logo
Centralines trustee resigns over $100k funding to rescope Central Hawke's Bay dam

Centralines trustee resigns over $100k funding to rescope Central Hawke's Bay dam

NZ Herald05-05-2025

Murphy was one of seven trustees.
In 2022 Centralines came under fire for putting $200,000 of its funding towards rescoping the Tukituki Water Security Project and has recently decided to put another $100,000 towards it.
Various attempts to get a dam in CHB off the ground have been mired in controversy since it was first supported by Hawke's Bay Regional Council (HBRC) almost a decade ago.
The Ruataniwha Dam was abandoned by HBRC in 2018 after a Supreme Court finding against it, and the $20 million it had spent on development went down the drain. Consents were sold to Water Holdings Hawke's Bay Ltd, a group of local farmers and rebranded as the Tukituki Water Security Project.
In December 2024, Development Minister Shane Jones committed $3m to the project through Regional Infrastructure Fund for the pre-construction development of the project.
A flyer distributed at a meeting by local pressure group Water Wise Use HB called for supporters to contact Central Hawke's Bay Consumers Power Trust chairwoman, Karen Middelberg, to request she move a motion at the next trustee meeting, in late May, directing the board to rescind its decision.
'If Middelberg is not prepared to act on the concerns of trust beneficiaries, then she should resign,' it said.
WWU spokesman Trevor Le Lievre said ratepayers and taxpayers should prepare themselves for an assault on their wallets, 'as this zombie project has an insatiable appetite for public money'.
However, Central Hawke's Bay Mayor Alex Walker said these sorts of comments were designed to 'fearmonger among our community and ratepayers, with no basis of fact to them'.
'The consents for the Tukituki Water Security Project are in private hands, the group is working on the next stages of a business case.
'If there is any requirement for public funding, there would be intense public discussions about this, and what is right for Central Hawke's Bay.
'That time is not now. There is nothing to debate.'
In response to the call for her resignation, Middelberg said the trust deed made it clear 'the trust is not to involve itself in the management or operation of the company'.
'This proposal to contribute $100,000 to the water project is a board decision, and it was shared with the trust by the company as a courtesy.
'This decision is well within the board's delegated responsibility and the decision does not meet the threshold that requires approval from the trust.
'The trust informed the board of the opinions from some of the community and expects these were considered in making its decision. We discussed it and although not all members agree, decided not to intervene.
'The trust's duties are to appoint directors to a company with $74m of assets in our community.'
Tukituki Water Security Project spokesman Mike Petersen said he welcomed discussions about water security.
'The Tukituki Water Security Project was formed to address the consequences of climate change and increased demand from population growth, and to better understand the impacts these will have in a drying region,' he said.
'Our view has been consistent about water storage being one part of the solution to ensure water security, alongside other measures such as wise water use, greater water efficiencies and recycling. In this respect, we share the same objectives as the Wise Water team.
'These are different projects, using the same Makaroro site for water storage, but with a completely different hierarchy of downstream water use.
'Centralines is a commercial company and has its own strategic and commercial imperatives for investing in projects like the TWSP.
'I cannot speak for Centralines, but they are among several businesses that have committed funding because they see water storage as a key regional priority for Hawke's Bay to help the region thrive and grow.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bay's wharf upgrade to stay in long-term plan
Bay's wharf upgrade to stay in long-term plan

