logo
Wisconsin joins lawsuit against Trump funding freeze; lawmakers react

Wisconsin joins lawsuit against Trump funding freeze; lawmakers react

Yahoo29-01-2025

State Sen. Kelda Roys speaks with reporters Tuesday about the Trump administration's memo announcing a suspension of federal funds directed to state and local governments. (Photo by Erik Gunn/Wisconsin Examiner)
Wisconsin joined 21 states and the District of Columbia Tuesday in a lawsuit to stop the Trump administration from cutting off the distribution of budgeted federal funds to states and local governments.
A federal district judge ruled Tuesday the Trump administration must wait until at least next week before it can move forward with pausing federal spending on trillions in grants and loans, though she emphasized the short-term administrative stay might not continue after a Feb. 3 hearing.
District Judge Loren L. AliKhan's decision temporarily blocks the Office of Management and Budget from moving forward with plans to stop payments on multiple federal programs, which it announced late Monday.
The White House action 'would immediately jeopardize critical federal benefits and investments that provide crucial health and childcare services, support public schools, combat hate crimes and violence against women, and provide life-saving disaster relief to states, among other critical programs,' the office of Gov. Tony Evers said in announcing the lawsuit late Tuesday.
Wisconsin expects to receive $28.2 billion in federal funds appropriated for the current 2023-25 two-year budget period, according to the Legislative Fiscal Bureau.
'This was a sweeping, reckless decision that has caused unnecessary chaos and panic in Wisconsin and across our country,' Evers said in announcing the lawsuit. 'Wisconsin's kids, families, veterans, law enforcement, seniors, and Wisconsinites in every corner of our state depend upon our federal tax dollars to support basic, everyday needs and services.'
Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul said the funding freeze appears to include money for law enforcement, victim services, health programs, infrastructure projects, education and additional purposes.
It 'has already resulted in widespread uncertainty and confusion,' Kaul said. 'This misguided and unlawful policy must be blocked before it leads to substantial harm to services and programs that are critical for Wisconsinites.'
Reaction to the Trump administration action was widespread, and state as well as federal lawmakers said they were starting to hear from constituents worried about the impact on programs and services they relied on.
'I am already hearing from my constituents who are worried about funding being cut off for cops and firefighters, child care, combatting the fentanyl crisis, food for kids, and so much more,' said Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.), vowing to fight action. 'Democrats and Republicans passed laws providing this funding for our kids, families, and communities, and ripping it away is an unconstitutional power grab.'
In a brief press conference in her state Capitol office, Sen. Kelda Roys (D-Madison) called the funding suspension an 'illegal power grab that the Trump administration is attempting to pull' and warned of 'the very real cost that that's going to have for Wisconsin families and families across America.'
Roys said the action was 'a stunt' by Trump. 'It's a way to try to see how far he can go, how much he can get away with, and to test the loyalty of all the GOP politicians that he thinks should bend the knee,' she said. 'And that should not distract us from the fact that this is going to have very, very real negative consequences for millions of families in our state, right here and across the country.'
She added the action is also 'a very destabilizing move that could have significant ramifications for people's sense of economic security' and a potential 'shock to the economy.'
U.S. Rep. Mark Pocan described the administration's action as an 'unprecedented and unconstitutional stop-payment on Congressionally appropriated funding' and attacked Trump as 'the Grifter-in-Chief' who was violating the Constitution by imposing the freeze.
Pocan connected the action with Trump's proposals for renewing tax cuts enacted in 2017, accusing the president of 'working to enrich himself and his billionaire buddies.'
'This reckless move will devastate every community across the country, and Republicans must join with Democrats to make sure Trump does not get away with this unconstitutional theft of American taxpayers' own money,' Pocan said.
Earlier Tuesday, Evers sent Trump a letter urging him to reverse the plan to cut off federal assistance, warning that it 'could have disastrous consequences for the people of Wisconsin and our state.'
He wrote that the freeze would withhold 'tax dollars from Wisconsin that were already approved by the U.S. Congress' and thus that they 'are the law.'
'I urge you to please follow the law and reconsider this decision,' Evers concluded.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff
Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Oil prices surge after Israel strikes Iran in major escalation of MidEast standoff

