Role of Calgary police in G7 security still being finalized
Social Sharing
The extent of the Calgary Police Service's role in helping provide security for the G7 leaders' summit in June is still unclear, and details are still being finalized ahead of the event.
The G7 meeting is set to be held in Kananaskis, a recreational area west of Calgary, for three days in June.
About 10,000 hotel rooms in the are expected to be booked, and the event is anticipated to bring about 2,000 delegates, 1,400 journalists and 70 official guests to Calgary and K-Country, according to a CPS report to the Calgary Police Commission.
Security for the event is being overseen by the Integrated Safety and Security Group (ISSG), led by the RCMP, with Calgary police and other law enforcement agencies acting in a support capacity.
Thousands of security personnel are expected to be policing the area, but it hasn't been determined yet as to how many will be CPS officers.
"It is a pretty big security posture and a big footprint," CPS Supt. Joe Brar told reporters at a media availability Wednesday.
"We are relying on other mutual aid partners to come from other provinces and other parts of the province to assist us. I'm not in a position to talk about those agencies because we're still working out details with them, and nor do I have the numbers."
Brar adds that while the focus of the event is in K-Country, there will be policing requirements in the city as well, as political gatherings such as the G7 leaders' summit are known to attract sometimes massive rallies.
He says there will be designated protest areas in the city, but they have yet to determine where they will be located. Brar said CPS has suggested municipal plaza, the Harry Hays building and the McDougall Centre.
"In Calgary, there are no restricted zones that'll be cordoned off for extended periods of time," Brar said.
"There will be some [heightened security] around the airport, some other sites, but minimal disruptions there. I think an event of this magnitude is going to bring disruptions. I think that's reasonable to expect."
He adds the police liaison team has not yet spoken with any protest leaders about possible rallies stemming from the G7 summit.
Temporary airspace restrictions will be put in place during the event, barring unauthorized aircraft, including drones. The RCMP says it anticipates the restrictions to apply in a 30-nautical-mile ring around the Kananaskis secure area; however, those details are also still being finalized.
Who is paying for G7 security?
With multiple law enforcement agencies assisting with G7 security as part of the ISSG, the exact breakdown of how costs will be covered is unclear.
According to the RCMP, when the summit is over, the total price of policing the event will be made public.
Brar says CPS will receive funding from the federal government through the Major International Event Security Cost Framework.
"An event of this magnitude requires a lot of human resources and other resources, and there is extraordinary and incremental costs that are incurred by the police of jurisdiction," Brar said.
"As this is considered a major international event, [Public Safety Canada has] a cost framework in place where we can enter into a contribution agreement to recover some of the costs incurred by the Calgary Police Service."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
John Robson: Carney offers weak words while Trump takes care of business
Israel's demolition of the Iranian regime shows our government at its finest. Unfortunately, because it's pompously paralyzed amid platitudes. It took hours to say anything, then said nothing. Which illustrates the importance of ideas. Article content I know, I know. Rarely does one look at our leaders and have 'ideas' spring to mind. As I've complained elsewhere, they've have perfected the art of murmuring sweet nothings at the public to the point that it's metastasized from a tactic into a mindset. But the crucial historical maxim 'ideas have consequences' doesn't only refer to good or carefully considered ones. Article content Article content Article content Stupid kills and vacant is as vacant does. When the Prime Minister's Office blathers about how 'Prime Minister (Mark) Carney and (French) President (Emmanuel) Macron discussed bolstering co-operation on shared priorities such as critical minerals, energy security, bilateral investment, artificial intelligence and quantum technology' at the G7, Carney actually thinks those words describe meaningful actions to help create a better world. Article content Article content On Israel and the Middle East, it's worse. Far worse. It's been clear for some time, to some of us anyway, that something is very wrong in the state of Canada. Protests in our major cities routinely, openly, smugly promote terrorism, harass Jews in their homes and places of worship and break laws, and police bring coffee. Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow is invisible when not dancing in purple feathers to promote 'diversity.' Ontario Premier Doug Ford could care less. Academics sign anti-Israel petitions. Article content Amid this mental and moral feebleness, something momentous is suddenly happening in the Middle East. And a great many supposedly wise and influential persons can't get their minds around it because, as I told my former bosses at the Reform party years ago, 'you cannot fight an enemy that has outposts inside your head' (they fired me, and fizzled out). Article content Article content So when you look at Canadian policymakers and pundits, before asking what tactical decisions they're making about the Middle East, primarily about PR strategy because the word-deed fog has permeated their brains, ask yourself what their fundamental beliefs are. Article content Article content Do they believe that geopolitics is a jungle where force settles disputes not paper promises or sweet-smelling sentiments? That there are people who hate our way of life and would destroy it if they could? That antisemites hate Jews not for their imagined defects but for their real virtues? Article content More fundamentally, do they know or care about the story of Israel? From Abraham, Isaac and Jacob to the Exodus, the construction and demolition of the temples and the Holocaust? Do they know Israel brought ethical monotheism to the world, which responded about the way you'd expect sinful humans to respond, with an unending series of attempts to slander, exile, maim or kill the messenger? Do they know they are unavoidably part of that story and that refusing to choose a side is choosing a side?
