logo
Visitors to Alaska State Capitol will be screened under newly awarded contract

Visitors to Alaska State Capitol will be screened under newly awarded contract

Yahoo02-04-2025

The front of the Alaska State Capitol in Juneau is seen on Wednesday, April 12, 2023. (Photo by James Brooks/Alaska Beacon)
Visitors to the state Capitol in Juneau will have to go through a metal detector under a policy adopted on Monday.
The Capitol visitor screening policy was approved in a 9-4 vote by the Legislative Council, a body made up of members from both the House and Senate that sets the rules for the Capitol complex.
Lawmakers did not publicly discuss or debate the policy change. Before the vote, they met in a session closed to the public for more than an hour and a half for a security briefing and to discuss the policy proposal.
The council declined to require that people in the building have ID badges, which was part of the original proposal.
Senate President Gary Stevens, R-Kodiak and the council's vice chair, supported the change. He described his reasoning in a Senate majority caucus news conference on Tuesday.
'The idea, really, is … to make sure people aren't entering with weapons — with guns, with knives and that sort of thing,' he said. 'You know, some folks have said, 'Well, let's wait until there's an incident, where someone gets hurt, and then we will install it.' I think that's not wise at all.'
Stevens cited a comment by Sen. Lyman Hoffman, D-Bethel, that hundreds of people undergo screenings at the annual Alaska Federation of Natives convention with little wait time.
Stevens also noted that metal detectors are used in the Dimond Courthouse across the street from the Capitol.
'You have them [at] every airport you enter into, so it's not as if people are unaware of how they work,' he said.
People who already have an electronic keycard to enter the building will not be affected by the policy. Stevens said the security staff who will operate the metal detectors say 20 seconds is the most time it would take to move through the devices.
Stevens said several times recently, people who work in the Capitol have told him they had concern or fear regarding visitors who don't have a reason to be in the building.
Rep. Sara Hannan, D-Juneau and the council chair, also voted for the change. She wrote in a newsletter to constituents on Tuesday that no legislators were happy to make the change, but waiting for a tragedy to occur was unacceptable.
'Legislative Council did not arrive at this decision lightly. For decades, we in Alaska have taken pride in the citizenry's open access to the Legislature,' Hannon wrote. 'However, and very unfortunately, in recent years our country has changed in ways that have led to increased risk of violence in our public institutions. The tragic, unchecked level of shootings in U.S. schools is in itself horrifying. The January 6th, 2020, attack on the nation's Capitol is another dispiriting example.'
Rep. Kevin McCabe, R-Big Lake, opposed the change. He is not currently on the council but served as its vice chair last year and said the idea has been under discussion for at least four years. He said Capitol security staff had brought up how only a few state capitols do not require screening. He said the staff's job is to keep the building secure, and they were doing their job by bringing the screening idea to legislators.
McCabe said the discussions prompted him and other Matanuska-Susitna Borough legislators to ask constituents about the idea while they were campaigning.
'They're already very angry that the Capitol is still down here in Juneau, where they can't come visit and they can't really get to us, so they just saw closing the Capitol with magnetometers and badges … they saw that as just another step in isolating legislators from the public,' McCabe said. 'And they believe, as do I frankly, that the Capitol building is the people's building.'
McCabe predicted that the next step would be to require badges.
'I just feel we should leave it open. We have a really able security team and, frankly, Alaskans are just not that militant, that they would storm the Capitol or come into the Capitol and create an issue,' he said.
The council members who voted for the policy change were chair Rep. Sara Hannan, D-Juneau; Stevens; House Speaker Bryce Edgmon, I-Dillingham; Sen. Matt Claman, D-Anchorage; Sen. Cathy Giessel, R-Anchorage; Sen. Elvi Gray-Jackson, D-Anchorage; Rep. Calvin Schrage, I-Anchorage; Sen. Bert Stedman, R-Sitka; and Rep. Louise Stutes, R-Kodiak.
Voting against requiring the screenings were Rep. Ashley Carrick, D-Fairbanks; Sen. Jesse Kiehl, D-Juneau; Rep. Chuck Kopp, R-Anchorage; and Rep. Mike Prax, R-North Pole.
The council also voted 8-5 to award a contract for up to $35,000 to University Protection Service LP to provide the screening services. The only difference in the council members' votes was that of Stedman, who voted against the contract. He said he generally opposed adding the metal detectors, noting that visitors already have to make an effort to go to Juneau. But he said he decided to vote for the policy after the council made it less onerous by removing the ID badge requirement.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'
Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

CNN

time25 minutes ago

  • CNN

Trump lays into Musk, suggesting he has ‘Trump derangement syndrome'