Oil prices surged around 7% on Friday morning after Israel launched airstrikes on Iran, marking a significant escalation in the Middle East conflict. International benchmark Brent crude futures (BZ=F) rose to just below $74 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate futures (CL=F) changed hands at almost $73. Both were paring earlier sharper gains that saw Brent spike by more than 13%. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel is prepared to keep attacking Iran "for as many days as it takes" after his country carried out strikes on its nuclear and military facilities overnight. "Over the past few months intelligence has shown that Iran is closer than ever to obtaining a nuclear weapon," IDF spokesperson BG Effie Defrin said in a video statement. "This morning the IDF began preemptive and precise strikes, targeting the Iranian nuclear program." On Friday morning, President Trump urged Iran to "make a deal" over its nuclear program to avert further conflict. "JUST DO IT, BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE," he wrote in a post to social media. Iran has threatened to hit US assets in the region as part of its retaliation, even as Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned the country against such a move. Rubio said Israel took "unilateral action" and the US was not involved in the strikes. Iran is the third-largest oil producer within the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), trailing only Saudi Arabia and Iraq, with output exceeding 3 million barrels per day. 'The most immediate risk is to Iranian exports, which could drop sharply from the current 1.6 to 1.8 million barrels per day if maximum pressure tactics escalate or broader disruptions occur,' Rebecca Babin, U.S. senior energy trader at CIBC Private Wealth, told Yahoo Finance Thursday night. 'There's also the possibility — though still uncertain — of direct supply losses if Israel targets Iranian oil infrastructure,' she added. Iran has launched 100 low-flying drones toward Israeli territory in retaliation, an Israeli military spokesman told Reuters. While the swarm is likely to take several hours to reach its target, it could just be paving the way for a missile bombardment later. It remains unclear whether the conflict could spill over into the broader region. 'We can probably expect a temporary slowdown in oil tanker traffic through the Strait of Hormuz,' said Ed Hirs, senior fellow at the University of Houston, in an interview with Yahoo Finance. Tehran has repeatedly threatened to block the strait, a vital chokepoint through which as many as 20 million barrels of oil pass each day. On Wednesday afternoon, crude futures surged more than 4% after the U.S. ordered the evacuation of non-essential embassy personnel from Iraq, amid rising regional threats. Supply concerns also mounted this week after President Trump indicated during a podcast that he's increasingly doubtful Washington will reach a nuclear deal with Iran, as recent talks have stalled. "I don't know. I did think so, and I'm getting ... less confident about it," Trump said on the program 'Pod Force One' which aired on Wednesday. Ines Ferre is a Senior Business Reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow her on X at @ines_ferre. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991
See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991

USA Today

time30 minutes ago

  • USA Today

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991

See photos: The last large-scale military parade in Washington DC in 1991 Show Caption Hide Caption Armored tanks arrive in DC for Trump's military birthday parade As Washington, D.C. prepares for the 250th anniversary of the U.S. Army, armored tanks have begun to arrive ahead of Saturday's celebration. Thousands of soldiers, military equipment, musical performances and more are set for this weekend in Washington D.C. for the U.S. Army's 250th anniversary celebration. Happening along the National Mall on Saturday, June 14, the event is also falling on the same day as President Donald Trump's 79th birthday, but the administration has insisted that the Army's anniversary and Trump's birthday are a coincidence and that the parade is justified to honor soldiers' sacrifice. Army parachutists jumping from aircraft are set to land and give Trump an American flag for his birthday, Pentagon officials said, according to Axios. A rare sight in Washington D.C., the last major military parade was held in 1991 to celebrate the end of the first Gulf War. Before 1991, large-scale military parades were held following the American victory in World War I and World War II. According to the National Park Service, "debates over military policy" that occurred during the Korean and Vietnam wars forced parades to be more "subdued." Photos: The last large military parade in Washington DC Contributing: Kathryn Palmer and staff, USA TODAY Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store