‘Badenoch has questions to answer over car hire security concerns'
The Conservative leader has denied there were security concerns about a private car hire arrangement she had when she was a senior minister, first reported by the Sunday Times.
According to the newspaper, Mrs Badenoch had access to a black Jaguar XJ and a driver throughout her time as business secretary through a car hire firm in her constituency at the time, Saffron Walden.
Officials wrote to her and said the arrangement was 'not recommended', and repeatedly warned her of the security risks of not using a car and driver provided by the Government Car Service (GCS), the Sunday Times said.
Civil servants were said to be wary the car could be bugged, and were concerned it was not maintained in a Government garage.
Mrs Badenoch was asked about the story as she appeared on the BBC's Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg.
She told the BBC: 'I never ignored security advice – the driver was security cleared. Actually, recommended by GCS.
'It was a contract that had been in place for about five years, and I renewed that contract.
'A memo was sent by someone who was unfamiliar with the contract asking about security concerns, and other civil servants said there were no security concerns, and that's the end of the matter,' Ms Badenoch said.
Leaking of the memo from civil servants warning of the security concerns was 'destructive', she said, adding: 'It's a nonsense story.'
But a Labour party spokesperson suggested the opposition leader still had questions to answer.
They said: 'Kemi Badenoch must explain why she hired a private chauffeur at taxpayers' expense rather than relying on the Government Car Service like other ministers.
'The Tory leader cannot just dismiss the security concerns that were raised at the time and hard working families deserve to know how much this extravagant arrangement cost.
'Kemi Badenoch has no plan for our country. The Tories have not listened and have not learned from their defeat last year.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
27 minutes ago
- The Independent
Top DeSantis aide named next Florida education commissioner
The Florida Board of Education has tapped a top aide of Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis to be the state's next education commissioner, a choice meant to influence K-12 and higher education policy in the state while bolstering a conservative legacy that could long outlast the governor's time in office. The board voted unanimously Wednesday to appoint Anastasios Kamoutsas, a deputy chief of staff to the governor. The job opened up after Commissioner of Education Manny Diaz, a former Republican state lawmaker, was named interim president of the University of West Florida. Kamoutsas' appointment is contingent on Diaz being named the permanent president of UWF. 'Student safety and achievement will be my top priorities," Kamoutsas said. "Parents will continue to be empowered. And teachers, you have my word that I stand in support of you.' Kamoutsas previously served as general counsel and chief staff at the state's Education Department, before moving to the governor's office. 'Stasi Kamoutsas has delivered on important issues like parental rights, school choice, and fighting back against radical ideologies in education,' DeSantis said in a statement. 'I am confident that he will continue to serve our state well as the next Commissioner of Education.' Kamoutsas is expected to help carry out DeSantis' conservative education agenda, from banning public funds for diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, to restricting how schools teach about race and history, and dramatically expanding the state's school voucher system, which provides billions in public funds for scholarships to private and religious schools. Among those who lauded Kamoutsas at Wednesday's meeting was former Commissioner of Education Richard Corcoran, who has overseen what critics describe as the 'hostile takeover' of New College of Florida. He's among the slate of Republican former state lawmakers who are now helming state colleges and universities. 'Every single major decision, I don't care if it was elimination of DEI, critical race theory, opening schools, demasking students, changing higher education, Stasi has been in that room, every single time,' Corcoran said. 'And not just as a participant. He's been in the room as a leader.'