President Donald Trump appeared to confirm the deterioration of his relationship with Elon Musk, saying he was 'very disappointed' in the tech billionaire after Musk repeatedly blasted the president's sweeping domestic agenda bill in recent days. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump told reporters in the Oval Office less than one week after the two exchanged effusive praise on Musk's last day as a special government employee. Since then, Musk has strongly criticized what Trump calls his 'Big, Beautiful Bill' that has passed the House and faces an uncertain path forward in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk called the bill a 'disgusting abomination.' Trump and Musk have not spoken since Musk lashed out at the legislation, a source familiar with the dynamic told CNN. 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left,' Trump said, adding that while Musk has not yet personally attacked him, the president expected that could be next. Trump repeatedly claimed that Musk's concerns with the bill were centered on the repeal of electric vehicle subsidies that benefitted Tesla. Musk has admitted his company has struggled in the wake of his political involvement. Musk didn't wait to respond, posting his reactions in real time on his social media platform X. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk said. He added: 'Such ingratitude.' Musk denied Trump's claim that the Tesla CEO knew the inner workings of the bill ahead of time, and countered that the elimination of EV tax incentives has nothing to do with his opposition to the massive domestic policy bill. 'Whatever. Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill' Musk in a separate post. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this! Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' One Republican strategist who has worked closely with the tech billionaire downplayed the idea that Musk's opposition is only about the EV subsidies, telling CNN that Musk was genuinely troubled by projections of how much the bill would add to the deficit – the reasoning Musk has publicly cited on multiple occasions. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the legislation passed by the House would increase the deficit by $2.4 trillion. During Thursday's Oval Office appearance alongside German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, Trump reminisced about his campaign bromance with Musk, who contributed at least a quarter-billion dollars to efforts supporting Trump's 2024 presidential bid and once called himself Trump's 'first buddy.' 'Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won – Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway,' Trump said, referring to his chief of staff Susie Wiles, appearing to hint at tensions between Wiles and Musk. Trump appeared to moderate his tone at times, saying he 'always liked Elon' – before implicitly accusing him of so-called 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' 'He's not the first – people leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of 'Trump derangement syndrome,' I guess they call it, but we have it with others too,' he said. 'They leave, and they wake up in the morning, and the glamour is gone,' he continued. 'The whole world is different, and they become hostile. I don't know what it is.' Kristen Holmes contributed to this report.

Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"
Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"

Axios

time30 minutes ago

  • Axios

Musk goes nuclear: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election"

Elon Musk declared all-out war on President Trump Thursday, writing on X: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate." Why it matters: The public breakup between Trump and Musk — who spent nearly $300 million to support the president's campaign and served in his administration until this week — has escalated dramatically.

Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now
Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump says he and Elon Musk 'had a great relationship,' but it might be over now

Trump responded to Elon Musk's criticism of the "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," he said. "I don't know if we will anymore." "Such ingratitude," Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans, wrote on X. President Donald Trump is finally responding to Elon Musk's criticism of his "Big Beautiful Bill." "Look, Elon and I had a great relationship," Trump said in the Oval Office on Thursday. "I don't know if we will anymore." Trump told reporters that Musk's criticism of the bill likely stemmed primarily from the phase-out of the electric vehicle tax credit, which would likely impact his company, Tesla. "You know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate… which was a lot of money for electric vehicles," Trump said. "And they're having a hard time, the electric vehicles." "Elon knew this from the beginning," Trump added. Musk fired back minutes later, saying that while he thought the EV phase-out was unfair, he was more concerned about the "MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill." He later wrote on X that without him, Trump would have lost the election, Democrats would have gained control of the House, and Republicans would've had a smaller majority in the Senate. "Such ingratitude," wrote Musk, who spent nearly $300 million to elect Trump and other Republicans last year. In the Oval Office, Trump also said that Musk was lashing out because he "missed" being in the White House. "I'll be honest, I think he misses the place. I think he got out there and all of a sudden, he wasn't in this beautiful Oval Office," Trump said. "I'll tell you, he's not the first. People leave my administration, and they love us, and then at some point, they miss it so badly, and some of them embrace it, and some of them actually become hostile. I don't know what it is. It's sort of Trump derangement syndrome, I guess they call it." The tech titan first unleashed on the "Big Beautiful Bill," which is set to serve as the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, on Tuesday. He's kept up his criticism ever since. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk wrote on X on Tuesday. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination." Musk main criticism has been of the bill's projected impact on the federal deficit. The Congressional Budget Office has estimated that in its current form, the bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next 10 years, while the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has said that number would be $2.5 trillion. Musk previously said that the bill undermined the work of DOGE, which has sought to cut billions of dollars in federal spending. Republicans on Capitol Hill have largely brushed off Musk's criticism. House Speaker Mike Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that Musk is "flat wrong" about the bill, while Senate Majority Leader John Thune said that the tech titan is "entitled to that opinion," but "we're going to proceed full speed ahead." Read the original article on Business Insider

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store