL) Revenue Ambitions
The ongoing Israel-Iran conflict has set global markets on edge, with oil prices rising as fears mount over potential disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for 20% of the world's oil. Of course, higher crude prices are a boon for energy giants, and Shell (SHEL) is well-positioned to capitalize on this opportunity. Confident Investing Starts Here: Despite trading near its 52-week high, Shell's valuation remains compelling, especially if geopolitical unrest continues to keep oil prices elevated. Looking at the most recent performance metrics, in Q1 2025, Shell reported adjusted earnings of $5.6 billion, with an EPS of $1.84, a 52% increase from the previous quarter. Israel-Iran Tensions and the Oil Price Surge The Middle East is a powder keg again, with Israel's recent strikes on Iran's nuclear and military targets sparking retaliation and global fears. Crude oil prices jumped over 7% to approximately $75 a barrel last Friday and have since remained elevated, with some analysts warning that prices could reach $100 or more if the conflict escalates further. According to political analysts, an all-out war between Israel and Iran is a strong possibility. The Strait of Hormuz, a narrow chokepoint handling a fifth of global oil and significant LNG flows, is at the heart of these fears. Iran's control over its northern edge means any closure could choke off supply, sending prices skyrocketing. For Shell, one of the world's largest oil and gas companies, this could be a golden opportunity. With its operations spanning exploration, production, and refining across Europe, Asia, and the Americas, Shell's scale ensures it reaps outsized rewards when crude prices climb. Shell's integrated model, which encompasses everything from upstream drilling to downstream refining, positions it to capture value across the supply chain, particularly when margins widen during supply crunches. Why the Strait of Hormuz Matters Now the Strait of Hormuz isn't just a waterway, it's the lifeblood of global energy. About 20 million barrels of oil per day, or 20% of global consumption, pass through this 21-mile-wide channel. Thus, Iran's ability to disrupt or even temporarily close the strait, as some fear in a worst-case escalation, could be disastrous for supply. Analysts at JPMorgan have floated $130 per barrel as a possibility, while ING warns that $150 could be reached if disruptions persist. Such intense oil price shocks are rarely suitable for smooth global economics, but for resource companies like SHEL, it could be a potent revenue booster. Shell's exposure to this region is significant but strategic. While it doesn't rely solely on Middle Eastern crude, its global trading arm actively deals in oil and LNG, allowing it to pivot quickly to high-margin opportunities. If the Strait faces prolonged issues, Shell's ability to source and refine oil from other regions, like its North American and African assets, gives it a competitive edge. Plus, its LNG operations could benefit if natural gas flows from Qatar, another strait-dependent exporter, tighten. Shell's Strategic Moves Amplify Its Edge Shell's recent decisions make it even better positioned to thrive in this environment. Under CEO Wael Sawan, the company has doubled down on its core strengths (i.e., oil, gas, and biofuels) while trimming less profitable ventures like U.S. offshore wind, which saw a $1 billion write-off in 2024. This pivot has sharpened its focus on high-margin segments, with Shell cutting $3.1 billion in costs a year ahead of schedule. A Valuation That Screams Opportunity At today's share price, Shell trades at roughly 11x its consensus EPS estimate of $6.21 for 2025, a bargain for a company of its caliber. Importantly, I believe that analysts haven't yet factored in the full impact of the Israel-Iran conflict, so the effective P/E could be even lower if oil prices remain high, let alone if they rise further. What is the 12-Month Forecast for Shell Stock? Wall Street remains highly bullish on Shell, with a Strong Buy consensus based on seven Buy and two Hold ratings over the past three months, and notably, no Sell ratings. Currently, SHEL's average 12-month stock price target of $75.87 suggests a 6.2% upside from current levels. Shell Offers Discounted Upside as Specter of War Intensifies Shell stands out in today's market as a global energy leader trading at a discount, backed by strong shareholder returns and positioned to benefit from geopolitical tensions in the Middle East. Ongoing risks around the Israel-Iran conflict and the Strait of Hormuz could keep oil prices elevated, boosting Shell's earnings potential. With a low P/E ratio, a nearly 4% dividend yield, and an additional 7% from share buybacks, Shell presents a compelling risk-reward opportunity for investors seeking exposure to energy in a volatile global landscape.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump's Old Tweet Mocking Obama On Iran Comes Back To Haunt Him