New Statesman
an hour ago
- New Statesman
Labour promised to fix the NHS but seems set on breaking it even more
Illustration by Charlotte Trounce When NHS Providers – the membership organisation that represents NHS trusts – starts using language like 'unthinkable', it's time to sit up and take note. They chose the term in early May to characterise the scale of the cuts being forced upon NHS managers by Wes Streeting's Department of Health and Social Care. Using evidence gathered from 114 trusts – more than half the total number in England – NHS Providers revealed the 'eye-watering' array of local services that face being scaled back or completely shut down: diabetes care for young people, rehabilitation centres, talking therapies, even – incredibly – palliative care beds. Meanwhile, nearly every trust surveyed said they were planning to cut – or had already begun cutting – up to 1,500 posts each to save money. Crucially, these include clinical roles such as doctors and nurses. How have we arrived at this brave new world in which the route to 'an NHS fit for the future… with world-class care for the many, not just the few' (Streeting at last year's party conference) is through slashing clinical services upon which the health, well-being and dignity of patients so manifestly depend? The role of Jim Mackey, Streeting's choice to lead the NHS in England, is key. In March, Mackey ordered trusts to comply with a 'financial reset' – code for unprecedented budget savings during 2025-26 to avoid a projected £6.6bn NHS deficit in England. The government, like its Conservative predecessors, insisted cuts required could occur harmlessly, through 'efficiency savings' alone. Needless to say, savings of up to 12 per cent of entire trusts' budgets cannot possibly be achieved without cutting services. Perhaps Mackey and Streeting hoped that so long as they had a target-driven story to tell the press about falling waiting lists, no one would care very much about the less headline-grabbing forms of NHS care such as rehabilitation after serious injuries or humane deathbed care. It is no coincidence that services for people with disabilities, mental health conditions and terminal illnesses are on the line; certain patients have long been deprioritised by those in power. As one anonymous finance director told NHS Providers: 'Health inequalities [are] a real issue when streamlining services. We need investment to reach the most vulnerable and excluded populations, not disinvestment.' What happens now? In a speech at the Medical Journalists' Association on 9 May, Mackey gave short shrift to the prospect of additional funding: the government, he said, was 'maxed out on what's affordable'. Meanwhile, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson doubled down on the fiction that reducing red tape could square the circle: 'We have underlined the need for trusts to cut bureaucracy to invest even further in the front line.' Easy for them to say. Less so for the doctor forced to have deathbed conversations with patients on trolleys in corridors (me, with increasing frequency these days). From a patient perspective, the impasse is painfully familiar. In his conference speech, Streeting rightly slammed 14 years of underinvestment as a legacy of 'Conservative neglect'. He explicitly stated, the day after the general election, that: 'The policy of this department is that the NHS is broken.' For NHS staff, this radical candour was more than a relief – it felt exhilarating. At last, it seemed, we had a health secretary willing to be honest about the scale of the task required to rebuild an NHS to be proud of. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Less than one year later, Streeting appears to be the first Labour health secretary willing to countenance the cutting back of end-of-life care on his watch. For me – a palliative care doctor who entered my specialty precisely to advocate for the patients that so many in power overlook – the only thing that's 'maxed out' right now is incredulity and disgust. Rachel Clarke's 'The Story of a Heart' has been shortlisted for this year's Women's Prize for Non-Fiction [See also: The public doesn't like Brexit. Has anyone told the media?] Related
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Kemi remains two weeks behind on winter fuel allowance
Even a stopped clock shows the right time twice a day. A level of success to which Kemi Badenoch can only aspire to right now. We've reached the point where for her to have a decent stab at approximating some intelligent questions goes down as an unmitigated triumph. Not that it really matters any more. To care about the Tory leader's performances at prime minister's questions is to commit a category error. She has become an irrelevance both to Labour and her own MPs. Possibly even to herself. Though that might require a level of personal insight that is beyond her. Two weeks ago, KemiKaze failed to notice that Keir Starmer had already U-turned on the winter fuel allowance and repeatedly asked him when he was going to U-turn. Not her finest hour. Some of her frontbench colleagues were almost in tears. Though Robert Jenrick was crying with laughter. You can see why he has been keeping up the perma-campaign to take her job. She never fails to keep giving him reasonable grounds for hope. At Wednesday's PMQs Kemi was back asking about the winter fuel allowance again. For reasons best known to herself, she has got it into her head that the only reason Starmer backtracked was down to her demanding that he did a fortnight previously. It hasn't occurred to her that public opinion and some extremely grumpy Labour MPs might have been rather more prominent in Keir's mind. He really doesn't need to dance to the beat of a party that is trailing the Lib Dems and Reform in some polls. 