Otago Daily Times

time3 days ago

  • Otago Daily Times

Bay's wharf upgrade to stay in long-term plan

The wharf at Jackson Bay could be upgraded. PHOTO: ODT FILES A $4 million upgrade of the Jackson Bay wharf — the only deep-sea port on the West Coast — may be a contender for co-funding with the government. However, councillors remain split over whether more investment is warranted. The road leading into Jackson Bay is also a headache for the Westland District Council, after slips reactivated in November are expected to take years to settle. The future security of the entire Haast-Jackson Bay Rd has been included in a bid to the government's Regional Infrastructure Fund (RIF), at its request. It forms part of package of potential investment supporting the wharf as a critical asset. In a recent update to councillors, Mayor Helen Lash said an upgrade of the aged Jackson Bay wharf was originally going to be part of the RIF application put forward with the Hokitika Airport upgrade. "We took it out to eliminate the risk of having the airport turned down ... but [government funding agency] Kanoa have come back and asked us to re-present that." Almost $10m of RIF co-funding was announced for the airport upgrade this year by way of a suspensory loan. If successful, the Jackson Bay project would be secured in the same way. Mrs Lash said the application was now past the second stage of assessment, and they expected to have a decision at the end of June. Letters of support from the fishing industry and community groups had gone in with the application. The $3.9m sought covered a "grand plan" for the wharf to see it was strengthened according to a report paid for by Fiordland Lobster, she said. A fixed crane, launching ramp for recreational fishers and a tolled carpark around the site that Talley's leased from the council was proposed. Mrs Lash said they had also included the Haast-Jackson Bay special purpose road in the funding bid. NZ Transport Agency Waka Kotahi funding has been secured for the link, which is now dotted with active slips, until 2027. PHOTO: ODT FILES "We have asked it be considered as staying in the picture in all perpetuity, rather than have that challenged, or ... being removed," the mayor said. "It's a big ask and we've been ballsy with the ask but we've got nothing to lose with it." She said the application — done at the "very sudden" request of the government's regional economic development and investment unit Kanoa — also had the support of the National Emergency Management Agency as the only deep-sea port on the Coast. More than 70% of submitters to the council's draft long-term plan backed external investment in the port, largely for the role it would have in a Civil Defence response. The other options offered in the draft plan were closing it, or selling it to a commercial interest. Crs Jane Neale, Steven Gillett and Patrick Phelps voted against any more money being spent on the wharf. Iwi representative Paul Madgwick said any government funding would come with strings attached. "Newsflash: Kanoa are not Santa Claus. They expect a big contribution before they give out any cash." Major safety upgrades, including structural beam and decking repairs on a large section of the pier, were completed with $1m of government funding in 2020. However, outstanding repairs remain. The majority of councillors eventually agreed to leave the wharf upgrade in the long-term plan — subject to shoring up external funding. They could still decide later to potentially sell the wharf. Cr Madgwick said its fate could be out of the council's hands at any time. "God might make that decision for us ... once that slip goes big time." — Hokitika Guardian By Janna Sherman

'There's been no transparency': Ruataniwha Dam protest outside meeting
'There's been no transparency': Ruataniwha Dam protest outside meeting

RNZ News

time29-05-2025

  • RNZ News

'There's been no transparency': Ruataniwha Dam protest outside meeting

Wise Water Use protestors. Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook Opponents of the controversial Ruataniwha Dam in Central Hawke's Bay staged a surprise protest outside a Centralines meeting in Waipukurau discussing the use of trust beneficiaries' money for the fast-tracked dam project. The protest comes a month after Centralines trustee Tony Murphy resigned because the electricity distributor's board put $100,000 towards a re-scope of the fast-tracked and rebranded Ruataniwha Dam , now called the Tukituki Water Security Project. Hawke's Bay power distributor Centralines is one of many sources of funding for the Ruataniwha Dam. It is comprised of a board, which makes operational decisions, and a trust that represents the public stakeholders. Protest group Wise Water Use spokesperson Trevor Le Lievre told RNZ Centralines had now committed $300,000 towards the controversial project . "There's been no transparency around this money. We believe it's a case of cronyism, pure and simple. So we are here to send a message to the trust because the trust appoints the board and so have some sway over what the board does. "We're here to tell the trust to call the board in, hold them to account, rescind that decision on the $100,000 and act in the best interest of beneficiaries," said Le Lievre. However, Centralines board chair Fenton Wilson was confident there was no issue, and makes no apologies for supporting the dam. "I welcome the strong views - from the company point of view we deal with what's in front of us and there's an opportunity to invest in a project that has real growth potential if it comes off. "But we are not in this alone, businesses right across Hawke's Bay are investing - the government is investing. People have done their due diligence and it fits the growth potential with this business and this company," he said. Wise Water Use protestors peacefully talk to Centralines' Board Chair and Trustees Photo: RNZ/Alexa Cook The Central Hawke's Bay Consumer Power trust chair Karen Middelburg told RNZ she has been listening to all of the community's voices on the issue, including the protestors concerns. "We've got a meeting now where we'll discuss what they've brought to the table and we'll certainly be passing that on to the board. "But our role is certainly not to tell the board how to make financial decisions for the company - our role is to appoint the board to do that on our behalf," she said. Wise Water Use is vowing to keep protesting against the dam project and member Murray Rosser said it should not be allowed to proceed under the government's fast track legislation. "It's such an outdated idea - it's going to ruin the river and wreck a whole lot of environmental precious taonga. "And it's going to put money in the hands of a few people and others won't get a dollar," he said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