Another old tweet from Donald Trump has gone viral again, but for the wrong reasons. As the president continued to ramp up his rhetoric against Iran, critics pointed to a November 2013 social media post where Trump accused then-President Barack Obama of planning to attack Iran. Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled! — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) November 11, 2013 'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly—not skilled!' Trump wrote, when he was still a reality TV personality. The resurfaced tweet sparked comments about irony, given Trump's recent saber-rattling against Tehran. What is it you said again???? — Martina Navratilova (@Martina) June 17, 2025 There's always a tweet. — Ron Filipkowski (@RonFilipkowski) June 17, 2025 Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Trump will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled! — Mario Callous, x grinder & amusements editor (@idonevenknowho) June 17, 2025 Always — Mason (@masonisonx) June 17, 2025 Guess who tweeted this back in 2013? 🤣'Remember that I predicted a long time ago that President Obama will attack Iran because of his inability to negotiate properly-not skilled!'8:55 PM • 11/10/13 — News Watcher (@testbotnews) June 17, 2025 In Trumpworld, projection isn't a defense mechanism—it's a prophecy. — MC Debris (@emceedebris) June 17, 2025 'Atrocious': Eric Trump Slammed For 'Disgusting' Use Of Offensive Slur In Interview 'Good F**king Gawd!': Trump Ripped As Putin's PR Guy After G7 Whine 'Like A Monty Python Skit': Trump's UK Trade Deal Moment Gets Super Weird In A Hurry
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Meta Platforms Stock Jumped Today
Meta Platforms stock saw solid gains amid a bullish day of trading for the broader market. Oppenheimer published new coverage raising its price target for Meta stock this morning. Meta announced today that it will be rolling out channel recommendations and advertisements on WhatsApp. 10 stocks we like better than Meta Platforms › Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) stock climbed in Monday's trading and closed out the daily session up 2.8%. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 (SNPINDEX: ^GSPC) and the Nasdaq Composite (NASDAQINDEX: ^IXIC) gained 0.9% and 1.5%, respectively. Stocks broadly moved higher today following a Wall Street Journal report suggesting that military strikes between Israel and Iran could de-escalate in the near future. In addition to the broader market trend, Meta Platforms' share price also got a boost from an announcement about its WhatsApp platform and positive coverage from analysts. Before the market opened this morning, Oppenheimer published a new note on Meta Platforms. The investment firm maintained an outperform rating on the stock and increased its one-year price target from $665 per share to $775 per share. As of today's market close, the new price target still implied additional upside of roughly 10%. Oppenheimer's analysts cited improvements in the digital-advertising market as a key factor behind its price-target increase. Meta announced today that it is rolling out channel subscriptions and in-platform advertisements on its WhatsApp messaging platform. Promoted channels and advertisements will now be featured in the WhatsApp Updates tab. While some users may not be thrilled with the changes, the move should help Meta monetize the large and highly engaged user base on its WhatsApp platform. In addition to integrating ads into the service, Meta has been experimenting with WhatsApp as a platform that can host artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot services for customer service applications. WhatsApp reportedly now has more than 3 billion active users a month, and there's a good chance that Meta will continue exploring ways to generate more revenue from the platform. Before you buy stock in Meta Platforms, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Meta Platforms wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,702!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $870,207!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 988% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025 Randi Zuckerberg, a former director of market development and spokeswoman for Facebook and sister to Meta Platforms CEO Mark Zuckerberg, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Meta Platforms. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Meta Platforms Stock Jumped Today was originally published by The Motley Fool Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data