National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Steven Wernick: The double standard that treats Modi like a hero and Netanyahu like a villain
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, whose government faces credible allegations of orchestrating the political assassination of a Canadian citizen on Canadian soil, was welcomed by world leaders at the G7 summit in Canada without hesitation. Meanwhile, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu — who's controversial, but is the leader of a democratic state that's under attack — is threatened with arrest by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for defending his citizens after one of the most horrific terrorist attacks since 9/11. Article content Article content This is not just hypocrisy, it's a distortion of justice. Of course, no democracy is above scrutiny. Legitimate criticism of Israel's wartime conduct — its proportionality, its humanitarian policies, its political leadership — is not only warranted, but necessary. Democracies thrive on accountability. But there is a profound difference between such critiques and the morally bankrupt equivalence that treats a sovereign state defending its citizens as indistinguishable from terrorists who deliberately target civilians. Article content Article content Article content Let's be clear: Netanyahu is far from a flawless leader. His judicial reform agenda has shaken Israeli democracy, and his coalition includes extremist elements that many Jews find abhorrent. He deserves political accountability. But legal accountability for war crimes? That's a bridge too far — especially when the ICC treats a country defending itself from terrorism as morally equivalent to a terror group that proudly live-streams its own atrocities. Article content Article content On Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists invaded Israel, murdering 1,200 people — including babies, women and elderly Holocaust survivors — raping and mutilating civilians, and kidnapping more than 250. Fifty-three living and murdered people remain in captivity. That day shattered Israeli society and Jewish communities around the world. It was an unprovoked genocidal assault. Article content Article content Since then, Israel has waged war in Gaza. Thousands have died, and the suffering is real. But the war could have ended months ago, and it could end now, if Hamas accepted any of the multiple ceasefire and hostage-release proposals brokered by the United States, Egypt and Qatar. Hamas has rejected every one. Every day that hostages remain in Hamas captivity prolongs the war and the suffering of civilians on both sides. Article content Let's not pretend this is about proportionality or international law. If it were, the ICC would not ignore the fact that Hamas deliberately embeds its military infrastructure beneath hospitals, schools and apartment buildings. Nor would it ignore the difference between a democratic country's military operating under civilian oversight, and a terror group that glorifies martyrdom and uses its own people as human shields. The ICC's pursuit of Israeli leaders while delaying full investigations into far more egregious violations by Russia, Syria and others undermines its own credibility as an impartial institution of justice.
Canada Standard
2 hours ago
- Canada Standard
"India-Canada relations are now getting back on track": Defence Expert Sanjeev Srivastava hails PM Modi's visit
Varanasi (Uttar Pradesh) [India], June 19 (ANI): Following Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Canada and meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, Defence Expert Sanjeev Srivastava on Thursday said that India-Canada relations are now getting back on track. Srivastava said that by reinstating their respective High Commissioners, both India and Canada have taken constructive steps to restore stability in the relationship. 'In a positive development, India and Canada have decided to reinstate their High Commissioners. Tensions between the two countries had significantly escalated after former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau made baseless allegations against India regarding the killing of terrorist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. The previous Trudeau government had also failed to take action against Khalistani terrorists, which had caused deep resentment in India,' the Defence expert told ANI. 'However, now that a new Prime Minister has been elected in Canada, India was invited to the G7 summit, and the discussions between the two Prime Ministers were positive. PM Modi was welcomed with great applause in Canada. This is a constructive turn of events, and India-Canada relations are now getting back on track,' Sanjeev Srivastava said. PM Modi visited Canada to attend the 51st G7 Summit at the invitation of his counterpart, Mark Carney. Earlier, PM Modi met Canadian PM Mark Carney on the sidelines of the G7 Summit. Notably, this was the first in-person meeting between the two leaders after Canada's recent general elections. During the meeting, the leaders reaffirmed the importance of India-Canada ties and agreed to take constructive steps to restore stability in the relationship, with the early return of High Commissioners to each other's capitals, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA), said in a statement on Wednesday. As per the MEA, the meeting between PM Modi and PM Carney provided an opportunity for both sides to hold frank and forward-looking discussions on the state of India-Canada relations and the way ahead. The leaders reaffirmed the importance of India-Canada ties, based on shared democratic values, respect for the rule of law and commitment to upholding the principles of sovereignty and territorial integrity. They underlined the need to pursue a constructive and balanced partnership grounded in mutual respect for concerns and sensitivities, strong people-to-people ties, and growing economic complementarities. In a significant development, it was announced by the MEA in its statement that India and Canada 'agreed to take calibrated and constructive steps to restore stability in the relationship, beginning with the early return of High Commissioners to each other's capitals.' (ANI)
