I Let AI Agents Plan My Vacation—and It Wasn't Terrible
The latest wave of AI tools claim to take the pain out of booking your next trip. From transport and accommodation to restaurants and attractions, we let AI take the reins to put this to the test. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff/Victoria Turk
The worst part of travel is the planning: the faff of finding and booking transport, accommodation, restaurant reservations—the list can feel endless. To help, the latest wave of AI agents, such as OpenAI's Operator and Anthropic's Computer Use claim they can take these dreary, cumbersome tasks from befuddled travelers and do it all for you. But exactly how good are they are digging out the good stuff?
What better way to find out than deciding on a last-minute weekend away. I tasked Operator, which is available to ChatGPT Pro subscribers, with booking me something budget-friendly, with good food and art, and told it that I'd prefer to travel by train. What's fascinating is that you can actually watch its process in real time—the tool opens a browser window and starts, much as I would, searching for destinations accessible by rail. It scrolls a couple of articles, then offers two suggestions: Paris or Bruges. 'I recently went to Paris,' I type in the chat. 'Let's do Bruges!'
Armed with my decision, Operator goes on to look up train times on the Eurostar website and finds a return ticket that will take me to Brussels and includes onward travel within Belgium. I intervene, however, when I see the timings: It selected an early-morning train out on Saturday, and an equally early train back on Sunday—not exactly making the most of the weekend, I point out. It finds a later return option.
So far impressed, I wait to double-check my calendar before committing. When I return, however, the session has timed out. Unlike ChatGPT, Operator closes conversations between tasks, and I have to start again from scratch. I feel irrationally slighted, as if my trusty travel assistant has palmed me off to a colleague. Alas, the fares have already changed, and I find myself haggling with the AI: can't it find something cheaper? Tickets eventually selected, I take over to enter my personal and payment details. (I may be trusting AI to blindly send me across country borders, but I'm not giving it my passport information.)
Using ChatGPT's Operator to book a train ticket to Bruges. Courtesy of Victoria Turk
Trains booked, Operator thinks its job is done. But I'll need somewhere to stay, I remind it—can it book a hotel? It asks for more details and I'm purposefully vague, specifying that it should be comfy and conveniently located. Comparing hotels is perhaps my least favorite aspect of travel planning, so I'm happy to leave it scrolling through Booking.com. I restrain myself from jumping in when I see it's set the wrong dates, but it corrects this itself. It spends a while surveying an Ibis listing, but ends up choosing a three-star hotel called Martin's Brugge, which I note users have rated as having an excellent location.
Now all that's left is an itinerary. Here, Operator seems to lose steam. It offers a perfunctory one-day schedule that appears to have mainly been cribbed from a vegetarian travel blog. On day 2, it suggests I 'visit any remaining attractions or museums.' Wow, thanks for the tip.
The day of the trip arrives, and, as I drag myself out of bed at 4:30AM, I remember why I usually avoid early departures. Still, I get to Brussels without issue. My ticket allows for onward travel, but I realize I don't know where I'm going. I fire up Operator on my phone and ask which platform the next Bruges-bound train departs from. It searches the Belgian railway timetables. Minutes later, it's still searching. I look up and see the details on a station display. I get to the platform before Operator has figured it out.
Bruges is delightful. Given Operator's lackluster itinerary, I branch out. This kind of research task is perfect for a large language model, I realize—it doesn't require agentic capabilities. ChatGPT, Operator's OpenAI sibling, gives me a much more thorough plan, plotting activities by the hour with suggestions of not just where to eat, but what to order (Flemish stew at De Halve Mann brewery). I also try Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, and their plans are similar: Walk to the market square; see the belfry tower; visit the Basilica of the Holy Blood. Bruges is a small city, and I can't help but wonder if this is simply the standard tourist route, or if the AI models are all getting their information from the same sources.
Various travel-specific AI tools are trying to break through this genericness. I briefly try MindTrip, which provides a map alongside a written itinerary, offers to personalize recommendations based on a quiz, and includes collaborative features for shared trips. CEO Andy Moss says it expands on broad LLM capabilities by leveraging a travel-specific 'knowledge base' containing things like weather data and real-time availability. Courtesy of Victoria Turk
After lunch, I admit defeat. According to ChatGPT's itinerary I should spend the afternoon on a boat tour, taking photos in another square, and visiting a museum. It has vastly overestimated the stamina of a human who's been up since 4:30AM. I go to rest at my hotel, which is basic, but indeed ideally located. I'm coming around to Operator's lazier plans: I'll do the remaining attractions tomorrow.
As a final task, I ask the agent to make a dinner reservation—somewhere authentic but not too expensive. It gets bamboozled by a dropdown menu during the booking process but manages a workaround after a little encouragement. I'm impressed as I walk past the obvious tourist traps to a more out-of-the-way dining room that serves classic local cuisine and is themed around pigeons. It's a good find—and one that doesn't seem to appear on the top 10 lists of obvious guides like TripAdvisor or The Fork.