NTF-ELCAC 'Victory' Claim Negated By Its Demands For More Extensive Repression
NTF-ELCAC 'Victory' Claim Negated By Its Demands For More Extensive Repression

Scoop

time15-05-2025

  • Scoop

NTF-ELCAC 'Victory' Claim Negated By Its Demands For More Extensive Repression

Eight days before the Mid-Term Elections, the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) claimed that an 'insurgency-free Philippines' was in sight, and at the same time warned against any complacency allowing a 'resurgence of insurgency in electoral disguise'. It called for greater repression of civil society and young people in particular and endless war. 'NTF-ELCAC can't have it both ways, claiming victory and calling for greater repression,' said Peter Murphy, Chairperson of the International Coalition for Human Rights in the Philippines (ICHRP). 'This organisation of military and police generals are shameless war mongers, demanding a bigger budget and more powers, plus less oversight. ICHRP fully supports the calls from United Nations Special Rapporteurs for NTF-ELCAC to be abolished, and we ourselves have called for this since it was established in December 2018,' said Murphy. The NTF-ELCAC called for: thorough vetting of foreign financial grants to Filipino development agencies, alleging that these fund the New People's Army rebellion. more intensive red-tagging of 'legal democratic forces' whom it accuses of 'ideological insurgency'. multi-year funding without oversight of its Barangay Development Program, used to pay local government units which declare themselves 'insurgency-free'. Since 2018 this fund has paid out P36 billion (US$720 million). forcing university administrations to crack down on student activism to channel 'critical thought and youthful idealism' to support government strategies. Government support for a national federation of rebel surrenderees (former rebels). More intensive local community control through permanent local peace councils, barangay task forces and grassroots monitoring systems to repress any critical discussions and organizing. In the Mid-Term Elections, the progressive party-lists and the Makabayan Senate candidates won 5 percent or more of the votes, despite the intense denunciation as 'communist terrorists' which they endured from NTF-ELCAC. The 3.5 to 4.5 million Filipinos who voted for these candidates are the target of the NTF-ELCAC under the criterion of 'legal democratic forces'. Looked at this way, the NTF-ELCAC is the greatest threat to democratic rights in the Philippines. Its claim that former rebels are its greatest asset in the fight against insurgency is undermined by extensive data that unarmed peasant farmers and indigenous people are routinely ordered to 'surrender', then paid a small compensation, and then continually pressed to denounce other members of their communities. Of course, the Barangay Development Program and funds for surrenderees are a great slush fund for military and police commanders. Meanwhile, the rhetoric of the NTF-ELCAC empowers the AFP to further cause terror in rural communities, including employing tactics of hameletting – surrounding communities with military presence – and aerial strafing and bombing. Development workers who server rural communities face ongoing attacks under false pretenses of 'financing terrorism.' The grand boast that the communist insurgency is almost over, and that 89 guerilla fronts have been dismantled since 2018, is not borne out on the ground.1 Fighting is reported in many provinces, and the social conditions that give rise to the armed conflict – especially poverty and landlessness – remain unchanged. 'ICHRP amplifies the long-standing demands of Filipino people for genuine land reform, an end to stultifying poverty and genuine respect for democratic rights. If there is to be peace, then NTF-ELCAC should be abolished and the government of the Philippines return to the peace talks agenda still outstanding with the National Democratic Front of the Philippines,' said Murphy. 'Top of the agenda right now is a draft Comprehensive Agreement on Economic and Social Reforms, which already includes free distribution of land to the landless.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store