'Glad you're catching up,' Keir said cheerily. But only a little. Kemi was still a fortnight behind everyone else. And she clearly hadn't been listening to the chancellor's speech earlier that morning in which she had indicated that the new means-tested threshold would be in place in time for next winter's payments. Labour had been right to stabilise the economy first, Starmer continued. The mention of the £22bn black hole seemed to derange Kemi. She started yelling 'chaos, chaos, chaos'. You'd have thought she would have got used to Starmer not really answering her questions in the way she would like by now. Would have factored that into her attack lines. Yet she continues to take it as a personal affront. And her accusations of chaos fell flat. Because not every U-turn is a sign of chaos. Sometimes it's pragmatism. You make one choice with one set of circumstances. And if they change, then you make another. It's how most people live their lives. 'Chaos, chaos, chaos,' Kemi shouted. She moved on to the two-child benefit cap. What did Starmer believe in? She believed fervently in child poverty, she said. More or less. Most charities and thinktanks had concluded that lifting the cap would be the most effective way of lifting children out of poverty. But that was not a Britain that KemiKaze wanted to see. Far better to make some children pay for the sins of their parents. If some hard-up families couldn't restrict themselves to just two kids then the third one deserved to starve to death. Because that would teach it a lesson. That was Kemi's way. That was the Conservative way. Babies born to be scroungers were a blight on all of us. It was an unusual take for a party leader. But I guess George Osborne would have been cheering her on. 'I know what I believe in,' said Kemi. We all know what she believes in. The last thing that she read on social media. 'But the prime minister has to look in his own folder to know what he believes in.' This came out as a torrent. As if she thought it was her best line of the day. Only she hadn't quite realised she herself had just read it out of her own folder. Sometimes her handlers must despair. Wrangling Kemi is a thankless task. She has no idea she is her own worst enemy. Not that this was a vintage performance from Starmer by any means. Then it didn't need to be. He no longer regards Badenoch as a serious opponent. Just a mild irritation who will sooner or later no longer be around to bother him. Maybe he's even getting just a bit too casual. Not spending quite as long preparing for this weekly set piece as he used to. Other more pressing things on his mind. His barbs and repartee sometimes lapsing into outright condescension. Not a good look. Mostly Keir just ignored whatever Kemi had to say and used his slots for his own soundbites. Kemi was on the side of the Russian on Chagos. Which is almost true. Only she and Putin have described it as a sellout. The US and our allies seem to be in favour. She was also a Russian stooge over Ukraine. Probably unfair. But she should learn to think before she speaks in future so that her words can't be twisted. Though that's not her style. She chose to end in self-immolation with a critique of the trade deal with the US. She didn't seem to know that we were paying less in steel tariffs than the rest of the world. As so often these days, it was the Lib Dem leader, Ed Davey, who appeared to be the real opposition. Certainly Starmer accords him greater bandwidth and credibility. Davey is the only leader to talk of Donald Trump in the same way as the rest of the country. An unstable president who cannot be trusted to keep his word on anything. That must hurt Keir. Because he knows it's true. The only other highlight of a dismal session was a first question from the new Reform MP, Sarah Pochin, who wasted no time in establishing her xenophobic credentials by calling for a ban on the burqa. Maybe she would like nuns to go bare-headed as well. Starmer refused to engage. Merely pointing out that as she had in a former life been a supporter of Liz Truss, then maybe she was fully behind Reform's economic plans to bankrupt the country. We ended with a point of order from Tory Jesse Norman. It was fine when Conservative prime ministers failed to answer any questions, he said. But it was beyond the pale for a Labour leader to do the same. The speaker merely observed that the purpose of PMQs had never been for the prime minister to answer questions. It was performative sideshow. And an opportunity for Kemi to express her existential futility in interpretive dance.