On the train home, I muse on my experience. The AI agent certainly required supervision. It struggled to string tasks together and lacked an element of common sense, such as when it tried to book the earliest train home. But it was refreshing to outsource decision-making to an assistant that could present a few select options, rather than having to scroll through endless listings. For now, people mainly use AI for inspiration, says Emma Brennan at travel agent trade association ABTA; it doesn't beat the human touch. 'An increasing number of people are booking with the travel agents for the reason that they want someone there if something goes wrong,' she says.
It's easy to imagine AI tools taking over the information gateway role from search and socials, with businesses clamoring to appear in AI-generated suggestions. 'Google isn't going to be the front door for everything in the future,' says Moss. Are we ready to give this power to a machine?
But then, perhaps that ship has sailed. When planning travel myself, I'll reflexively check a restaurant's Google rating, look up a hotel on Instagram, or read TripAdvisor reviews of an attraction, despite desires to stay away from the default tourist beat. Embarking on my AI trip, I worried I'd spend more time staring at my screen. By the end, I realize I've probably spent less.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
17 minutes ago
- CNBC
China's biggest public AI drop since DeepSeek, Baidu's Ernie, is about to hit the market
On Monday, Chinese technology giant Baidu plans to make its Ernie generative AI large language model open source, a move by China's tech sector that could be its biggest in the AI race since the emergence of DeepSeek. A Baidu spokesman confirmed the plan and said the open sourcing will be a gradual roll-out. Will it be a shock to the market on the order of DeepSeek? That's a question which divides AI experts. One big change is that Baidu wasn't always on the open source bandwagon. "Baidu has always been very supportive of its proprietary business model and was vocal against open-source, but disruptors like DeepSeek have proven that open-source models can be as competitive and reliable as proprietary ones," Lian Jye Su, chief analyst with technology research and advisory group Omdia, previously told CNBC. Now that Baidu has made the decision to open source, even if it isn't a DeepSeek moment, it is an important one for the global AI race. "This isn't just a China story. Every time a major lab open-sources a powerful model, it raises the bar for the entire industry," said Sean Ren, associate professor of computer science at the University of Southern California and Samsung's AI Researcher of the Year. Ren says Baidu's move puts pressure on closed providers like OpenAI and Anthropic to justify gated APIs and premium pricing. "While most consumers don't care whether a model's code is open-sourced, they do care about lower costs, better performance, and support for their language or region. Those benefits often come from open models, which give developers and researchers more freedom to iterate, customize, and deploy faster," Ren said. Other industry experts view an open source Ernie as potentially being even more disruptive to both U.S. and Chinese competitors when it comes to the price equation. "Baidu just threw a Molotov into the AI world," said Alec Strasmore, founder of AI advisory Epic Loot. "OpenAI, Anthropic, DeepSeek, all these guys who thought they were selling top-notch champagne are about to realize that Baidu will be giving away something just as powerful," Strasmore said, comparing Baidu's move to Costco creating Kirkland. He said the message to all of the world's startups is "stop paying top dollar." "This isn't a competition; it's a declaration of war on pricing," Strasmore said. Baidu said in March that its recent ERNIE X1 model delivers performance on par with DeepSeek's R1 "at only half the price." Baidu's CEO, Robin Li, hinted earlier this year that the roll-out would help developers worldwide in AI development. "Our releases aim to empower developers to build the best applications — without having to worry about model capability, costs, or development tools," Li said in a speech to developers in China in April. In the least, it's one more moment in time when investors have to analyze how cost dynamics in AI model access are changing quickly, and what it means that more applications can be built on top of "these dirt cheap models," Strasmore said. "Baidu is going to be seeding the world with Chinese AI models," he added. Making these AI tools more widely available is a notable development from Baidu, but "the news of Baidu going open source probably lands with a big thud," said Cliff Jurkiewicz, vice president of global strategy at Phenom, an applied AI company for the human resources sector. "Most people in the United States don't even know it's a Chinese tech company," he said. Jurkiewicz compared the broader move to open architecture in AI as the difference between Android and Apple. "When Android first emerged, its standout feature was that it was configurable and customizable. But it was almost too much work in the sense that people just wanted the thing to function correctly," Jurkiewicz said. "Android, out of the box, is plain and vanilla, so it has to be customized, and that's a real challenge," he added. There is no doubt that the open source movement in AI is a threat to the business models of major players in the space. Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, wrote in a January Reddit thread about the issue, and in more recent Senate testimony has said an open source rollout may happen this summer. "While OpenAI has open-sourced models in the past, the company has generally favored a proprietary, closed source development approach," Altman said, acknowledging that may need to change. "[I personally think we need to] figure out a different open source strategy," Altman said. "Not everyone at OpenAI shares this view, and it's also not our current highest priority … We will produce better models [going forward], but we will maintain less of a lead than we did in previous years." In the May Senate appearance, Altman said, "We realize that we open AI can do more to help here. So we're going to release an open source model that we believe will be the leading model this summer because we want people to build on the U.S. stack in terms of closed source models. A lot of the world uses our technology and the technology of our colleagues. We think we're in good shape there." More recently, Altman posted that the release would be delayed, but still scheduled for summer. One advantage U.S. players maintain, according to Jurkiewicz, is that the Baidu release will encounter skepticism at the enterprise level, with many questions about security. "On the other hand, the big players — OpenAI's ChatGPT and Microsoft's Co-Pilot — are integrated with everything," Jurkiewicz said. Ren said while open source often conveys a sense of transparency, that doesn't necessarily translate into market trust. "Just because a model's weights are public doesn't mean we know what data it was trained on, whether consent was given, or if those data contributors were credited or compensated," Ren said. As AI becomes more embedded into our daily lives, that lack of accountability becomes a serious issue. "If we don't address it now, we risk scaling systems that quietly extract value from millions of people without consent, credit, or compensation," Ren said. With DeepSeek, some countries banned the AI and there were widespread concerns about consumers downloading the technology. Strasmore said the Chinese links can get dangerous if more products are tied to the Baidu API. "This would be virtually giving China access to every app on every phone. That's one scary component," he said.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Microsoft (MSFT) Just Got a New $530 Target — Here's What's Driving It
Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) is one of the . On June 26, Morgan Stanley reiterated the stock as 'Overweight' and raised its price target to $530 per share from $482. The firm has updated its capex-implied AI revenue analysis and its OpenAI model, which elaborates on the contribution to Azure. According to the firm, the yield on Microsoft's investments in Generative AI is becoming 'increasingly apparent' despite investors continuing to debate it. It is confident that there is upside to Azure forecasts and that Microsoft's 'prime position for the upcoming GenAI innovation cycle, matched with solid execution,n is driving an acceleration in the Azure business.' drserg / 'We update our capex-implied AI revenue analysis and our OpenAI model detailing the contribution to Azure. Core conclusion remains the same: conservatism in our Azure forecasts. With increased confidence in upside to Azure forecasts — our price target moves to $530 and conviction in OW remains.' Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT) provides AI-powered cloud, productivity, and business solutions, focusing on efficiency, security, and AI advancements. While we acknowledge the potential of MSFT as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 10 AI Stocks in the Spotlight and Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio
Entrepreneur
24 minutes ago
- Entrepreneur
Try This AI-Powered Stock Picker
Disclosure: Our goal is to feature products and services that we think you'll find interesting and useful. If you purchase them, Entrepreneur may get a small share of the revenue from the sale from our commerce partners. Even the most business-savvy self-starters can feel out of their depth in the stock market. With charts, ratios, earnings calls, and today's insane volatility to navigate, it's no wonder many people avoid investing altogether. However, you may be missing out on financial freedom or an early retirement if you continue to put it off. Sterling Stock Picker breaks down those barriers using smart, strategic AI that personalizes your portfolio and teaches you while you invest. You'll feel more confident before investing your first dollar and understand when it's time to pull out. You can use code SAVE20 at checkout to get lifetime access for $55.19, regularly $486. How it works: Invest in 3 simple steps Sterling makes it surprisingly simple to start investing in stocks, even if this is your first time. Start by taking a 5-minute quiz to assess your risk tolerance, so the platform understands how bold or cautious you want to be. This ensures all future recommendations are tailored to your comfort level. Second, you can use the intuitive stock picker to explore companies that match your values, investment goals, and risk appetite. You don't need to know what a PEG ratio is or how to read a balance sheet—Sterling does the number crunching for you and gives you a clear "buy," "sell," or "hold" recommendation using its patent-pending North Star tech. Once you're ready, the platform helps you build a diversified stock portfolio automatically. And if you have questions, like whether a certain sector is a good bet right now or if a trending stock is too risky, you can ask Finley, your built-in AI investment coach powered by ChatGPT. It's like having a financial advisor and mentor rolled into one. Whether you're investing $100 or $10,000, Sterling helps you invest with purpose, clarity, and confidence. Use code SAVE20 at checkout for a limited time to get a Sterling Stock Picker lifetime subscription for $55.19 (reg. $486). Sterling Stock Picker: Lifetime Subscription See Deal Why this deal is worth it In 2025, the stock market has been anything but predictable. Between tech surges, inflation swings, and ongoing global shifts, there's been no shortage of volatility—and with that, opportunity. For self-starters who want to capitalize on market dips and sudden upswings, having an AI stock picking app to guide your decisions is more valuable than ever. StackSocial prices subject to change.
